Прес-комунікації адміністрації США щодо Тунісу після «виняткового стану» 25 липня 2021 року: формування дискурсу нагальності
Ключові слова:
прес-комунікації США, Туніс, 25 липня, криза, нагальність, CADS, фреймінг, ключовість, колокаційна мережа
Анотація
25 липня 2021 року стало винятковим днем для Тунісу, який відкрив нову главу в його сучасній політичній історії та викликав хвилю глобальної реакції на оголошений «винятковий стан». У цьому дослідженні розглядаються прес-комунікації адміністрації США щодо Тунісу після цієї події. Зокрема, у ньому досліджуються (i) домінуючі кризові фрейми, що пронизують ці повідомлення та їх основну політичну програму, і (ii) ступінь, у якому цей дискурс сигналізує про зміну зовнішньої політики США щодо Тунісу в кризових ситуаціях. Для досягнення вказаних цілей дослідження було проведено корпусне вивчення з використанням інтегративної методики, що поєднує підходи якісний (фрейми) і кількісний (ключовість і сполучуваність). Результати показали зміну дискурсів за тематикою кризи, їх перехід від почуття єдності до першочерговості. Це може відтворювати обережне ставлення американського уряду та його підвищену стурбованість перехідними заходами Каїса Сайєда. У широкому сенсі дослідження запропонувало уявлення про те, як динаміка глобальної політики розгортається у дискурсі. Важливо, що тлумачення політико-демократичної кризи в Тунісі адміністрацією Байдена в термінах нагальності може мати реальні наслідки для міжнародного сприйняття майбутнього країни. Теоретично, застосування результатів дослідження стосується в першу чергу Corpus-Assisted Discourse Studies (далі CADS), зокрема еволюції таких понять корпусної лінгвістики як ключовість і колокаційні мережі.
Завантаження
##plugins.generic.usageStats.noStats##
Посилання
An, S. K., & Gower, K. K. (2009). How do the news media frame crises? A content analysis of crisis news coverage. Public Relations Review, 35(2), 107–112. doi:10.1016/j.pubrev.2009.01.010
Anagnostou, N. K., & Weir, G. R. S. (2007). Review of software applications for deriving collocations. In G. R. S. Weir & T. Ozasa (Eds.), Texts, Textbooks and Readability (pp. 63–72). Glasgow: University of Strathclyde Publishing.
Ancarno, C. (2020). Corpus-Assisted Discourse Studies. In A. De Fina & A. Georgakopoulou (Eds.), The Cambridge Handbook of Discourse Studies (pp. 165–185). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Baker, P. (2016). The shapes of collocation. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 21(2), 139–164. doi:10.1016/j.pubrev.2009.01.01010.1075/ijcl.21.2.01bak
Baker, P., Gabrielatos, C., & McEnery, T. (2013). Sketching Muslims: A corpus driven analysis of representations around the word ‘Muslim’ in the British press 1998–2009. Applied Linguistics, 34(3), 255–278.
Baker, P., & McEnery, T. (2015). Who benefits when discourse gets democratised? Analysing a Twitter corpus around the British Benefits Street debate. In P. Baker & T. McEnery (Eds.), Corpora and discourse studies: Integrating discourse and corpora (pp. 244–265). Basingstoke: Palgrave.
Ben Ghozlen, B. (2023). Crisis construction in the contemporary communication environment: a dynamic, complex, and mis/disinformation-rich process. Lyuboslovie, 23, 195–205. doi:10.46687/IXXR3433
Bogetić, K. (2013). Normal straight gays: Lexical collocations and ideologies masculinity in personal ads of Serbian gay teenagers. Gender and Language, 7(3), 333–367.
