Additional sense nuances as a cognitive phenomenon
Abstract
The article introduces the analysis of additional sense nuances in a belles-lettres discourse. Cognitive approach is used to studying the phenomena of text-linguistics. Additional sense nuances are treated as a separate kind of implicit speech, which is determined by the author’s intention and is conceptual in its nature. Its decoding presupposes the anticipation of accumulated sense of other types of implicit speech in the discourse: non-allusive hints, allusions, and symbols. The study is conducted on the material of the text of C. Ahern’s novel. It is shown that the creation and decoding of implicit speech kinds mentioned correlates with cognitive operations. The decoding of additional speech nuances takes two stages and rests on cognitive operations, the basic of them being the operations of specificity and perspective.
Downloads
References
Blakar, R. (1987). Yazyk kak instrument social’noy vlasti [Language as an instrument of social power]. М.: Nauka, 88-125 (in Russian).
Galojan, Ja. Je. (2013). Mezhkul'turnye aspekty jazyka delovyh peregovorov [Language intercultural aspects of business negotiations]. Lichnost', rech' i juridicheskaja praktika: Sbornik nauch. trudov. – Personality, speech and juridical practice: Collection of scientific works, 16. Rostov-n/D, 43-46 (in Russian).
Davy`dyuk, Yu.B.(2014). Efekt oshukanogo ochikuvannya u semanty`chnij, temporal`nij ta syuzhetnij strukturi anglomovnogo xudozhn`ogo dy`skursu. Diss. kand. filol. Nauk [Defeated Expectancy in Semantic, Temporal and Plot Structure of English Literary Text. Cand. philol. sci. diss.]. Kyiv (in Ukrainian). Dem’jankov, V.Z. (2001). Ponjatie i koncept v hudozhestvennoj literature i v nauchnom jazyke [Notion and concept in belles-lettres literature and scientific language]. Voprosy filologii [Questions of Philology]. M.: Mosk. gos. in-t inostr. jazykov im. M. Toreza. – Moscow State Institute of Foreign Languages after M. Torez, 1, 35-47 (in Russian).
Dem’jankov, V.Z. (2007). Termin “koncept” kak jelement terminologicheskoj kul'tury [The tem “concept” as an element of terminological culture]. Jazyk kak materija smysla: sb. statej v chest' akademika N.Ju. Shvedovoj –Language as a material of sense: collection of articles after the academician N. Ju. Shvedova. M.: Azbukovnik, 606-622 (in Russian).
Dronova, E. M. (2010). Problemy perevoda stilisticheskogo priema alljuzii v anglo-irlandskoj literature pervoj poloviny XX veka. [Problems of translation of stylistic means of allusion in the English-Irish literature in the first half of XX cent.] Available from: http://www.ebiblioteka.lt/
Isaeva, L.A. (1996). Vidy skrytyh smyslov i sposoby ih predstavlenija v hudozhestvennom tekste (na m-le russkogo jazyka). Avtoref. diss. dokt. filol. nauk [Types of hidden senses and ways of their presentation in a belles-lettres text (on the material of the Russian language). Dr. philol. sci. synopsis.]. Krasnodar (in Russian).
Kuznyetsova, A. (2015). Implicit Meaning in a Belles-Lettres Text: Speech Means in a Cognitive Paradigm. New Developments in Linguistic Pragmatics (NDLP 2015) – Book of Abstracts. 12-14 April, 2015. Lodz: University of Lodz.
Langacker, R.W. (1990). Concept, Image and Symbol. The Cognitive Basis of Grammar. Berlin, New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
Langacker, R.W. (2008). Cognitive grammar: a basic introduction. Oxford; N.Y.: Oxford Univ. Press, Inc.
Maslennikova, A.A. (1999) Skrytye smysly i ih lingvisticheskaja interpretacija: Avtoref. …doktora filol. nauk [Hidden meanings and their linguistic interpretation. Dr. philol. sci. synopsis]. Saint-Petersburg (in Russian).
Matveeva, G.G. (2003). K voprosu o rechevyh strategijah skrytogo vozdejstvija otpravitelja teksta na ego poluchatelja [On the question of speech strategies of hidden impact of the text addressant on its recipient]. Lichnost', rech' i juridicheskaja praktika. – Personality, speech and juridical practice, 6. Rostov/D, (in Russian).
