An EU recovery programme for Ukraine? Towards a new narrative for EU—Ukraine relations?
In 1947, the United States of America launched the European Recovery Programme to support the post-war reconstruction of Europe. The Marshall Plan, as it became known after U.S. Secretary of State George C. Marshall, was one of the major success stories of US foreign policy in the twentieth century. The notion of an EU Recovery Programme for Ukraine provoked interest – and division in Ukraine. The enlargement of the EU in 2004 and 2007 demonstrated the EU’s capacity to mount grand economic and political projects. However, since then, the EU has faced difficulties exerting influence and constructing a coherent narrative of its role in the European neighbourhood and the wider world. Would a more transformative aid and development programme for its Ukrainian neighbour offer an opportunity for the EU as well as Ukraine? In this article we use a series of elite interviews conducted across Ukraine in 2016-17 to explore how such a notion is understood. We find that Ukrainian elites have mixed feelings about existing EU aid programmes; many respondents resented the conditions the EU imposes, but nor do they want or expect aid to be given unconditionally. Whilst many aspire for Ukraine to reach EU standards of law and prosperity, Ukrainian elites favour self-help in their efforts to forge a stable sovereign state. Both the EU and Russia are understood as metonymies – as standing for two sets of values and geopolitical futures – and neither quite fit what Ukrainians seek. We conclude that whilst a Marshall Plan-style action could have benefits, it is not desired as a basis for a shared narrative and basis of cooperation and development.
Barthes, R. (2009)  Mythologies. London: Vintage.
Bischof, G., & Petschar, H. (2017). The Marshall Plan—Saving Europe rebuilding Austria: The European Recovery Program. New Orleans: University of New Orleans Publishing.
Bliesemann de Guevara, B. (eds.) (2016). Myth and narrative in international politics: Interpretative approaches to the study of IR. London: Palgrave.
British Council and Goethe-Institut (2018). Culture in an Age of Uncertainty: The value of cultural relations in societies in transition. November 2018, London and Munich. Available at: https://www.britishcouncil.org/sites/default/files/cultural_relations_in_an_age_of_uncertainty_en.pdf [Accessed 22 December 2018]
Burke, K. (1969). A Grammar of motives. Berkeley, Los Angeles, London: University of California Press.
CEPA (2018). CEPA Releases Bipartisan Open Letter to raise the costs on Russian military aggression. Center for European Policy Analysis, 12 December. Available at: https://www.cepa.org/open-letter-on-ukraine
Chaban, N., & O’Loughlin, B. (2018). The EU’s crisis diplomacy in Ukraine: The matrix of possibilities. Journal of International Affairs, 26 September. Available at: https://jia.sipa.columbia.edu/eus-crisis-diplomacy-ukraine-matrix-possibilities
Eichengreen, B. (2001). The market and the Marshall Plan. In M. Shain (ed.) The Marshall Plan: fifty years after. Basingstoke: Palgrave, 131-146.
Ellwood, D. (2012). The shock of America: Europe and the challenge of the century. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Ellwood, D.W. (2006). The Marshall Plan: A strategy that worked. USA: Foreign Policy Agenda, 17-25. Available at: https://www.marshallfoundation.org/library/documents/marshall-plan-strategy-worked/
European Commission (2018). EU approves disbursement of €500 million in Macro-Financial Assistance to Ukraine. Press release, 30 November, Brussels. Available at: http://europa.eu/rapid/press-release_IP-18-6600_en.htm
Helprin, M. (1998). A Marshall Plan for Russia. Wall Street Journal, 9 September. Available at: https://www.wsj.com/articles/SB905290504273433500
Hoskins, A. (2006). Temporality, proximity and security: Terror in a media-drenched age. International Relations, 20(4), 453-466.
Kingdon, J.W. (1984). Agendas, alternatives, and public policies. Boston: Little, Brown.
Kitzinger, J. (2000). Media templates: patterns of association and the (re) construction of meaning over time. Media, Culture & Society, 22(1), 61-84.
