Mytholoric space of Amerindian prosaic texts: cognitive-semiotic and narrative perspectives

  • S. V. Volkova
Keywords: Amerindian, reverse perspective, metamorphosis, mytholoric characters, mytholoric space

Abstract

The paper suggests a new cognitive facet of ethnolinguistics for exposing ethno-cultural features embodied in mytholoric characters of literary prosaic texts. The term "mytholoric" is a coinage that reflects syncretic unity of mythic and folk lore of Amerindian culture. Myhtoloric space is defined as cognitive and semiotic construct that incorporates different types of mytholoric characters. Author’s mytholoric character is a cumulative cognitive and semiotic textual construal, which reflects behavior and deeds of the person who stands for the interests of Amerindian in modern American society and tries to adapt to the rules of existing in that new world. It has been proved that metamorphosis is a dominant linguistic means in creating mytholoric and author’s mytholoric character. Semiotic and cognitive analysis made it possible to construe the model of the main character, interpreted as ethnocultural symbol. Narrative analysis of the Amerindian prosaic texts outlined the ways and means of narrative perspectives highlighting metamorphosis and reverse perspective as the major ones in creating and interpreting the mytholoric space in literary text. The paper suggests linguistic and cognitive mechanism of reverse perspective in literary text. Models of mytholoric space are determined by the genre of the literary text and eclecticism of mytholoric characters.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Alexander, H.B. (2005). Native American Mythology. N.Y.: Dover Publications.

Barthes, R. (1975). The Pleasure of The Text. New York: Hill and Wang.

Bruner, E.M. (1986). Introduction. In: V.W. Turner, & E.M. Bruner (Eds.). The Anthropology of Experience (p. 7). Urbana: University of Illinois Press.

Florensky, P. (2002). Reverse Perspective. London: Reaction Books.

Freeman, M.H. (2007). Poetic iconicity. In: V. Chlopicki, A. Pawelec, & A. Pokojska (Eds.).Cognition in language.Volume in honour of Professor Elzbieta Tabakowska (pp. 472–501). Krakow: Terrium.

Genette, G. (1980). Narrative Discourse: an Essay in Method. New York: Cornell University Press.

Jacobson, R., & Halle, M. (1975). Fundamentals of Language. The Hague-Paris: Mouton.

Jung, C.G. (1964). Man and His Symbols. New York: Anchor Press.

Lake-Thom, B. (1997). Spirits of the Earth: a Guide to Native American Nature Symbols, Stories and Ceremonies. New York: Penguin Group.

Langacker, R. (1990). Concept, image and symbol. Berlin-New York: Mouton de Gruyter.

Lincoln, K. (1985). Native American renaissance. California: University of California Press.

Lundquist, S. (2004). Native American literatures: An introduction. New York-London: Continuum International Publishing Group.

Macmillan English Dictionary for Advanced Learners (2002). Oxford: Bloomsbury Publishing.

Martin, B., & Ringham, F. (2006). Key Terms in Semiotics. London: Continuum.

Sandner, D. (1991). Navajo Symbols of Healing. Rochester: Healing Arts Press.

Schmid, W. (2003). Narratology: An Introduction. Berlin-Boston: de Gruyter.

Silverman, K. (1983). The Subject of Semiotics. New York: Oxford University Press.

Toelken, B. (1976). Seeing with a Native Eye: How Many Sheep Will It Hold. New York: Harper and Row.

Volkova, S.V. (2016). Semiotics of Butterfly in Modern Amerindian Prose. Science and education a new dimension. Philology, 4(50), 46–51.

Volkova, S.V. (2016). Reverse Perspective as a Narrative Technique in Amerindian Prosaic Texts. Legeartis. Language yesterday, today, tomorrow, 1(1), 359–394, DOI: 10.1515/ lart-2016-0008.

Volkova, S.V. (2017). The Semiotics of Folkdance in Amerindian Literary Prose. In: E.Chrzanowska-Kluczewska, & O. Vorobyova (Eds.). Language – Literature – the Arts: a Cognitive Semiotic Interface (pp. 149–166). Frankfurt am Main et al.: Peter Lang Edition.
Published
2018-04-15
How to Cite
Volkova, S. V. (2018). Mytholoric space of Amerindian prosaic texts: cognitive-semiotic and narrative perspectives. Cognition, Communication, Discourse, (15), 104-116. https://doi.org/10.26565/2218-2926-2017-15-07