Additional sense nuances as a cognitive and pragmatic phenomenon
Keywords:
additional sense nuances, implicit sense, cognitive mechanism, cognitive operation, conceptual blend, complex blend
Abstract
The article introduces the analysis of additional sense nuances in a belles-lettres discourse in view of pragmatic and cognitive approach. Additional sense nuances are treated as a separate kind of implicit information, their cognitive nature being determined by the author’s intention. Its inferring presupposes the anticipation of accumulated sense of other types of implicit sense in the discourse: non-allusive hints, allusions, and symbols. The text of C. Ahern’s novel serves the material for this study. It is shown that the creation and inferring of implicit senses is correlated with cognitive mechanisms and operations. The inferring of additional speech nuances embraces two stages and rests on cognitive mechanisms, mainly profiling with focusing/defocusing, prominence, specificity and perspective.
Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
References
Ahern, C. (2007). A Place Called Here. – London: Harper.
Bezuhla, L.R. (2007). Verbalizatsiia implitsytnykh smysliv u nimetskomovnomu dialohichnomu dyskursi [Verbalization of implicit meanings in the German dialogical discourse]. Kharkiv: KhNU imeni V.N. Karazina Publ.
Bezuhla, L.R. (2008). Implitsytni smysly z pozytsii kohnityvnoi prahmalinhvistyky [Implicit meanings in terms of cognitive pragmalinguistics]. Visnyk Kharkiv. nats. un-tu im. V.N. Karazina − V.N. Karazin National Univ. Messenger, 805, 25–30 (in Ukrainian).
Bezuhla, L.R. (2009). Kohnityvno-prahmatychni kharakterystyky implitsytnykh smysliv u nimetskomovnomu dyskursi [Cognitive-pragmatic characteristics of implicit meanings in the German discourse]. Doctoral dissertation synopsis, Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv, Kyiv, Ukraine. (in Ukrainian)
Blakar, R. (1987). Jazyk kak instrument social'noj vlasti [Language as a means of social power]. In: V.V. Petrov (Ed.). Jazyk i modelirovanie social'nogo vzaimodejstvija [Language and modeling of social interaction] (pp. 88–125). Мoscow: Nauka Publ. (in Russian).
Boldyrev, N.N., & Dubovickaja, E.Ju. (2006). Kognitivnyj mehanizm formirovanija smysla “priblizitel'nost'” na materiale sovremennogo anglijskogo jazyka [Cognitive mechanism of formation of “approximate nature” meaning: evidence from the modern English language]. Voprosy kognitivnoi lingvistiki. – Issues of Cognitive Linguistics, 1 (007), 55–60. (in Russian).
Boldyrev, N.N. (2009). Konceptual'naja osnova jazyka [Conceptual basis of language]. In: E.S. Kubrjakova (Ed.). Kognitivnye issledovanija jazyka. Vyp. IV. Konceptualizacija mira v jazyke [Cognitive research of language. Vol. IV. Conceptualization of world in language] (pp. 25–77). Moscow and Tambov: In-t jazykoznanija RAN Publ. & TGU im. G.R. Derzhavina Publ. (in Russian).
Cherkasova, I.P., & Tkachev, M.A. (2015). Osnovopolagajushhie koncepty fikcional'nogo diskursa R. Brjedbjeri (na primere romana “Vino iz oduvanchikov”) [Basic concepts of R. Bradbury’s fictional discourse (evidence from the novel “Dandelion Wine”)]. Filologich. nauki. Voprosy teorii i praktiki. – Philological Sciences. Issues of theory and practice, 8 (50), Part 2, 206–209. (in Russian).
Davydiuk, Yu.B. (2014). Efekt oshukanoho ochikuvannia u semantychnii, temporalnii ta siuzhetnii strukturi anhlomovnoho khudozhnoho dyskursu [Defeated Expectancy in Semantic, Temporal and Plot Structure of English Literary Text]. Candidate dissertation, Kyiv National Linguistic University, Kyiv, Ukraine. (in Ukrainian).
Deane, P.D. (1992). Grammar in mind and brain. Explorations in cognitive syntax. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
Dement'ev, V.V. (2001). Osnovy teorii neprjamoj kommunikacii [Basics of indirect communication theory]. Doctoral dissertation, Saratov State University, Saratov, Russia. (in Russian).
