APPLICATION OF THE PRINCIPLES OF EUROPEAN CONTRACT LAW AND OTHER SOURCES OF «SOFT LAW» IN INTERNATIONAL COMMERCIAL ARBITRATION
Abstract
Introduction. The article examines the application of the Principles of European Contract Law (PECL) and other sources of "soft law" of the European Union in international commercial arbitration. It highlights the legal foundations, practical aspects, and particularities of integrating these instruments into the practices of European arbitral institutions.
Summary of the main results of the study. It is determined that although "soft law" instruments such as the PECL and the UNIDROIT Principles of International Commercial Contracts are not formally binding, they increasingly influence the resolution of commercial disputes. This is due to their ability to effectively bridge gaps in national legislation and international treaties, ensuring uniform legal standards and enhancing predictability in arbitration awards. The practices of major European arbitration institutions, such as ICC (Paris), LCIA (London), SCC (Stockholm), VIAC (Vienna), and DIS (Germany), were analyzed. It was established that these institutions actively refer to the PECL and the UNIDROIT Principles both for direct application (when explicitly chosen by the parties) and for interpreting contractual provisions and filling normative gaps when no explicit choice of law is made. Arbitration practice particularly demonstrates extensive reliance on the PECL and the UNIDROIT Principles in matters related to interpreting obligations of the parties and applying the principles of good faith and reasonableness.
Conclusion. It is substantiated that the integration of "soft law" sources into the arbitration practices of arbitral jurisdictions reflects contemporary trends in international commercial law and meets the needs of international trade. However, further expansion of their application requires enhancing legal certainty, clarifying the scope of application of such instruments, and further standardizing the practices of European arbitration centers. In perspective, strengthening the role of the PECL and UNIDROIT Principles in international commercial arbitration can promote further harmonization of contract law at the European and global levels.
Downloads
References
/References
Lew J.D.M., Mistelis L.A., Kröll S.M. Comparative International Commercial Arbitration. The Hague: Kluwer Law International. 2003. 956 p.
DiMatteo L. A. CISG as a Basis for a Comprehensive International Sales Law. Villanova Law Review. 2013. Vol. 54. 33 p.
1958 - Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards - "The New York Convention". URL: https://www.newyorkconvention.org/english
2020 LCIA Arbitration Rules, URL: https://www.lcia.org/Dispute_Resolution_Services/lcia-arbitration-rules-2020.aspx
2021 ICC Rules of Arbitration, URL: https://iccwbo.org/dispute-resolution/dispute-resolution-services/arbitration/rules-procedure/2021-arbitration-rules/
Lando O., Beale H. Principles of European Contract Law. Parts I and II / prepared by the Commission on European Contract Law. Hague; London; Boston. Kluwer Law International, 2000. XXIV, 535 p.
2009 Draft Common Frame of Reference (DCFR). URL: https://sakig.pl/wp-content/uploads/2019/01/dfcr.pdf
DiMatteo L. A. Soft Law and the Principle of Fair and Equitable Decision Making in International Contract Arbitration. Chinese Journal of Comparative Law. 2013. Vol. 1. 28 p.
UNIDROIT Principles 2016. URL: https://www.unidroit.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/06/Unidroit-Principles-2016-English-bl.pdf
Cordero-Moss G. Soft Law as a Replacement or Corrective of National Law in Investment Arbitration? European International Arbitration Review. 2019. 16 p.
2021 VIAC Arbitration and Mediation Rules. URL: https://www.viac.eu/wp-content/uploads/2025/02/VIAC_schieds_mediationsordnung_2021_e_v4_1812s.pdf
2021 UNCITRAL Arbitration Rules. URL: https://uncitral.un.org/sites/uncitral.un.org/files/media-documents/uncitral/en/21-07996_expedited-arbitration-e-ebook.pdf
ICC International Court of Arbitration. Final Arbitral Award in case No. 19869/MCP/DDA (Yemen v. Canadian Nexen Petroleum Yemen et al.) 04 February 2020. URL: https://www.unilex.info/principles/case/2413
England, Wales and Northern Ireland Arbitration Act. 1996. URL: https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1996/23/contents
Magnus U. CISG vs. Regional Sales Law Unification: With a Focus on the New Common European Sales Law. Munich. Sellier European Law Publishers, 2012. 405 p.
Міжнародний арбітражний суд при Міжнародній торговій палаті. Арбітражне рішення у справі № 8128 (Швейцарський покупець проти Австрійського продавця).Базель.1995. URL:https://cisg-online.org/files/cases/6493/fullTextFile/526_19052877.pdf
CISG Advisory Council Opinion No. 14 Interest Under Article 78 CISG. URL: https://cisg-online.org/files/ac_op/CISG_Advisory_Council_Opinion_No_14.pdf
Permanent Court of Arbitration (PCA). Chevron Corporation and Texaco Petroleum Corporation v. The Republic of Ecuador (II), PCA Case No. 2009-23. The Hague: Permanent Court of Arbitration, 2018. URL: https://pca-cpa.org/en/cases/49/
Pabalk Ticaret Limited Sirketi v. Norsolor, ICC Case No. 3131. URL: https://jusmundi.com/en/document/decision/en-pabalk-ticaret-limited-sirketi-v-norsolor-award-friday-26th-october-1979
Republic of Yemen v. Canadian Nexen Petroleum Yemen Ltd., ICSID Case No. ARB/14/30, Final Award, 2020.
