Paradoxicality in Modern English Poetic Discourse: Testing Boundaries of Linguistic Research in the 21st Century
Abstract
This article elaborates on a paradigmatic dialogue approach to explore paradoxicality manifestations in modern English poetic discourse. It follows a "jigsaw pattern" principle predominant in linguistic research in the 21st century and kaleidoscopically integrates key notions, techniques, and methodological tools of cognitive poetics, including multimodal, cognitive semiotics, and mobile stylistics. Such an approach facilitates developing a completely new view on paradoxicality. The paper defines paradoxicality as a cognitive and discursive category, modelled on the basis of "fuzzy set" principle, which predetermines the elasticity of its boundaries and constant accessibility for new members. A number of categorial features, related to certain categorial foci, structure the category. In particular, contradiction, unusualness, boundedness, anomality and mobility foci actualized to a different extent in multimodal poetic discourse through paradoxical poetic forms (micro-, macro- and megaparadoxical). The paper proves that paradoxical poetic forms are multimodal construals, incorporating preconceptual, conceptual, verbal, and non-verbal facets. Formation of paradoxical poetic forms is a result of linguistic and cognitive activity of addresser and addressee ensured by linguistic and cognitive processes of precategorization, acategorization and categorization. Cognitive and semiotic operations as well as procedures accompany each process at a certain facet of a form.
Downloads
References
Alber, J. (2016). Unnatural Narrative: Impossible Worlds in Fiction and Drama (Frontiers of Narrative). University of Nebraska Press.
Atmanspacher, H. & Fach, W. (2005). "Acategoriality as Mental Instability". Journal of Mind and Behavior 26, 181-205.
Bataille, G. (2003). Zapret i transgessiya [Prohibition and Transgression]. Available from: http://vispir.narod.ru/bataj2.htm.
Belekhova, L. (2004). Slovesnyi obraz v amerykanskiy poezii: linguokognityvnyi pogliad [Verbal Image in American Poetry: Linguistic and Cognitive Perspective]. Moscow: Zvezdopad.
Bell, A. (2014). The Possible Worlds of Hypertext Fiction. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Bennett, J. (2015). Poetry. Available from: http://www.johnmbennett.net.
Blanchot, M. (1994). Opyt-predel [Experience-limit]. Tanatographiya Erosa: Zhorzh Batay I Frantsuzskaya Mysl XX veka [Tanatography of Eros: Georges Bataille and the French Thought mid XX century]. SPb: Mifril.
Burke, M. (2014). “Stylistics: From Classical Rhetoric to Cognitive Neuroscience”. In: Burke, Michael (ed.), The Routledge Handbook of Stylistics. Abingdon, NY: Routledge: 1-9.
Büsse, B. (2013). “Introduction”. 32-nd PALA Conference «Mobile Stylistics». 31 July – 4 August 2013. Book of Abstracts. University of Heidelberg, 1.
Chernigovskaya, Т. (2018). Liudi so znaniyami "Kak u Vsekh" Stanut Lishnimi [People with knowledge "as Everybody has" to Become Superfluous]. Available from: http://www.more.club/post/tatyana-chernigovskaya-lyudi-so-znaniyami-kak-u-vseh-stanut-lishnimi
Epstein, M. (1999). Russian Postmodernism: New Perspectives on Post-Soviet Culture. Oxford, New York: Berghahn Books.
Eshelman, R. (2008). Performatism, or the End of Postmodernism. New York: The Davies Group Publishers.
Foucault, М. (1994). O Transgressiyi [On Transgression] Tanatographiya Erosa: Zhorzh Batay I Frantsuzskaya Mysl XX veka [Tanatography of Eros: Georges Bataille and the French Thought mid XX century]. SPb: Mifril.
Gavins, J. (2013). Reading the Absurd. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
Gebser, J. (1986). The Ever-Present Origin, Part One: Foundations of the Aperspectival World and Part Two: Manifestations of the Aperspectival World. Athens: Ohio University Press.
Gibbons, A. (2012). Multimodality, Cognition, and Experimental Literature. New York: Routledge.