Krastev, I. (2018). Sorry, NATO. Trump doesn’t believe In allies. New York Times, 11 July. Available at: https://www.nytimes.com/2018/07/11/opinion/trump-nato-summit-allies.html
Lévi-Strauss, C. (1955). The structural study of myth. The Journal of American Folklore, 68(270), 428-444.
Milward, A. S. (1989). Was the Marshall Plan necessary? Diplomatic History, 13(2), 231-253.
Miskimmon, A. (2018). Strategic narratives of EU foreign policy and the European Neighbourhood Policy. In T. Schumacher, A. Marchetti and T. Demmelhuber (Eds.). The Routledge Handbook on the European Neighbourhood Policy. London: Routledge, pp. 153-166.
Miskimmon, A., O’Loughlin, B., & Roselle L. (2013). Strategic narratives, communication power and the new world order. New York: Routledge.
Odugbemi, S., & Lee, T. (2011). Accountability through public opinion: from inertia to public action. Washington DC: The World Bank.
Ojala, M., & Pantti, M. (2017). Naturalising the new cold war: The geopolitics of framing the Ukrainian conflict in four European newspapers. Global Media and Communication, 13(1), 41-56.
Petrov, V. (2018). Rada ratifies agreement with EU on 1 billion euros macro-financial aid. Kyiv Post, 8 November. Available at: https://www.kyivpost.com/ukraine-politics/rada-ratifies-agreement-with-eu-on-1-billion-euros-macro-financial-aid.html
Rae, H. (2018). Liberalism and the anxiety of belief. Patterns of Prejudice, 52(4), 293-313.
Rabinovych, M. (2018). Reinventing EU neighbourhood policy as a development exercise: The case of post-Euromaidan Ukraine. Crossroads Europe, 13 September. Available at: https://crossroads.ideasoneurope.eu/2018/09/13/reinventing-eu-neighbourhood-policy-as-development-exercise-the-case-of-post-euromaidan-ukraine/
Ross, G. (1975). Party and mass organization: The changing relationship of PCF and CGT. In D.L.M. Blackmer & S. Tarrow (eds.) Communism in Italy and France. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 504-540.
Shanahan, E.A., Jones, M.D., and McBeth, M.K. (2011). Policy Narratives and Policy Processes. The Policy Studies Journal, 39(3), 535–561.
Spechler, M.C. (1992). No Marshall Plan for Russia. Christian Science Monitor, 25 March. Available at: https://www.csmonitor.com/1992/0325/25181.html
Szostek, J. (2018). Nothing is true? The credibility of news and conflicting narratives during “Information War” in Ukraine. The International Journal of Press / Politics, 23(1), 116-135.
Wolczuk, K., & D. Zeruolis (2018) Rebuilding Ukraine: An assessment of EU assistance. Ukraine Forum Research Paper, August 2018. Available at https://www.chathamhouse.org/sites/default/files/publications/research/2018-08-16-rebuilding-ukraine-eu-assistance-wolczuk-zeruolis.pdf
Copyright (c) 2018 Miskimmon Alister, O’Loughlin Ben
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors, who publish with this journal, accept the following conditions:
The authors reserve the copyright of their work and transfer to the magazine the right of the first publication of this work under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial License, which allows other persons to freely distribute a published work with mandatory reference to the authors of the original work and the first publication of the work in this journal.
Authors have the right to enter into separate additional agreements for the non-exclusive dissemination of the work in the form in which it was published by this journal (for example, to post the work in the electronic institutions' repository or to publish as part of a monograph), provided that the link to the first publication of the work in this journal is given.
The journal policy allows and encourages the authors to place the manuscripts on the Internet (for example, in the institutions' repositories or on personal websites), both before the presentation of this manuscript to the editorial board and during review procedure, as it contributes to the creation of productive scientific discussion and positively affects the efficiency and dynamics of citing the published work (see The Effect of Open Access).