Eckart Brödermann. The Multiple Roles of the UNIDROIT Principles of International Commercial Contracts in Arbitration. Kluwer Arbitration Blog.2023. URL: https://arbitrationblog.kluwerarbitration.com/2023/09/13/the-multiple-roles-of-the-unidroit-principles-of-international-commercial-contracts-in-arbitration/
2023 SCC Arbitration Rules. URL: https://sccarbitrationinstitute.se/wp-content/uploads/2024/12/SCC_Arbitration_Rules_2023_English.pdf
Joint Venture Case VIAC (Vienna International Arbitral Centre), Final Award, 2013, Case No. SCH-5243, published in Vienna International Arbitral Centre, Selected Arbitral Awards, Volume 1, Verlag WKÖ Service GmbH (2015), p. 312.
2018 DIS Arbitration Rules. URL: https://www.disarb.org/fileadmin//user_upload/Werkzeuge_und_Tools/2018_DIS-Arbitration-Rules_012023.pdf
Bundesgerichtshof [Federal Supreme Court of Germany]. CLOUT Case No. 445 (VIII ZR 60/01). 2001.
Lew J.D.M., Mistelis L.A., Kröll S.M. Comparative International Commercial Arbitration. The Hague: Kluwer Law International. 2003. 956 p.
DiMatteo L. A. CISG as a Basis for a Comprehensive International Sales Law. Villanova Law Review. 2013. Vol. 54. 33 p.
1958 - Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards - "The New York Convention". URL: https://www.newyorkconvention.org/english
2020 LCIA Arbitration Rules, URL: https://www.lcia.org/Dispute_Resolution_Services/lcia-arbitration-rules-2020.aspx
2021 ICC Rules of Arbitration, URL: https://iccwbo.org/dispute-resolution/dispute-resolution-services/arbitration/rules-procedure/2021-arbitration-rules/
Lando O., Beale H. Principles of European Contract Law. Parts I and II / prepared by the Commission on European Con-tract Law. Hague; London; Boston. Kluwer Law International, 2000. XXIV, 535 p.
2009 Draft Common Frame of Reference (DCFR). URL: https://sakig.pl/wp-content/uploads/2019/01/dfcr.pdf
DiMatteo L. A. Soft Law and the Principle of Fair and Equitable Decision Making in International Contract Arbitration. Chinese Journal of Comparative Law. 2013. Vol. 1. 28 p.
UNIDROIT Principles 2016. URL: https://www.unidroit.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/06/Unidroit-Principles-2016-English-bl.pdf
Cordero-Moss G. Soft Law as a Replacement or Corrective of National Law in Investment Arbitration? European Inter-national Arbitration Review. 2019. 16 p.
2021 VIAC Arbitration and Mediation Rules. URL: https://www.viac.eu/wp-content/uploads/2025/02/VIAC_schieds_mediationsordnung_2021_e_v4_1812s.pdf
2021 UNCITRAL Arbitration Rules. URL: https://uncitral.un.org/sites/uncitral.un.org/files/media-documents/uncitral/en/21-07996_expedited-arbitration-e-ebook.pdf
ICC International Court of Arbitration. Final Arbitral Award in case No. 19869/MCP/DDA (Yemen v. Canadian Nexen Petroleum Yemen et al.) 04 February 2020. URL: https://www.unilex.info/principles/case/2413
England, Wales and Northern Ireland Arbitration Act. 1996. URL: https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1996/23/contents
Magnus U. CISG vs. Regional Sales Law Unification: With a Focus on the New Common European Sales Law. Munich. Sellier European Law Publishers, 2012. 405 p.
International Court of Arbitration at the International Chamber of Commerce. Award in Case No. 8128 (Swiss Buyer v. Austrian Seller), Basel, 1995. URL:https://cisg-online.org/files/cases/6493/fullTextFile/526_19052877.pdf
CISG Advisory Council Opinion No. 14 Interest Under Article 78 CISG. URL: https://cisg-online.org/files/ac_op/CISG_Advisory_Council_Opinion_No_14.pdf
Permanent Court of Arbitration (PCA). Chevron Corporation and Texaco Petroleum Corporation v. The Republic of Ec-uador (II), PCA Case No. 2009-23. The Hague: Permanent Court of Arbitration, 2018. URL: https://pca-cpa.org/en/cases/49/
Pabalk Ticaret Limited Sirketi v. Norsolor, ICC Case No. 3131. URL: https://jusmundi.com/en/document/decision/en-pabalk-ticaret-limited-sirketi-v-norsolor-award-friday-26th-october-1979
Republic of Yemen v. Canadian Nexen Petroleum Yemen Ltd., ICSID Case No. ARB/14/30, Final Award, 2020.
Eckart Brödermann. The Multiple Roles of the UNIDROIT Principles of International Commercial Contracts in Arbitra-tion. Kluwer Arbitration Blog.2023. URL: https://arbitrationblog.kluwerarbitration.com/2023/09/13/the-multiple-roles-of-the-unidroit-principles-of-international-commercial-contracts-in-arbitration/
2023 SCC Arbitration Rules. URL: https://sccarbitrationinstitute.se/wp-content/uploads/2024/12/SCC_Arbitration_Rules_2023_English.pdf
Joint Venture Case VIAC (Vienna International Arbitral Centre), Final Award, 2013, Case No. SCH-5243, published in Vienna International Arbitral Centre, Selected Arbitral Awards, Volume 1, Verlag WKÖ Service GmbH (2015), p. 312.
2018 DIS Arbitration Rules. URL: https://www.disarb.org/fileadmin//user_upload/Werkzeuge_und_Tools/2018_DIS-Arbitration-Rules_012023.pdf
Bundesgerichtshof [Federal Supreme Court of Germany]. CLOUT Case No. 445 (VIII ZR 60/01). 2001.
Copyright (c) 2025 Кирило Воронов

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.