On the Question of the Adoption of the Epiclesis ‘Euergetes’ by Ptolemy III
Abstract
In 2020, I published the monograph From Basileis-Pharaohs to Pharaohs-Basileis: The First 100 Years of the Ptolemaic Monarchy. In that book, I proposed to move the date of the famine that occurred during the reign of Ptolemy III from 245/244 BC to the period between 243 and 238 BC, drawing on the evidence of the Alexandrian ‘synodal’ decree of 3 December 243 BC. If my hypothesis is correct, it becomes necessary to reconsider the background of Ptolemy’s adoption of the Greek form of the sacred epiclesis ‘Euergetes’ (Benefactor), which earlier I associated with the help that the population of Egypt received from the king during that famine. In modern historiography, there are a number of alternative suggestions regarding the prior actions of Ptolemy III, supposedly consistent with the Hellenistic ideas about euergetism. Among them are the victorious end of the Asian military campaign (246–245 BC); suppression of unrest in Egypt; return to Egypt of the statues of local gods and cult objects that had been removed by the Persian conquerors; and deeds for the benefit of Egyptian temples and sacred animals. But these actions of Ptolemy III either did not meet the definition of a ‘beneficent act’ or concerned only ethnic Egyptians. Traces of the Greek semantic content of the epiclesis ‘Euergetes’ should be sought in the Alexandrian ‘synodal’ decree produced by the Egyptian priesthood. It contains a list of the king’s merciful acts during the first years of his reign, including the easing of fiscal policy and proclamation of a mass amnesty. Such actions were understood as euergetism in the Egyptian and Greek (especially Hellenistic) traditions. Either of them could become the reason for the official deification of the Hellenistic ruler. Responding with an apotheosis to a large-scale act of economic euergetism became everyday reality in the Hellenistic world. Amnesty for prisoners also directly brought the benefactor closer to the Olympian gods, led by Zeus himself.
Downloads
References
Beyer-Rotthoff, B. Untersuchungen zur Aussenpolitik Ptolemaios' III. Bonn, 1993.
Bonneau, D. Le fisc et le Nil: incidences des irrégularités de la crue du Nil sur la fiscalité foncière dans l'Égypte grecque et romaine. Paris, 1971.
Bringmann, K. The King as Benefactor: Some Remarks on Ideal Kingship in the Age of Hellenism. In: A. Bulloch, E. Gruen, A. Long, A. Stewart (ed.), Images and Ideologies. Selfdefinition in the Hellenistic World. Berkeley – Los Angeles – Oxford, 1993, pp. 8-25.
Brumbaugh, M. The new politics of Olympos: kingship in Kallimachos’hymns. New York, 2019. Carrez-Maratray, J.-Y. Bérénice II d’Égypte, une reine dans les étoiles. Paris, 2014.
Chaniotis, A. Normen staerker als Emotionen? Der kulturhistorische Kontext der griechischen Amnestie. In: K. Harter-Uibopuu, F. Mitthof (Hg), Vergeben und Vergessen? Amnestie in der Antike. Wien, 2013, pp. 47-70.
Clayman, D. Berenice II and the Golden Age of Ptolemaic Egypt. Women in antiquity. Oxford — New York, 2014.
Coppola, A. Kings, Gods and Heroes in a Dynastic Perspective: A Comparative Approach. ErgaLogoi, Vol. 2, 2016, pp. 17-37.
Coşkun, A. The war of Brothers, the Third Syrian War, and the Battle of Ankyra (246–241 BC): a Re-Appraisal. In: K. Erickson (ed.), The Seleukid Empire, 281–222 BC: War within the Family. Swansea, 2018, pp. 197-252.
Doningo Gygax, M. Benefaction and rewards in the ancient Greek city: the origins of Euergetism. Cambridge, 2016.
Dreher, M. Die Herausbildung eines politischen Instruments: Die Amnestie bis zum Ende der klassischen Zeit. In: K. Harter-Uibopuu, F. Mitthof (Hg.), Vergeben und Vergessen? Amnestie in der Antike. Wien , 2013, pp. 71-94.
El-Masry, Y., Altenmüller, H., Thissen, H.-J. Das Synodaldekret von Alexandria aus dem Jahre 243 v. Chr. Hamburg, 2012.
Fuks, A. Dositheos son of Drimylos: a prosopographical note. The Journal of Juristic Papyrology, 7-8, 1953-1954, pp. 205-209.