Bondi, M., & Scott. M. (Eds.). (2010). Keyness in texts. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Bos, L., Lecheler, S., Mewafi, M., & Vliegenthart, R. (2016). It's the frame that matters: Immigrant integration and media framing effects in the Netherlands. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 55, 97–108. doi:10.1016/j.pubrev.2009.01.01010.1016/j.ijintrel.2016.10.002
Brezina, V., Weill-Tessier, P., & McEnery, A. (2021). #LancsBox v. 6.x. [software package]. Retrieved from: http://corpora.lancs.ac.uk/lancsbox
Brezina, V., McEnery, T., & Wattam, S. (2015). Collocations in context: A new perspective on collocation networks. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 20(2), 139–173. doi:10.1016/j.pubrev.2009.01.01010.1075/ijcl.20.2.01bre
Cacciatore, M. A., Scheufele, D. A., & Iyengar, S. (2016). The end of framing as we know it … and the future of media effects. Mass Communication and Society, 19(1), 7–23. doi:10.1080/15205436.2015.1068811
Cheng, J. W., Mitomo, H., Otsuka, T., & Jeon, S. Y. (2016). Cultivation effects of mass and social media on perceptions and behavioural intentions in post-disaster recovery – The case of the 2011 Great East Japan Earthquake. Telematics and Informatics, 33(3), 753–772. doi:10.1016/j.tele.2015.12.001
Chilton, P. (2004). Analysing political discourse: Theory and practice. Routledge.
Chong, D., & Druckman, J. N. (2012). Dynamics in mass communication effects research. In H. A. Semetko & M. Scammell (Eds.), The Sage Handbook of Political Communication (pp. 307–323). London: Sage Publications Ltd.
Coombs, W. T. (2018). Revising situational crisis communication theory: The influences of social media on crisis communication theory and practice. In L. L. Austin & Y. Jin (Eds.), Social media and crisis communication (pp. 21–38). New York, NY: Routledge.
Coombs, W. T. (2007). Protecting organization reputations during a crisis: The development and application of situational crisis communication theory. Corporate Reputation Review, 10(3), 163–176. doi:10.1057/palgrave.crr.1550049
de Bruijn, H. (2019). The art of political framing: How politicians convince us that they are right. Amsterdam University Press.
De Candia, S., Spinzi, C., & Venuti, M. (2013). 'I don't know the answer to that question': A corpus-assisted discourse analysis of White House press briefings. Critical Approaches to Discourse Analysis across Disciplines, 7(1), 66–81.
Durán-Muñoz, I. (2019). Adjectives and their keyness: A corpus-based analysis of tourism discourse in English. Corpora, 14(3), 351–378. doi:10.1016/j.pubrev.2009.01.010
Entman, R. M. (2004). Projections of power: Framing news, public Opinion, and U.S. foreign policy. Chicago, MI: University of Chicago Press.
Entman, R. M. (1993). Framing: Toward clarification of a fractured paradigm. Journal of Communication, 43(4), 51–58. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.1993.tb01304.x
Fairclough, I., & Fairclough, N. (2011). Practical reasoning in political discourse: The UK government’s response to the economic crisis in the 2008 Pre-Budget Report. Discourse & Society, 22(3), 243–268. doi:10.1177/0957926510395439
Farooq, U. A. (2022). As Tunisia's Saied consolidates power, US remains without clear roadmap ahead. Retrieved from https://www.middleeasteye.net/news/tunisia-kais-saied-us-biden-without-roadmap-ahead
Fetouri, M. (2022). What will 2022 bring to Tunisia in light of Kais Saied's power grab? Retrieved from https://www.middleeastmonitor.com/20220113-what-will-2022-bring-to-tunisia-in-light-of-kais-saieds-power-grab/
Firth, J. R. (1957). Papers in Linguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Frath, P., & Gledhill, C. (2005). Free-range clusters or frozen chunks? Reference as a defining criterion for linguistic units. Recherches Anglaises et Nord-américaines, 38, 25–43. doi:10.1016/j.pubrev.2009.01.01010.3406/ranam.2005.1745
Freelon, D. (2010). ReCal: Intercoder reliability calculation as a web service. International Journal of Internet Science, 5(1), 20–33.
Gabrielatos, C. (2018). Keyness analysis: Nature, metrics and techniques. In C. Taylor & A. Marchi (Eds.), Corpus approaches to discourse: A critical review (pp. 225–258). Oxford: Routledge.
Gabrielatos, C. (2008). Collocational analysis as a gateway to critical discourse analysis: the case of the construction of refugees, asylum seekers and immigrants in the UK press. Retrieved from https://eprints.lancs.ac.uk/id/eprint/31109/
Gabrielatos, C., & Marchi, A. (2011, November 17). Keyness: Matching metrics to definitions. Paper presented at the conference Theoretical-methodological challenges in corpus approaches to discourse studies – and some ways of addressing them. Retrieved from http://eprints.lancs.ac.uk/51449/
Gerken, F., & Van Der Meer, T. G. L. A. (2019). Crisis frame dynamics: Frame diversity in news media and the role of governmental actors. Journal of International Crisis and Risk Communication Research, 2(2), 149–180. doi:10.1016/j.pubrev.2009.01.01010.30658/jicrcr.2.2.1
Goh, G. Y. (2011). Choosing a reference corpus for keyword calculation. Linguistic Research, 28(1), 239-256.
