PROFESSIONAL INTENTIONS OF PEDAGOGICAL STUDENTS: MOTIVATION, EXPECTATIONS AND READINESS TO WORK AS TEACHERS AFTER GRADUATION

Keywords: professional intentions, pedagogical students, motivation, expectations, readiness to work as a teacher, pedagogical education, teacher, New Ukrainian School (NUS)

Abstract

This article explores the professional intentions of pedagogical students in Ukraine, focusing on their motivation, expectations, and readiness to work as teachers after graduation. The topic’s relevance stems from the transformative processes in contemporary Ukrainian education and the crucial impact of future educators’ professional maturity on the quality of national education. The authors emphasize the need for a thorough study of these factors to improve the content and technologies of future teachers’ professional training.
The article reviews scholarly works on the professional motivation and readiness of future teachers. Modern research highlights the necessity of continuous professional development, scientific and methodological activity, innovative engagement, and adaptation to changes in the educational environment, particularly the implementation of ICT. The influence of broader educational challenges, such as the COVID-19 pandemic and military actions, as well as reforms (e.g., the New Ukrainian School – NUS), on student expectations are also examined. The conclusion is that professional intentions result from the interplay of classic pedagogical ideas and modern educational realities, demanding creativity, continuous learning, and adaptability from future teachers.
To empirically study professional intentions, motivation, and readiness for pedagogical activity, an anonymous online survey was conducted among 100 pedagogical students from various Ukrainian cities, including Kharkiv, Kyiv, Dnipro, and Poltava. A quantitative survey method was used with Google Forms. The questionnaire included both closed and open-ended questions, combining structured surveying with content analysis of free responses. The survey covered sections related to motivation for choosing the profession, expectations from future activities, employment plans, factors that might hinder career realization, and self-assessment of professional readiness. The sample was formed using random sampling through online communities and social networks, ensuring broad coverage of students from different years and regions.
The main motives for choosing the profession were the desire to work with children (“calling”) and job stability in education. Approximately half of the students cited these internal motives. Over 60% of respondents considered their career choice to be conscious. The most common expectations from the profession included flexible working hours and holidays, as well as the opportunity for personal growth and self-realization through teaching children. Expectations of high salaries and public respect were less pronounced. Roughly half of the students expressed a clear readiness to work in a school after graduation, with another 25–30% intending to do so temporarily. About 10–15% do not plan to work in their chosen field.
Among the obstacles and drawbacks of the profession, the most frequently mentioned were low wages, high emotional burden and stress, lack of support from administration or the state, and insufficient practical training during studies. Most students rated themselves as partially ready to work as teachers (less than 25% considered themselves fully ready). Among the suggestions for increasing motivation and readiness, students highlighted: higher salaries, additional pedagogical support and mentorship, practical improvement of training (more school practice), and increased public recognition and respect for teachers.
The survey revealed that future educators have significant interest in teaching, but this is coupled with an awareness of existing difficulties (financial, organizational issues) and a feeling of insufficient preparation. These findings underscore the importance of enhancing material support, improving practical training, and developing mentorship systems to retain young educators in the profession and realize their motivational potential.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Bashkir, O. M. (2017). The place of pedagogy in the system of pedagogical education of Ukraine in the historical discourse of the 19th – early 20th centuries. Educational discourse. No. 3–4 (18–19). P. 57–63. Electronic resource. Access mode: https://ap.uu.edu.ua/article/286 [in Ukrainian].
Vyshnevsky, V. O. (2007). Theoretical foundations of modern Ukrainian pedagogy. Lviv: SPOLOM, 264 p. Electronic resource. Access mode: https://pedagogy.lnu.edu.ua/departments/pedagogika/library/vyshnevsky.pdf [in Ukrainian].
Gupan, N. M. (2017). History of pedagogy: issues of crisis and development. Ukrainian pedagogical journal. No. 1. P. 110–113. [in Ukrainian].