Dement'ev, V.V. (2006). Neprjamaja kommunikacija [Indirect communication]. Moscow: Gnozis Publ.
Dement'ev, V.V. (2013). Aktual'nye problemy neprjamoj kommunikacii i ee zhanrov: vzgljad iz 2013 [Topical problems of indirect communication and its genres: glimpse from 2013]. Zhanry rechi [Genres of Speech], 1(9), 23–48. (in Russian).
Dem'jankov, V.Z. (2001). Ponjatie i koncept v hudozhestvennoj literature i v nauchnom jazyke [Notion and concept in belles-lettres literature and scientific language]. Voprosy filologii –Issues of Philology, 1, 35–47. (in Russian).
Dem'jankov, V.Z. (2007). Termin “concept” kak jelement terminologicheskoj kul'tury [The term “concept” as an element of terminological culture]. In: M.V. Liapon (Ed.). Jazyk kak materija smysla [Language as a material of meaning] (pp. 606–622). Moscow: Azbukovnik Publ. (in Russian).
Dronova, E.M. (2010). Problemy perevoda stilisticheskogo priema alljuzii v anglo-irlandskoj literature pervoj poloviny XX veka) [Problems of translation of stylistic means of allusion in the English-Irish literature in the first half of XX cent.]. Vestnik VGU. Seriia “Lingvistika i mezhkulturnaia kommunikatciia”. – Voronezh State University Messenger. Series “Linguistics and Intercultural Communication”, 1. Available from: http://www.ebiblioteka.lt/resursai/Uzsienio%20leidiniai/Voronezh/lin/2004-01/lin0401_15.pdf
Fauconnier, G., & Turner, M. (2002). The way we think: conceptual blending and the mind’s hidden complexities. New York: Basic Books.
Galojan, Ja.Je. (2013). Mezhkul'turnye aspekty jazyka delovyh peregovorov [Intercultural aspects of the language of business negotiations]. Lichnost', rech' i juridicheskaja praktika. – Personality, speech and juridical practice, 16, 43–46. (in Russian).
Golubeva, N.A. (2010). Kognitivnye principy, mehanizmy i operacii v grammatike [Cognitive principles, mechanisms and operations in grammar]. Vestnik VGU. Serija “Lingvistika i mezhkul'turnaja kommunikacija”. – Proceedings of Voronezh State University. Series “Linguistics and Intercultural Communication”, 1, 32–35. (in Russian).
Jaroshevich, I.S. (2012). Alljuzija kak sredstvo realizacii intertekstual'nosti v publichnoj politicheskoj kommunikacii [Allusion as the means of intertextuality realization in public political communication]. Vestnik Polockogo gos.un-ta. – Messenger of Polotsk St. Univ., 15. Available from: [jaroshevich_2012-15-p.117.pdf]
Karasik, V.I. (2005). Koncepty-reguljativy [Concepts-regulators]. Jazyk, soznanie, kommunikacija. – Language, consciousness, communication, 30, 131–141. (in Russian).
Krasovskaja, N.V. (2009). Hudozhestvennyj koncept: metody i priemy issledovanija [Bell-lettres concept: methods and ways of research]. Izvestija Saratov. un-ta. Serija: Filologija. Zhurnalistika. – Saratov Univ. Review. Series: Philology. Journalism, 4, 21–24. (in Russian).
Kubrjakova, E.S., Dem'jankov, V.Z., Pankrac, Ju.G., & Luzina, L.G. (1997). KSKT: Kratkij slovar' kognitivnyh terminov [Brief dictionary of cognitive terms]. Moscow: Filol. fakul'tet MGU im. M.V. Lomonosova Publ.
Kulikova, M.A. (2010). Kommunikativno-pragmaticheskij portret kosvennyh rechevyh aktov v poslovichnom diskurse [Communicative-pragmatic portrait of indirect speech acts in the proverb discourse]. Available from: kpfu.ru/staff_files/F1593067235/Kulikova_st.pdf
Kuznyetsova, A. (2015). Implicit Meaning in a Belles-Lettres Text: Speech Means in a Cognitive Paradigm. Book of Abstracts from NDLP 2015 (New Developments in Linguistic Pragmatics), 12-14 April. Lodz: University of Lodz, 93.
