Keywords: digital technologies, politics, political public relations, political processes, political communication


The article attempts to conceptualize the study of the impact of digital technology in politics. It analyzes the current academic literature on the topic of digital technologies in politics, political communication and political public relations. The approaches to the formulation of the problem, as well as the challenges faced by scientists in the study of digital technology are highlighted. The analysis of foreign and domestic scientific literature is carried out. The article points out the factors influencing the research of the problem, the features and challenges that exist for scientists. A comprehensive analysis of scientific papers of recent years was carried out. Author attempts to identify the main areas of research on the impact of digital technologies on political processes. Due to their importance, there is a large number of studies that cover issues from different sides, little related to each other. Therefore it is problematic to form their subject field or a holistic view. Considered the development of scientists devoted to the impact of digital technologies on political public relations, political communication, political participation, political processes. The analysis of research devoted to political activism, protest movement, communication of political parties. Researches devoted to the digitalization of foreign and domestic political processes in the state were considered. The concepts of digital diplomacy and bureaucracy are analyzed. It was found that there are difficulties at the stage of defining approaches to the study of the role of digital technologies in politics. It is noted what their features are at the present stage. Analyzed the works of domestic scientists and the current state of the issue. The paper attempts to conceptualize and identify the problems, directions, and prospects for the study of the impact of digital technologies in politics.


Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Mykyta Shmanatov, V.N. Karazin Kharkiv National University, 4, Svoboda Sq., Kharkiv, 61022, Ukraine

PhD Student, Department of Political Science.


Strömbäck, J., & Esser, F. 2017. How Political Actors Use the Media. A Functional Analysis of the Media’s Rolein Politics. In: Aelst, P. van, Walgraveed, S. Political Public Relations and Mediatization: The Strategies of News Management. UK: Basingstoke, Palgrave 63-83.

Stockmann, C. and Scalia, V. 2020. “Democracy on the Five Star Movement’s Rousseau platform”, European Politics and Society 21(5): 603-617. URL:

Deseriis, M. 2020. “Digital movement parties: a comparative analysis of the technopolitical culture sand the participationplat forms of the Movimento 5 Stelle and the Piratenpartei”, Information, Communication & Society 23(12): 1770–1786.

On approval of the Concept of development of the digital economy and society of Ukraine for 2018-2020 and approval of the action plan for its implementation. 2018. URL: (in Ukrainian).

Solvak, M. and Vassil, K. 2018. “Could Internet Voting Halt Declining Electoral Turnout? New Evidence That E-Voting Is Habit Forming”, Policy & Internet 10(1): 4-21. URL:

Petitpas, A., Jaquet J. M., and Sciarini, P. 2021. “Does E-Voting matter for turnout, and to whom?”, Electoral Studies 71 .

Kelm O, Dohle, M. and Bernhard, U. 2019. “Politicians’ Self-Reported Social Media Activities and Perceptions: Results From Four Surveys Among German Parliamentarians”, Social Media + Society”. April.

Fowler E., Franz M., Martin G., Peskowitz Z. & Ridout T. 2021. “Political Advertising Online and Offline”, American Political Science Review, 115(1):130-149.

Jackson, S. J., Bailey, M. and Welles, B. F. 2020. # Hashtag Activism: Net works of race and gender justice. MIT Press. March 2020. URL:

Freelon, D., A. Marwick, A. and Kreiss, D. 2020. “False equivalencies: Online activism from left to right”, Science 369(6508): 1197-1201.

Konkov, A.E. 2019. “Digitalization in Political Relations: Planes for Perception and Mechanisms for Transformation”, Global Infrastructure in the Digital Age 12(6):6-28.

URL: (In Russian)

Regulations on the Ministry of Digital Transformation of Ukraine of September 18, 2019. URL: (in Ukrainian).

Gilardi, F. 2022. Digital Technology, Politics, and Policy-Making. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. URL:

Fung, A., H. Russon Gilman, H. and Shkabatur, J. 2013. “Six models for the internet + politics”, International Studies Review 15(1), 30-47. URL:

Guess, A., & Lyons, B. 2020. Misinformation, Disinformation, and Online Propaganda. In: N. Persily & J. Tucker (Eds.). Social Media and Democracy: The State of the Field, Prospects for Reform 10-33. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Levy, R. 2021. “Social Media, News Consumption, and Polarization: Evidence from a Field Experiment”, American Economic Review 111 (3): 831-70. URL:

Hartmann, K. and Wenzelburger, G. 2021. “Uncertainty, riskand the use of algorithms in policy decisions: a case study on criminal justice in the USA”, Policy Sciences 54(2), 269-287. URL:

Danaher J, Hogan MJ, Noone C, et al. 2017. Algorithmic governance: Developing a research agenda through the power of collective intelligence. Big Data & Society. December.

How to Cite
Shmanatov, M. (2021). DIGITAL TECHNOLOGIES AS A FACTOR INFLUENCING POLITICAL PROCESSES: AN ATTEMPT AT CONCEPTUALIZATION. The Journal of V.N. Karazin Kharkiv National University. Issues of Political Science, 40, 29-37.