Dutkevych, T., Savytska, O. (2020). Psychological support of innovative processes in a higher education institution: monograph. Kyiv: Publishing center of Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv, 240 p. [in Ukrainian].
Yevtukh, M. B. (2021). The problem of the teacher’s personality in the pedagogical heritage of K. D. Ushinsky. Science and education: problems, prospects, innovations: theses of the All-Ukrainian scientific-practical conference (July 21–23, 2021). Kyiv, pp. 135–140. [in Ukrainian].
Kisil, Z. R., Shvets, D. V. (2023). Motivation of human activity: teaching aids in diagrams, tables, comments. Odesa: ODUVS, 154 p. [in Ukrainian].
Korylchuk, N. I., Dzevytska, L. S., Vasilyuk-Zaytseva, S. V. (2023). Problems and prospects of modern education in Ukraine: attempts at scientific reflection. Academic visions. Issue. 16. P. 1–13. [in Ukrainian].
Krysheminska, L. (2003). Problems of forming the content of professional education in the conditions of graduated training of specialists. Education of Ukraine. February 18 (№ 13). P. 5. [in Ukrainian].
Leont’eva, I. V. (2021). Reforming education in Ukraine: the evolution of scientific views (2001–2021). Pedagogical education: theory and practice. Psychology. Pedagogy. No. 36(2). P. 12–17. DOI: 10.28925/2311
2409.2021.361 [in Ukrainian].
Lyashenko, O. I. (2005). The quality of education as the basis for the functioning and development of modern education systems. Pedagogy and Psychology. No. 1. P. 5–12. [in Ukrainian].
Nychkalo, N. G. (2002). Ukrainian pedagogical calendar: a teaching aid for students of higher education. scholastic. conclusion / edited by L. O. Kalmykova, T. F. Baeva; edited by V. P. Kotsur; lit. ed. L. P. Kozhukhovska.
Kyiv, P. 170. [in Ukrainian].
Pavlenko, V. I., Sereda, G. O. (2021). Professional self-determination of future teachers in the process of professional training. Scientific Lyceum of Education. No. 2. P. 45–52. Electronic resource. Access mode: https://lib.iitta.gov.ua/id/eprint/744643/1 [in Ukrainian].
Sukhomlynskyi V. O. іn dialogue with modernity: theses of the XI International and XXVIII All-Ukrainian Pedagogical Readings (September 24, 2021, Uzhgorod) / [edited by Ya. M. Syvokha et al.]. Uzhhorod: RIK-U, 219 p. https://dspace.uzhnu.edu.ua/jspui/bitstream/lib/50533/1/%D0%92%D0%B0%D1%81%D0%B8%D0%BB%D1%8C%20 %D0%A1%D1%83%D1%85%D0%BE%D0%BC%D0%BB%D0%B8%D0%BD%D1%81%D1%8C% D 0 % B A % D 0 % B 8 % D 0 % B 9 % 2 0 % D 1 % 8 3 % 2 0 %D0%B4%D1%96%D0%B0%D0%BB%D0%BE%D0%B7%D1%96%20%D1%96%D0%B7%20 %D1%81%D1%83%D1%87%D0%B0%D1%81%D0%BD%D1%96%D1%81%D1%82%D1%8E..pdf [in Ukrainian].
Tomchuk, M., Tomchuk, S. (2019). Pedagogy. Kyiv: Center for Educational Literature, 368 p. [in Ukrainian].
Upatova, I. P. (2012). Scientific and methodological work as a factor in the professional development of a teacher in the context of the modernization of education. Scientific notes of the pedagogical department. Kharkiv: V. N. Karazin KhNU, Issue 30. P. 171–176. [in Ukrainian].
Khomenko, S. A. (2023). Development of pedagogy in modern Ukraine. Scientific Bulletin of Economics and Law. No. 2. P. 48–52. Electronic resource. Access mode: https://ekonomics.com.ua/s104-rozvitok-pedagogiki-vsuchasniy-ukrayini [in Ukrainian].
Khomych, L. O. (1998). Professional and pedagogical training of a primary school teacher. K.: “Magister-S”, 200p. [in Ukrainian].
Khomyakovska, T.O. (2015). Technology “Case-Study” as a method of contextual learning in the process of teaching a foreign language. Scientific notes of Vinnytsia National Agrarian University. Series: Social and Human Sciences / Chief editor Kaletnik G.M. Vinnytsia LLC firm “Plagner”: VNAU, Issue 4. 146 p. P. 117–125. [in Ukrainian].
Khromova, V. (2012). Pedagogical conditions for training future managers for innovative professional activity: diss. ... candidate of pedagogical sciences: speciality 13.00.04 “Theory and methodology of professional
education” / V. Khromova. Lugansk, 343 p. [in Ukrainian].
Yagupov, V. V. (2012). Competency-based approach to professional training of specialists in the system of vocational education.Pedagogical and psychological sciences in Ukraine: collection of scientific works: in 5 volumes. Vol. 4: Professional education and adult education. Kyiv: Pedagogical thought, 512 p. [in Ukrainian].
Shvets, T. (2016). The theoretical ground of the pedagogical conditions for the professional training of future preschool teachers. Eastern European Scientific Journal (Gesellschaftswissenschaften). № 1. Р. 134–137.
Published
2025-07-03
Cited
How to Cite
Shvedova, Y., & Smal, K. (2025). PROFESSIONAL INTENTIONS OF PEDAGOGICAL STUDENTS: MOTIVATION, EXPECTATIONS AND READINESS TO WORK AS TEACHERS AFTER GRADUATION. Scientific Notes of the Pedagogical Department, (56), 55-62. https://doi.org/10.26565/2074-8167-2025-56-06