Langacker, R.W. (1987). Foundations of Cognitive Grammar (Vol. I. Theoretical Prerequisites). Stanford, California: Stanford Univ. Press.
Langacker, R.W. (1990). Concept, Image and Symbol. The Cognitive Basis of Grammar. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
Langacker, R.W. (2008). Cognitive grammar: a basic introduction. Oxford; N.Y.: Oxford Univ. Press, Inc.
Maslennikova, A.A. (1999). Skrytye smysly i ih lingvisticheskaja interpretacija [Hidden meanings and their linguistic interpretation]. Doctoral dissertation synopsis, Saint Petersburg University, Saint-Petersburg, Russia. (in Russian).
Matveeva, G.G. (2003). Njuansy smysla v skrytoj pragmalingvistike [Sense nuances in hidden pragmalinguistics]. Available from: http:// rspu.edu.ru/projects/deytch/note32. html.
Matveeva, G.G., Samarina, I.V., & Selivestrova, L.N. (2009). Dva napravlenija v sovremennoj pragmalingvistike [Two directions in modern pragmalinguistics]. Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgsk. un-ta (Ser. 12) – Saint-Petersburg Univ. Messenger (Series 12), 1, Part II, 77–90. (in Russian).
Nikonova, V.G. (2008). Trahediyna kartyna svitu v poetytsi Shekspira [Tragic world image in Shakespeare’s poetry]. Dnipropetrovsk.: DUEP Publ.
Nikonova, V.G. (2011). Khudozhniy kontsept: protsedury rekonstruktsiyi ta modelyuvannya (na materiali trahediy V. Shekspira). [Belles-lettres concept: procedures of reconstruction and modeling (on the material of Shakespeare’s tragedies]. Visnyk Kyivsk. Natsionaln. Linhv. Un-tu. – Kyiv National Linguistic Univ. Messenger, 14, 2, 113–122 (in Ukrainian).
Parshina, E.O. (2016). Kognitivnye osnovy formirovanija znachenija appeljativov-toponimov [Cognitive basics of formation of appellatives-toponimes]. Available from: http://www.tsutmb.ru/nauka/internet-konferencii/2016/yazik-kultura-profcomm/2/parshina.pdf
Piroh, I.I. (2015). Arhumentatsiya v aspekti kohnityvnykh operatsiy [Argumentation in terms of cognitive operations]. Tezy dopovidey XIV nauk. konf. z mizhnar. uchastyu: Karazins`ki chy`tannya: Lyudy`na. Mova. Komunikaciya. –Proceedings from XIV scientif. conference with international participation: Karazin Readings: Person. Language. Communication. Kharkiv, 182–183 (in Ukrainian).
Poljakovs'ka, Ju.V. (2014). Zamovchuvannya i natyak yak zasoby vyrazhennya nepryamoyi informatsiyi [Suppression and hint as ways of indirect information expression]. Ukrayins'kyy smysl – Ukrainian Sense, 1. Available from: www.ukrsense.dp.ua/index.php/USENSE/article/view/85
Popova, Z.D., & Sternin, I.A. (2007). Kognitivnaja lingvistika [Cognitive Linguistics]. M.: AST, Vostok-Zapad Publ.
Radziyevs'ka T.V. (2010). Tekst yak zasib komunikatsiyi [Text as a means of communication]. Kyiv: Inform. analit. Agentstvo Publ.
Samarina, I.V., & Pohlebina, A.A. (2013). Pragmatika mul'tiplikacionnogo diskursa [Pragmatics of multicommunicational discourse]. Sb. nauchnykh trudov mezhdunarodnoi nauchnometodicheskoi konferentcii Lichnost', rech' i juridicheskaja praktika. – Proc. from intern. scientific method. conference Personality, Speech and Juridical Practice. Rostov-n/D, 183–186.
