Constructing negative emotions in cinematic discourse: a cognitive-pragmatic perspective

doi:10.26565/2218-2926-2019-19-04

Tetiana Krysanova Lesya Ukrainka Eastern European National University https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9456-3845

DOI: https://doi.org/10.26565/2218-2926-2019-19-04

Keywords: cinematic discourse, cognitive-pragmatic analysis, construct, meaning, multimodality, multisemiosis, negative emotion, semiotic resource

Abstract

This article reveals cognitive-pragmatic properties of constructing negative emotions in English feature cinematic discourse. This research is underpinned by semiotic theories, linguistic theory of emotions, discourse studies, cognitive linguistics, the theories of conceptual integration and joint attention, which stipulate an integrative approach to the multisemiosis of negative emotive meanings by verbal, non-verbal, and cinematographic semiotic resources. This research stressess the polycoded and multimodal nature of cinematic discourse, where a combination of visual and acoustic modes changes dynamically in the film time and space. Adopting an interactional-dynamic perspective on emotive meaning making in film, I claim that negative emotions in cinematic discourse are emergent multimodal dynamic constructs resulting from the online interaction of verbal, non-verbal, and cinematic resources, which takes place at primary and secondary stages of film making. The primary semiosis of negative emotive meaning occurs in the screenplay, which is an integral part of cinematic discourse and presents a film cognitive model. The secondary semiosis takes place in the film diegesis through a combination of verbal, non-verbal and cinematographic means specific for a particular negative emotion. In feature cinematic discourse, I distinguish eight combination patterns of multimodal semiotic resources depending on a set of criteria: quantitative vs qualitative or synchronous vs sequential configuration patters. The collective author’s intention and film genres influence the choice of cinematic techniques and their configuration patterns.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Argaman, O. (2010). Linguistic markers and emotional intensity. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 39(2), 89-99.
Bamberg, M. (1997). Language, Concepts and Emotions: the Role of Language in the Construction of Emotions. Language Sciences, 19(4), 309-340.
Bateman, A. & Schmidt, K.-H. (2012). Multimodal Film Analysis. How Films Mean. London, New York: Routledge.
Baldry, A. & Thibault P. J. (2006). Multimodal Transcription and Text Analysis: A Multimedia Toolkit and Coursebook. London & Oakville: Equinox.
Barret, L. (2017). How Emotions are Made. The Secret Life of the Brain. Boston, New York: Houghton.
Bondarenko, E. V. (2018). Stilistika jepohi mul’timodal’nosti: problema metoda [Stylistics in the multimodal age: problem of method]. In I. M Kolyehayeva (Ed.). Ljubov’ k slovu: filol. zametki v chest’ jubileja prof. V. A. Kuharenko (pp. 52-61). Odesa: KP OHT Publ. (in Russian)
Bondarenko, E. V., Martynjuk, A. P., Frolova, I. E., & Shevchenko, I. S. (2017). Kak narisovat’ portret pticy: metodologija kognitivno-kommunikativnogo analiza jazyka [How to draw a portrait of a bird: methodology of a cognitive-communicative analysis of language]. Kharkiv: Karazin university Publ. (in Russian)
Branigan, E. (2006). Projecting a Camera Language-Games in Film Theory. New York, London: Routledge.
Bubel, C. (2006). The linguistic construction of character relations in TV drama : Doing friendship in Sex and the City. (Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation). Saarland University, Saarbrücken, Germany.
Carroll, N. (1999). Film, Emotion, and Genre. In C. Plantinga & G. M. Smith (Eds.). Passionate View: Film, Cognition and Emotion (pp. 21-47). Baltimore, London: The Johns Hopkins University Press.
Chovanec, J. (2011). Humour in quasi-conversations: Constructing fun in online sports journalis. In M. Dynel (Ed.). The Pragmatics of Humour across Discourse Domains (pp. 243–264). Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
Damasio, A. (1994). Descartes’ Error: Emotion, Reason, and the Human Brain. New York: Avon Books.
