Narrative tension within the framework of cognitive modeling
Abstract
his paper discusses cognitive linguistic foundations of narrative tension, defined as a particular way of story arrangement aimed at getting the reader’s immediate cognitive response, accompanied by intense excitement exposed through the emotional states of fearful apprehension (suspense), curiosity and surprise. Narrative tension, as a part of the general interpretation program possessed by a literary text, is incorporated into its narrative structure. Since research on narrative tension is still being launched, numerous aspects of its evoking and maintaining remain undisclosed so far.
In this paper I propose an authentic methodology for cognitive modeling of narrative structure. Being a part of cognitive linguistic analysis of narrative tension incorporated in a narrative structure, cognitive modeling helps to conceptualize the complicated nature of the narrative proper, as well as to unify the principles of its studying.
Downloads
References
Adam, J.-M. (2011). The narrative sequence: History of a concept and a research area // Colloque International ‘Redefinition de la sequence dans la narratologie postclassique’, May 20-21, 2011. University of Fribourg.
Admony, V. G. (1969). Sintagmaticheskoe napryazhenie v stihe i proze [Syntagmatic tension in poetry and prose]. M.: Nauka (in Russian).
Bamberg, M., Marchman, V. (1991). Binding and unfolding: Towards the linguistic construction of narrative discourse // Discourse Processes. No. 14. P. 277 ̶305.
Baroni, R. (2006). Introduction: The many ways of dealing with sequence in contemporary narratology. In: R. Baroni, F. Revaz (eds.). Narrative Sequence in Contemporary Narratologies. Columbus: Ohio State University Press, pp. 1 ̶11.
Bremond, C. (1973). Logique du recit. Paris: Seuil.
Brewer, W., Lichtenstein, E. (1982). Stories are to entertain: A structural-affect theory of stories. Urbana-Champaign: University of Illinois and Urbana-Champaign.
Carroll, N. (1996). The Paradox of suspense. In: P. Vorderer, H. J. Wulff, M. Friedrichsen (eds.). Suspense: conceptualizations, theoretical analyses, and empirical explorations. New York-London: Routledge, pp. 71 ̶91.
Сupchik, G.C. Suspense and disorientation: Two poles of emotionally charged literary uncertainty // In: P. Vorderer, H. J. Wulff, M. Friedrichsen (eds.). Suspense: conceptualizations, theoretical analyses, and empirical explorations. New York-London: Routledge, pp.189 ̶197.
Dijk, T.A., van, Kintsch, W. (1983). Strategies of discourse comprehension. New York: Academic Press.
Dijk, T. A., van. (1982). Episodes as units of discourse analysis. In: D. Tannen (ed.). Analyzing discourse: text and talk. Georgetown: Georgetown University Press, pp. 177–195.
Dove, G. (1989). Suspense in the formula story. Ohio: Bowling Green State University Popular Press.
Fill, A. (2003). Linguistic Devices for the creation of suspense. In: B. Kettemann (ed.). Expanding circles, transcending disciplines, and multimodal texts. Tubingen: Gunter Narr Verlag, pp.263 ̶276.
Fludernik, M., Olsen, G. (2011). Introduction. In: G. Olsen (ed.) Current Trends in Narratology. Berlin / New York. Walter de Gruyter, pp. 1–33.
Gerrig, R. J., Bernardo, A. (1994). Readers as problem-solvers in the experience of suspense // Poetics, No. 22, 459 ̶472.
Grejmas, A.-Zh. (1996 / 2003) Razmyshleniya ob aktantnyh modelyah [Thoughts on actant models]. M.: IG Progress (in Russian).
Herman L., Vervaek B. (2009). Narrative interest as cultural negotiation // Narrative, Vol. 17, Number 1, 111 ̶129.
Herman, D. (2009). Story logic: problems and possibilities of narrative. Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press.
Kintsch, W. (1998 / 2004). Comprehension: A paradigm for cognition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Kuijpers, M. (2014). Absorbing stories. The effects of textual devices on absorption and evaluative response. Utrecht: Utrecht University.
Labov, W. (1972). The transformation of experience in narrative syntax. In: Language in the inner city: Studies in the Black English Vernacular. Philadelphia: U. Pennsylvania Press, pp. 354 ̶396.
Labov, W., Waletzky, J. (1967). Narrative analysis: oral versions of personal experience. In: J. Helm (ed.). Essays on the Verbal and Visual Arts. Seattle: University of Washington Press, pp. 12 ̶44.
Larivaille, P. (1974). L`analyse (morpho)logique du récit // Poétique, No.19, 368 ̶ 388.
