Documenting Vagrants and ‘Cripples’ in Late-18th-Century Sloboda Ukraine (Evidence of Revision Lists from the Kharkiv Viceroyalty)
Abstract
The article is concerned with issues of population counting and taxation in Sloboda Ukraine towards the end of the 18th century. The purpose of the study is to analyze the evidential value of primary census documents (revision lists, literally ‘revision tales,’ revizki kazky) and accompanying administrative records from the period of the Kharkiv Viceroyalty, with a particular focus on the category of vagrants and ‘cripples.’ The author outlines the main phases in the evolution of the census procedure, taking into account its distinctive regional features. It is demonstrated that a reliable categorization of population for tax purposes was introduced in Sloboda Ukraine no earlier than the first quarter of the 18th century. Throughout the century, population counting in the region remained variable in form and approach to the recording of individual information and verification of census results. The fourth ‘revision’ (1782–1783) covered the entire taxable population of the region and most of the non-taxable social groups that had not previously been subject to population counts. In addition to the standard census information, revision lists produced in the last two decades of the 18th century contained supplemental biographical data that make it possible to sketch out collective portraits of individual social groups. The vagrants and ‘cripples’ of Sloboda Ukraine are represented in these statistical records as a numerous population category that required the attention and care of local authorities. Using methods of source criticism, the author was able to indentify characteristics of population counting related to the functioning of the regional bureaucratic apparatus. The article expands the range of mass sources that can be used in historical-demographic, genealogical, and prosopographic research, as well as in the study of the history of medicine and everyday life of marginalized groups in Sloboda Ukraine.
Downloads
References
Bojko, A. V. Pivdenna Ukraina ostann'oi chverti XVIII ct.: Analiz dzherel. Kyiv, 2000. (In Ukrainian)
Derzhavnyj arkhiv Kharkivs'koi oblasti (DAKhO), f. 31, op. 141, spr. 39. Revizskie skazki na kalek po okrugam Har'kovskogo namestnichestva. 1782 g. (In Russian)
Derzhavnyj arkhiv Kharkivs'koi oblasti (DAKhO), f. 31, op. 141, spr. 51. Revizskie skazki na cygan po okrugam Har'kovskogo namestnichestva. 1782 g. (In Russian)
Everett, J. B. The Imperial Russian Revision Lists of the Eighteenth and Nineteenth Centuries. Slavic and East European Information Resources, vol. 19, 2018, pp. 49–67.
Feldblyum, B. Russian Revision Lists: A History. Avotaynu, vol. XIV, no. 3, 1998, pp. 59–69.
Hed'o, A. Materialy revizijnoho perepysu naselennia iak dzherelo z istorii inozemnykh kolonistiv Donbasu (za materialamy Derzhavnoho arkhivu Donets'koi oblasti). Naukovi zapysky. Zbirnyk prats' molodykh vchenykh ta aspirantiv [Scientific Notes. Collection of Works of Young Scientists and Graduate Students], t. 19, kn. I, 2009, s. 551–562. (In Ukrainian)
Honcharova, N. O. Reviz'ki skazky hrets'kykh poselen'. U: O. H. Velychko (avt.-uporiad.) ta in. Zaporiz'kyj arkhiv. Studii z istorii hrekiv Pivdnia Ukrainy XVIII–XX st. Zaporizhzhia, 2003, s. 8–15. (In Ukrainian)
Instrukcija Slobodskoj gubernii gubernatoru s Gubernskoju i Provincial'nymi kanceljarijami (№ 12.430 ot 6 ijulja 1765 g.). Polnoe sobranie zakonov Rossijskoj imperii. Sobr. І, t. XVII. SanktPeterburg, 1830, c. 181–189. (In Russian)
Kabuzan, V. M. Narodonaselenie Rossii v XVIII — pervoj polovine XIX v. (po materialam revizij). Moskva, 1963. (In Russian)
Karazin, V. N. Ob'jasnenie podrobnoj tablicy obstojatel'stv narodonaselenija v SlobodskoUkrainskoj gubernii i sravnenie vyvodimyh iz nee perechnej (rezul'tatov) s podobnymi im, izvlechennymi iz takovyh zhe obstojatel'stv prochih gubernij Rossijskoj Imperii i drugih zemel' Evropy. V: Sochinenija, pis'ma i bumagi V. N. Karazina, sobrannye i redaktirovannye prof. D. I. Bagaleem. Har'kov, 1910, s. 382–394. (In Russian)
Kirilov, I. K. Cvetushhee sostojanie vserossijskogo gosudarstva…, kn. 1–2. Moskva, 1831. (In Russian)
Lykova, V. V. Reviz'ki skazky iak dzherelo do sotsial'no-ekonomichnoi istorii Pivdennoi Ukrainy pershoi polovyny KhIKh st. (1795–1835 rr.). Naukovi pratsi istorychnoho fakul'tetu Zaporiz'koho derzhavnoho universytetu [Scholarly Works of the Faculty of History, Zaporizhzhia National University], vyp. XXI, 2007, s. 345–351. (In Ukrainian)
O vvedenii revizii, o raspredelenii soderzhanija vojska po chislu dush, ob opredelenii voinskih i izbranii zemskih komissarov dlja zavedovanija vseh sborov s krest'jan dlja soderzhanija vojska, i o schet zemskih komissarov v sobiraemyh imi den'gami i pripasah. Imennoj ukaz (№ 3245 ot 26 nojabrja 1718 g.). Polnoe sobranie zakonov Rossijskoj imperii. Sobr. І, t. V. SanktPeterburg, 1830, s. 597. (In Russian)
Ob uchinenii vo vsej Imperii novoj revizii. Manifest (№ 15.278 ot 16 nojabrja 1781 g.). Polnoe sobranie zakonov Rossijskoj imperii. Sobr. І, t. XXI. Sankt-Peterburg, 1830, s. 304–306. (In Russian)
Pod'japol'skaja, E. P. Revizskie skazki kak istoricheskij istochnik. V: Akademiku Borisu Dmitrievichu Grekovu ko dnju semidesjatiletija. Moskva, 1952, s. 311–321. (In Russian)
Uchrezhdenija dlja upravlenija Gubernij Vserossijskoj Imperii chast' pervaja (№ 14.392 ot 7 nojabrja 1775 g.). Polnoe sobranie zakonov Rossijskoj imperii. Sobr. І, t. XX. SanktPeterburg, 1830, s. 240–241. (In Russian)
Copyright (c) 2024 Olena Vorotyntseva
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