Deleuze, G. (1989). Cinema 2: The Time Image. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Dirven, R. (1997). Emotions as cause and the cause of emotions. In S. Niemeier & R. Dirven (Eds.). The Language of Emotions: Conceptualization, Expression, and Theoretical Foundation (pp. 55-83). Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
Dynel, M. (2011). Stranger than Fiction? A Few Methodological Notes on Linguistic Research in Film Discourse. Brno Studies in English. 37(1): 41-61. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5817/BSE2011-1-3
Esslim, M. (1987). The Field of Drama. How the signs of drama create meaning on stage and screen. London & New York: Methuen.
Fauconnier, G. & Turner M. (1998). Conceptual Integration Networks. Cognitive Science, 22(2), 133-187.
Fauconnier, G. & Turner M. (2003). The Way We Think: Conceptual Blending and the Mind’s Hidden Complexities. New York: Basic Books.
Feng, D., & O’Halloran K. L. (2013). The multimodal representation of emotion in film: Integrating cognitive and semiotic approaches. Semiotica; 197, 79-100. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/sem-2013-0082
Foolen, A. (2012). The Relevance of Emotion for Language and Linguistics. In A. Foolen, U. Lüdtke, T. Racine & J. Zlatev (Eds.) Moving Ourselves, Moving Others: Motion and Emotion in Intersubjectivity, Consciousness and Language (pp. 347-368). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Foolen, A. (2019). Quo vadis pragmatics? From adaptation to participatory sense-making. Journal of Pragmatics, 145, 39-46. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2019.03.008
Frijda, N. H. (1986). The Emotions (Studies in Emotion and Social Interaction). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Fryer, D. L. (2019). Engagement in Medical Research Discourse. A Multisemiotic Discourse-Semantic Study of Dialogic Positioning (Doctoral thesis, University of Gothenburg. Faculty of Arts, Gothenburg, Sweden). Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/2077/58506.
Gaut, B. (1999). Identification and Emotion in Narrative Film. In C. Plantinga & G. M. Smith (Eds.). Passionate View: Film, Cognition, and Emotion (pp. 200-216). Baltimore, London: The Johns Hopkins University Press.
Halliday, M. A. K. (1978). Language as social semiotic: The social interpretation of language and meaning. London: Edward Arnold.
Jekman, P. (2010). Psihologija jemocij. Ja znaju, chto ty chuvstvuesh [Psychology of emotions. I know what you feel]. SPb.: Piter. (in Russian)
Konijn, E. A. (2000). Acting Emotions. Shaping Emotions On Stage. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.
Kozloff, S. (2000). Overhearing Film Dialogue. Berkeley & Los Angeles: University of California Press.
Kress, G. (2010). Multimodality: A Social Semiotic Approach to Contemporary Communication. London & New York: Routledge.
Krejdlin, G. E. (2002). Neverbal’naja semiotika: Jazyk tela i estestvennyj jazyk. [Nonverbal Semiotics: Body Language and Natural Language]. Moskva: Novoe literaturnoe obozrenie. (in Russian)
Laine T. (2007). Shame and Desire: Emotion, Intersubjectivity, Cinema. Brussels: Peter Lang.
Lakoff, G. (1987). Women, Fire, and Dangerous Things: What Categories Reveal about the Mind. Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press.
Lagnacker, R. (2001). Discourse in Cognitive Grammar. Cognitive Linguistics, 12(2), 143-188.
Leeuwen, T. van. (2006). Introducing Social Semiotics. London: Routledge.
Makarov, M. L. (2003). Osnovy teorii diskursa [Fundamentals of Discourse Theory]. M.: ITDGK “Gnozis”. (in Russian)
Mjagkova, E. Ju. (1990). Jemocional’naja nagruzka slova: opyt psiholingvisticheskogo issledovanija [The emotional load of the word: the experience of psycholinguistic research]. Voronezh: Izd-vo Voronezh. un-ta Publ. (in Russian)
Matito, F. D. (2005). Apuntes para el perfil de un dramaturgo Álvaro Cubillo de Aragón [Notes for the profile of a playwright Álvaro Cubillo de Aragón]. In M. G. Dengra & R. C. Pérez (Eds.). Escenografía y escenificación en el teatro español del Siglo de Oro: actas del II Curso sobre Teoría y Práctica del Teatro. (pp. 113-132). Granada: Universidad de Granada.
