Metaphor in the light of conceptual metaphor theory: a literature review

  • O. V. Vakhovska
Keywords: conceptual metaphor theory, metaphor, metaphorical creativity, metaphorical mapping, metaphorical meaning, target and source of metaphor

Abstract

This paper reviews some of the central insights on metaphor that come from the domain of cognitive linguistics and originate, for the most part, from the conceptual metaphor theory in its standard version. The review focuses upon the nature, origin, function, components, systematicity and types of metaphor, and upon metaphorical meaning; lays a special emphasis upon the mapping mechanism of metaphor; contrasts metaphor to metonymy and addresses the interaction and overlap of these. A large portion of this paper is a review on the issue of metaphorical creativity. Metaphorical creativity is, to the best of my knowledge, a little-studied topic in cognitive linguistics. There are some claims concerning metaphorical creativity in the review that might appear rigid, decisive and conclusive, but they are definitely not intended as such. Research on metaphorical creativity is still being launched, and numerous aspects of creative metaphorical concepts remain undisclosed so far. This, on the one hand, is reflected in the at times cursory nature of my review and, on the other, indicates a need for further investigations. In my review, I cite literature with a fundamental standing in the cognitive linguistic field mainly. The literature selection for this paper is ultimately shaped by my affiliation with the cognitive linguistic community and by my ambition to eventually formulate a conceptualization of metaphor and of creative metaphor that would lend these to computation. I introspect and comment on some of the assumptions and claims that the literature puts forward. In the review are Modern English metaphorical expressions that come from the cited literature, or are prompted by my own research and introspection; these data help support or, though scarcely, challenge the assumptions and claims. In prospect, this paper will grow into a larger-scale research on the issue of metaphorical creativity. The review might have implications for cognitive linguistic theorizing and research, and be of particular purpose for Ukrainian cognitive linguists aiming their research at the international, in particular European, scholarly community.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Barcelona, A. (2000). Types of Arguments for Metonymic Motivation of Conceptual Metaphor. New York: Mouton de Gruyter.

Barcelona, A. (2003). Metaphor and Metonymy at the Crossroads: A Cognitive Perspective. Berlin; New York: Mouton de Gruyter.

Barnden, J.A. (2010). Metaphor and Metonymy: Making Their Connections More Slippery. Cognitive Linguistics, 21(1), 1–34.

Croft, W. (2006). The Role of Domains in the Interpretation of Metaphors and Metonymies. In: D. Geeraerts (Ed.). Cognitive Linguistics: Basic Readings (pp. 269–303). Berlin; New York: Mouton de Gruyter.

Dirven, R., & Pörings, R. (2002). Metaphor and Metonymy in Comparison and Contrast. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.

Dörner, D. (1999). Bauplan für eine Seele. Reinbek: Rowohlt.

Evans, V., & Green, M. (2006). Cognitive Linguistics. An Introduction. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.

Fauconnier, G. (1985). Mental Spaces: Aspects of Meaning Construction in Natural Language. Cambridge, МА: MIT Press.

Fauconnier, G. (2007). Mental Spaces. In: D. Geeraerts, H. Cuyckens (Eds.). The Oxford Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics (pp. 351–77). USA: Oxford University Press.

Fauconnier, G. (2009). Generalized Integration Networks. In: V. Evans, S. Pourcel (Eds.). New Directions in Cognitive Linguistics (pp. 147–60). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

Fauconnier, G., & Turner, M. (2000). Compression and Global Insight. Cognitive Linguistics, 11(3/4), 283–305.

Fauconnier, G., & Turner, M. (2002). The Way We Think: Conceptual Blending and the Mind’s Hidden Complexities. New York: New York Basic Books.

Gibbs, R.W. (1994). The Poetics of Mind: Figurative Thought, Language, and Understanding. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Gibbs, R.W. (1999). Taking Metaphor Out of Our Heads and Putting It into the Cultural World. In: R.W. Gibbs, G.J. Steen (Eds.). Metaphor in Cognitive Linguistics (pp. 145–66). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

Gomez Ramirez, D.A. de J. (2016). Personal communication.

Goossens, L. (1995). Metaphtonymy: The Interaction of Metaphor and Metonymy in Figurative Expressions for Linguistic Action. In: L. Goossens, P. Pauwels, B. Rudzka-Ostyn, A. Simon-Vanderbergen (Eds.). By Word of Mouth: Metaphor, Metonymy and Linguistic Action in a Cognitive Perspective (pp. 159–74). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

Grady, J. (1997). ‘THEORIES are BUILDINGS Revisited’. Cognitive Linguistics 8(4), pp. 267–90.

Grady, J. (1999). A Typology of Motivation for Conceptual Metaphor: Correlation vs Resemblance. In: Metaphor in Cognitive Linguistics. Selected Papers from the Fifth International Cognitive Linguistics Conference. Amsterdam, July 1997 (pp. 79–101). Amsterdam: John Benjamins

Grady, J. (2000). Cognitive Mechanisms of Conceptual Integration. Cognitive Science, 11(3/4), 335–47.

