Echo questions in English conversational discourse: structural-semantic, cognitive-communicative, and functional characteristics
Abstract
The article focuses on echo questions, common in English conversational discourse, presenting their structural-semantic, cognitive-communicative, and functional characteristics from the perspective of cognitive-discursive research paradigm. The language material under analysis (13,938 echo questions in discourse contexts) has been selected from British and American prose of the 20th and 21st centuries as well as 92 feature films. In the study, echo questions are identified on the basis of semantic and/or structural relation to the preceding utterance (stimulus), manifested as its full, partial or paraphrased repetition. Structural and semantic differences from the stimulus are viewed as operation of the syntactic processes of complication and compression, which may be combined with the realization of actualizing, qualifying, and social modus categories. Cognitive-communicative characteristics of echo questions encompass their role in building/updating a mental context model of the communicative situation, repairing communicative failures and restoring discourse coherence, verbalizing mental processes operating during comprehension of the interlocutor's utterance (sensation, perception, thinking, memory, attention) and emotions. Functioning of echo questions, regulated by the mental context model of the communicative situation, involves performing speech acts, both direct (quesitives) and indirect (directives, expressives, metacommunicatives, constatives, and commissives), as well as realizing a number of communicative strategies (information-cognitive, directive, argumentative, evaluative, and metacommunicative) by means of the corresponding tactics.
Downloads
References
Arutjunova, N.D. (1986). Dialogicheskaja citacija (K probleme chuzhoj rechi) [Dialogical citation (On the subject of other's speech)]. Voprosy jazykoznanija. – Topics in the study of language, 1, 50–62 (in Russian).
Bennett, E. (1996). Dumb witness. [Motion picture]. UK: Carnival Film & Television.
Biber, D., Johansson, S., Leech, G., Conrad, S., & Finegan, E. (1999). Longman grammar of spoken and written English. London: Longman.
Bloh, M.Ja. (2000). Teoreticheskie osnovy grammatiki [Theoretical foundations of grammar]. Moscow: Vysshaja shkola Publ.
Carter, R., & McCarthy, M. (2006). Cambridge grammar of English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Chhetiani, T.D. (1987). Lingvisticheskie aspekty faticheskoj metakommunikacii. [Linguistic aspects of phatic metacommunication] (Candidate dissertation). Kiev State Teachers' Training Institute of Foreign Languages, Kyiv, Ukraine. (in Russian).
Christie, A. (1989). Selected Detective Prose. Moscow: Raduga Publ.
Christie, A. (2007). Murder on the Orient Express. London: Harper.
Collins, P. (2006). Clause types. In: B. Aarts, & A. McMahon (Eds.). The Handbook of English Linguistics (pp. 180–197). Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
Connelly, M. (2006). Echo Park. New York: Little, Brown and Company.
Cruttenden, A. (1986). Intonation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Daneš, F. (2004). Universality vs. culture-specificity of emotion. In: E. Weigand (Ed.). Emotion in dialogic interaction: Advances in the complex (pp. 23–32). Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
Davies, J., & Wharmby, T. (1980). Why didn't they ask Evans? [Motion picture]. UK: London Weekend Television.
Davis, S. (1980). Perlocutions. In: J.R. Searle, F. Kiefer, & M. Bierwisch (Eds.). Speech Act Theory and Pragmatics (pp. 37–55). Dordrecht: Reidel Publishing Company.
Dijk, T.A. van (1977). Text and context: Explorations in the semantics and pragmatics of discourse. New York: Longman.
Dijk, T.A. van (1981). Towards an empirical pragmatics: Some social psychological conditions of speech acts. Philosophica, 27(1), 127–138.
Dijk, T.A. van (2000). Cognitive discourse analysis: An introduction. Available from: http://www.discursos.org/unpublished%20articles/cogn-dis-anal.htm
Dijk, T.A. van (2008). Discourse and context: A sociocognitive approach. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Dijk, T.A. van (2012). Discourse and knowledge. In J.P. Gee, & M. Handford (Eds.). The Routledge handbook of discourse analysis (pp. 587–603). London: Routledge.
Dijk, T.A. van (2014). Discourse and knowledge: A sociocognitive approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Doyle, A.C. (1993). The case-book of Sherlock Holmes. Ware: Wordsworth Editions Limited.
Dymarskij, M.Ja. (2013). Predikacija i predikativnost' [Predication and predicativity]. In: A.V. Bondarko (Ed.). Glagol'nye i imennye kategorii v sisteme funkcional'noj grammatiki [Verbal and nominal categories in the system of functional grammar] (pp. 81–87). SPb.: Nestor-Istoriya Publ.
Ephron, N. (1998). Sleepless in Seattle [Motion picture]. USA: Warner Bros.
Fiengo, R. (2007). Asking questions. Using meaningful structures to imply ignorance. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Frost, H. (2004). Single Santa seeks Mrs. Claus [Motion picture]. USA: Hallmark Entertainment.
Giles, D. (1985). A murder is announced [Motion picture]. UK: BBC.
Grice, P. (1989). Studies in the way of words. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.
Horn, L.R. (2001). A natural history of negation. Stanford: CSLI Publications.
Huddleston, R. (1984). Introduction to the grammar of English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Jakobson, R. (1987). Linguistics and poetics. In: K. Pomorska, & S. Rudy (Eds.). Language in literature (pp. 62–94), Cambridge, MA: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
Kent, J. (2008). Cat among the pigeons [Motion picture]. UK: ITV Productions.
