Possible worlds of a literary text character: a cognitive and quantitative linguistic approach
Abstract
The article aims to forward a model for analyzing the evaluative component of controversial literary characters. This model presupposes the application of the basic tenets of the possible worlds theory to the analysis of a fiction text, combining it with the methodology of cognitive and quantitative linguistics. To exemplify the employment of the developed model, the image of Louis XI, the King of France, depicted by W. Scott in his novel Quentin Durward, was analyzed. Portrayed as an astute politician, this protagonist puts on different guises and plays numerous roles while the plot unravels, trying to achieve his goals and influence the people around him. Such roles are viewed in the article as possible worlds of Louis XI. In these worlds, he is described through various positive and negative characteristics, which are considered predicates of basic propositional schemas featuring in semantics of lingual networks. To fathom the importance and ubiquity of the characteristics, two indices used in quantitative linguistics (coverage rate and mean frequency) were employed. Such a complex approach enabled to reveal the existence of 15 possible worlds of Louis XI in the novel. Two-thirds of them are primary possible worlds created via direct description of the image by the author, and one-third is secondary possible worlds, where the King is depicted indirectly by presenting the vantage point of other characters who appraise Louis and express their attitude to him. The most important characteristics of Louis emphasized by the author and featuring in the maximum number of his possible world create a portrait of a skillful medieval monarch. Being sly, he hypocritically conceals his true cruel and mercenary aspirations and generally succeeds in presenting himself to others as a devout Christian and wise ruler acting for the benefit of his subjects, which is vindicated by the prevalence of his positively charged descriptions. Thus, the image created by W. Scott in his novel lives up to the reputation of Universal Spider—the symptomatic nickname that this historical figure earned from his contemporaries.
Downloads
References
Bal, M. (1997). Narratology: Introduction to the Theory of Narrative. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
Bieliekhova, L. (2021). Integrated model of poetic text interpretation. In In A. Pawelec, A. Shaw & G. Szpila (Eds.), Text-Image-Music: Crossing the borders. Intermedial conversations on the poetics of verbal, visual and musical texts (pp. 199-210). Berlin: Peter Lang. Retrieved from https://www.peterlang.com/view/9783631846698/html/ch22.xhtml
Buk, S. (2008). Osnovy statystychnoi linhvistyky: navchalno-metodychnyi posibnyk [Fundamentals of quantitative linguistics: a study aid]. Lviv: Ivan Franko LNU Publ. (in Ukrainian).
Doležel, L. (1998). Heterocosmica: Fiction and Possible Worlds. Baltimore and London: The Johns Hopkins University Press.
Fillmore, C. (1968). The Case for Case. In E. Bach, & R.T. Harms (Eds.). Universals in Linguistic Theory. (pp. 1–90). New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.
Fina A., de, & Georgakopoulou, A. (2012). Analyzing narrative: Discourse and sociolinguistic perspectives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Graeser, А. С., Singer M., & Trabasso, T. (2002). Constructing Interferences during Narrative Text Comprehension. N.Y.: Basic Books.
Halych, O., Nazarets, V., & Vasyliev, Ye. (2008). Teoriia literatury: pidruchnyk [Theory of literature: A textbook]. Kyiv: Lybid (in Ukrainian).
Hidalgo Downing, L. (2003). Text world creation in advertising discourse. Círculo de Lingüística Aplicada a la Comunicación (CLAC), 13, 23-44.
Hilpinen, R. (1986). Semantika imperativov i deonticheskaja logika [Semantics of imperatives and deontic logic]. In Novoe v zarubezhnoj lingvistike. Vyp. XVIII: Logicheskij analiz estestvennogo jazyka. (pp. 300–317). Moscow: Progress Publ. (in Russian).
Hintikka, J. (2019). Perspectives on the Logical Study of Language. Logica Universalis, 13(2), 151-163. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11787-019-00224-2
Korotkova, L. (2001). Semantyko-kohnityvnyi ta funktsionalnyi aspekty tekstovykh anomalii u suchasnii anhlomovnii khudozhnii prozi [Semantic, cognitive, and functional aspects of text anomalies in modern English-language prose]. Unpublished candidate dissertation thesis, Kyiv National Linguistic University, Kyiv, Ukraine (in Ukrainian).
Kotovska, O. (2015). Typolohiia mozhlyvykh svitiv u kohnityvnii linhvistytsi [Typology of possible worlds in cognitive linguistics]. Naukovyi chasopys NPU imeni M. P. Drahomanova, 13, 127-135 (in Ukrainian).
Kripke, S. (1986). Zagadka kontekstov mnenija [A puzzle about belief]. In Novoe v zarubezhnoj lingvistike. Vyp. XVIII: Logicheskij analiz estestvennogo jazyka. (pp. 4-16). Moscow: Progress Publ.