Matthiessen, C. M. I. M. (2009). Multisemiosis and Context-Based Register Typology: Registerial Variation in the Complementarity of Semiotic Systems. In E. Ventola & A. J. M. Guijarro (Eds.). The World Told and the World Shown. Multisemiotic Issues (pp. 11-38). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Minskij, M. (1979). Frejmy dlja predstavlenija znanij [Framework for Representing Knowledge]. M.: Jenergija Publ. (in Russian)
Muzychuk, T. L. (2010). Russkij neverbal’nyj diskurs v jazykovoj sisteme i rechevoj dejatel’nosti (na materiale hudozhestvennoj prozy) [Russian nonverbal discourse in language system and speech activity (on a material of art prose)]. Unpublished doctoral dissertation synopsis, Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia, Moscow, Russia. (in Russian)
Niemeier, S., & Dirven, R. (1997). The Language of Emotions: Conceptualization, Expression, and Theoretical Foundation. Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
Oakley, T., & Tobin, V. (2012). Attention, Blending, and Suspense in Classic and Experimental Film. In R. Schneider & M. Hartner (Eds.). Blending and the Study of Narrative (pp. 57-83). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
O’Halloran, K. L. (2011). Multimodal Analysis and Digital Technology. In A. Baldry & E. Montagna (Eds.). Interdisciplinary Perspectives on Multimodality: Theory and Practice (pp. 1-26). Campobasso: Palladino.
Plantinga, C. (1999). The Scene of Empathy and the Human Face on Film. In C. Plantinga & G. M. Smith (Eds.). Passionate View: Film, Cognition and Emotion (pp. 239-255). Baltimore, London: The Johns Hopkins University Press.
Saarni, C. (1993). Socialization of emotion. In M. Lewis & J. M. Haviland (Eds.). Handbook of Emotions (pp. 435-446). New York, London: The Guilford Press.
Saldre, M., & Torop, P. (2012). Transmedia space. In I. Ibrus & C. A. Scolari (Eds.) Crossmedia innovations: Texts, markets, institutions (pp. 25-44). Berlin: Peter Lang.
Seizov, O., & Wildfeuer J. (2017) Introduction: Rethinking Multimodality in the Twenty-first Century. In O. Seizov & J. Wildfeuer. (Eds.) New Studies in Multimodality: Conceptual and Methodological Elaborations (pp. 1-10). London: Bloomsbury Academic.
Serjakova, I. I. (2012). Neverbal’nyj znak kommunikacii v anglojazychnyh diskursivnyh praktikah [Non-verbal sign of communication in English-speaking discursive practices]. Kyiv: Izd. Centr KNLU. Publ. (in Russian)
Shahovskij, V. I. (2010). Jemocii. Dolingvistika, lingvistika, lingvokul’turologija [Emotions. Pre-linguistics, linguistics, linguoculturology]. Moscow: Knizhnyj dom «LIBROKOM» Publ. (in Russian)
Shevchenko, І. S. (2004). Stanovlenie kognitivno-kommunikativnoj paradigmy v lingvistike [The formation of the cognitive-communicative paradigm in linguistics]. Visny’k Kharkiv’`kogo nacional’nogo universy’tetu imeni V. N. Karazina, 635, 202-205. (in Russian)
Smith, G. M. (1999). Local Emotions, Global Moods, and Film Structure. In C. Plantinga & G. M. Smith (Eds.). Passionate View: Film, Cognition and Emotion (pp. 103-126). Baltimore, London: The Johns Hopkins University Press.
Soloshhuk, L. V. (2006). Verbal’ni i neverbal’ni komponenty’ komunikaciyi v anglomovnomu dy’skursi [Verbal and non-verbal components of communication in English discourse]. Kharkiv: Konstanta Publ. (in Ukrainian)
Solomon, R. C. (2008). The Philosophy of Emotions. In M. Lewis, J. M. Haviland-Jones & L. F. Barrett (Eds.) Handbook of emotions (pp. 3-16). New York, London: Guilford Press.
Tan, E. (1999). Sentiment in Film Viewing. In C. Plantinga & G. M. Smith (Eds.). Passionate View: Film, Cognition and Emotion (pp. 48-64). Baltimore, London: The Johns Hopkins University Press.
Torop, P. (2008). Translation and semiotics. Sign Systems Studies, 36(2), 253-258. DOI: 10.5840/signsystems200836214.
Turner, M. (2017). Multimodal form-meaning pairs for blended classic joint attention. Linguistics Vanguard, 3, 1-7. DOI 10.1515 / lingvan-2016-0043.
Zlatev, J., Racine, T. P., Sinha, C., & Itkonen, E. (2008) Intersubjectivity: What Makes us Human? In J. Zlatev, T. P. Racine, C. Sinha & E. Itkonen (Eds.). The Shared Mind: Perspectives on Intersubjectivity (pp.1-14). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.