Kovsh, O.A. (2007). Repliki-povtory s semantikoj nedoverija v bolgarskom jazyke [Repetitions expressing distrust in the Bulgarian language]. In B.Ju. Norman, & N.V. Suprunchuk (Eds.). Juzhnoslavjanskie jazyki v ih istorii i sovremennom sostojanii [South Slavic languages: Their history and modern state] (pp. 68–80). Minsk: IP Logvinov Publ.
Leech, G. (2006). A glossary of English grammar. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
Longman Dictionary of Contemporary English (2003). Harlow: Pearson Education Limited.
McCawley, J.D. (1998). The syntactic phenomena of English. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Pochepcov, G.G. (2009). Izbrannye trudy [Selected works]. Kharkiv: HNU imeni V.N. Karazina.
Pyrozhenko, O.G. (2001). Kognityvni ta komunikatyvni aspekty verbalizacii' konceptu nepravdy u dialogichnomu dyskursi (na materiali suchasnoi' anglijs'koi' movy). [Cognitive and communicative aspects of verbalization of the concept of lying in dialogical discourse (on the data of the present-day English language)] (Candidate dissertation synopsis). V.N. Karazin Kharkiv National University, Kharkiv, Ukraine. (in Ukrainian).
Quirk, R., Greenbaum, S., Leech, G., & Svartvik, J. (1985). A comprehensive grammar of the English language. London: Longman.
Radford, A. (2009). An introduction to English sentence structure. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Rye, R. (1989a). Four and twenty blackbirds [Motion picture]. UK: Picture Partnership Productions.
Rye, R. (1989b). Problem at sea [Motion picture]. UK: Picture Partnership Productions.
Rye, R. (1989c). Triangle at Rhodes [Motion picture]. UK: Picture Partnership Productions.
Santorini, B., & Kroch, A. (2007). The syntax of natural language: An online introduction using the Trees program. Available from: http://www.ling.upenn.edu/~beatrice/syntax-textbook/
Shevchenko, I.S. (1998). Istoricheskaja dinamika pragmatiki predlozhenija: anglijskoe voprositel'noe predlozhenie 16-20 vekov [Historical dynamics of the pragmatics of the sentence: The English interrogative sentence of 16th–20th centuries]. Kharkiv: Konstanta Publ.
Shmeleva, T.V. (1984). Smyslovaja organizacija predlozhenija i problema modal'nosti [Sentence meaning and the issue of modality]. In: K. Gorshkova, & E.V. Klobukova (Eds.). Aktual'nye problemy russkogo sintaksisa: publikacii laboratorii "Russkij jazyk i russkaja literatura v sovremennom mire" filologicheskogo fakul'teta MGU [Topical problems of Russian syntax: Publications of the "Russian language and Russian literature in the modern world" laboratory of Philological Faculty of Moscow State University] (pp. 78–100). Moscow:
Izd-vo Moskovskogo universiteta.
Steel, D. (2010). Legacy: A Novel. New York: Delacorte Press.
Strelchenko, N.S. (2015). Pytannia-perepyty v terminolohichnomu aspekti [Echo questions from the terminological point of view]. Naukovi zapysky. Seriia: Filolohichni nauky (movoznavstvo). – Scientific papers. Series: Philology (Linguistics), 138, 243–248 (in Ukrainian).
Tannen, D. (2007). Talking voices: Repetition, dialogue, and imagery in conversational discourse. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Teschner, R.V., & Evans, E.E. (2007). Analyzing the grammar of English. Washington, D.C.: Georgetown University Press.
Tsui, A. (1992). A functional description of questions. In: M. Coulthard (Ed.). Advances in Spoken Discourse Analysis (pp. 89–110). London: Routledge.
Vinogradov, V.V., & Istrina, E.S. (Eds.). (1960). Grammatika russkogo jazyka [Grammar of the Russian language]. Moscow: Izdatel'stvo Akademii nauk SSSR Publ.
Vynoslavs'ka, O.V., Breusenko-Kuznjecov, O.A., Zlyvkov, V.L., Apisheva, A.Sh., & Vasyl'jeva, O.S. (2005). Psyhologija : Navch. posib. dlja stud. vyshch. navch. zakl. [Psychology: Manual for students of higher educational establishments]. Kyiv: Firma "INKOS" Publ.
Zampi, M. (1951). Laughter in Paradise [Motion picture]. UK: Associated British Picture Corporation.
Zhinkin, N.I. (1955). Vopros i voprositel'noe predlozhenie [The question and the interrogative sentence]. Voprosy jazykoznanija. – Topics in the study of language, 3, 22–34 (in Russian).
Zwaan, R.A., & Radvansky, G.A. (1998). Situation models in language comprehension and memory. Psychological Bulletin, 123(2), 162–185.
Zwaan, R.A., & Rapp, D.N. (2006). Discourse comprehension. In M.J. Traxler, & M.A. Gernsbacher (Eds.). Handbook of Psycholinguistics (pp. 725–764). New York: Elsevier.
Authors, who publish with this journal, accept the following conditions:
The authors reserve the copyright of their work and transfer to the journal the right of the first publication of this work under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial Non-Derivs License (CC BY-NC-ND), which allows other persons to freely distribute a published work with mandatory reference to the authors of the original work and the first publication of the work in this journal.
Authors have the right to enter into separate additional agreements for the non-exclusive dissemination of the work in the form in which it was published by this journal (for example, to post the work in the electronic institutions' repository or to publish as part of a monograph), provided that the link to the first publication of the work in this journal is given.
The journal policy allows and encourages the authors to place the manuscripts on the Internet (for example, in the institutions' repositories or on personal websites), both before the presentation of this manuscript to the editorial board and during review procedure, as it contributes to the creation of productive scientific discussion and positively affects the efficiency and dynamics of citing the published work (see The Effect of Open Access).
