THE JUDICIARY IN THE PROCESS OF DEMOCRATIC BACKSLIDING: A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF EASTERN EUROPEAN COUNTRIES (POLAND, HUNGARY, THE CZECH REPUBLIC, BULGARIA, SERBIA)

Keywords: judiciary, democratic backsliding, rule of law, comparative analysis, Hungary, Poland, the Czech Republic, Bulgaria, Serbia, institutional crisis

Abstract

The article examines the transformation and erosion of the judiciary in five Eastern European countries – Poland, Hungary, the Czech Republic, Bulgaria, and Serbia — in the context of democratic backsliding (democratic backsliding). The independence of the judiciary is a foundational pillar of liberal democracy, serving as a critical check on executive and legislative power. Understanding how this pillar can be systematically weakened is therefore essential for assessing the resilience of democratic institutions across the region. It characterizes the key parameters of comparative analysis: the independence of the constitutional court, the independence of ordinary courts, judicial governance, and external pressure. Special attention is paid to identifying common strategies for weakening judicial authority, particularly the use of mechanisms of «autocratic legalism» and «state capture», as well as analyzing instruments of political pressure on judges — from discretionary powers of judicial administration heads to the creation of politicized disciplinary bodies. The study considers the differences between countries determined by the configuration of political power (the presence of a constitutional majority), the density of international institutional oversight, and the structure of accountability mechanisms. It is shown that Hungary and Poland experienced a targeted systemic assault on the judiciary, Bulgaria and Serbia suffer from chronic institutional erosion, while the Czech Republic serves as a counterexample of judicial resilience due to strong judicial self-governance and effective internal checks and balances. Practical recommendations for Ukraine are formulated, including the need for legislative protection of the High Council of Justice from political influence, preventing the creation of discretionary disciplinary bodies, implementing transparent mechanisms of judicial self-governance, and enhancing public trust through openness of judicial procedures. The findings can serve as an analytical framework for further reforms of Ukraine's judicial system on its path to European integration and strengthening the rule of law in the post-war period.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Denis Revenko, V.N. Karazin Kharkiv National University, 4, Svoboda Sq., Kharkiv, 61022, Ukraine

PhD student, Department of Political Sciences.

References

Dahl, R. A. 1991. Democracy and Its Critics. New Haven: Yale University Press.

Curoš, P. 2023. Attack or reform: Systemic interventions in the judiciary in Hungary, Poland, and Slovakia. Oñati Socio-Legal Series 13(2): 626-658. https://doi.org/10.35295/osls.iisl/0000-0000-0000-1393

Kovács, K. and Scheppele, K.L. 2018. The fragility of an independent judiciary: Lessons from Hungary and Poland-and the European Union. Communist and Post-Communist Studies 51(3): 189-200. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.postcomstud.2018.07.005

Sadurski, W. 2018. How democracy dies (in Poland): A case study of anti-constitutional populist backsliding. Revista Forumul Judecatorilor 104-121.

Šipulová, K. and Kosar, D. 2024. Purging the Judiciary After a Transition: Between a Rock and a Hard Place. Hague Journal on the Rule of Law https://doi.org/10.1007/s40803-024-00201-y

Levitsky, S. and Ziblatt, D. 2018. How Demo-cracies Die. New York: Crown Publishing Group.

Defiance in the Face of Autocratization: Democracy report 2023. 2023. V-Dem Institute University of Gothenburg: URL: https://www.v-dem.net/documents/29/V-dem_ democracyreport2023 lowres.pdf

2025 Rule of Law Report: Country Chapter on the rule of law situation in Serbia. SWD (2025) 931 final. 2025. European Commission Strasbourg. URL: https://commission.europa.eu/publications/2025-rule-law-report-communication-and-country-chapters_en

Matczak, M. 2018. Poland's Constitutional Crisis: Facts and interpretations. Oxford: Foundation for Law, Justice and Society.

Attacks on Justice - Czech Republic. 2008. International Commission of Jurists. URL: https://www.icj.org/wp-content/uploads/2009/07/CzechRepublic-Attacks-on-justice-2005-Publications-2008.pdf

Enchev, K. 2018. Evaluation of the Bulgarian judicial system reform for the period 2010-2017 according to the European Commission monitoring reports : Master's thesis. University of Twente. https://essay.utwente.nl/#/view/74548

The Situation of the Judiciary in Serbia After Milosevic: Where Does It Stand, Where Does It Go?: Report of the Implementation Meeting on Human Dimension. 2000. OSCE ODIHR. Iss. 17 October 2000. Meeting on Human Dimension Issues, 17 October 2000. URL: https://www.osce.org/files/f/documents/8/6/20038.pdf

Vadász, V. 2018. Crisis in the Hungarian judicial administration? Hungarian Academy of Sciences, Law Working Papers, 19 June 2018. URL: http://jog.tk.mta.hu/mtalwp

Zelazna, E. 2020. The Rule of Law Crisis Deepens in Poland after A.K. v. Krajowa Rada Sądownictwa and CP, DO v. Sąd Najwyższy. European Papers 5(1): 329-334. https://doi.org/10.15166/2499-8249/355

Kryzys praworządności. Historia zmian w sądach po 2015 roku. 2021. Kultura Liberalna Nr 673 (48/2021), 30 listopada 2021. URL: https://kulturaliberalna.pl/2021/11/30/kryzys-praworzadnosci-historia/ (in Polish).

Raport NIK: Największy kryzys polskiego wymiaru sprawiedliwości od 1989 r. 2024. Rzeczpospolita, 2 października 2024. URL: https://www.rp.pl/sady-i-trybunaly/art41227291-raport-nik-najwiekszy-kryzys-polskiego-wymiaru-sprawiedliwosci-od-1989-r (in Polish).

Verfassungsblog. 2024. Restoring the Rule of Law, 18 December 2024. URL: https://verfassungsblog.de/restoring-the-rule-of-law/

Kljajic, S. 2026. Serbia: Reform denounced as a political takeover of justice. Deutsche Welle, 4 February 2026. URL: https://www.dw.com/en/serbia-critics-decry-attack-on-judicial-independence-and-increase-in-political-control-of-judiciary/a-75799216

Marinova, I. and Lindholm, R. 2024. Bulgaria: Political Crisis With No End in Sight? Wilson Center, 18 December 2024. URL: https://www.wilsoncenter.org/article/bulgaria-political-crisis-no-end-sight

Venice Commission. 2022. Bulgaria. Opinion on the draft amendments to the Judicial System Act concerning the Inspectorate to the Supreme Judicial Council. CDL-AD(2022)022. URL: https://www.venice.coe.int/webforms/documents/?pdf=CDL-AD(2022)022-e

Thavard, B. 2025. Bulgaria's rule-of-law crisis could be Europe's next headache. EUobserver, 1 October 2025. URL: https://euobserver.com/100971/bulgarias-rule-of-law-crisis-could-be-europes-next-headache/

Krastev, I. 2020. Is It Tomorrow Yet? Paradoxes of the Pandemic. London: Allen Lane.

Published
2026-04-30
How to Cite
Revenko, D. (2026). THE JUDICIARY IN THE PROCESS OF DEMOCRATIC BACKSLIDING: A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF EASTERN EUROPEAN COUNTRIES (POLAND, HUNGARY, THE CZECH REPUBLIC, BULGARIA, SERBIA). The Journal of V.N. Karazin Kharkiv National University. Series "Issues of Political Science", 49, 102-112. https://doi.org/10.26565/2220-8089-2026-49-13