Grewal, S., Satouri, S. D., & DeHaven, I. (2022). Tunisia’s new constitution will only worsen its political crisis. Retrieved from https://www.brookings.edu/blog/order-from-chaos/2022/07/06/tunisias-new-constitution-will-only-worsen-its-political-crisis/
Hamid, S. (2021). Tunisia, democracy, and the return of American hypocrisy. Retrieved from https://www.brookings.edu/blog/order-from-chaos/2021/08/03/tunisia-democracy-and-the-return-of-american-hypocrisy/
Hänggli, R., & Kriesi, H. (2010). Political framing strategies and their impact on media framing in a Swiss direct-democratic campaign. Political communication, 27(2), 141–157. doi:10.1080/10584600903501484
Hardt-Mautner, G. (1995). ‘Only connect’. Critical discourse analysis and corpus linguistics. University of Lancaster. Retrieved from http://ucrel.lancaster.ac.uk/papers/techpaper/vol6.pdf
Hong, S. (2016). Government press releases and citizen perceptions of government performance: Evidence from Google Trends Data. Public Performance & Management Review, 39(4), 885–904. doi:10.1080/15309576.2015.1137776
Iyengar, S. (1991). Is anyone responsible? Chicago, MI: University of Chicago Press.
Kirvalidze, N., & Samnidze, N. (2016). Political discourse as a subject of interdisciplinary studies. Journal of Teaching and Education, 5(1), 161–170.
Konstantinova, A., Anufrienko, S., Abazalieva, M., Gevorgyan, A., & Soloveva, E. (2019). Political discourse and the study of parliamentary communication: a comparative analysis. SHS Web Conference, 69, 00007. doi:10.1016/j.pubrev.2009.01.01010.1051/shsconf/20196900007
Loke, B. (2016). Unpacking the politics of great power responsibility: Nationalist and Maoist China in international order-building. European Journal of International Relations, 22(4), 847–871. doi:10.1016/j.pubrev.2009.01.01010.1177/1354066115611968
Marzo, P. (2020). Solving the security–democracy dilemma: the US foreign policy in Tunisia post-9/11. Third World Quarterly, 41(7), 1181–1199. doi:10.1016/j.pubrev.2009.01.01010.1080/01436597.2020.1754126
Marzouki, K. (2022, January 25). July 25: An exceptional day in Tunisia with many connotations. Retrieved from https://english.legal-agenda.com/july-25-an-exception-day-in-tunisia-with-many-connotations/
Mayr, A. (Ed.). (2008). Language and power: An introduction to institutional discourse. London: Continuum.
McEnery, T. (2009). Keywords and moral panics: Mary Whitehouse and media censorship. In D. Archer (Ed.), What's in Word-list? Investigating Word Frequency and Keyword Extraction (pp. 93–124). Oxford: Ashgate.
McEnery, T. (2006). Swearing in English: Bad Language, Purity and Power from 1586 to the Present. Abington: Routledge.
McEnery, T., & Wilson, A. (2001). Corpus linguistics: An introduction. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
Mohd Don, Z., & De Rycker, A. (2013). Discourse in crisis, crisis in discourse. In A. De Rycker & Z. Mohd Don (Eds.), Discourse and crisis: Critical perspectives (pp. 3–65). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Lehecka, T. (2015). Collocation and Colligation. In J. O. Östman & J. Verschueren (Eds.), Handbook of Pragmatics Online (pp. 1–23). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Neuman, R. W., Just, M. R., & Crigler, A. N. (1992). Common knowledge: News and the construction of political meaning. Chicago, MI: The University of Chicago Press.
Oxley, Z. (2020). Framing and political decision making: An overview. Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Politics. Retrieved from https://oxfordre.com/ politics/view/10.1093/acrefore/9780190228637.001.0001/acrefore-9780190228637-E-1250
Partington, A. (2003). The linguistics of political argument: The spin-doctor and the wolf-pack at the White House. London: Routledge.
Phillips, M. (1989). Lexical structure of text. Discourse analysis monograph no. 12. English Language Research: University of Birmingham.