Santos, A., Chaigneau, S.E., Simmons, W.K., Barsalou, L.W. (2010). Property generation reflects word association and situated stimulation. Available from: www.port.ac.uk/departments/academic/psychology/staff/filetdown loads, 6831, en.pdf
Shevchenko, I.S. (2006). Podhody k analizu koncepta v sovremennoj kognitivnoj lingvistike [Approaches to the analysis of concept in modern cognitive linguistics]. Visnyk Kharkiv. nats. un-tu im. V.N. Karazina. – V.N. Karazin National Univ. Messenger , 725, 192–195.
Shevchenko, I.S., Susov, I.P., Bezuhlaya, L.R. (2008). Abrys kohnityvnoho vektora prahmalynhvystyky [Overview of pragmatic vector in pragmalinguistics]. Visnyk Kharkiv. nats. un-tu im.V.N. Karazina. – V.N. Karazin National Univ. Messenger , 811, 3–7.
Sviatovets, V.F. (2011). Slovnyk tropiv i stylistychnyh fihur [Dictionary of tropes and figures of speech]. K.: Akademija Publ.
Telija, V.N. (1986). Konnotativnyj aspekt nominativnyh edinic [Connotative aspect of nominative units]. Moscow State University: Prosveshhenie Publ.
Thomas, R.F. (1986). Virgil's "Georgics" and the art of reference. Harvard Studies in Classical Philology, 90, 71–98.
Weizman, E. (1993). Interlanguage Requestive Hints. In: G. Kasper, and S. Blum-Kulka (Eds.). Interlanguage Pragmatics (pp. 124–128). N.Y.: Oxford Univ. Press.
Zhabotinskaja, S.A. (2013). Setevaja semantika. Teorija i praktika [Network semantics. Theory and practice]. In: L.A. Furs (Ed.). Mat-ly Vseros. nauch. konf.: Kognitivnaja lingvistika: itogi, perspektivy. Vypusk 14. Kognitivnyje issledovanija jazyka [Proceedings from allrussian scientific conf.: Cognitive linguistics: results, prospects. Issue 14. Cognitive language research] (pp. 81–86). Moscow-Tambov: Inst. of Linguistic Research RAS, G.R. Derzhavin Publ. House.
Bezuhla, L.R. (2007). Verbalizatsiia implitsytnykh smysliv u nimetskomovnomu dialohichnomu dyskursi [Verbalization of implicit meanings in the German dialogical discourse]. Kharkiv: KhNU imeni V.N. Karazina Publ.
Bezuhla, L.R. (2008). Implitsytni smysly z pozytsii kohnityvnoi prahmalinhvistyky [Implicit meanings in terms of cognitive pragmalinguistics]. Visnyk Kharkiv. nats. un-tu im. V.N. Karazina − V.N. Karazin National Univ. Messenger, 805, 25–30 (in Ukrainian).
Bezuhla, L.R. (2009). Kohnityvno-prahmatychni kharakterystyky implitsytnykh smysliv u nimetskomovnomu dyskursi [Cognitive-pragmatic characteristics of implicit meanings in the German discourse]. Doctoral dissertation synopsis, Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv, Kyiv, Ukraine. (in Ukrainian)
Blakar, R. (1987). Jazyk kak instrument social'noj vlasti [Language as a means of social power]. In: V.V. Petrov (Ed.). Jazyk i modelirovanie social'nogo vzaimodejstvija [Language and modeling of social interaction] (pp. 88–125). Мoscow: Nauka Publ. (in Russian).
Boldyrev, N.N., & Dubovickaja, E.Ju. (2006). Kognitivnyj mehanizm formirovanija smysla “priblizitel'nost'” na materiale sovremennogo anglijskogo jazyka [Cognitive mechanism of formation of “approximate nature” meaning: evidence from the modern English language]. Voprosy kognitivnoi lingvistiki. – Issues of Cognitive Linguistics, 1 (007), 55–60. (in Russian).
Boldyrev, N.N. (2009). Konceptual'naja osnova jazyka [Conceptual basis of language]. In: E.S. Kubrjakova (Ed.). Kognitivnye issledovanija jazyka. Vyp. IV. Konceptualizacija mira v jazyke [Cognitive research of language. Vol. IV. Conceptualization of world in language] (pp. 25–77). Moscow and Tambov: In-t jazykoznanija RAN Publ. & TGU im. G.R. Derzhavina Publ. (in Russian).