Leshchenko, A. V. (2017). Narrativnaya napryazhennost' hudozhestvennogo teksta [Narrative tension in the literary text]. Cherkassy: CHP Gordienko E. I. (in Russian).
Myshkina, N. L. (1998). Vnutrennyaya zhizn' teksta: mekhanizmy, formy, harakteristiki [The inner life of the text: mechanisms, forms, characteristics]. Perm': Izdatel`stvo Permskogo universiteta (in Russian).
Phelan, J. (2006). Narrative theory, 1966-2006: A Narrative. In: R. Scholes, J. Phelan, R. Kellogg (eds.). The Nature of narrative: revised and expanded. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 295 ̶328.
Propp, V. Y. (1928 / 2001). Morfologiya volshebnoj skazki [Morphology of the fairy-tale]. M.: Labirint (in Russian).
Reichl, S. (2009). Cognitive principles, critical practice: Reading literature at university. Vienna: Vienna University Press.
Ryan, M.-L. (2005). Media and narrative. In: D. Herman, M. Jahn, M.-L. Ryan Routledge Encyclopedia of Narrative Theory. London: Routledge.
Scott, J. (2013). Creative writing and stylistics: creative and critical approaches. L.: Palgrave Macmillan.
Stern, I. B. (1998).Vibranі topіki ta leksikon suchasnoї lіngvіstiki: entsiklop. slovnik dlya fakhіvtsіv z teoretichnikh gumanіtarnikh distsiplіn ta gumanіtarnoї іnformatiki. K.: «ArtEk» (in Russian).
Sternberg, M. (2003). Universals of narrative and their cognitive fortunes (II) // Poetics today, 24:3, 517 ̶ 638.
Sternberg, M. (2003). Universals of narrative and their cognitive fortunes (I) // Poetics today, 24:2, 297 ̶ 395.
Tan, E. (1996). Emotion and the structure of narrative film: Film as an emotion machine. NJ: Mahwah.
Todorov, Tz. (1981). Introduction to Poetics, trans. Richard Howard, introduction by Peter Brooks, Minesota U. P. [Translation of: Poétique, Paris, Seuil 1968 & 1973].
Vorobyova, O. P. (2013). Lingvistika segodnya: reinterpretatsiya epistemy // Vіsnik KNLU. Serіya: Fіlologіya, t. 16, 2, 41–47. (in Russian).
Wulff, H. J. (1996). Suspense and the influence of cataphora on viewer`s expectations. In: P. Vorderer, H. J. Wulff, M. Friedrichsen (eds.). Suspense: conceptualizations, theoretical analyses, and empirical explorations. New York-London: Routledge, pp.1 ̶17.
Yeltsova, M. N. (2006). Kategorii napryazheniya i napryazhennosti prostogo povestvovatel'nogo predlozheniya [Categories of tension and tenseness in the simple affirmative sentence]. Perm': Permskij tekhnicheskij universitet. (in Russian).
Yudina, T. V. (1990). Kategoriya napryazhennosti i sredstva ee vyrazheniya [Category of tension and the means of its manifestation]. Leningrad: Leningradsky gosudarstvennyj pedagogicheskij institut im. A. I. Gercena. (in Russian).
Zhabotinskaya, S. A. (2013). Semantika lingval'nyh setej i strukturirovanie informacii v professional'noj sfere: materialy konferencii [Semantics of lingual networks and information structuring in the professional sphere: conference papers]. SPb: Izd-vo IMC «NVSH-SPb» (in Russian).
Zillman, D. (1996). The psychology of suspense in dramatic exposition. In: P. Vorderer, H. J. Wulff, M. Friedrichsen (eds.). Suspense: conceptualizations, theoretical analyses, and empirical explorations. New York-London: Routledge, pp.199 ̶ 231.
Authors, who publish with this journal, accept the following conditions:
The authors reserve the copyright of their work and transfer to the magazine the right of the first publication of this work under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial Non-Derivs License (CC BY-NC-ND), which allows other persons to freely distribute a published work with mandatory reference to the authors of the original work and the first publication of the work in this journal.
Authors have the right to enter into separate additional agreements for the non-exclusive dissemination of the work in the form in which it was published by this journal (for example, to post the work in the electronic institutions' repository or to publish as part of a monograph), provided that the link to the first publication of the work in this journal is given.
The journal policy allows and encourages the authors to place the manuscripts on the Internet (for example, in the institutions' repositories or on personal websites), both before the presentation of this manuscript to the editorial board and during review procedure, as it contributes to the creation of productive scientific discussion and positively affects the efficiency and dynamics of citing the published work (see The Effect of Open Access).