Powers, J. H., & Xiao, X. (Eds.). (2008). The social construction of SARS: Studies of a health communication crisis. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Rodelo, F. V., & Muñiz, C. (2019). Government frames and their influence on news framing: An analysis of cross-lagged correlations in the Mexican context. Global media and communication, 15(1), 103–119. doi:10.1016/j.pubrev.2009.01.01010.1177/1742766518818862
Ryan, M. (2022). U.S. presses Tunisia, once a bright spot of Arab Spring, on democracy. The Washington Post. Retrieved from https://www.washingtonpost.com/national-security/2022/09/19/united-states-tunisia-democracy/
Scott, M. (2009). In search of a bad reference corpus. In D. Archer (Ed.), What's in Word-list? Investigating Word Frequency and Keyword Extraction (pp. 79–92). Oxford: Ashgate.
Scott, M. (2008). Wordsmith Tools Version 5.0. Liverpool: Lexical Analysis Software.
Scott, M. (1997). PC analysis of key words – and key key words. System, 25(2), 233–245. doi:10.1016/j.pubrev.2009.01.01010.1016/s0346-251x(97)00011-0
Semetko, H. A., & Valkenburg, P. M. (2000). Framing European politics: A content analysis of press and television news. Journal of Communication, 50(2), 93–109. doi:10.1016/j.pubrev.2009.01.01010.1111/J.1460-2466.2000.TB02843.X
Shevchenko, I. (2022). American social media on the Russia-Ukraine war: A multimodal analysis. Cognition, communication, discourse, 25, 65-79. doi:10.1016/j.pubrev.2009.01.01010.26565/2218-2926-2022-25-05
Sinclair, J. (1991). Corpus, concordance, collocation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Sun, T. (2010). Adversarial questioning and answering strategies in Chinese government press conferences. Taiwan Journal of Linguistics, 8(2), 131–162.
Taylor, C., & Del Fante, D. (2020). Comparing across languages in corpus and discourse analysis: some issues and approaches. Meta, 65(1), 29–50.
Tian, Y., & Yang, J. (2022). Deny or bolster? A comparative study of crisis communication strategies between Trump and Cuomo in COVID-19. Public Relations Review, 48(2), 102182. doi:10.1016/j.pubrev.2009.01.01010.1016/j.pubrev.2022.102182
Ullmann, S. (2021). Discourses of the Arab revolutions in media and politics. New York: Routledge.
van der Meer, T. G. L. A., Verhoeven, P., Beentjes, H., & Vliegenthart, R. (2014). When frames align: The interplay between PR, news media, and the public in times of crisis. Public Relations Review, 40(5), 751–761. doi:10.1016/j.pubrev.2009.01.01010.1016/j.pubrev.2014.07.008
van Dijk, T. A. (2004). Texts and contexts of parliamentary debates. In P. Bayley (Ed.), Cross-Cultural Perspectives on Parliamentary Discourse (pp. 339–372). Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
van Dijk, T. A. (2001). Political discourse and ideology. Paper presented at Jornadas del Discurso Politico, UPF, Barcelona. Retrieved from http://www.discourse-in-society.org/dis-pol-ideo.htm
Wierzbicka, A. (1997). Understanding cultures through their key-words. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Williams, R. (1976). Keywords. Oxford University Press.
Wodak, R. (1989). Language, power and ideology: Studies in political discourse. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Xi, Y., Chen, A., & Ng, A. (2021). Conditional transparency: Differentiated news framings of COVID-19 severity in the pre-crisis stage in China. PLoS ONE, 16(5), e0252062. doi:10.1016/j.pubrev.2009.01.01010.1371/journal.pone.0252062
Xie, C., Zhang, J., Huang, Q., Chen, Y., & Morrison, A. M. (2022). An analysis of user-generated crisis frames: Online public responses to a tourism crisis. Tourism Management Perspectives, 41, 1–16. doi:10.1016/j.pubrev.2009.01.01010.1016/j.tmp.2021.100931
Yerkes, S. (2021). The Tunisian President’s election plan is troubling. So is the U.S. response. Retrieved from https://carnegieendowment.org/2021/12/21/tunisian-president-s-election-plan-is-troubling.-so-is-u.s.-response-pub-86060
Zhabotynska, S., & Brynko, A. (2022). Emotive lexicon of the political narrative: Ukraine and the West in Chinese media. Cognition, communication, discourse, 25, 89-118. doi:10.1016/j.pubrev.2009.01.01010.26565/2218-2926-2022-25-07
Anagnostou, N. K., & Weir, G. R. S. (2007). Review of software applications for deriving collocations. In G. R. S. Weir & T. Ozasa (Eds.), Texts, Textbooks and Readability (pp. 63–72). Glasgow: University of Strathclyde Publishing.
