Verbalization of evaluation in prose and dramatic genres

Keywords: the category of evaluation, artistic discourse, dramatic discourse, genre, evaluation characteristics, language modeling, language means

Abstract

The article deals with the study of the peculiarities of linguistic expression of the category of assessment, which as a universal language category operating at different language levels, plays an important role in the choice of native speakers and, consequently, culture, language means of information and is equally important for mental processes of perception, comprehension and acceptance or non-acceptance of this information. The publications in the scientific literature on various aspects of the study of the category of evaluation in terms of language have been reviewed. The analysis of the peculiarities of verbalization of the category of evaluation is carried out on the material of fictional and dramatic discourse, which is a productive language environment for studying the category of evaluation, because through verbalized national-cultural ideas and stereotypes are reflected the conceptual and linguistic pictures of the world. First of all, this category is manifested in the language and characteristics of the characters. Special attention is paid to the characters of a (chynovnyk, pan, a pani, a panna and a cossack, verbalized in the fictional and dramatic discourse of the XIX century. Evaluative characteristics, which are the elements of language modeling of fictional images, served as a basis for distinguishing the following types of evaluation: positive and negative evaluation in the structure of the text narrative, neutral evaluation, hidden positive evaluation, author's evaluation, evaluation by other characters. A positive evaluation in the language of fiction is shown by the linguistic means of creating the character of a cossack. Negative assessment was found in the linguistic means of creating the image of the pan (landlord), the images of the pani and panna are ambivalent. Evaluation is present both in the language of the characters and in the author's characteristics or comments. The object of evaluation in the fictional and dramatic genres can be both internal and external characteristics of the characters, and external characteristics are often marked by positive evaluation, while internal features have either negative or ambivalent evaluation characteristics. It was found that the ways of realization of positive or negative evaluation in the language of fiction are quite diverse. They depend on the literary and fictional methods, the creative manner of the writer and reflect his worldview.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Tetiana Sukalenko, University of State Fiscal Service of Ukraine

Doctor of Philological Sciences, Professor of the Department of Journalism, Ukrainian Philology and Culture

References

Areshenkova O. Yu. Typy otsinok ta movni zasoby yikh vyrazhennia v reklamnykh tekstakh. Filologichni studii. 2012. Vyp. 7. Ch. 2. S. 100–109.

Bessonova O. L. Otsinka yak semantychnyi komponent leksychnogo znachennia slova (na materiali imennykiv-nazv osoby v anglijskii, franczuzkii ta ukrayinskii movakh): avtoref. dys. na zdobuttia nauk. stupenia kand. filol. nauk: spets. 10.02.19 «Teoriia movoznavstva». Donetsk, 1995. 22 s.

Buiar I. Ye. Lingvistychna kategoriia otsinky: otsiniuvannia dosiagnutogo u vitchyznyanii lingvistytsi. Naukovi zapysky Natsionalnogo universytetu «Ostrozka akademiia». Seriia: Filologichna. Ostrog, 2009. Vyp. 11. S. 145–149.

Vyshyvana N. Osoblyvosti movnoii kategorii otsinnosti ta struktura ocinky. Naukovyi visnyk Chernivetskogo natsionalnogo universytetu. Seriya: Germanska filologiia. Chernivtsi: Ruta, 2004. Vyp. 188–189. S. 73–78.

Vovchok Marko. Opovidannia. Kazky. Povisti. Roman. Kyiiv: Naukova dumka, 1983. 638 s.

Kaiky M. Yu. Verbalizatsiia otsinnykh znachen v rosiiskii dytyachii literaturi seredyny XX – pochatku XXI stolittia: avtoref. dy`s. na zdobuttya nauk. stupenya kand. filol. nauk: spets. 10.02.02 «Rosiiska mova». Kyiiv, 2010. 24 s.

Kashhenko A. F. Zruinovane hnizdo: ist. povisti ta opovidannia / uporiad., avt. pislyamovy ta prymit. V. G. Bieliaiev. Kyiiv: Dnipro, 1991. 647 s.

Kots T. Otsinnist yak semantyko-stylistychna kategoriya publitsystychnogo styliu. Ukraiinska mova. 2016. # 4. S. 78–86.

Kotsyubynskyi M. Tvory: u 7 t. Kyiiv: Nauk. dumka, 1974. T. 3: Opovidannia. Povisti (1908–1913). 430 s.

Kosmeda T. A. Aksiologichni aspekty pragmalingvistyky: zasoby vyrazhennia kategoriyi otsinky v ukrayinskii ta rosiiskii movakh: avtoref. dys. na zdobuttia nauk. stupenia doktora filol. nauk: spets. 10.02.01 «Ukraiinska mova», 10.02.02 «Rosiiska mova». Kharkiv, 2001. 32 s.