Cherkasova, I.P., & Tkachev, M.A. (2015). Osnovopolagajushhie koncepty fikcional'nogo diskursa R. Brjedbjeri (na primere romana “Vino iz oduvanchikov”) [Basic concepts of R. Bradbury’s fictional discourse (evidence from the novel “Dandelion Wine”)]. Filologich. nauki. Voprosy teorii i praktiki. – Philological Sciences. Issues of theory and practice, 8 (50), Part 2, 206–209. (in Russian).
Davydiuk, Yu.B. (2014). Efekt oshukanoho ochikuvannia u semantychnii, temporalnii ta siuzhetnii strukturi anhlomovnoho khudozhnoho dyskursu [Defeated Expectancy in Semantic, Temporal and Plot Structure of English Literary Text]. Candidate dissertation, Kyiv National Linguistic University, Kyiv, Ukraine. (in Ukrainian).
Deane, P.D. (1992). Grammar in mind and brain. Explorations in cognitive syntax. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
Dement'ev, V.V. (2001). Osnovy teorii neprjamoj kommunikacii [Basics of indirect communication theory]. Doctoral dissertation, Saratov State University, Saratov, Russia. (in Russian).
Dement'ev, V.V. (2006). Neprjamaja kommunikacija [Indirect communication]. Moscow: Gnozis Publ.
Dement'ev, V.V. (2013). Aktual'nye problemy neprjamoj kommunikacii i ee zhanrov: vzgljad iz 2013 [Topical problems of indirect communication and its genres: glimpse from 2013]. Zhanry rechi [Genres of Speech], 1(9), 23–48. (in Russian).
Dem'jankov, V.Z. (2001). Ponjatie i koncept v hudozhestvennoj literature i v nauchnom jazyke [Notion and concept in belles-lettres literature and scientific language]. Voprosy filologii –Issues of Philology, 1, 35–47. (in Russian).
Dem'jankov, V.Z. (2007). Termin “concept” kak jelement terminologicheskoj kul'tury [The term “concept” as an element of terminological culture]. In: M.V. Liapon (Ed.). Jazyk kak materija smysla [Language as a material of meaning] (pp. 606–622). Moscow: Azbukovnik Publ. (in Russian).
Dronova, E.M. (2010). Problemy perevoda stilisticheskogo priema alljuzii v anglo-irlandskoj literature pervoj poloviny XX veka) [Problems of translation of stylistic means of allusion in the English-Irish literature in the first half of XX cent.]. Vestnik VGU. Seriia “Lingvistika i mezhkulturnaia kommunikatciia”. – Voronezh State University Messenger. Series “Linguistics and Intercultural Communication”, 1. Available from: http://www.ebiblioteka.lt/resursai/Uzsienio%20leidiniai/Voronezh/lin/2004-01/lin0401_15.pdf
Fauconnier, G., & Turner, M. (2002). The way we think: conceptual blending and the mind’s hidden complexities. New York: Basic Books.
Galojan, Ja.Je. (2013). Mezhkul'turnye aspekty jazyka delovyh peregovorov [Intercultural aspects of the language of business negotiations]. Lichnost', rech' i juridicheskaja praktika. – Personality, speech and juridical practice, 16, 43–46. (in Russian).
Golubeva, N.A. (2010). Kognitivnye principy, mehanizmy i operacii v grammatike [Cognitive principles, mechanisms and operations in grammar]. Vestnik VGU. Serija “Lingvistika i mezhkul'turnaja kommunikacija”. – Proceedings of Voronezh State University. Series “Linguistics and Intercultural Communication”, 1, 32–35. (in Russian).
Jaroshevich, I.S. (2012). Alljuzija kak sredstvo realizacii intertekstual'nosti v publichnoj politicheskoj kommunikacii [Allusion as the means of intertextuality realization in public political communication]. Vestnik Polockogo gos.un-ta. – Messenger of Polotsk St. Univ., 15. Available from: [jaroshevich_2012-15-p.117.pdf]
Karasik, V.I. (2005). Koncepty-reguljativy [Concepts-regulators]. Jazyk, soznanie, kommunikacija. – Language, consciousness, communication, 30, 131–141. (in Russian).