Ancarno, C. (2020). Corpus-Assisted Discourse Studies. In A. De Fina & A. Georgakopoulou (Eds.), The Cambridge Handbook of Discourse Studies (pp. 165–185). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Baker, P. (2016). The shapes of collocation. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 21(2), 139–164. doi:10.1016/j.pubrev.2009.01.01010.1075/ijcl.21.2.01bak
Baker, P., Gabrielatos, C., & McEnery, T. (2013). Sketching Muslims: A corpus driven analysis of representations around the word ‘Muslim’ in the British press 1998–2009. Applied Linguistics, 34(3), 255–278.
Baker, P., & McEnery, T. (2015). Who benefits when discourse gets democratised? Analysing a Twitter corpus around the British Benefits Street debate. In P. Baker & T. McEnery (Eds.), Corpora and discourse studies: Integrating discourse and corpora (pp. 244–265). Basingstoke: Palgrave.
Ben Ghozlen, B. (2023). Crisis construction in the contemporary communication environment: a dynamic, complex, and mis/disinformation-rich process. Lyuboslovie, 23, 195–205. doi:10.46687/IXXR3433
Bogetić, K. (2013). Normal straight gays: Lexical collocations and ideologies masculinity in personal ads of Serbian gay teenagers. Gender and Language, 7(3), 333–367.
Bondi, M., & Scott. M. (Eds.). (2010). Keyness in texts. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Bos, L., Lecheler, S., Mewafi, M., & Vliegenthart, R. (2016). It's the frame that matters: Immigrant integration and media framing effects in the Netherlands. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 55, 97–108. doi:10.1016/j.pubrev.2009.01.01010.1016/j.ijintrel.2016.10.002
Brezina, V., Weill-Tessier, P., & McEnery, A. (2021). #LancsBox v. 6.x. [software package]. Retrieved from: http://corpora.lancs.ac.uk/lancsbox
Brezina, V., McEnery, T., & Wattam, S. (2015). Collocations in context: A new perspective on collocation networks. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 20(2), 139–173. doi:10.1016/j.pubrev.2009.01.01010.1075/ijcl.20.2.01bre
Cacciatore, M. A., Scheufele, D. A., & Iyengar, S. (2016). The end of framing as we know it … and the future of media effects. Mass Communication and Society, 19(1), 7–23. doi:10.1080/15205436.2015.1068811
Cheng, J. W., Mitomo, H., Otsuka, T., & Jeon, S. Y. (2016). Cultivation effects of mass and social media on perceptions and behavioural intentions in post-disaster recovery – The case of the 2011 Great East Japan Earthquake. Telematics and Informatics, 33(3), 753–772. doi:10.1016/j.tele.2015.12.001
Chilton, P. (2004). Analysing political discourse: Theory and practice. Routledge.
Chong, D., & Druckman, J. N. (2012). Dynamics in mass communication effects research. In H. A. Semetko & M. Scammell (Eds.), The Sage Handbook of Political Communication (pp. 307–323). London: Sage Publications Ltd.
Coombs, W. T. (2018). Revising situational crisis communication theory: The influences of social media on crisis communication theory and practice. In L. L. Austin & Y. Jin (Eds.), Social media and crisis communication (pp. 21–38). New York, NY: Routledge.
Coombs, W. T. (2007). Protecting organization reputations during a crisis: The development and application of situational crisis communication theory. Corporate Reputation Review, 10(3), 163–176. doi:10.1057/palgrave.crr.1550049
de Bruijn, H. (2019). The art of political framing: How politicians convince us that they are right. Amsterdam University Press.
De Candia, S., Spinzi, C., & Venuti, M. (2013). 'I don't know the answer to that question': A corpus-assisted discourse analysis of White House press briefings. Critical Approaches to Discourse Analysis across Disciplines, 7(1), 66–81.
