Dynamics of the concept CANADA in English-Canadian poetic texts of the 18th–21st centuries
Abstract
The article deals with the trends of historical dynamics of linguistic and cognitive characteristics of the concept Canada in English-Canadian poetic texts of the 18th–21st centuries. This research deploys a complex semantic and cognitive analysis of its lexical-semantic nominative means of poetic texts. As a result specific features of national, cultural and author’s knowledge encoded in the poetic texts are identified and classified. The lexical nominative means of the concept Canada are viewed in terms of two groups of nominative means: direct and figurative. All the nominations are classified according to several criteria. Direct and figurative nominative means of the concept Canada variously characterize physical, geographical, territorial, demographic, social, political, historical, and cultural features of the Canadian state. The variability in priority of thematic nomination groups of the concept Canada in different historical periods of the statehood formation reveals the influence of the extralingual factors on the authors’ selection of nominative means of the concept Canada. The concept Canada combines the features of both a literary, cultural and a toponymic concept. It has been modeled as a complex two-component structure that includes a sensory-notional and a figurative component. Historically conditioned transformations of the structural components of the concept Canada is interpreted in terms of its invariant and diachronically variable linguistic and cognitive characteristics. During three periods of Canadian history, the transformations of the structural components of the concept Canada reveal themselves as either the hierarchic shifts of the literary concepts-slots in the sensory-notional component or as the variability of the set of conceptual metaphors in its figurative component.
Downloads
References
Arnol’d, I.V. (1981). Stilistika sovremennogo anglijskogo jazyka [Stylistics of the modern English language]. Leningrad: Prosveshhenie Publ.
Arutiunova, N.D. (1999). Jazyk i mir cheloveka [Language and human world]. Moskva: Jazyki russkoj kul’tury Publ.
Babenko, L.G. & Kazarin, Ju.V. (2004). Lingvisticheskij analiz hudozhestvennogo teksta. Teorija i praktika [Linguistic analysis of literary text. Theory and practice]. Moskva: Flinta : Nauka Publ.
Babushkin, A.P. (1997). Tipy konceptov v leksiko-frazeologicheskoj semantike jazyka, ih lichnostnaja i nacional’naja specifika [Types of concepts in the lexical and phraseological semantics of the language, their personal and national specificity]. Unpublished doctor’s dissertation. Voronezh State University, Voronezh, Russia (in Russian).
Bondarenko, Y.V. (2012). Evolyuciya ponyattya chasu v anglijs’kij movi ta u dy’skursi [Evolution of the Notion of Time in the English Language and in Discourse]. Unpublished candidate dissertation. V.N. Karazin Kharkiv National University, Kharkiv, Ukraine (In Ukrainian).
Danilov, S.Ju. (2006). Istorija Kanady [History of Canada]. Moscow: Ves’ mir Publ.
Dovhaniuk, E.V. (2017). Evolyuciya konceptu KRASA v anglomovnomu dy’skursi XVI–XXI stolit’ [The evolution of the concept BEAUTY in the English discourse of the 14th–21st centuries]. Unpublished candidate dissertation. V.N. Karazin Kharkiv National University, Kharkiv, Ukraine (In Ukrainian).
Fedoriuk, L.V. (2018). Koncept SMERT` v ukrayins’kij kognity’vno-movnij karty’ni svitu: struktura, staty’ka i dy’namika [The concept Death in the Ukrainian cognitive-linguistic world picture: structure, statics and dynamics]. Unpublished candidate dissertation. Vasyl’ Stus Donetsk National University, Vinnitsa, Ukraine (In Ukrainian).
Fomina, T.D. (2006). Dinamika koncepta v politicheskom diskurse (na primere vystuplenij D. Busha i T. Bljera, posvjashhennyh vtoroj voennoj kapmanii v Irake) [Dynamics of concept in political discourse (Based on speeches of G. Bush and T. Blair)]. Unpublished candidate dissertation. Moscow State Pedagogical University, Moscow, Russia (In Russian).
Gal'perin, I.R. (1981). Tekst kak ob’ekt lingvisticheskogo issledovanija [Text as an object of linguistic research]. Moskva: Nauka Publ.
Gilmor, W.C. (1988). Newfoundland and Dominion Status: the External Affairs Competence and International Law Status of Newfoundland, 1855–1934. Toronto: Carswell and Company.
Hrenova, A.V. (2017). Istoricheskaja dinamika konceptov PRESIDENT i PREZIDENT v amerikanskih i rossijskih SMI [Historical dynamics of PRESIDENT concept in American and Russian media]. Unpublished candidate dissertation. Institute of Foreign Languages, Saint Petersburg, Russia (In Russian).