Krasovskaja, N.V. (2009). Hudozhestvennyj koncept: metody i priemy issledovanija [Bell-lettres concept: methods and ways of research]. Izvestija Saratov. un-ta. Serija: Filologija. Zhurnalistika. – Saratov Univ. Review. Series: Philology. Journalism, 4, 21–24. (in Russian).
Kubrjakova, E.S., Dem'jankov, V.Z., Pankrac, Ju.G., & Luzina, L.G. (1997). KSKT: Kratkij slovar' kognitivnyh terminov [Brief dictionary of cognitive terms]. Moscow: Filol. fakul'tet MGU im. M.V. Lomonosova Publ.
Kulikova, M.A. (2010). Kommunikativno-pragmaticheskij portret kosvennyh rechevyh aktov v poslovichnom diskurse [Communicative-pragmatic portrait of indirect speech acts in the proverb discourse]. Available from: kpfu.ru/staff_files/F1593067235/Kulikova_st.pdf
Kuznyetsova, A. (2015). Implicit Meaning in a Belles-Lettres Text: Speech Means in a Cognitive Paradigm. Book of Abstracts from NDLP 2015 (New Developments in Linguistic Pragmatics), 12-14 April. Lodz: University of Lodz, 93.
Langacker, R.W. (1987). Foundations of Cognitive Grammar (Vol. I. Theoretical Prerequisites). Stanford, California: Stanford Univ. Press.
Langacker, R.W. (1990). Concept, Image and Symbol. The Cognitive Basis of Grammar. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
Langacker, R.W. (2008). Cognitive grammar: a basic introduction. Oxford; N.Y.: Oxford Univ. Press, Inc.
Maslennikova, A.A. (1999). Skrytye smysly i ih lingvisticheskaja interpretacija [Hidden meanings and their linguistic interpretation]. Doctoral dissertation synopsis, Saint Petersburg University, Saint-Petersburg, Russia. (in Russian).
Matveeva, G.G. (2003). Njuansy smysla v skrytoj pragmalingvistike [Sense nuances in hidden pragmalinguistics]. Available from: http:// rspu.edu.ru/projects/deytch/note32. html.
Matveeva, G.G., Samarina, I.V., & Selivestrova, L.N. (2009). Dva napravlenija v sovremennoj pragmalingvistike [Two directions in modern pragmalinguistics]. Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgsk. un-ta (Ser. 12) – Saint-Petersburg Univ. Messenger (Series 12), 1, Part II, 77–90. (in Russian).
Nikonova, V.G. (2008). Trahediyna kartyna svitu v poetytsi Shekspira [Tragic world image in Shakespeare’s poetry]. Dnipropetrovsk.: DUEP Publ.
Nikonova, V.G. (2011). Khudozhniy kontsept: protsedury rekonstruktsiyi ta modelyuvannya (na materiali trahediy V. Shekspira). [Belles-lettres concept: procedures of reconstruction and modeling (on the material of Shakespeare’s tragedies]. Visnyk Kyivsk. Natsionaln. Linhv. Un-tu. – Kyiv National Linguistic Univ. Messenger, 14, 2, 113–122 (in Ukrainian).
Parshina, E.O. (2016). Kognitivnye osnovy formirovanija znachenija appeljativov-toponimov [Cognitive basics of formation of appellatives-toponimes]. Available from: http://www.tsutmb.ru/nauka/internet-konferencii/2016/yazik-kultura-profcomm/2/parshina.pdf
Piroh, I.I. (2015). Arhumentatsiya v aspekti kohnityvnykh operatsiy [Argumentation in terms of cognitive operations]. Tezy dopovidey XIV nauk. konf. z mizhnar. uchastyu: Karazins`ki chy`tannya: Lyudy`na. Mova. Komunikaciya. –Proceedings from XIV scientif. conference with international participation: Karazin Readings: Person. Language. Communication. Kharkiv, 182–183 (in Ukrainian).
Poljakovs'ka, Ju.V. (2014). Zamovchuvannya i natyak yak zasoby vyrazhennya nepryamoyi informatsiyi [Suppression and hint as ways of indirect information expression]. Ukrayins'kyy smysl – Ukrainian Sense, 1. Available from: www.ukrsense.dp.ua/index.php/USENSE/article/view/85
Popova, Z.D., & Sternin, I.A. (2007). Kognitivnaja lingvistika [Cognitive Linguistics]. M.: AST, Vostok-Zapad Publ.
