Cognitive instruments of investigating communicative failures

  • A. P. Martynyuk
Keywords: communicative act, communicative failure, conceptual content, conceptual network, contextualized interpretation

Abstract

The present paper examines the causes of communicative failures on the basis of the methodological assumption of cognitive linguists that a language unit used by the speaker in a communicative act is associated with a body of conceptual content which gives access to conceptual network of encyclopaedic knowledge and provides raw material for contextualized interpretation. The analysis reveals that communicative failures take place when: 1) the speaker’s verbal utterance does not evoke any conceptual content in the mind of the interpreter as a result of a) losing its symbolic function due to the speaker’s violation of lingual norms (lingual causes) or b) being out of the interpreter’s focus of attention (extra-lingual causes); 2) the communicants privilege different aspects of the encyclopaedic knowledge evoked by the verbal or non-verbal utterance in some discourse context due to the difference of experience shaped by the communities of practice they are part of (lingua-cognitive causes).

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1. Chafe W. Discourse, consciousness and time: the flow and displacement of
conscious experience in speaking and writing / W. Chafe. – Chicago : Chicago
University Press, 1994. – 392 p.
2. Croft W. Cognitive Linguistics / W. Croft, F. Cruse. – New York : Cambridge
University Press, 2004. – 356 p.
3. Eckert P. Constructing meaning, constructing selves / P. Eckert, S. McConnell-
Ginet // Gender articulated: language and the socially constructed self [ed. Hall
K., Bucholtz M.]. – New York, London : Routledge, 1995. – P. 369-507.
4. Fauconnier G. Conceptual projection and middle spaces / G. Fauconnier. – San
Diego : University of California, Department of Cognitive Science Technical
Report 9401, 1994 (available at http://www.blending.stanford.edu).
5. Fillmore C. Frame semantics / C. Fillmore // Linguistics in the morning calm
[ed. The Linguistic Society of Korea]. – Seoul: Hanshin, 1982. – P. 111-37.
6. Grice H.P. Logic and conversation / H.P. Grice // Syntax and Semantics. – New
York : Academic Press, 1975. – P. 25-69.
7. Lakoff G. Foreword to Gilles Fauconnier Mental Spaces / G. Lakoff, E.
Sweetser // Mental Spaces. – Cambridge : Cambridge University Press, 1994. –
P. ix-xlvi.
8. Langacker R. Foundations of cognitive grammar, vol. 1: theoretical prerequisites /
R. Langacker. – Stanford, Calif. : Stanford University Press, 1987. – 516 p.
9. Leech G. Principles of pragmatics / G. Leech. – L. : Longman, 1983. – 250 p.
10. Moore T. Understanding language: towards a post-Chomskyan linguistics /
T.Moore, C. Carling. – London : Macmillan, 1982. – 225 p.
11. Saville-Troike M. The Ethnography of communication [2-d edition] /
M. Saville-Troike. – Oxford : Basil Blackwell, 1989. – 315 p.
12. Schank R.C. Script, plans, goals, and understanding: an inquiry into human
knowledge structures / R.C. Schank, R.P. Abelson. – Hillsdale (NJ) : Laurence
Erlbaum Associates, 1977. – 248 p.
13. Schiffrin D. Approaches to discourse / D. Schiffrin. – Oxford; Cambridge :
Blackwell, 1994. – 470 p.
14. Sperber D. Relevance: communication and cognition / D. Sperber, D. Wilson. –
Oxford; Cambridge, MA : Blackwell, 1995. – 132 p.
15. Turner M. Reading minds: the study of English in the age of cognitive science /
M. Turner. – Princeton, NJ : Princeton Univ. Press, 1991. – 318 p.
16. Giles H. Accommodation theory: Communication, context and consequences /
H. Giles, N. Coupland, J. Coupland // Contexts of Accommodation. –
Cambridge, UK : CUP. – 1991. – P. 1-68.
Published
2018-09-11
How to Cite
Martynyuk, A. P. (2018). Cognitive instruments of investigating communicative failures. Cognition, Communication, Discourse, (8), 51-62. https://doi.org/10.26565/2218-2926-2014-08-04