Emergent meaning-making in multimodal discourse: A case for sadness in The Horse Whisperer
Abstract
This article addresses functional-pragmatic and cognitive-semiotic issues of emergent meaning-making in multimodal discourse. The theoretical backbone comprises the theories of conceptual integration, blended classic joint attention, embodied cognition, and performativity. This study acknowledges that emergent meaning-making is a performative act grounded on the intersubjective interaction of communicants constituted by environmental and bodily factors. Emergent meaning is viewed as novel, which possesses a certain level of complexity, and is not derived from the meaning of its semiotic elements. A case study analysis of sadness in film enables to reveal the main features of emergent meaning-making: 1) filmmakers and viewers co-participate in meaning-making and are able to share joint attention providing intersubjective interaction mediated by the camera; 2) meaning-making is grounded in bodily experiences and embodied not only through nonverbal elements but also verbal and cinematic semiotic resources in film; 3) a synergistic integration of modes and semiotic resources constructs the emergent meaning; 4) the configuration of semiotic resources is characterized by the volatility of combinations; 4) emergent constructs may be organized according to particular regulations creating constructive patterns. These findings stipulate further analysis of meaning-making, its material-perceptual and socio-semiotic aspects.
Downloads
References
Arnheim, R (2004). Visual Thinking. Berkeley & Los Angeles: University of California Press.
Awards. The Horse Whisperer (1988). (n.d.). Internet Movie Database. Retrieved May 2, 2022, from https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0119314/awards?ref_=tt_ql_1
Barrett, L., Mesquita, B., Ochsner, K. N., & Gross, J. J. (2007). The experience of emotion. Annual Review of Psychology, 58(1), 373-403. https://doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.58.110405.085709
Bateman, A., & Schmidt, K.-H. (2012). Multimodal film analysis. How films mean. London, New York: Routledge.
Brinck, I. (2008). The role of intersubjectivity in the development of intentional communication. In J. Zlatev, T. P. Racine, Ch. Sinha, & E. Itkonen (Eds.), The Shared Mind: Perspectives on Intersubjectivity (pp. 115-140). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Carston, R. (2002). Linguistic meaning, communicated meaning and cognitive pragmatics. Mind and Language, 17(1-2), 127-148.
Chalmers, D. J. (2006). Strong and weak emergence. In P. Davies, & P. Clayton (Eds.), The Re-Emergence of Emergence: The Emergentist Hypothesis From Science to Religion (pp. 244-254). Oxford University Press. https://doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.58.110405.085709
Cohen, A. (2011). Music as a source of emotion in film. In J. A. Sloboda, & P. N. Juslin (Eds.), Handbook of Music and Emotion: Theory, Research, Applications (pp. 249-272). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Coëgnarts, M., & Kravanja, P. (2015). Embodied visual meaning in film. In M. Coëgnarts, & P. Kravanja (Eds.), Embodied cognition and cinema (pp. 63-80). Leuven: Leuven University Press.
Fauconnier, G., & Turner, M. (2003). The way we think: Conceptual blending and the mind’s hidden complexities. New York, NY: Basic Books.
Fischer-Lichte, E. (2008). The transformative power of performance: A new aesthetics. London & New York: Routledge.
Foulkes, P., & Hay, J. B. (2015). The emergence of sociophonetic structure. In B. MacWhinney, & W. O’Grady (Eds.), The Handbook of Language Emergence (pp. 292-313). New York, NY: Wiley.
Halliday, M. A. K. (1978). Language as social semiotic: The social interpretation of language and meaning. London: Edward Arnold.
Heimann, K.S., Umiltà, M.A, Guerra, M., & Gallese, V. (2014). Moving mirrors: A high density EEG study investigating the effects of camera movements on motor cortex activation during action observation. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 26(9), 2087–2101.
Hopper, P. J. (2015). An emergentist approach to grammar. In B. MacWhinney, & W. O’Grady (Eds.), The Handbook of Language Emergence (pp. 314-327). New York, NY: Wiley.
Johnson, S. (2002). Emergence: The Connected Lives of Ants, Brains, Cities, and Software. New York & London: Scribner.
Kim, J. (1999). Making sense of emergence. Philosophical Studies, 95, 3-36.
Kiss, M. (2015). Film narrative and embodied cognition: The impact of image schemas on narrative form. In M. Coëgnarts, & P. Kravanja (Eds.), Embodied Cognition and Cinema (pp. 43-61). Leuven: Leuven University Press.
Krysanova, T. (2019). Constructing negative emotions in cinematic discourse: a cognitive-pragmatic perspective. Cognition, Communication, Discourse, 19, 55-77. https://doi.org/10.26565/2218-2926-2019-19-04
Krysanova, T., & Shevchenko, I. (2019). The intersemiosis of negative emotions in the cinematic discourse: A psycholinguistic perspective. Psycholinguistics. Series: Philology, 25 (2), 117-137. https://doi.org/10.31470/2309-1797-2019-25-2-117-137
Krysanova, T., & Shevchenko, I. (2021). Conceptual blending in multimodal construction of negative emotions in film. In A. Pawelec, A. Shaw, & G. Szpila (Eds.), Text-Image-Music: Crossing the Borders. Intermedial Conversations on the Poetics of Verbal, Visual and Musical Texts. In Honour of Prof. Elzbieta Chrzanowska-Kluczewska. Series: Text – Meaning – Context: Cracow Studies in English Language, Literature and Culture (pp. 357-371), Berlin: Peter Lang. https://doi.org/10.3726/b18012
Kövecses, Z. (2015). Metaphor and emergentism. In B. MacWhinney, & W. O’Grady (Eds.), The Handbook of Language Emergence (pp. 147-162). New York, NY: Wiley.
