LEGITIMACY DEFICIT AND INSTITUTIONAL FAILURE OF THE GOVERNMENT OF UKRAINE: CHALLENGES AND WAYS TO OVERCOME

  • Nataliia Kononenko Kuras Institute of Political and Ethnic Studies of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, 8 Generala Almazova Str., Kyiv, 01011 https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8397-2830
  • Oleh Kononenko National Aviation University, 1 Liubomyr Huzar Avenue, Kyiv, 03058 https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4058-6272
Keywords: institutional capacity, government legitimacy, normative and legal traps, informal institutions, modernization, dual institutions, government reforms

Abstract

The article analyzes the institutional capacity and legitimacy of governmental structures in Ukraine, particularly in the context of the current war. The main problem that undermines the effectiveness of the government is the regulatory and legal traps that arise from unreformed mechanisms of relations between the branches of government. The author analyzes these traps in the examples of interaction between the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine, the Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine and the President, and how it affects decision-making. The author considers the duality of executive leadership as a key problem when both the president and the prime minister have the authority to manage the government, which creates a blurred system of responsibility and destabilizes the political process in general. The issue of the lack of a clear mechanism of government control by parliament, in particular through the institution of a coalition, is highlighted, which deepens the crisis of legitimacy. The traps are exacerbated by the possibility of the government functioning without an approved program, which reduces political responsibility. The author assesses political practices and inter-institutional relations in European countries (France and Germany)  to compare their governance systems with the Ukrainian ones. It is demonstrated that in Ukraine the system of interaction between the parliament and the government is less effective, which undermines democratic principles. The conclusions about the need for fundamental changes in the legal framework to eliminate the opacity of political practices in Ukraine and to remove restrictions on the activities of the Ukrainian government to increase its ability to respond effectively to challenges, in particular against the backdrop of war and in the context of post-war reconstruction, are argued.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Nataliia Kononenko, Kuras Institute of Political and Ethnic Studies of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, 8 Generala Almazova Str., Kyiv, 01011

PhD in Political Science.

Oleh Kononenko, National Aviation University, 1 Liubomyr Huzar Avenue, Kyiv, 03058

Senior Lecturer, Department of Sociologyand Political Science, Faculty of International Relations.

References

Cohn, M. 2021. A theory of the executive branch: Tension and legality : 321-325. Oxford University Press.

Grundgesetz fürdie Bundesrepublik Deutschland. 1949 (in German).

Alekankina, K. 2020. Four Cabinets of Ministers after Euromaidan: the path of reforms. VOX Ukraine. URL: https://voxukraine.org/chotiri-kabineti-ministriv-pislya-yevromajdanu-shlyah-reform (in Ukrainian).

Leshchenko, S. 2015. Behind the scenes of politics: the conspiracy between Yatsenyuk and Akhmetov. Ukrainian Pravda. URL: https://blogs.pravda.com.ua/authors/leschenko/552d3e78e5a3b/ (in Ukrainian).

Hryhoryshyn revealed how Yatsenyuk lobbies Akhmetov's interests. 2015. Slovo i Dilo. URL: https://www.slovoidilo.ua/2015/09/29/novyna/polityka/hryhoryshyn-rozpoviv-yak-yacenyuk-lobiyuye-interesy-axmetova (in Ukrainian).

Zahrebelʹsʹka, A. 2021. Thecountry of DTEK: how anunrecognized monopoly is in fluencing Ukraine. Left Bank. URL: https://lb.ua/economics/2021/12/09/500402_kraina_dtek_yak_neviznana_monopoliya.html (in Ukrainian).

The AMCU in 2016 was going to recognize Akhmetov's DTEK as a monopoly, but sharply soft ened the assessment of the oligarch (document). 2019. Nashi Groshi. URL: https://nashigroshi.org/2019/07/08/amku-u-2016-rotsi-zbyravsia-vyznaty-dtek-akhmetova-monopolistom-ale-rizko-pom-iakshyv-otsinku-oliharkhu-dokument/ (in Ukrainian).

The State Property Fund sold 25% of "DTEK Zahidenergo" and "Kyivenergo" to Akhmetov's company. 2017. Radio Svoboda. URL: https://www.radiosvoboda.org/a/news/28683917.html (in Ukrainian).

Macroeconomic Overview. 2019. Ministry of Finance. URL: https://mof.gov.ua/uk/makroogljad (in Ukrainian)

Burdey, N. 2019. Rinat Akhmetov, having misled the AMCU, monopolized the cokechemical industry. Ukrainian Pravda. URL: https://www.pravda.com.ua/articles/2019/09/19/7226796/ (in Ukrainian).

In the Mykytascase, a "million-dollar bribe to Groysman" emerged, which the the ex-prime minister denies. 2020. UkrainianPravda. URL: https://www.epravda.com.ua/news/2020/12/4/668847/ (in Ukrainian).

Kramer, A. 2020. Desperate for Aid, Ukraine First Hasto Fight Corruption. The New York Times. URL: https://www.nytimes.com/2020/03/27/world/europe/ukraine-foreign-aid-corruption.html?fbclid=IwAR2X774XXSone0sl0sDA06sh5plhR6HwyBIHuxFIX_nQjdi1RNpZjbKW-1E

Honcharuk, O. 2020 For penniesin government salaries, the y'llexhaust your mind, and the presswill pourdirton you. Novoe Vremya. URL: https://nv.ua/ukr/ukraine/politics/oleksiy-goncharuk-nizki-zarplati-v-uryadi-pidsilyuyut-vpliv-oligarhiv-novini-ukrajini-50095905.html (in Ukrainian).

Institute of Sociology of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine. 2021. Ukrainiansociety: monitoring of social changes. 30 years of independence. Iss. 8(22). Kyiv. URL: https://i-soc.com.ua/assets/files/monitoring/monitoring-2021-bez-dodatkov.pdf (in Ukrainian).

Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine. 2024. Ukraine Facility. URL: https://www.ukrainefacility.me.gov.ua/ (in Ukrainian).

Maiboroda, O. 2023. Form of Government: Semi-presidentialism in the Ukrainian Variant. In H. Zelenko (Ed.), Political System of Ukraine: Constitutional Model and Political Practices: Monograph. 536 р. Kyiv: I.F. Kuras Institute of Political and Ethnic Studies, NAS of Ukraine: 18-51. DOI: 10.53317/978-617-14-0109-9 (in Ukrainian).

Published
2024-07-02
How to Cite
Kononenko, N., & Kononenko, O. (2024). LEGITIMACY DEFICIT AND INSTITUTIONAL FAILURE OF THE GOVERNMENT OF UKRAINE: CHALLENGES AND WAYS TO OVERCOME. The Journal of V.N. Karazin Kharkiv National University. Issues of Political Science, 45, 7-14. https://doi.org/10.26565/2220-8089-2024-45-01