Variations in the geomagnetic field that accompanied the 10 June 2021 solar eclipse
Abstract
Urgency. At present, the existence of the geomagnetic effect of solar eclipses (SEs) is in question. The data presented in the literature are contradictory. Some researchers assert that the amplitude of the north-south component of the main geomagnetic field increases, while others that it decreases. The third group of researchers notes that this amplitude does not change at all, but instead the amplitude of the west-east component shows variations. In some cases, observations confirm the mechanism for the geomagnetic effect caused by disturbances in the Sq current system, while in other cases observations contradict with the mechanism. The difficulties that are encountered in observing the SE geomagnetic effect are caused by the fact that the magnetic field is subjected to the influence of many energy sources. The magnitude of the geomagnetic effect depends not only on the magnitude (phase) of the solar eclipse but also on the state of space weather, geographic coordinates of data acquisition, local time, season, etc. Therefore, the study of the geomagnetic effect from each new solar eclipse remains an urgent problem. The main feature of the 10 June 2021 Solar eclipse is its annularity. The maximum magnitude did not exceed 0.943, and the eclipse obscuration 89%.
The aim of this work is to present the results of analysis of variations in the geomagnetic field that were recorded by the INTERMAGNET during the 10 June 2021 SE.
Methods and Methodology. To analyze the effects in the main Earth’s magnetic field, the INTERMAGNET data have been utilized. The data have been analyzed from 15 magnetic observatories located between 77.47°-N and 48.17°-N latitude where the maximum phase varied from 0.943 to 0.124. The analysis was performed with 1-min temporal resolution providing a 0.1-nT resolution. To determine spectral content of the quasi-periodic variations, the systems spectral analysis has been used, which combines mutually complementary the short-time Fourier transform, the wavelet transform employing the Morlet wavelet as a basis function, and the Fourier transform in a sliding window with a width adjusted to be equal to a fixed number of harmonic periods.
Results. An aperiodic geomagnetic effect of a solar eclipse has been detected and explained; it consists in a decrease by not greater than 30 nT in the level of the north-south component. The effect is explained by a variation in the ionospheric current density in the west-east direction as a result of a decrease in the electron density during the eclipse. A quasi-periodic geomagnetic effect of a solar eclipse has been revealed; it is explained by the generation of atmospheric gravity waves. The wave acts to modulate the ionospheric electric current, as well as to drag the electrons inducing additional quasi-periodic ionospheric current with a period equal to the wave period. The amplitude of the quasi-periodic variations was observed to be a few nanoteslas. The systems spectral analysis provided more precise values of periods of quasi-periodic variations in the geomagnetic field accompanying the solar eclipse, approximately 20 min and 35 min.
Conclusions. The aperiodic and quasi-periodic geomagnetic effects are caused by the disturbance (generation) of the ionospheric current.
Downloads
References
2. Chree C. Magnetic and electric observations at Kew Observatory relating to the solar eclipse of August 21, 1914. Terrestrial Magnetism and Atmospheric Electricity. 1915;20(2):71-74. https://doi.org/10.1029/TE020i002p00071
3. Bauer LA, Fisk HW. On the results of some magnetic observations during the solar eclipse of August 21, 1914. Terrestrial Magnetism and Atmospheric Electricity. 1916;21(2):57-86. https://doi.org/10.1029/TE021i002p00057
4. Bauer LA. Results and analysis of magnetic observations during the solar eclipse of May 29, 1919.—Summary I. Terrestrial Magnetism and Atmospheric Electricity. 1920;25(3):81-98. https://doi.org/10.1029/TE025i003p00081
5. Chapman S. The Effect of a Solar Eclipse on the Earth’s Magnetic Field. Terrestrial Magnetism and Atmospheric Electricity. 1933;38(3):175-183. https://doi.org/10.1029/TE038i003p00175
6. Özcan O, Aydoğdu M. Possible effects of the total solar eclipse of August 11, 1999 on the geomagnetic field variations over Elaziǧ-Turkey. J. Atmos. Sol.-Terr. Phys. 2004;66(11):997-1000. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jastp.2004.03.009
7. Curto JJ, Heilig B, Pinol M. Modeling the geomagnetic effects caused by the solar eclipse of 11 August 1999. Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics. 2006;111(A7):A07312. https://doi.org/10.1029/2005JA011499
8. Egedal J, Ambolt N. The effect on geomagnetism of the solar eclipse of 30 June 1954. Journal of Atmospheric and Terrestrial Physics. 1955;7:40-48. https://doi.org/10.1016/0021-9169(55)90105-7
9. Nagata T, Nakata Y, Rikitake T, Yokoyama I. Effect of the Solar Eclipse on the Lower Parts of the Ionosphere and the Geomagnetic Field. Rep. lonosph. Res. Japan. 1955;9:121-135.
10. Nagata T, Rikitake T, Nakata Y. The effect of a solar eclipse on the lower part of the ionosphere and on the geomagnetic field. J. Atmos. Terr. Phys. 1956;6:236-242.
11. Kato Y, Ossaka J. The effect of the Solar Eclipse on the Sq current of the diurnal variation. Science reports of the Tohoku University. Ser. 5, Geophysics. 1956;7(SUPPLEMENT):21-29.
12. Rikitake T, Uyeda T, Tanaoka I, Nakagawa E. Preliminary report on the effect of the solar eclipse on April, 19, 1958 on the geomagnetic field. Rept Ionospheric Res. Japan. 1958;12:174-181.
