Recent Trends in Economic and Business History: The Analysis of the Most Impactful Articles Published from 2016 to 2020
The article aims to analyse recent trends in economic and business history from 2016 to 2020 and identify the factors determining the impact of the research articles. The authors analysed the ten most cited articles published in prestigious international peer-reviewed journals on economic and business history. They summarize the content of every article and explain its contribution to the field. The article defines efficient theoretical instruments for studies in the field of economic and business history. The observations can be useful to researchers concerned about the impact of their publications and those interested in the dynamics of the field. The synthesis of the observations revealed the following most important factors determining the impact of research articles. The proposal of a new theory or concept certainly raises the interest of the academic community. A new representative empirical material is crucial to increase the level of citations in the field of economic history. Alternatively, a good strategy is to present a new efficient method for the analysis of existing datasets. Explicit explanation of how the new data and methods specify conventional perceptions about historical events and processes increases the popularity of publications. An effective way to raise the interest of the readers is to look at the deviations from the “norms” – historical anomalies and paradoxes. A critical synthetic review of the literature on a topic or a problem is usually appreciated by the community of economic historians, but it is especially popular in journals on business history. The final part of the article offers observations on the disciplinary and national diversity of author teams. It concludes that such diversity results in the multidisciplinary character of the studies and increases their value for the sister disciplines.
Alfani, G., Murphy, T. E. Plague and Lethal Epidemics in the Pre-Industrial World. The Journal of economic History, vol. 77, iss. 1, 2017, pp. 314-343. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022050717000092.
Bengtsson, E., Waldenström, D. Capital Shares and Income Inequality: Evidence from the Long Run. The Journal of Economic History, vol. 78 , iss. 3, 2018, pp. 712-743. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022050718000347.
Bodenhorn, H., Guinnane, T. W., and Mroz, T. A. Sample-Selection Biases and the Industrialization Puzzle. The Journal of Economic History, vol. 77 , iss. 1, 2017, pp. 171-207. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022050717000031.
Brankovic, J. Why Rankings Appear Natural (but Aren’t). Business & Society, vol. 61, iss. 4, 2022, pp. 801-806. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/00076503211015638.
Broadberry, S., Guan, H., and Daokui Li, D. China, Europe, and the Great Divergence: A Study in Historical National Accounting, 980–1850. The Journal of Economic History, vol. 78, iss. 4, 2018, pp. 955-1000. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022050718000529.
Cabras, I., Bamforth, C. From Reviving Tradition to Fostering Innovation and Changing Marketing: The Evolution of Micro-Brewing in the Uk and Us, 1980–2012. Business History, vol. 58, iss. 5, 2016, pp. 625-646. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00076791.2015.1027692.
Colpan, A. M., Jones, G. Business Groups, Entrepreneurship and the Growth of the Koç Group in Turkey. Business History, vol. 58, iss. 1, 2016, pp. 69-88. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00076791.2015.1044521.
Foster, W. M., et al. The Strategic Use of Historical Narratives: A Theoretical Framework. Business History, vol. 59, iss. 8, 2017, pp. 1176-1200. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00076791.2016.1224234.
Hiebl, M. R. W. Sample Selection in Systematic Literature Reviews of Management Research. Organizational Research Methods, 2021, pp. 1-33. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428120986851.
Jones, G., van Leeuwen M. H. D., and Broadberry, S. The Future of Economic, Business, and Social History. Scandinavian Economic History Review, vol. 60, no. 3, 2012, pp. 225–253.
Logan, T. D, Parman, J. M. The National Rise in Residential Segregation. The Journal of Economic History, vol. 77, iss. 1, 2017, pp. 127-170. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022050717000079.
Maclean, M., Harvey, C., and Clegg, S. R. Organization Theory in Business and Management History: Present Status and Future Prospects. Business History Review, vol. 91, iss. 3, 2017, pp. 457-481. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007680517001027.
Wadhwani, R. D., Lubinski, C. Reinventing Entrepreneurial History. Business History Review, vol. 91, iss. 4, 2017, pp. 767-799. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007680517001374.
Copyright (c) 2022 Volodymyr Kulikov , Iryna Skubii
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).