Transmedial presence of verbal texts in architecture and public space. Between informativity and emotivity
Abstract
From the semiotic viewpoint, architectonic structures and the surrounding public spaces can be seen as texts to be read and interpreted within proper historical, social, and cultural contexts. In addition, they are almost always multimodal, that is polysemiotic texts whose content becomes complemented with pictorial elements (paintings, sculptures), with written or oral language and, on occasion, with music.
I intend to focus specifically on the presence of verbal texts inside, on or around buildings (mostly within an urban space), which is a case of textual embedment. Functions of written inserts, inscriptions, signboards, tablets, posters, banners, graffiti, etc. are multifarious. They range from informational and explanatory, to devotional, to political–critical, to – in the end – poetic, experimental, creative, funny, and ironical. Aesthetically, they often enrich but sometimes violate architecture and public space. The following types of verbal texts will be considered briefly, according to their content:
1) up-to-date information (warnings, advertisements, etc.);
2) historical-institutional information;
3) religious-devotional (including critical) information;
4) political commentaries;
5) poetic and experimental creations, mostly artistic critical games played by conceptual and post-modern artists.
Several of my examples qualify as instances of urban creativity, specifically street art and graffiti of resistance (cf. Awad & Wagoner, 2017; Stampoulidis, 2019).
In the spirit of cognitive semiotics, defined by Zlatev, Sonesson, and Konderak (2016) as the transdisciplinary, conceptual-empirical study of meaning, mind and communication, this article (based on a corpus of twenty-six inscriptions gathered from many international locations) raises the issue of the interplay of informativity and emotional load contained in verbal texts immersed in public settings. Undoubtedly, the message conveyed by architectural carriers and urban space contributes synergically to the overall meaning of the verbal messages that accompany them.
Downloads
References
Basista, A., & Nowakowski, A. (2012). Jak czytać architekturę? [How to read architecture?]. Kraków: Universitas.
de Beaugrande, R.-A., & Dressler, W. U. (1990). Introduction to text linguistics. London: Longman.
Biglari, A. (2023). General introduction to Open semiotics. In A.Biglari (Ed.), Open semiotics. Volume 1: Epistemological and conceptual foundations (pp. 33-42). Paris: L’Harmattan.
Chrzanowska-Kluczewska, E. (2019). Verbal text in architecture – a text within a text. In G.T.
Papanikos (Ed.), Abstract book. 9th Annual International Conference on Architecture. 8-11 July 2019. Athens, Greece (p. 29). Athens, ATINER.
Damasio, A. (1994). Descartes’ error: Emotion, reason, and the human brain. New York, NY: Gosset/Putnam.
Ekman, P. (1992). An argument for basic emotions. Cognition and Emotion, 6, 169-200.
Graffiti. (n. d.). Wikipedia. Retrieved January 27, 2024, from https://pl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Graffiti
Jain, Sh., & Asawa, K. (2019). Modeling of emotion elicitation conditions for a cognitive-emotive architecture. Cognitive Systems Research, Volume 55, June 2019, 60-76. Retrieved November 26, 2024 from https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S138904171
Kalyva, E. (2016). Images and text in Conceptual Art. Critical operations in context. Cham, Switzerland: Palgrave MacMillan.
Kegler, K.R. (2018, Sept. 28–29). Frankenstein. Parabel der Moderne 1818 – 2018 [Conference presentation]. International Symposium of the Inklings-Society, Ingolstadt, Germany. https://arthist.net/archive/17088
LeDoux, J. (2015). Anxious. The modern mind in the age of anxiety. London: Oneworld Publications.
Lefebvre, H. (1970/2003). The urban revolution. Minnesota, MN: Minnesota University Press.
