FEMINIST INSTITUTIONALISM AS A MAJOR TREND IN GENDER INEQUALITY RESEARCH

Keywords: gender inequality, institutions, institutionalism, gender practices, feminist institutionalism

Abstract

The development of gender equality is studied through the prism of feminist institutionalism, which combines institutional analysis with feminist criticism. The main attention is paid to the mechanisms of formation of gender norms and their impact on social processes. The role of social networks in shaping public discourse on gender issues is analyzed, as well as historical and contemporary approaches to gender equality, including the ideas of John Stuart Mill and their influence on the development of contemporary theories.

The interaction of formal and informal institutional practices that affect the position of women in politics, economics and society is considered. The mechanisms through which gender stereotypes are entrenched in institutional structures are studied, as well as the prospects and strategies for overcoming them. Special attention is paid to the analysis of legal initiatives and international standards in the field of gender equality, as well as their impact on political and social reforms.

The importance of a comprehensive approach to the analysis of gender inequality is emphasized, taking into account political, social and economic factors. Special attention is paid to approaches to institutional research in the social sciences, their common elements and fundamental differences. The significance of feminist institutionalism as a new approach to the analysis of institutions in the context of gender equality is argued. Special emphasis is placed on the need to transform social norms and values, which will contribute to the formation of an equal environment for all citizens. The study also considers examples of successful practices in combating gender inequality in different countries. Thus, a comprehensive overview of the main challenges and prospects for the development of gender equality in the modern world is provided.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Dmytro Varych, V.N. Karazin Kharkiv National University 4, Svoboda Sq., Kharkiv, 61022, Ukraine

PhD student, Department of Political Sciences.

References

REFERENCES

Mill, J. 2001. Про свободу. Київ: Основи: 463 с. URL: http://litopys.org.ua/mill/mill.htm (in Ukrainian).

MacRae,H.&Weiner,E. 2021. Feminist institutionalism. In: G. Abels, A. Krizsán, H. MacRae and A. van der Vleuten, eds. The Routledge Handbook of Gender and EU Politics. Abingdon: Routledge: 56-67.

Clavero, S. & Galligan, Y. 2020. Analysing Gender and Institutional Change in Academia: Evaluating the Utility of Feminist Institutionalist Approaches, Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management 42(3):1-17 https://doi.org/10.1080/1360080X.2020.1733736

Minto, Rachel and Mergaert, Lut 2018. Gender mainstreaming and evaluation in the EU: comparative perspectives from feminist institutionalism. International Feminist Journal of Politics 20 (2) : 204-220. https://doi.org/10.1080/14616742.2018.1440181

Bashtannyk, O. 2023. Methodological foundations of the study of political institutions: historical institutionalism and analysis of the functioning of state power institutions. Dnipro Scientific Journal of Public Administration, Psychology, Law 4: 7-11. https://doi.org/10.51547/ppp.dp.ua/2023.4.1 (in Ukrainian).

Bashtannyk, O. 2020. Sociological institutionalism as a direction of the new institutionalism of political science: methodology and its implementation in Ukrainian political science studies. Grani. Vol. 23. No. 9: 5-14. https://doi.org/10.15421/172080 (in Ukrainian).

Bashtannyk, O. 2019. Institutionalism of rational choice: theoretical and methodological foundations and Ukrainian political science. Grani. Vol. 22. No. 11: 37–46. https://doi.org/10.15421/171996 (in Ukrainian).

Published
2024-12-02
How to Cite
Varych, D. (2024). FEMINIST INSTITUTIONALISM AS A MAJOR TREND IN GENDER INEQUALITY RESEARCH. The Journal of V.N. Karazin Kharkiv National University. Issues of Political Science, 46, 81-87. https://doi.org/10.26565/2220-8089-2024-46-11