Radziyevs'ka T.V. (2010). Tekst yak zasib komunikatsiyi [Text as a means of communication]. Kyiv: Inform. analit. Agentstvo Publ.
Samarina, I.V., & Pohlebina, A.A. (2013). Pragmatika mul'tiplikacionnogo diskursa [Pragmatics of multicommunicational discourse]. Sb. nauchnykh trudov mezhdunarodnoi nauchnometodicheskoi konferentcii Lichnost', rech' i juridicheskaja praktika. – Proc. from intern. scientific method. conference Personality, Speech and Juridical Practice. Rostov-n/D, 183–186.
Santos, A., Chaigneau, S.E., Simmons, W.K., Barsalou, L.W. (2010). Property generation reflects word association and situated stimulation. Available from: www.port.ac.uk/departments/academic/psychology/staff/filetdown loads, 6831, en.pdf
Shevchenko, I.S. (2006). Podhody k analizu koncepta v sovremennoj kognitivnoj lingvistike [Approaches to the analysis of concept in modern cognitive linguistics]. Visnyk Kharkiv. nats. un-tu im. V.N. Karazina. – V.N. Karazin National Univ. Messenger , 725, 192–195.
Shevchenko, I.S., Susov, I.P., Bezuhlaya, L.R. (2008). Abrys kohnityvnoho vektora prahmalynhvystyky [Overview of pragmatic vector in pragmalinguistics]. Visnyk Kharkiv. nats. un-tu im.V.N. Karazina. – V.N. Karazin National Univ. Messenger , 811, 3–7.
Sviatovets, V.F. (2011). Slovnyk tropiv i stylistychnyh fihur [Dictionary of tropes and figures of speech]. K.: Akademija Publ.
Telija, V.N. (1986). Konnotativnyj aspekt nominativnyh edinic [Connotative aspect of nominative units]. Moscow State University: Prosveshhenie Publ.
Thomas, R.F. (1986). Virgil's "Georgics" and the art of reference. Harvard Studies in Classical Philology, 90, 71–98.
Weizman, E. (1993). Interlanguage Requestive Hints. In: G. Kasper, and S. Blum-Kulka (Eds.). Interlanguage Pragmatics (pp. 124–128). N.Y.: Oxford Univ. Press.
Zhabotinskaja, S.A. (2013). Setevaja semantika. Teorija i praktika [Network semantics. Theory and practice]. In: L.A. Furs (Ed.). Mat-ly Vseros. nauch. konf.: Kognitivnaja lingvistika: itogi, perspektivy. Vypusk 14. Kognitivnyje issledovanija jazyka [Proceedings from allrussian scientific conf.: Cognitive linguistics: results, prospects. Issue 14. Cognitive language research] (pp. 81–86). Moscow-Tambov: Inst. of Linguistic Research RAS, G.R. Derzhavin Publ. House.
Published
2017-06-10
How to Cite
Кузнецова, А. В. (2017). Additional sense nuances as a cognitive and pragmatic phenomenon. Cognition, Communication, Discourse, (13), 92-113. https://doi.org/10.26565/2218-2926-2016-13-05
Section
Articles
Authors, who publish with this journal, accept the following conditions:
The authors reserve the copyright of their work and transfer to the journal the right of the first publication of this work under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial Non-Derivs License (CC BY-NC-ND), which allows other persons to freely distribute a published work with mandatory reference to the authors of the original work and the first publication of the work in this journal.
Authors have the right to enter into separate additional agreements for the non-exclusive dissemination of the work in the form in which it was published by this journal (for example, to post the work in the electronic institutions' repository or to publish as part of a monograph), provided that the link to the first publication of the work in this journal is given.
The journal policy allows and encourages the authors to place the manuscripts on the Internet (for example, in the institutions' repositories or on personal websites), both before the presentation of this manuscript to the editorial board and during review procedure, as it contributes to the creation of productive scientific discussion and positively affects the efficiency and dynamics of citing the published work (see The Effect of Open Access).
