A cognitive linguistic approach to the analysis of fantasy text characters

Keywords: basic frame, character, eidetic aspect of description, evaluation coefficient, fantasy genre, logical aspect of description, propositional schema

Abstract

This article aims to suggest a procedure of analyzing fantasy text characters focusing on their evaluative component. The said procedure is based on the methodology of cognitive linguistics, namely the basic frames theory. Basic frames are schematic mental structures that form the backbone of our informational system. The frames consist of propositional schemas containing static and dynamic characteristics of a character under scrutiny. The empirical data of the research are represented by descriptions of characters in a series prototypical for fantasy genre – legendarium by J. R.R. Tolkien which includes the novels The Silmarillion, The Hobbit, and The Lord of the Rings. In his books, the writer created not only an alternative universe with its geography and mythology but also versatile characters who belong to different “races” – Elves, Men, Hobbits, Dwarves, Ents, and Orcs. The race affiliation of a protagonist exposes his/her peculiar traits of character, worldview, and way of life making it easier for the writer to describe them. So analyzing the evaluation of characters one should take into consideration both common features shared by all representatives of a race portraying it as a homogeneous entity – eidos (a holistic non-segmented image) and unique individual features of the protagonist – logos (an image where its constituents are singled out). Consequently, the evaluation of a character may be mathematically represented as a summary coefficient equal to the ratio of logical and eidetic coefficients. The former is calculated as the ratio of positive and negative propositions describing the personal qualities of a protagonist, the latter is the ratio of positive and negative propositions describing the race to which the character belongs. The article contains a detailed analysis of the six races of Tolkien’s legendarium and two representatives of each race which enabled to outline their generalized portraits and determine summary evaluations which makes it clear that some characters are “better” and some are “worse” than average representatives of their race.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Barthes, R. (1989). Ot proizvedenija k tekstu [From a literary work to a text]. In: R. Barthes Izbrannye raboty: Semiotika. Pojetika [Selected works: Semiotics. Poetics] (pp. 413-423). Moscow: Progress Publ.
Batsevych, F. (1999). Refreiminhovyi dyskurs: shliakhy ruinuvannia kartyn svitu [Reframing discourse: ways to ruin images of the world]. Aktualni problemy mentalinhvistyky: Naukovyi zbirnyk, 29-33 (in Ukrainian).
Fantasy. Retrieved from: http://www.bse.sci-lib.com/letter 022.shtml
Fontenot, M. N. (2019). Exploring the People of Middle-earth: Nerdanel, Called the Wise. Retrieved frоm: https://www.tor.com/2019/02/21/exploring-the-people-of-middle-earth-nerdanel-called-the-wise/
Freeman, M. (2002). The body in the word: A cognitive approach to the shape of a poetic text. In: E. Semino, & J. Culperer (Eds.). Cognitive Stylistics: Language and Cognition in Text Analysis (pp. 23-47). Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publ.
Gakov, V. (1995). Tolkien J. R. R. In: V. Gakov (Ed.). Jenciklopedija fantastiki [Encyclopedia of science fiction] (pp. 556-558). Minsk: IKO “Galaksias” Publ.
Gopman, V. L. (1992). Knigi objazany horosho konchat'sja... [Books ought to have a good ending…]. In: Tolkien J. R. R. List raboty Melkina i drugie volshebnyie skazki [Leaf by Niggle and other fairy stories] (pp. 297-299). Moscow: RIF Publ.