Gibbs, R. (1999). The Poetics of Mind: Figurative Thought, Language and Understanding. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Goldsmith, K. (2011). Uncreative Writing: Managing Language in the Digital Age. Columbia: Columbia University Press.
Inman, P. (2014). Written 1976 – 2013. Manchester: if p then q.
Kirby, A. (2009). Digimodernism: How New Technologies Dismantle the Postmodern and Reconfigure Our Culture. New York; London: Continuum.
Macmillan English Dictionary for Advanced Learners. (2012). London / New York: MacMillan / A.& C. Black.
Marina, О. (2015). Semiotika Paradoksalnosti u kognityvno-komunikatyvnomu vysvitlenni (na materiali suchasnogo anglomovnogo poetychnogo dyskursu) [Semiotics of Paradoxicality in Cognitive and Communicative Elucidation (on the material of Modern English poetic discourse)]. Kherson: Ailant.
Nomura, Y., et al. (2017). Toward a holographic theory for general spacetimes Physical Review D 95, 086002. Vol. 95, Iss. 8.
Nørgaard, N. (2010). “Multimodality: Extending the Stylistic Tool-Kit”. In McIntyre, Dan and Beatrix Büsse (eds.,), Language and Style. In Honour of Mick Short. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 443-448.
Oxford Dictionary for Advanced Learners. (2009). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Perloff, M. (2012). Unoriginal Genius: Poetry by Other Means in the New Century. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Robinson, P. (2013). The Limits and Openness of the Contemporary. The Oxford Handbook of Contemporary British and Irish poetry. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1-21.
Ryan, M.-L. (2013). Impossible Worlds and Aesthetic Illusion. Immersion and Distance : Aesthetic Illusion in Literature and Other Media. Amsterdam; New York: Brill | Rodopi. Series: Studies in Intermediality. Vol. 6, 131-150.
Stockwell, P. (2017). The Language of Surrealism. London: Palgrave.
Tsur, R. (2012). Playing by Ear and the Tip of the Tongue. Precategorial Information in Poetry. Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing.
Vermeulen, T. & van den Akker, R. (2010). Notes on Metamodernism. Journal of Aesthetics and Culture. Vol. 2, 10-24.
Vorobyova, O. (2013). "Lingvistika segodnia: reinterpretatsiya epistemy" [Linguistics Today: Reinterpretation of the Episteme]. Visnyk Kyivskogo Natsionalnogo Lingvistychnogo Universytetu Vol.16, No. 2, 41-47.
Vorobyova, O.P. (2017). 'Haunted by ambiguities' revisited: in search of a metamethod for literary text disambiguation. Lege artis. Language yesterday, today, tomorrow. The Journal of University of SS Cyril and Methodius in Trnava. Warsaw: De Gruyter Open. vol. II(1), 428-496.
DOI: 10.1515/lart-2017-0011 ISSN 2453-8035
Wierzbicka, A. (1992). Semantics, Culture, and Cognition: Universal Human Concepts in Culture-Specific Configurations. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Zade, L. (1965). "Fuzzy Sets". Information and Control, No. 8, 338-353.
Žižek, S. (2006). The Parallax View. Cambridge, MA, London: The MIT Press.
Authors, who publish with this journal, accept the following conditions:
The authors reserve the copyright of their work and transfer to the journal the right of the first publication of this work under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial Non-Derivs License (CC BY-NC-ND), which allows other persons to freely distribute a published work with mandatory reference to the authors of the original work and the first publication of the work in this journal.
Authors have the right to enter into separate additional agreements for the non-exclusive dissemination of the work in the form in which it was published by this journal (for example, to post the work in the electronic institutions' repository or to publish as part of a monograph), provided that the link to the first publication of the work in this journal is given.
The journal policy allows and encourages the authors to place the manuscripts on the Internet (for example, in the institutions' repositories or on personal websites), both before the presentation of this manuscript to the editorial board and during review procedure, as it contributes to the creation of productive scientific discussion and positively affects the efficiency and dynamics of citing the published work (see The Effect of Open Access).