Grady, J. (2007). Metaphor. In: D. Geeraerts, H. Cuyckens (Eds.). The Oxford Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics (pp. 188–214). USA: Oxford University Press.

Kövecses, Z. (2002). Metaphor. A Practical Introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Kövecses, Z. (2010). A New Look at Metaphorical Creativity in Cognitive Linguistics, Cognitive Linguistics, 21(1), 663–97.

Kövecses, Z. (2017). Levels of Metaphor. Cognitive Linguistics ,28(2), 321–47.

Lakoff, G. (1990). The Invariance Hypothesis: Is Abstract Reason Based on Image Schemas? Cognitive Linguistics, 1, 39–74.

Lakoff, G. (1993). The Contemporary Theory of Metaphor. In: A. Ortony (Ed.). Metaphor and Thought (pp. 202–51). New York: Cambridge University Press.

Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980a). Conceptual Metaphor in Everyday Language. The Journal of Philosophy, 77(8), 453–86.

Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980b). Metaphors We Live By. Chicago: Chicago University Press.

Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1999). Philosophy in the Flesh: the Embodied Mind and its Challenge to Western Thought. New York: New York Basic Books.

Lakoff, G., & Turner M. (1989). More Than Cool Reason: A Field Guide to Poetic Metaphor. Chicago: Chicago University Press.

Langacker, R.W. (2008). Cognitive Grammar. A Basic Introduction. New York: Oxford University Press.

Maslow, A., Frager, R., Fadiman, J. (1987). Motivation and Personality. 3rd ed. Boston: AddisonWesley.

Nikitin, M.V. (2007). Kurs lingvisticheskoj semantiki [A Course in Linguistic Semantics]. 2nd ed. Saint Petersburg: Izdatel'stvo RGPU im. A.I. Gercena Publ.

Ritchie, L.D. (2006). Context and Connection in Metaphor. Basingstoke, New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

Talmy, L. (2000). Toward a Cognitive Semantics. V. 1: Concept Structuring System. Cambridge, MA, London, England: A Bradford Book.

Turner, M. (2007a). Conceptual Integration. In: D. Geeraerts, H. Cuyckens. (Eds.). The Oxford Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics (pp. 377–94). USA: Oxford University Press.

Turner, M. (2007b). The Way We Imagine. In: I. Roth (Ed.). Imaginative Minds. Proceedings of the British Academy (pp. 213–36). Oxford: Oxford Uviversity Press.

Turner, M., & Fauconnier, G. (2000). Metaphor, Metonymy and Binding. In: A. Barcelona (Ed.). Metaphor and Metonymy at the Crossroads: A Cognitive Perspective (pp. 133–45). Berlin, New York: Mouton de Gruyter.

Vakhovska, O.V. (2011). Verbalizatsiia kontseptu HRIKH v anhlomovnomu dyskursi XIV–XXI stolit [Linguistic Manifestation of the SIN Concept in the English Discourse of the 14th–21st Centuries]. Candidate dissertation, V.N. Karazin Kharkiv National University, Kharkiv, Ukraine. (in Ukrainian).

Vakhovska, O.V. (2017). Metaphor in First-Person Verbal Report on Emotion Experience of Depression. MSc Thesis in Cognitive Science, Osnabrück, University Osnabrück, Germany.

Vosniadou, S. (1986). Children and Metaphors. Illinois: University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.

Warren, B. (2002). An Alternative Account of the Interpretation of Referential Metonymy and Metaphor. In: R. Dirven, R. Pörings (Eds.). Metaphor and Metonymy in Comparison and Contrast (pp. 113–30). Berlin, New York: Mouton de Gruyter.

Zhabotinskaja, S.A. (2011). Konceptual’naja metaphora: procedura analiza mnozhestvennyh dannyh [Conceptual Metaphor: A Procedure of Big Data Analysis]. Zbirnyk naukovykh prats' za materialamy VII naukovoyi konferentsiyi: Aktual'ni problemy metalinhvistyky – Proceedings of the 7th International Scientific Conference: Current Issues of Mentalinguistics. Cherkasy, 3–6. (in Russian).

Zhabotinskaja, S.A. (2012). Kognitivnoe kartirovanie kak lingvosemioticheskij faktor [Cognitive Mapping as a Linguosemiotic Factor]. Funkcional'naja lingvistika – Functional Linguistics, 2, 179–82. (in Russian).

Zhabotynska, S.A. (2014). Personal communication.
Published
2018-04-15
How to Cite
Vakhovska, O. V. (2018). Metaphor in the light of conceptual metaphor theory: a literature review. Cognition, Communication, Discourse, (15), 84-103. https://doi.org/10.26565/2218-2926-2017-15-06