Gabelko, O. L. Istoriya Vifinskogo tsarstva. Sankt-Peterburg, 2005. (In Russian)
Gehrke, H.-J. Geschichte des Hellenismus. München, 1990.
Grabowski, T. Ostatni Triumf Ptolemeuszy. Czwarta Wojna syryjska (221–217 p.n.e.). Kraków, 2010.
Grainger, J. D. The Syrian Wars. Leiden – Boston, 2010.
Hauben, H. L'expédition de Ptolémèe III en Orient et la sédition domestique de 245 av. J.-C. Quelques mises au point. Archiv für papyrusforschung und verwandte gebiete, Bd. 36, 1990, pp. 29-37.
Hayden, B. Price Formation and Fluctuation in Ptolemaic Egypt. PhD Dissertation. Chicago, 2018.
Hölbl, G. A History of the Ptolemaic Empire: Transl. from germ. London – New York, 2001. Huss, W. Ägypten in hellenistischer Zeit: 332-30 v.Chr. München, 2001.
Johstono, P. The Army of Ptolemaic Egypt 323 to 204 BC An Institutional and Operational History. Barnsley, 2020.
Koenen, L. The Ptolemaic King as a Religious Figure. In: A. Bulloch, E. Gruen, A. Long, A. Stewart (ed.), Images and Ideologies. Self-definition in the Hellenistic World. Berkeley – Los Angeles – Oxford, 1993, pp. 26-116.
La’da, C. Amnesty in Hellenistic Egypt. A Survey of the Sources. In : K. Harter-Uibopuu, F. Mitthof (Hg.), Vergeben und Vergessen? Amnestie in der Antike. Wien , 2013, pp. 163-209.
La’da, C. Amnesty in Pharaonic Egypt. In : K. Harter-Uibopuu, F. Mitthof (Hg.), Vergeben und Vergessen? Amnestie in der Antike. Wien , 2013, pp. 17-43.
Ladynin, I. A. Tret’ya Siriyskaya voyna i zakhvat Ptolemeyem III v Azii kul’tovykh predmetov v svedeniyakh knigi Daniila i Porfiriya Tirskogo. Antiquitas Aeterna, vyp. 2, 2007, s. 273-287. (In Russian)
Ladynin, I. A. Dinasticheskiy kul’t i eponimnoye zhrechestvo Ptolemeyev. V sb.: S. Yu. Saprykin, I. A. Ladynin (red.), «Bogi sredi lyudey»: kul’t praviteley v ellinisticheskom, post·ellinisticheskom i rimskom mire. Moskva – Sankt-Peterburg, 2016, s. 265-312. (In Russian)
Losev, A. F. Mifologiya grekov i rimlyan. Moskva, 1996. (In Russian)
Ludlow, F. M., Manning, J. G. Revolts under the Ptolemies: A Paleoclimatological Perspective. In: J. Collins, J. G. Manning (ed.), Revolt and Resistance in the Ancient Classical World and the Near East. In the Crucible of Empire. Leiden – Boston, 2016, pp. 154-171.
Manning, J. G. The Last Pharaohs. Egypt unter the Ptolemies, 305-30 BC. Princeton; Oxford, 2010.
Muccioli, F.-M. Gli epitet' ufficiali dei re ellenistici. Stuttgart, 2013.
Olbrycht, M. J. Early Arsakid Parthia (ca. 250–165 B.С.): At the Crossroads of Iranian, Hellenistic, and Central Asian History. Leiden – Boston, 2021.
Olivier, J., Lorber, C. Three Gold Coinages of Third-Century Ptolemaic Egypt. Revue belge de Numismatique et de Sigillographie, t. 159, 2013, pp. 49-150.
Van Oppen de Ruiter, B. Berenice II Euergetis. Essays in Early Hellenistic Queenship. New York, 2015.
Orrieux, C. Zenon de Caunos, parépidèmos, et le destin grec. Paris, 1985.
Paschidis, P. Between city and King. Prosopographical Studies on the Intermediaries Between the Cities of the Greek Mainland and the Aegean and the Royal Courts in the Hellenistic Period (322–190 BC). Athens, 2008.
Pfeiffer, St. ntr.wj.mnh.wj – theoi Euergetai. Das dritte Ptolemaierpaar im Kanoposdekret. Eine "ganzheitliche" Betrachtung. Egyptian museum collections around the world, Bd. 2, 2002, pp. 937-947.