Matveeva, G.G. (2003a). Njuansy smysla v skrytoj pragmalingvistike [Sense nuances in hidden pragmalinguistics]. Available from: http://rspu.edu.ru/projects/ Matveeva, G.G., Samarina I.V., & Selivestrova L.N. (2009). Dva napravlenija v sovremennoj pragmalingvistike [Two directions in modern pragmalinguistics]. Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgsk. un-ta.– Saint-Petrsburg Univ. Messenger. 1, II, 12, 77-90 (in Russian).
Nikonova, V.G. (2008). Tragedijna karty`na svitu v poety`ci Shekspira: [monografiya] [Tragic world image in Shakespeare’s poetry] [monograph]. D.: DUEP.
Nikonova, V.G. (2011). Xudozhnij koncept: procedury` rekonstrukciyi ta modelyuvannya (na materiali tragedij V. Shekspira). [Belles-lettres concept: procedures of reconstruction and modeling (on the material of Shakespeare’s tragedies]. Visny`k Ky`yivs`k. nacional`n. un-tu. Seriya: Filologiya. – Kyiv National Linguistic Univ. Messenger, Philology, 14, 2, 113-122 (in Ukrainian).
Pirog, I.I. (2015) Argumentation in terms of cognitive operations. Karazins`ki chy`tannya: Lyudy`na. Mova. Komunikaciya.: Tezy` dopovidej XIV nauk. konferenciyi z mizhnarod. uchastyu – Karazin readings: Person. Language. Communication. Proc.14th scientif. conference with international participation. Kharkiv, 182-183 (in Ukrainian).
Popova, Z.D. (2007). Kognitivnaja lingvistika [Cognitive Linguistics]. Moscow: AST: Vostok-Zapad (in Russian).
Radziyevs`ka, T.V. (2010). Tekst yak zasib komunikaciyi: [monografiya] [Text as a means of communication]. Kyiv: Inform. analit. agentstvo.
Samarina, I.V., & Pohlebina A.A. (2013). Pragmatika mul'tiplikacionnogo diskursa [Pragmatics of multicommunicational discourse]. Lichnost', rech' i juridicheskaja praktika: Sbornik nauch. trudov. – Personality, speech and juridical practice: Collection of scientific works, 16. Rostov-n/D, 183-186 (in Russian).
Santos, A., Chaigneau, S.E., Simmons, W.K., & Barsalou, L. W. (2010). Property generation reflects word association and situated stimulation. Available from: www.port.ac.uk/departments/academic/psychology/staff/
Telija, V.N. (1986). Konnotativnyj aspekt nominativnyh edinic [Connotative aspect of nominative units]. Moscow State University: Prosveshhenie (in Russian).
Thomas, R. F. (1986). Virgil's “Georgics” and the art of reference. Harvard Studies in Classical Philology, 90, 71-98.
Shevchenko, I.S. (2006). Podhody k analizu koncepta v sovremennoj kognitivnoj lingvistike [Approaches to the analysis of concept in modern cognitive linguistics]. Vіsnik Kharkіv. nats. un-tu im. V.N. Karazina. – V.N. Karazin National Univ. Messenger, 725, 192-195.
Vorkachev, S.G. (2003). Koncept kak “zontikovyj termin” [Concept as an “umbrella” term]. Jazyk, soznanie, kommunikacija – Language, conscious, communication. M.: Gnozis. 24, 24, 5-12 (in Russian).
Voronushkina, O.V. (2014). Vidy skrytyh smyslov i sposoby ih jeksplikacii [Types of hidden senses and means of their explication]. Vestnik Altajsk. gos. ped. un-ta. – Altay State Pedagogical Univ. Messenger, 21, 62-67 (in Russian).
Authors, who publish with this journal, accept the following conditions:
The authors reserve the copyright of their work and transfer to the journal the right of the first publication of this work under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial Non-Derivs License (CC BY-NC-ND), which allows other persons to freely distribute a published work with mandatory reference to the authors of the original work and the first publication of the work in this journal.
Authors have the right to enter into separate additional agreements for the non-exclusive dissemination of the work in the form in which it was published by this journal (for example, to post the work in the electronic institutions' repository or to publish as part of a monograph), provided that the link to the first publication of the work in this journal is given.
The journal policy allows and encourages the authors to place the manuscripts on the Internet (for example, in the institutions' repositories or on personal websites), both before the presentation of this manuscript to the editorial board and during review procedure, as it contributes to the creation of productive scientific discussion and positively affects the efficiency and dynamics of citing the published work (see The Effect of Open Access).
