• Nataliia Vysotska Kyiv National Linguistic University
Keywords: American literature, canon, “Americanization”, genteel tradition, American Renaissance, “revolution of plurality”


The paper addresses transformations of American literary canons from diachronic perspective. It is argued that the following principal stages in this process may be identified: transition from ancient Greek and Roman legacy to previous and contemporary British writings (18th c.); “Americanization” of the canon marked by fierce polemics (19th – early 20th c.); functioning of “protocanon” based on genteel tradition (turn of the 19th – 20th cc.); building of democratic-individualistic canon around key figures in American Renaissance and later mainstream authors (mid-20th с.); and, finally, “the revolution of plurality” entailing the opening of the canon for representatives of ethnic, racial, gender and other minorities (1960s-1990s), and on, to present-day changes in its generic parameters and pronounced cultural and intermedial dimensions. 


Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Nataliia Vysotska, Kyiv National Linguistic University
Doctor of Philology, Full Professor, Head of the Department of the V. I. Fesenko Theory and History of World Literature at Kyiv National Linguistic University


Апенко, Е.М. (2000) Литературная критика , История литературы США. Т.IІІ. Литература середины ХІХ в. (поздний романтизм). Москва: Наследие.

Коренева, М.М. (1997) Литература ХVIII в. Введение, История литературы США. Т.I. Литература колониального периода и эпохи Войны за независимость XVII-XVIII в. Москва: Наследие.

Михед, Т.В. (2006) Пуританська традиція і література Американського Ренесансу: 1830-1860. Київ: Знання України.

Bercovitch, S. (1986) The Problem of Ideology in American Literary History, New Literary History, #12.

Bercovitch, S. (1986) Preface, Reconstructing American Literary History, Ed. S. Bercovitch. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard Univ. Press.

Bercovitch, S. (1993) The Rites of Assent: Transformations in the Symbolic Construction of America. N.Y. & L.: Routledge.

Bloom, H. (1994) The Western Canon. The Books and School of the Ages. N.Y. : San Diego, L.: Harcourt, Brace, and Co.

The Columbia Literary History of the United States. (1988) N.Y.: Columbia Univ. Press.

D’Haen, T. (2011) How Many Canons Do We Need? World Literature, National Literature, European Literature, The Canonical Debate Today: Crossing Disciplinary and Cultural Boundaries , Ed. by L.Papadima, D. Damrosch, T. D’Haen. Amsterdam, N.Y. : Rodopi.

Doren, C. van. (1932) Towards a New Canon, The Nation. April 13. [Електронний ресурс]. – Режим доступу: http://go.galegroup.com/ps/l.do?id=GALE%7CH1420025423&v=2.1&u=lincclin_iscc&it=r&p=LitRG&sw=w

Geiger, R. (2014) The History of American Higher Education. Princeton: Princeton Univ. Press.

Guillory, J. (2010) Canon, Critical Terms for Literary Study, Ed. by J.Guillory, F.Lentrichia. Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press.

Lauter, P. (1990) Introduction, Heath Anthology of American Literature, Ed. Paul Lauter. Lexington, Mass.: D.C.Heath & Co.

Lauter, P. (2001) From Walden Pond to Jurassic Park: Activism, Culture, and American Studies. Durham & L.: Duke Univ. Press.

Lauter, P. (2002) Preface, Heath Anthology of American Literature, Ed. P. Lauter. 4th ed. Boston-N.Y.: Houghton-Mifflin.

Levine, L. (1996) The Opening of the American Mind: Canons, Culture, and History. Boston: Beacon Press.

Matthiessen, F.O. (1969) American Renaissance: Art and Expression in the Age of Emerson and Whitman. N.Y.: Oxford UP.

Messmer, M. (2000) Reading National American Historiography Internationally. Comparative Literature. № 52:3.

Wyck, Brooks van. (1918) On Creating Usable Past. The Dial. Vol LXIX. #764. [Електронний ресурс]. – Режим доступу: http://www.archive.org/stream/dialjournallitcrit64chicrich#page/337/mode/1up
How to Cite
Vysotska, N. (2017). DYNAMICS OF AMERICAN LITERARY CANONS: FROM CLASSICAL ANTIQUITY TO “REVOLUTION OF PLURALITY”. Accents and Paradoxes of Modern Philology, 1(1), 74-85. Retrieved from https://periodicals.karazin.ua/accentsjournal/article/view/7990
Literary Studies