Lewis, C. S. (2018). The Dethronement of Power. CS Lewis’ Response to Critics of The Lord of the Rings. Retrieved from: https://earthandoak.wordpress.com/2018/01/06/cs-lewis-response-to-critics-of-the-lord-of-the-rings-the-dethronement-of-power/
Losev, A. F. (1990). Filosofija imeni [Philosophy of the name]. Moscow: MGU Publ.
Lotman, Yu. M. (1992). Кul’tura i vzryv [Culture and explosion]. Moscow: Genezis Publ.
Lotman, Yu. M. (1998). Struktura hudozhestvennogo teksta [Structure of a literary text]. In: Yu. M. Lotman Ob iskusstve [On art] (pp. 14-285). Saint Petersburg: Iskusstvo – SPB Publ.
Pavkin, D. M. (2002). Obraz Charivnoyi Krayiny v romanax J. R. R. Tolkiyena: lingvokognityvnyj analiz [The image of Fairy Land in J. R. R. Tolkien’s novels: a cognitive linguistic analysis]. Unpublished candidate dissertation thesis, Bohdan Khmelnytsky State University, Cherkasy, Ukraine (in Ukrainian).
Pavkin, D. M. (2004). Emotivna otsinka obrazu prostoru (na materiali romaniv J. R. R. Tolkiyena) [Emotive evaluation of the spatial image (a study of J. R. R. Tolkien’s novels)]. Visnyk Cherkaskogo universitetu. Filologichni nauky, 60, 112-120 (in Ukrainian).
Pavkin, D. M. (2011). Chy pysav J. R. R. Tolkien fentezi, abo teoriya zhanriv u svitli prototypnoyi semantyky [Did J. R. R. Tolkien write fantasy, or theory of genres against the background of prototypical semantics]. Vitchyznyana filologiya: teoretychni ta metodychni aspekty vyvchennya, 2, 91-99 (in Ukrainian).
Safonova, O. (2016). Obraz mifologicheskogo drakona v tvorchestve J. R. R. Tolkina [The image of mythological dragon in works by J. R. R. Tolkien]. Vremja nauki, 1, 26-33 (in Russian).
Shippey, Т. (1997). Tolkien kak poslevoennyiy pisatel [Tolkien as a post-war writer]. Znanie – sila, 12, 143-148 (in Russian).
Sytnyk, N. V. (2009). Fentezi J.R.R. Tolkina: arhetypovyj vymir hudozhn`oyi struktury. [J. R. R. Tolkien’s fantasy: an archetypal dimension of the literary structure]. Unpublished candidate dissertation thesis, V. I. Vernadsky Tavria National University, Simferopol, Ukraine (in Ukrainian).
Tihomirova, E. (2003). Misce osoby`stogo kvestu Aragorna v metakvesti Seredzem'ya (na materiali tekstiv Dzh. Tolkina) [Aragorn’s personal quest as a part of metaquest of Middle-earth]. Mandrivets. Naukovi zapysky pry Ky`yevo-Mogy`lyans`kij akademiyi, 4, 45-50 (in Ukrainian).
Tsur, R. (1992). Toward a Theory of Cognitive Poetics. Amsterdam etc.: Elsevier Science Publ.
Turaeva, Z. Ja. (1999). Lingvistika teksta na ishode vtorogo tysjacheletija [Text linguistics at the end of the second millennium]. Visnyk Kyivskoho linhvistychnoho universytetu. Seriia “Filolohiia”. Vol. 2, # 2, 17-25 (in Russian).
Valgina, N. S. (2003). Teorija teksta [Theory of the Text]. Moscow: Logos Publ.
Vorobiova, O. P. (2004). Kohnityvna poetyka v Ukraini: napriamy doslidzhen [Cognitive poetics in Ukraine: research trends]. Materialy mizhnarodnoyi naukovoyi konferentsiyi: Aktualni problemy romano-hermanskoi filolohii v Ukraini ta Bolonskyi protses. Chernivtsi, 37-38 (in Ukrainian).
White, М. (2002). Tolkien: Biografiya [Tolkien: A Biography]. Moscow: Eksmo Publ.
Zhabotinskaja, S. A. (2010). Lingvokognitivnyj podhod k analizu normativnyh processov [Cognitive linguistic approach to the regulatory processes analysis]. Vіsnyk Kharkіvskoho natsionalnogo universitetu іm. V.N. Karazіna, 928, 6-20 (in Russian).
Published
2020-07-20
How to Cite
Pavkin, D. (2020). A cognitive linguistic approach to the analysis of fantasy text characters. Cognition, Communication, Discourse, (20), 41-61. https://doi.org/10.26565/2218-2926-2020-20-03