Durán-Muñoz, I. (2019). Adjectives and their keyness: A corpus-based analysis of tourism discourse in English. Corpora, 14(3), 351–378. doi:10.1016/j.pubrev.2009.01.010
Entman, R. M. (2004). Projections of power: Framing news, public Opinion, and U.S. foreign policy. Chicago, MI: University of Chicago Press.
Entman, R. M. (1993). Framing: Toward clarification of a fractured paradigm. Journal of Communication, 43(4), 51–58. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.1993.tb01304.x
Fairclough, I., & Fairclough, N. (2011). Practical reasoning in political discourse: The UK government’s response to the economic crisis in the 2008 Pre-Budget Report. Discourse & Society, 22(3), 243–268. doi:10.1177/0957926510395439
Farooq, U. A. (2022). As Tunisia's Saied consolidates power, US remains without clear roadmap ahead. Retrieved from https://www.middleeasteye.net/news/tunisia-kais-saied-us-biden-without-roadmap-ahead
Fetouri, M. (2022). What will 2022 bring to Tunisia in light of Kais Saied's power grab? Retrieved from https://www.middleeastmonitor.com/20220113-what-will-2022-bring-to-tunisia-in-light-of-kais-saieds-power-grab/
Firth, J. R. (1957). Papers in Linguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Frath, P., & Gledhill, C. (2005). Free-range clusters or frozen chunks? Reference as a defining criterion for linguistic units. Recherches Anglaises et Nord-américaines, 38, 25–43. doi:10.1016/j.pubrev.2009.01.01010.3406/ranam.2005.1745
Freelon, D. (2010). ReCal: Intercoder reliability calculation as a web service. International Journal of Internet Science, 5(1), 20–33.
Gabrielatos, C. (2018). Keyness analysis: Nature, metrics and techniques. In C. Taylor & A. Marchi (Eds.), Corpus approaches to discourse: A critical review (pp. 225–258). Oxford: Routledge.
Gabrielatos, C. (2008). Collocational analysis as a gateway to critical discourse analysis: the case of the construction of refugees, asylum seekers and immigrants in the UK press. Retrieved from https://eprints.lancs.ac.uk/id/eprint/31109/
Gabrielatos, C., & Marchi, A. (2011, November 17). Keyness: Matching metrics to definitions. Paper presented at the conference Theoretical-methodological challenges in corpus approaches to discourse studies – and some ways of addressing them. Retrieved from http://eprints.lancs.ac.uk/51449/
Gerken, F., & Van Der Meer, T. G. L. A. (2019). Crisis frame dynamics: Frame diversity in news media and the role of governmental actors. Journal of International Crisis and Risk Communication Research, 2(2), 149–180. doi:10.1016/j.pubrev.2009.01.01010.30658/jicrcr.2.2.1
Goh, G. Y. (2011). Choosing a reference corpus for keyword calculation. Linguistic Research, 28(1), 239-256.
Grewal, S., Satouri, S. D., & DeHaven, I. (2022). Tunisia’s new constitution will only worsen its political crisis. Retrieved from https://www.brookings.edu/blog/order-from-chaos/2022/07/06/tunisias-new-constitution-will-only-worsen-its-political-crisis/
Hamid, S. (2021). Tunisia, democracy, and the return of American hypocrisy. Retrieved from https://www.brookings.edu/blog/order-from-chaos/2021/08/03/tunisia-democracy-and-the-return-of-american-hypocrisy/
Hänggli, R., & Kriesi, H. (2010). Political framing strategies and their impact on media framing in a Swiss direct-democratic campaign. Political communication, 27(2), 141–157. doi:10.1080/10584600903501484
Hardt-Mautner, G. (1995). ‘Only connect’. Critical discourse analysis and corpus linguistics. University of Lancaster. Retrieved from http://ucrel.lancaster.ac.uk/papers/techpaper/vol6.pdf
Hong, S. (2016). Government press releases and citizen perceptions of government performance: Evidence from Google Trends Data. Public Performance & Management Review, 39(4), 885–904. doi:10.1080/15309576.2015.1137776
Iyengar, S. (1991). Is anyone responsible? Chicago, MI: University of Chicago Press.
Kirvalidze, N., & Samnidze, N. (2016). Political discourse as a subject of interdisciplinary studies. Journal of Teaching and Education, 5(1), 161–170.