13. Kato Y. The effect on geomagnetic filed of the solar eclipse of October 12, 1958. Sci. Rep. Tohoku Univ. Ser. 5, Geophysics. 1960;12(1):.
14. Tauer J. On Methods Used for Determining the Effect of a Solar Eclipse on the Geomagnetic Field. Studia Geophysica et Geodaetica. 1964;8(1):72-81. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02607050
15. Kato Y. The Effect on the Geomagnetic Micropulsation of the Solar Eclipse of 20 July 1963. Science reports of the Tohoku University. Ser. 5, Geophysics. 1964;16(2):49-62.
16. Matsushita S. Effects of a solar eclipse on the equatorial geomagnetic field. Annales De Géophysique. 1966;22:471-477.
17. Bomke HA, Blake HA, Harris AK, Hulse WH, Sheppard DJ, Giesecke AA, Pantoja A. Recombination coefficient and coronal contribution to E-layer ionization from magnetic observations of a solar eclipse. Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics. 1967;72(23):5913-5918. https://doi.org/10.1029/JZ072i023p05913
18. Giesecke AA, Casaverde M, Kato Y, Aoyama I, Takei S. The effect on the geomagnetic field of the solar eclipse of Nov. 12, 1966 at and near the dip equator. Rep. Ionosph. Space Res. Japan. 1968;22:61-69.
19. Lilley FEM, Woods DV. Magnetic observations of the solar eclipse of 23 October 1976 in Australia. Nature. 1977;266(5605):823-824. https://doi.org/10.1038/266823a0
20. Rastogi RG. Solar eclipse effects on geomagnetism. Proc. Indian Nat. Sci. Acad. 1982;48(A, Supplement 3):464-472.
21. D’Costa A, Perez G. Change of the geomagnetic pulsation regime in the period of the solar eclipse on October 12, 1977. Geomagnetism and Aeronomy. 1984;24(4):658-661.
22. Takeda M, Araki T. Ionospheric currents and fields during the solar eclipse. Planetary and Space Science. 1984;32(8):1013-1019. https://doi.org/10.1016/0032-0633(84)90057-6
23. Nevanlinna H, Häkkinen L. Geomagnetic Effect of the Total Solar Eclipse on July 22, 1990. Journal of geomagnetism and geoelectricity. 1991;43(4):319-321. https://doi.org/10.5636/jgg.43.319
24. Walker GO, Li TYY, Wong YW, Kikuchi T, Huang YN. Ionospheric and geomagnetic effects of the solar eclipse of 18 March 1988 in East Asia. Journal of Atmospheric and Terrestrial Physics.
1991;53(1–2):25-37. https://doi.org/10.1016/0021-9169(91)90017-2
25. Brenes J, Leandro G, Fernández W. Variation of the geomagnetic field in Costa Rica during the total solar eclipse of July 11, 1991. Earth, Moon, and Planets. 1993;63:105-117. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00575100
26. Orozco AL, Barreto LM. Magnetic Effects during the Solar Eclipse of July 11, 1991. Geofísica Internacional. 1993;32(1):3-13. https://doi.org/10.22201/igeof.00167169p.1993.32.1.1147
27. Thoa NTK, Chau HD, Hao TQ, Tri PV, Son VT, Truong LV, Nam VH. Magnetic and ionospheric observations during the October 24, 1995 total solar eclipse in Vietnam. Terrestrial, Atmospheric and Oceanic Sciences. 1997;8(2):155-164. https://doi.org/10.3319/TAO.1997.8.2.155(ASEE)
28. Střeštík J. The response of the 11 August 1999 total solar eclipse in the geomagnetic field. Earth, Moon, and Planets. 1999;85(0):561-566. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1017047627850
29. Malin SRC, Özcan O, Tank SB, Tunçer MK, Yazici-Çakin O. Geomagnetic signature of the 1999 August 11 total eclipse. Geophys. J. Int. 2000;140(3):F13-F16. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-246X.2000.00061.x
30. Korte M, Lühr H, Förster M, Haak V, Bencze P. Did the solar eclipse of August 11, 1999, show a geomagnetic effect? Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics. 2001;106(A9):18563-18575. https://doi.org/10.1029/2001JA900006
31. Hvoždara M, Prigancová A. Geomagnetic effects due to an eclipse-induced low-conductivity ionospheric spot. Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics. 2002;107(A12):SIA 14-1-SIA 14-13. https://doi.org/10.1029/2002JA009260
32. Ladynin AV, Semakov NN, Khomutov SYu. Changes in the daily geomagnetic variation during the total solar eclipse of the 1 August 2008. Russian Geology and Geophysics. 2011;52(3):343-352. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rgg.2011.02.007
33. Onovughe EV. Geomagnetic Diurnal Variation during the Total Solar Eclipse of 29 March 2006. International Journal of Astronomy. 2013;2(4):51-55. https://doi.org/10.5923/j.astronomy.20130204.01
34. Chernogor LF. Physical effects of solar eclipses in atmosphere and geospace. Kharkiv: V. N. Karazin Kharkiv National University, 2013. 480 p. [in Russian].
35. Chernogor LF. Advanced methods of spectral analysis of quasiperiodic wave-like processes in the ionosphere: specific features and experimental results. Geomagnetism and Aeronomy. 2008;48(5):652-673.https://doi.org/10.1134/S0016793208050101
36. Chernogor LF, Blaunstein N. Radiophysical and Geomagnetic Effects of Rocket Burn and Launch in the Near-the-Earth Environment. Boca Raton, London, New York: CRC Press. Taylor & Francis Group, 2018. 542 p.