Leeuwen, T. van. (2006). Introducing social semiotics. London: Routledge.
Matthiessen, Ch. M. I. M. (2009). Multisemiosis and context-based register typology: Registerial variation in the complementarity of semiotic systems. In E. Ventola, & A. J. M. Guijarro (Ed.), The world shown and the world told (pp. 11-38). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Merriam-Webster Dictionary (n.d.). Retrieved March 1, 2022, from: https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/
Oakley, T., & Tobin, V. (2012). Attention, blending, and suspense in classic and experimental film. In R. Schneider, & M. Hartner (Eds.), Blending and the Study of Narrative (pp. 57-83). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Online Etymology Dictionary (n.d.). Retrieved March 1, 2022, from: https://www.etymonline.com/search?q
O’Connor, T. (1994). Emergent properties. American Philosophical Quarterly, 31(2), 91-104. Retrieved from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/20014490
Peretz, I. (2011). Towards a neurobiology of musical emotions. In J. A. Sloboda, & P. N. Juslin. Handbook of Music and Emotion: Theory, Research, Applications (pp. 99-126). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Pflaeging, J., Wildfeuer, J., & Bateman, J. A. (2021). Empirical multimodality research: methods, evaluations, implications. Berlin: De Gruyter.
Shapiro, L. (2012). Embodied cognition. In E. Margolis, R. Samuels, & S. P. Stich (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Philosophy of Cognitive Science (pp. 118-147). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Seizov, O., & Wildfeuer J. (2017) Introduction: Rethinking multimodality in the twenty-first century. In O. Seizov, & J. Wildfeuer. (Eds.), New Studies in Multimodality: Conceptual and Methodological Elaborations (pp. 1-13). London: Bloomsbury Academic. https://doi.org/10.5040/9781350026544.0007
Schmid, H.-J. (2012). Generalizing the apparently ungeneralizable. Basic ingredients of a cognitive-pragmatic approach to the construal of meaning-in-context. In H.-J. Schmid (Ed.), Cognitive pragmatics. Handbooks of pragmatics (pp. 3-22). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Shevchenko, I., & Gutorov, V. (2019). A cognitive-pragmatic perspective on apologies in English and Ukrainian discourse. Lege artis. Language yesterday, today, tomorrow. The journal of University of SS Cyril and Methodius in Trnava. Trnava: University of SS Cyril and Methodius in Trnava, IV(2), 301-342.
Shevchenko, I. (2019). Introduction. Еnactive meaning-making in the discourse of theatre and film. Cognition, Communication, Discourse, 19, 15-19. http://doi10.26565/2218-2926-2019-19-01
Scorolli, C., & Borghi, A. (2008). Language and embodiment. Anthropology and Philosophy, 9(1-2), 7-23.
Trasmundi, S. B., & Steffensen, S. V. (2016). Meaning emergence in the ecology of dialogical systems. Psychology of Language and Communication, 20(2), 154-181. https://doi.org/10.1515/pls-2016-0009
Turner, M. (2017). Multimodal form-meaning pairs for blended classic joint attention. Linguistics Vanguard, 3, 1-7. https://doi.org/10.1515 / lingvan-2016-0043
User Ratings. The Horse Whisperer (1988). (n.d.). Internet Movie Database. Retrieved May 2, 2022, from https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0119314/ratings/?ref_=tt_ov_rt
Zlatev, J. (2008). The co-evolution of intersubjectivity and bodily mimesis. In J. Zlatev, T. P. Racine, C. Sinha, & E. Itkonen (Eds.), The Shared Mind: Perspectives of Intersubjectivity (pp. 215-244). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Zlatev, J. (2015). The Emergence of gestures. In B. MacWhinney, & W. O’Grady (Eds.), The Handbook of Language Emergence (pp. 458-477). New York, NY: Wiley.
Zwaan, R. A. (2004). The immersed experiencer: toward an embodied theory of language comprehension. In B. H. Ross (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation (pp. 35–62). New York, NY: Academic Press.
Copyright (c) 2022 Krysanova Tetiana
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Authors, who publish with this journal, accept the following conditions:
The authors reserve the copyright of their work and transfer to the journal the right of the first publication of this work under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial Non-Derivs License (CC BY-NC-ND), which allows other persons to freely distribute a published work with mandatory reference to the authors of the original work and the first publication of the work in this journal.
Authors have the right to enter into separate additional agreements for the non-exclusive dissemination of the work in the form in which it was published by this journal (for example, to post the work in the electronic institutions' repository or to publish as part of a monograph), provided that the link to the first publication of the work in this journal is given.
The journal policy allows and encourages the authors to place the manuscripts on the Internet (for example, in the institutions' repositories or on personal websites), both before the presentation of this manuscript to the editorial board and during review procedure, as it contributes to the creation of productive scientific discussion and positively affects the efficiency and dynamics of citing the published work (see The Effect of Open Access).