Pfeiffer, St. Das Dekret von Kanopos (238 v.Chr.). Kommentar und historische Auswertung eines dreisprachigen Synodaldekretes der ägyptischen Priester zu Ehren Ptolemaios’ III. und seiner Familie. Archiv für papyrusforschung und verwandte gebiete, (Beih.), Bd. 18, 2004, pp. I-386.
Pfeiffer, St. Die Ptolemäer: im Reich der Kleopatra. Stuttgart, 2017.
Pfeiffer, St. Griechische und lateinische Inschriften zum Ptolemäerreich und zur römischen Provinz Aegyptus. 2. Aufl. Berlin – Münster, 2020.
Pfeiffer, St., Klinkott, H. Legitimizing the Foreign King in the Ptolemaic and Seleucid Empires: The Role of Local Elites and Priests. In: C. Fischer-Bovet, S. von Reden (ed), Comparing the Ptolemaic and Seleucid empires: integration, communication, and resistance. Cambridge – New York, 2021, pp. 233-261.
Prioux, E. Callimachus’ Queens. In: B. Acosta-Hughes, L. Lehnus, S. Stephens (ed.), Brill's Companion to Callimachus. Leiden, 2011, pp. 201-224.
Psoma, S. Numismatic Evidence on the Ptolemaic Involvement in Thrace During the Second Syrian War. American Journal of Numismatic, vol. 20, 2008, pp. 257-263.
Scheibeireiter, Ph. Atheniensium vetus exemplum: Zum Paradigma einer antiken Amnestie. In: K. Harter-Uibopuu, F. Mitthof (Hg.), Vergeben und Vergessen? Amnestie in der Antike. Wien, 2013, pp. 95-126.
Sewell-Lasater, T. Becoming Kleopatra: Ptolemaic Royal Marriage, Incest, and the Path to Female Rule. PhD Dissertation. Houston, 2020.
Shelton, J. Notes on the Ptolemaic Salt Tax under Ptolemy III. Zeitschrift für papyrologie und epigraphik, Bd. 71, 1988, pp. 133-136.
Smith, H. A Note on Amnesty. The journal of egyptian archaeology, vol. 54, 1968, pp. 209-214.
Surikov, I. Ye. Ocherki ob istoriopisanii v klassicheskoy Gretsii. Moskva, 2011. (In Russian)
Thiers, Ch. Égyptiens et Grecs au service des cultes indigènes. Un aspect de l’évergétisme en Égypte lagide. In: M. Molin (dir), Les régulations sociales dans l'Antiquité. Actes du colloque d’Angers 23-24 mai 2003. Rennes, 2006, pp. 275-301.
Thissen, H.-J. Studien zum Raphiadekret. Meisenheim am Glan, 1966.
Volkmann, H. Der Herrscherkult der Ptolemäer in phoenikischen inschriften und sein Beitrag zur Hellenisirung von Kypros. Historia, Vol. 5, 1956, pp. 448-455.
Zelinskyi, A. L. Aleksandriys'ki faraony ta yikhni piddani. Zmitsnennya vlady pershykh Ptolemeyiv. Kyiv, 2010. (In Ukrainian)
Zelinskyi, A. L. Golod v Egipte pri Ptolemeye ІІІ Evergete: peresmotr datirovki i istochnikovoy bazy. Vostok [Orient], 2020, no. 3, s. 65-73. (In Russian)
Zelinskyi, A. L. Prinyatiye Ptolemeyem III epiklezy «Everget» v svete t. n. Aleksandriyskogo sinodal’nogo dekreta. U zb.: Problemy istoriyi ta arkheolohiyi Ukrayiny. Tezy dopovidey XII mizhnarodnoyi naukovoyi konferentsiyi (lystopad 2020 roku). Kharkiv, 2020, s. 35. (In Russian)
Zelinskyi, A. L. Vid basylevsiv-faraoniv do faraoniv-basylevsiv: pershi 100 rokiv ptolemeyivs'koyi monarkhiyi. Vinnytsya – Kyiv, 2020. (In Ukrainian)
Zelinskyi, A. L. Antiokh II i Rodos vo vremya II Siriyskoy voyny: vozmozhnaya tsel’ voyennogo al’yansa. Starodavnie Prychornomoria [The Ancient Black Sea region], vyp. XIII, s. 158-164. (In Russian)
Copyright (c) 2023 Andrii Zelinskyi
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