Li, W., & Zlatev, J. (2022). Intersemiotic translation from fairy tale to sculpture: An exploration of secondary narrativity. Sign Systems Studies, 50(2/3), 317-345. https://doi.org/10.12697/SSS.3
Lotman, J. (1992/2004/2009). Culture and explosion. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Maynard, S. K. (2002). Linguistic emotivity. Centrality of place, the topic-comment dynamic, and an ideology of pathos in Japanese discourse. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Miłosz, Cz. (1996/2008). Poezje wybrane/Selected poems. Kraków: Wydawnictwo Literackie.
Mohammad, S. M. (2017). Word affect intensities. Retrieved December 21, 2020 from https://www.aclweb.org/anthology/L18-1027.pdf
Pană, L. L. (2018). Towards a general theory of information (Ch. 387). In Mehdi Khosrow-Pour (Ed.), Encyclopedia of information science and technology (4th ed).
https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-5225-2255-3.ch387
Paül i Agustí, D., & Guerrero i Lladós, M. (2021). The influence of public spaces on emotional states. Journal of Urban Design. https://doi.org/10.1080/13574809.2021.1960155
Pérez-Izaguirre, E., & Liñero Reglero, A. M. (2024). What can graffiti tell us about emotions and motivation? Some key points for learning. Trends in Psychology, (2024) 32, 84-99. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43076-023-00304-9
Robinson, S., & Pallasmaa, J. (2015). Mind in architecture: Neuroscience, embodiment, and the future of design. Boston, MA: The MIT Press.
Saldre, M., & Torop, P. (2012). Transmedia space. In I. Ibrus, & C. A. Scolari (Eds.).
Crossmedia innovations. Texts, markets, institutions (pp. 25-44). Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.
Sobita, W. (2018). Textualisation as an interpretative strategy: Intermediality in contemporary verbal-visual artistic texts (Unpublished PhD dissertation). Philological Faculty, Jagiellonian University, Kraków, Poland.
Sonesson, G. (2010). Here comes the semiotic species. Reflections on the semiotic turn in the cognitive sciences. In B. Wagoner (Ed.), Symbolic transformation (pp. 38-58). London, New York: Routledge.
Stampoulidis, G. (2019). Stories of resistance in Greek Street Art: A cognitive-semiotic approach. Public Journal of Semiotics, 8(2), 29-48. https://journals.lub.lu.se/pjos/article/view/19872
Street art. (n.d.). In Wikipedia. Retrieved January 27, 2024 from https://pl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Street_art
Synergy. (2008). In Cambridge Advanced Learner’s Dictionary (3rd ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
Szymborska, W. (1993). „Koniec i początek”/ “The end and the beginning”. Retrieved January 24, 2024, from https://exceptindreams.livejournal.com/359394.html
Zlatev, J. (2015). Cognitive semiotics. In P. Trifonas (Ed.), International handbook of semiotics (pp. 1043-1067). Dordrecht: Springer.
Zlatev, J., Sonesson, G., & Konderak, P. (2016). Introduction. Cognitive semiotics comes of age. In J. Zlatev, G. Sonesson, & P. Konderak (Eds.), Meaning, mind and communication: Explorations in cognitive semiotics (pp. 9-30). Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.
Copyright (c) 2024 Chrzanowska-Kluczewska Elżbieta
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Authors, who publish with this journal, accept the following conditions:
The authors reserve the copyright of their work and transfer to the journal the right of the first publication of this work under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial Non-Derivs License (CC BY-NC-ND), which allows other persons to freely distribute a published work with mandatory reference to the authors of the original work and the first publication of the work in this journal.
Authors have the right to enter into separate additional agreements for the non-exclusive dissemination of the work in the form in which it was published by this journal (for example, to post the work in the electronic institutions' repository or to publish as part of a monograph), provided that the link to the first publication of the work in this journal is given.
The journal policy allows and encourages the authors to place the manuscripts on the Internet (for example, in the institutions' repositories or on personal websites), both before the presentation of this manuscript to the editorial board and during review procedure, as it contributes to the creation of productive scientific discussion and positively affects the efficiency and dynamics of citing the published work (see The Effect of Open Access).