Konstantinova, A., Anufrienko, S., Abazalieva, M., Gevorgyan, A., & Soloveva, E. (2019). Political discourse and the study of parliamentary communication: a comparative analysis. SHS Web Conference, 69, 00007. doi:10.1016/j.pubrev.2009.01.01010.1051/shsconf/20196900007
Loke, B. (2016). Unpacking the politics of great power responsibility: Nationalist and Maoist China in international order-building. European Journal of International Relations, 22(4), 847–871. doi:10.1016/j.pubrev.2009.01.01010.1177/1354066115611968
Marzo, P. (2020). Solving the security–democracy dilemma: the US foreign policy in Tunisia post-9/11. Third World Quarterly, 41(7), 1181–1199. doi:10.1016/j.pubrev.2009.01.01010.1080/01436597.2020.1754126
Marzouki, K. (2022, January 25). July 25: An exceptional day in Tunisia with many connotations. Retrieved from https://english.legal-agenda.com/july-25-an-exception-day-in-tunisia-with-many-connotations/
Mayr, A. (Ed.). (2008). Language and power: An introduction to institutional discourse. London: Continuum.
McEnery, T. (2009). Keywords and moral panics: Mary Whitehouse and media censorship. In D. Archer (Ed.), What's in Word-list? Investigating Word Frequency and Keyword Extraction (pp. 93–124). Oxford: Ashgate.
McEnery, T. (2006). Swearing in English: Bad Language, Purity and Power from 1586 to the Present. Abington: Routledge.
McEnery, T., & Wilson, A. (2001). Corpus linguistics: An introduction. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
Mohd Don, Z., & De Rycker, A. (2013). Discourse in crisis, crisis in discourse. In A. De Rycker & Z. Mohd Don (Eds.), Discourse and crisis: Critical perspectives (pp. 3–65). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Lehecka, T. (2015). Collocation and Colligation. In J. O. Östman & J. Verschueren (Eds.), Handbook of Pragmatics Online (pp. 1–23). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Neuman, R. W., Just, M. R., & Crigler, A. N. (1992). Common knowledge: News and the construction of political meaning. Chicago, MI: The University of Chicago Press.
Oxley, Z. (2020). Framing and political decision making: An overview. Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Politics. Retrieved from https://oxfordre.com/ politics/view/10.1093/acrefore/9780190228637.001.0001/acrefore-9780190228637-E-1250
Partington, A. (2003). The linguistics of political argument: The spin-doctor and the wolf-pack at the White House. London: Routledge.
Phillips, M. (1989). Lexical structure of text. Discourse analysis monograph no. 12. English Language Research: University of Birmingham.
Powers, J. H., & Xiao, X. (Eds.). (2008). The social construction of SARS: Studies of a health communication crisis. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Rodelo, F. V., & Muñiz, C. (2019). Government frames and their influence on news framing: An analysis of cross-lagged correlations in the Mexican context. Global media and communication, 15(1), 103–119. doi:10.1016/j.pubrev.2009.01.01010.1177/1742766518818862
Ryan, M. (2022). U.S. presses Tunisia, once a bright spot of Arab Spring, on democracy. The Washington Post. Retrieved from https://www.washingtonpost.com/national-security/2022/09/19/united-states-tunisia-democracy/
Scott, M. (2009). In search of a bad reference corpus. In D. Archer (Ed.), What's in Word-list? Investigating Word Frequency and Keyword Extraction (pp. 79–92). Oxford: Ashgate.
Scott, M. (2008). Wordsmith Tools Version 5.0. Liverpool: Lexical Analysis Software.
Scott, M. (1997). PC analysis of key words – and key key words. System, 25(2), 233–245. doi:10.1016/j.pubrev.2009.01.01010.1016/s0346-251x(97)00011-0
Semetko, H. A., & Valkenburg, P. M. (2000). Framing European politics: A content analysis of press and television news. Journal of Communication, 50(2), 93–109. doi:10.1016/j.pubrev.2009.01.01010.1111/J.1460-2466.2000.TB02843.X
Shevchenko, I. (2022). American social media on the Russia-Ukraine war: A multimodal analysis. Cognition, communication, discourse, 25, 65-79. doi:10.1016/j.pubrev.2009.01.01010.26565/2218-2926-2022-25-05
Sinclair, J. (1991). Corpus, concordance, collocation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Sun, T. (2010). Adversarial questioning and answering strategies in Chinese government press conferences. Taiwan Journal of Linguistics, 8(2), 131–162.