Johnson, M. (1987). The Body in the Mind: The Bodily Basis of Meaning, Imagination. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
Kaganovska, O.M. (2003). Tekstovi koncepty hudozhn’oyi prozy’: kognity’vna ta komunikaty’vna dy’namika (na materiali franczuz’koyi romanisty’ky’ seredy’ny’ XX storichchya) [Textual Concepts of Literary Prose: Cognitive and Communicative Dynamics (A Study of the mid-20-th Century French Novels)]. Unpublished doctor’s dissertation synopsis. Kyiv National Linguistic University, Kyiv, Ukraine (In Ukrainian).
Karasik, I.V. (2002). Jazykovoj krug: lichnost’, koncepty, diskurs [Language circle: personality, concepts, discourse]. Volgograd: Peremena Publ.
Krasnyh, V.V. (1998). Virtual’naja real’nost’ ili real’naja virtual’nost'? (Chelovek. Soznanie. Kommunikacija) [Virtual reality or real virtuality? (Man. Consciousness. Communication)]. Moskva: Dialog-MGU Publ.
Krupa, M. (2005). Lingvisty’chny’j analiz hudozhn’ogo tekstu [Linguistic analysis of literary text]. Ternopil`: Pidruchny’ky’ i posibny’ky Publ.
Kubriakova, E.S. (2012). V poiskah sushhnosti jazyka. Kognitivnye issledovanija [In search of the essence of language. Cognitive research]. Moskva: Znak Publ.
Kukharenko, V.A. (2004). Interpretaciya tekstu [Text interpretation]. Vinny’cya: Nova kny’ga Publ.
Lakoff, G. (1987). Women, Fire and Dangerous Things. What Categories Reveal About the Mind. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Lotman, Ju.M. (1999). Vnutri mysljashhih mirov: Chelovek – tekst – semiosfera – istorija [Inside the thinking worlds: Person – text – semiosphere – history]. Moskva: Jazyki russkoj kul’tury Publ.
Lower, A.R. (1977). Colony to Nation: History of Canada. Toronto: McClelland&Stewart.
Martynyuk, A.P. (2009). Perspekty’vy’ dy’skursy’vnogo napryamu doslidzhennya konceptiv [Perspectives of the discursive study of concepts]. Visnyk Kharkiv. nats. un-tu im. V.N. Karazina. – Karazin University Journal, 837, 14-18 (In Ukrainian).
Maslova, V.A. (2004). Pojet i kul’tura: Konceptosfera Mariny Cvetaevoj [Poet and culture: Marina Tsvetaeva’s conceptual sphere]. Moskva: Flinta Nauka Publ.
Maslova, Zh.N. (2016). Hudozhestvennaja konceptualizacija i kognitivnoe var’irovanie [Artistic conceptualization and cognitive variation]. Kognicija, kommunikacija, diskurs. – Cognition Communication Discourse, 12, 36-51 (In Russian).
Miller, L.V. (2004). Lingvokognitivnye mehanizmy formirovanija hudozhestvennoj kartiny mira (na materiale russkoj literatury) [Linguistic and cognitive mechanisms of the formation of an artistic world picture (Case study of Russian literature)]. Unpublished doctor’s dissertation. Saint-Petersburg State University, Saint-Petersburg, Russia (In Russian).
Molchanova, G.G. (1986). Semantika hudozhestvennogo teksta [Semantics of literary text]. Tashkent: Izd-vo FAN UzSSR Publ.
Morohovskij A.N., Vorob’jova O.P., Lihosherst N.I. & Timoshenko Z.V. (1991). Stilistika anglijskogo jazyka [Stylistics of the English language]. Kyiv: Vishha shkola Publ.
Morozova, E.I. (2005). Lozh’ kak diskursivnoe obrazovanie: lingvokognitivnyj aspekt [Lies as a discursive formation: linguistic and cognitive aspect]. Har’kov: Jekograf Publ.
Nikonova, V.G. (2008). Poety’ko-kognity’vny’j analiz dramaty’chnogo tekstu: xudozhnij concept [Poetic and cognitive analysis of a dramatic text: artistic concept]. Visny’k Dnipropetrovs’kogo universy’tetu. Seriya: Movoznavstvo – Visnyk of Dnipropetrovsk University. Series: Linguistics, 16 (14), 215-220 (In Ukrainian).
Polina, A.V. (2004). Movna ob’yekty’vaciya konceptu BOG v anglijs’komu dy’skursi XVI–XX stolit’ [Language objectivation of the concept GOD in the English secular discourse of the XIV–XX centuries]. Unpublished candidate dissertation. V.N. Karazin Kharkiv National University, Kharkiv, Ukraine (In Ukrainian).
Popova, Z.D. & Sternin, I.A. (2009). Leksicheskaja sistema jazyka: Vnutrennjaja organizacija, kategorial’nyj apparat [Lexical system of language: Inner organization, categorical apparatus]. Moskva: Librkom Publ.