Kosmeda T. A. Aksiologichni aspekty pragmalingvistyky: formuvannia i rozvytok kategorii otsinky. Lviv: LNU im. Franka, 2000. 350 s.

Krasilnikova L. V. Zhanr nauchnoi retsenzii: semantika i pragmatika. Moskva: Dialog–MGU, 1999. 139 s.

Kryshhuk V. L. Verbalizatciya otcinky v ukraiinskii istorychnij prozi kintcia XX – pochatku XXI st.: dys. ... kand. filol. nauk: spets. 10.02.01 «Ukrayinska mova». Kam'yanecz`-Podil`s`ky`j, 2015. 208 s.

Mekh N. O. Realizatsiya kategorii otsinky u movnii kartyni svitu. Naukovyi visnyk Izmaiilskogo derzhavnogo pedagogichnogo instytutu. Izmaiil, 2005. Vyp. 19. S. 153–156.

Minina M. A. Psykholingvisticheskii analiz semantiki otsenki: avtoref. diss. na soiskaniie uchen. stepeni kand. filol. nauk: spets. 10.02.04 «Germanskie yazyki». Moskva, 1995. 15 s.

Mykhalchenko M. Otsinka u filosofsko-logichnomu ta psykhologichnomu aspektakh. Lingvistychni studii Kharkivskogo pedagogichnogo universytetu imeni G. S. Skovorody. Xarkiv, 2008. Vy`p. 18. S. 8–12.

Nechui-Levytskyi I. S. Zibrannia tvoriv: u 10 t. Kyiiv: Naukova dumka, 1965. T. 1: Prozovi tvory. 377 s.

Onyshhenko I. V. Kategoriya otsinky ta zasoby yii vyrazhennia v publicystychnykh ta informaciinykh tekstakh: avtoref. dys. na zdobuttia nauk. stupenya kand. filol. nauk: spets. 10.02.01 «Ukraiinska mova». Dnipropetrovsk, 2004. 24 s.

Prykhodko A. Y. Kognitivno-diskursyvnyi potentsyal otsenki i sposoby yego vyrazheniia v sovremennom anglyiskom yazyke: avtoref. dyss. na soiskanie nauch. stepeni doktora filol. nauk: spets. 10.02.04 «Germanskie yazyki». Belgorod, 2004. 428 s.

Prykhodko G. I. Otsinnyi komponent u semantychnii strukturi slova. Visnyk Zhytomyrskogo derzhavnogo universytetu. Seriya: Filologichni nauky. Zhytomyr, 2009. Vyp. 45. S. 44–47.

Starytskyi M. Tvory: u 8 t. Kyiiv: Dnipro, 1964. T. 4: Dramatychni tvory: Piesy. 702 s.

Temirgazina Z. K. Lingvisticheskaia aksiologiia: problemy i perspektivy. Lingvisticheskaia aksiologiia: kollektivnaia monografiia / otv. red. Z. K. Temirgazina. Pavlodar: Tipografiia Sitina, 2014. S. 9–21.

Ukraiinka Lesia. Tvory: u 10 t. Kyiiv: Dnipro, 1965. T. 7: Prozovi tvory. 355 s.

Fedorenko O. Kategoriya emotsiinoi otsinky v realizatsii komunikatyvnykh zavdan zhurnalista. Visnyk Lvivskogo universytetu. Seriya: Zhurnalistyka. Lviv, 2011. Vyp. 34. S. 242–248.

Franko I. Zibrannia tvoriv: u 50 t. Khudozhni tvory. Tomy 1–25 / AN URSR. In-t lit-ry im. T. G. Shevchenka. Kyiiv: Naukova dumka, 1978. T. 15: Povisti ta povidannia (1878–1882). 511 s.

Shashkevych M. Tvory. Kyiiv: Vyd-vo khud. l-ry, 1973. 191 s.

Shevchenko T. Zibrannya tvoriv: u 6 t. / redkol. M. G. Zhulynskyi (golova), V. S. Borodin, S. A. Galchenko, O. K. Fedoruk ta in.; NAN Ukraiiny, In-t literatury im. T. G. Shevchenka. Kyiiv: Nauk. dumka, 2003. T. 1 – T. 6.

Published
2021-12-13
How to Cite
Sukalenko, T. (2021). Verbalization of evaluation in prose and dramatic genres. The Journal of V. N. Karazin Kharkiv National University. Series “Philology”, (89), 59-65. https://doi.org/10.26565/2227-1864-2021-89-10