Taylor, C., & Del Fante, D. (2020). Comparing across languages in corpus and discourse analysis: some issues and approaches. Meta, 65(1), 29–50.
Tian, Y., & Yang, J. (2022). Deny or bolster? A comparative study of crisis communication strategies between Trump and Cuomo in COVID-19. Public Relations Review, 48(2), 102182. doi:10.1016/j.pubrev.2009.01.01010.1016/j.pubrev.2022.102182
Ullmann, S. (2021). Discourses of the Arab revolutions in media and politics. New York: Routledge.
van der Meer, T. G. L. A., Verhoeven, P., Beentjes, H., & Vliegenthart, R. (2014). When frames align: The interplay between PR, news media, and the public in times of crisis. Public Relations Review, 40(5), 751–761. doi:10.1016/j.pubrev.2009.01.01010.1016/j.pubrev.2014.07.008
van Dijk, T. A. (2004). Texts and contexts of parliamentary debates. In P. Bayley (Ed.), Cross-Cultural Perspectives on Parliamentary Discourse (pp. 339–372). Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
van Dijk, T. A. (2001). Political discourse and ideology. Paper presented at Jornadas del Discurso Politico, UPF, Barcelona. Retrieved from http://www.discourse-in-society.org/dis-pol-ideo.htm
Wierzbicka, A. (1997). Understanding cultures through their key-words. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Williams, R. (1976). Keywords. Oxford University Press.
Wodak, R. (1989). Language, power and ideology: Studies in political discourse. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Xi, Y., Chen, A., & Ng, A. (2021). Conditional transparency: Differentiated news framings of COVID-19 severity in the pre-crisis stage in China. PLoS ONE, 16(5), e0252062. doi:10.1016/j.pubrev.2009.01.01010.1371/journal.pone.0252062
Xie, C., Zhang, J., Huang, Q., Chen, Y., & Morrison, A. M. (2022). An analysis of user-generated crisis frames: Online public responses to a tourism crisis. Tourism Management Perspectives, 41, 1–16. doi:10.1016/j.pubrev.2009.01.01010.1016/j.tmp.2021.100931
Yerkes, S. (2021). The Tunisian President’s election plan is troubling. So is the U.S. response. Retrieved from https://carnegieendowment.org/2021/12/21/tunisian-president-s-election-plan-is-troubling.-so-is-u.s.-response-pub-86060
Zhabotynska, S., & Brynko, A. (2022). Emotive lexicon of the political narrative: Ukraine and the West in Chinese media. Cognition, communication, discourse, 25, 89-118. doi:10.1016/j.pubrev.2009.01.01010.26565/2218-2926-2022-25-07
Опубліковано
2023-12-26
Як цитувати
Бен Гозлен, Б. (2023). Прес-комунікації адміністрації США щодо Тунісу після «виняткового стану» 25 липня 2021 року: формування дискурсу нагальності. Когніція, комунікація, дискурс, (27), 9-33. https://doi.org/10.26565/2218-2926-2023-27-01
Розділ
Статті
Авторське право (c) 2023 Бутейна Бен Гозлен
Цю роботу ліцензовано за Міжнародня ліцензія Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0.
Автори, які публікуються у цьому журналі, погоджуються з наступними умовами:
Автори залишають за собою право на авторство своєї роботи та передають журналу право першої публікації цієї роботи на умовах ліцензії Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial Non-Derivs License (CC BY-NC-ND), яка дозволяє іншим особам вільно розповсюджувати опубліковану роботу з обов'язковим посиланням на авторів оригінальної роботи та першу публікацію роботи у цьому журналі.
Автори мають право укладати самостійні додаткові угоди щодо неексклюзивного розповсюдження роботи у тому вигляді, в якому вона була опублікована цим журналом (наприклад, розміщувати роботу в електронному сховищі установи або публікувати у складі монографії), за умови збереження посилання на першу публікацію роботи у цьому журналі.
Політика журналу дозволяє і заохочує розміщення авторами в мережі Інтернет (наприклад, у сховищах установ або на особистих веб-сайтах) рукопису роботи, як до подання цього рукопису до редакції, так і під час його редакційного опрацювання, оскільки це сприяє виникненню продуктивної наукової дискусії та позитивно позначається на оперативності та динаміці цитування опублікованої роботи (див. The Effect of Open Access).