Prykhodko, A.N. (2013). Koncepty i konceptosistemy [Concepts and conceptual systems]. Dnepropetrovsk: Belaja E.A. Publ.
Prykhodko, I.V. (2018) Istoriya yak ekstralingval’ny’j chy’nny’k formuvannya obrazu derzhavy’ v anglomovnij kanads’kij poeziyi XVIII–XXI st. [History as extralinguistic formation factor of image of state in English-Canadian poetry of the XVIII–XXI centuries]. Naukovi zapy’sky’ Central’noukrayins’kogo derzhavnogo pedagogichnogo universy’tetu im. Volody’my’ra Vy’nny’chenka. Seriya: Filologichni nauky’ – Scientific Papers of V. Vynnychenko Central Ukrainian State Pedagogical University. Series: Philological Sciences, 164, 251-256 (In Ukrainian).
Serazhym, K.S. (2003). Dy’skurs yak sociolingval’ny’j fenomen suchasnogo komunikaty’vnogo prostoru (metodologichny’j, pragmaty’ko-semanty’chny’j i zhanrovo-lingvisty’chnj aspekty’: na materiali polity’chnogo riznovy’du ukrayins’kogo masovoinformacinogo dy’skursu) [Discourse as a sociolingual phenomenon of contemporary communicative space (methodological, pragmatically-semantic and genre-linguistic aspects: on the basis of political variety of the Ukrainian mass-media discourse)]. Unpublished doctor’s dissertation. Kyiv National Taras Shevchenko University, Institute of Journalism, Kyiv, Ukraine (In Ukrainian).
Shevchenko, I.S. (2016). Dinamika kontseptov kultury: mezhdu individualnym i kollektivnym [Dynamics of the concepts of culture: between individual and collective]. Lingvistyka 21 stolittia: novi doslidzhennia i perspektivy – The 21st century linguistics: new studies and perspectives. 172-181 (in Russian).
Stepanov, Ju.S. (2007). Koncepty. Tonkaja plenka civilizacii [Concepts. Thin membrane of civilization]. Moskva: Jazyki slavjanskih kul’tur Publ.
Tarasova, I.A. (2016). Kognitivnaja pojetika: predmet, terminologija, metody [Cognitive poetics: subject matter, terminology, methods]. Saratov: Nauchnaja kniga Publ.
Trim, R. (2011). Conceptual networking theory in metaphor evolution: Diachronic variations in models of love. In M.E. Winters, H. Tissary, K. Allan (Eds). Historical Cognitive Linguistics (pp. 223-259) Berlin, New York: Walter de Gruyter.
Vakhovska, O.V. (2011). Verbalizaciya konceptu GRIX v anglomovnomu dy’skursi XVI–XXI stolit’ [The Verbalization of the Concept SIN in the English Discourse of the 14th–21st Centuries]. Unpublished candidate dissertation. V.N. Karazin Kharkiv National University, Kharkiv, Ukraine (In Ukrainian).
Van Dijk, T.A. (2008). Discourse and Context. A Sociocognitive Approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Vezhbickaja, A. (2001). Leksikografija i konceptual’nyj analiz [Lexicography and conceptual analysis]. Moskva: Jazyki russkoj kul’tury.
Vorkachev, S.G. (2002). Koncept schast’ja v russkom jazykovom soznanii: opyt lingvokul’turologicheskogo analiza [The concept HAPPINESS in the Russian language consciousness: the practice of linguo-cultural analysis]. Krasnodar: Kubanskij gosudarstvennyj tehnologicheskij universitet.
Zhabotinskaja, S.A. (2004). Konceptual’nyj analiz jazyka: frejmovye seti [Conceptual analysis of language: frame network]. Mova. Naukovo-teorety’chny’j chasopy’s iz movoznavstva. – Language. Scientific-theoretical linguistic journal, 9, 81-92 (In Russian).
Authors, who publish with this journal, accept the following conditions:
The authors reserve the copyright of their work and transfer to the magazine the right of the first publication of this work under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial Non-Derivs License (CC BY-NC-ND), which allows other persons to freely distribute a published work with mandatory reference to the authors of the original work and the first publication of the work in this journal.
Authors have the right to enter into separate additional agreements for the non-exclusive dissemination of the work in the form in which it was published by this journal (for example, to post the work in the electronic institutions' repository or to publish as part of a monograph), provided that the link to the first publication of the work in this journal is given.
The journal policy allows and encourages the authors to place the manuscripts on the Internet (for example, in the institutions' repositories or on personal websites), both before the presentation of this manuscript to the editorial board and during review procedure, as it contributes to the creation of productive scientific discussion and positively affects the efficiency and dynamics of citing the published work (see The Effect of Open Access).