Leibniz, G. (1710). Theodicy. Essays on the Goodness of God, the Freedom of Man and the Origin of Evil. Retrieved from: https://www.gutenberg.org/files/17147/17147-h/17147-h.htm
Leibniz, G. (1714). The Monadology. Retrieved from:
http://home.datacomm.ch/kerguelen/monadology/printable.html
Livingston, P., & Sauchelli, A. (2011). Philosophical perspectives on fictional characters. New Literary history, 42(2), 337-360. Retrieved from https://www.jstor.org/stable/23012547
Lysova, Z. (2007). S. Modal’nyj analiz: ontologija, logika i lingvistika [Modal analysis: ontology, logic, and linguistics]. Vestnik SamGU, 5/2 (55), 23-29 (in Russian).
Marina, O.S. (2017). Paradoxicality in Modern English Poetic Discourse: Testing Boundaries of Linguistic Research in the 21 st Century. Cognition, communication, discourse, 15, 39-50. https://doi.org/10.26565/2218-2926-2017-15-03
Mollat, M. (2020). Louis XI. Retrieved from: https://www.britannica.com/biography/Louis-XI
Mykolaichuk, N. (2014). Teoriia mozhlyvykh svitiv u khudozhnomu prostori novely F. Kafky «Perevtilennia» [Possible worlds theory in the literary space of “Metamorphosis” by F. Kafka]. Studia methodologica, 3, 145-151 (in Ukrainian).
Nazarenko, M. (2006). «Vozmozhnye miry» v istoricheskoj proze [“Possible worlds” in historic prose]. In Russkaja literatura. Issledovanija: Sb. nauch. trudov. X, 105-115 (in Russian).
Obelets, Yu. (2006). Temporalna struktura mozhlyvykh svitiv khudozhnoho tekstu [Temporal structure of possible worlds of a literary text]. Unpublished candidate dissertation thesis, Odesa National University, Odesa, Ukraine (in Ukrainian).
Pavkin, D. (2020). A cognitive linguistic approach to the analysis of fantasy text characters. Cognition, communication, discourse, 20, 41–61. https://doi.org/10.26565/2218-2926-2020-20-03
Russel, B. (1959). Istorija zapadnoj filosofii [A History of Western Philosophy]. Moscow: Nauka Publ.
Ryan, M.-L. (2008). Transfictionality across media. In J. Pier, & J.A. Garcia Landa (Eds.) Theorizing narrativity. (pp. 385-417). Berlin: de Gruyter.
Saint-Gelais, R. (2005). Transfictionalty. In D. Herman et al. (Eds.) The Routledge encyclopedia of narrative theory. (pp. 612-613). London: Routledge.
Searle, J., & Vanderveken, D. (1986). Osnovnye ponjatija ischislenija rechevyh aktov [Fundamentals of speech act taxonomy]. In Novoe v zarubezhnoj lingvistike. Vyp. XVIII: Logicheskij analiz estestvennogo jazyka. (pp. 242-263). Moscow: Progress Publ. (in Russian).
Stockwell, P. (2016). Cognitive Stylistics. In R. Jones (Ed.), The Routledge Handbook of Language and Creativity (pp. 240-252). London: Routledge.
Zhabotinskaja, S. (2013). Imja kak tekst: konceptual’naja set’ leksicheskogo znachenija (analiz imeni jemocii) [The name as a text: conceptual network of lexical meaning (analysis of the name of emotion)]. Cognition, communication, discourse, 6, 47-76. https://doi.org/10.26565/2218-2926-2013-06-04
Zhabotinskaja, S. (2017). Narrativnye politicheskie koncepty: metodika lingvokognitivnogo analiza [Narrative political concepts: a methodology of cognitive linguistic analysis]. In N. Petljuchenko (Ed.). Koncepty i kontrasty. (pp. 30-40). Odessa: Gel’vetika Publ. (in Russian).
Copyright (c) 2021 Dmytro Pavkin
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Authors, who publish with this journal, accept the following conditions:
The authors reserve the copyright of their work and transfer to the journal the right of the first publication of this work under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial Non-Derivs License (CC BY-NC-ND), which allows other persons to freely distribute a published work with mandatory reference to the authors of the original work and the first publication of the work in this journal.
Authors have the right to enter into separate additional agreements for the non-exclusive dissemination of the work in the form in which it was published by this journal (for example, to post the work in the electronic institutions' repository or to publish as part of a monograph), provided that the link to the first publication of the work in this journal is given.
The journal policy allows and encourages the authors to place the manuscripts on the Internet (for example, in the institutions' repositories or on personal websites), both before the presentation of this manuscript to the editorial board and during review procedure, as it contributes to the creation of productive scientific discussion and positively affects the efficiency and dynamics of citing the published work (see The Effect of Open Access).
