MEMIRONY: REBOUND OF RELATIONSHIPS IN MEMES

Keywords: memirony, meme, metahumour, relationships, post-postmodern

Abstract

The study researches the mutual influences of memes and love or sexual relationships. It displays, that, on the one side, the topic of relationships is one of the most common and in many ways defines Internet memetics as a whole. On the other side, creating and sending memes became an important part of contemporary relationships and support them. Memes help to remember key point of successful relationships and this knowledge is a constituent of their background and allow develop them and, at the same time, strengthens their sustainability through good emotional context. Regarding this, the study displays, that memetic humour, even in its most sharp or black forms plays a positive role. Based on this the research introduces and considers the new concepts of memirony and metahumour. So, the study affirms, that memes are part of post-postmodern eventuality, more relatable and sincere than postmodern. Relatable, truth-to-life memes, in comparison with too intellectual memes, helps maintain closer relationships through genuine love game. The research put special attention to a linguistic component of memes, meme «languages» in particular. Except for basic memetic conceptions by Limor Shifman, Douglas Hofstadter, Susan Blackmore, etc., and the cognitive approach of Daniel Dennet, the study is based on the conception of love as a comedy by Alenka Zupančič and laughter as a linguistic appearance by Mladen Dolar, the conception of the relationships between sincerity, comedy and charm by Graham Harman, etc. The research was conducted on the material of Internet memes, as well as other works of contemporary art that demonstrate the importance of humour for relationships.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Nataliia Zahurska , V.N. Karazin Kharkiv National University

Zahurska Nataliia V.

D.Sc.in Philosophy

Professor of the Department of Theoretical and Practical Philosophynamed

after Professor J.B.Schad

V.N.Karazin Kharkiv National University

4, Svobody sqr., 61022, Kharkiv,Ukraine

References

Blackmore, S. (1999). The Meme Machine. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Božovič, M. (2002). Diderot’s Hysterical Materialism. Kulturwissenschaftliches Institut im Wissenschaftszentrum NRW, Jahrbuch 2001/2002, 171–186.

Bryant, L. R. (2011). The Democracy of Objects. Open Humanities Press. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Library.

Christina, G. (2017). Are We Having Sex Now or What? In R. Halwani, A. Soble, S. Hoffman & J. M. Held (Eds.). The Philosophy of Sex Contemporary Readings, (pp. 31–37). Lanham, Boulder, N.-Y. & L.: Rowman & Littlefield.

Derrida, J. (2008). The Animal That Therefore I Am. N.-Y.: Fordham University Press.

Dolar, M. (2006). A Voice and Nothing More. Massachusetts & L.: The MIT Press.

Gans, E. (1995). Toujours l’amour. Chronicles of Love and Resentment, 20. Retrieved from http://anthropoetics.ucla.edu/views/vw20/

Harman, G. (2005). Guerilla Metaphysics: Phenomenology and the

Carpentry of Things. Chicago and La Salle, Illinois: Open Court.

Hofstadter, D. (1985). Metamagical Themas: Questing for the Essence of Mind and Pattern. N.-Y.: Basic Books.

Jeske, D. (2019). Love and Friendship. In A. M. Martin (Ed.). The Routledge Handbook of Love in Philosophy, (pp. 13–22). N.-Y. & L.: Routledge.

de Jong, C. (2017). Modern Love. N.-Y.: Primary Information/Ugly Duckling Presse.

July, M. (2015). The First Bad Man. N.-Y., L., Toronto, Sydney, New Delhi: Scribner.

Kien, G. (2019). Communicating with Memes: Consequences in Post-truth. Civilization. Lanham, Boulder, N.-Y. & L.: Lexington Books.

Konstantinou, L. (2017). Four Faces of Postirony. In R. Van den Akker, Α. Gibbons, T. Vermeulen (Eds.). Metamodernism: Historicity, Affect, and Depth after Postmodernism, (pp. 87–102). Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield.

Kraus, Ch. (2006). I Love Dick. L.-A.: Semiotext(e) / Native Agents.

Leader, D. (2002). Extract from Why Do Women Write More Letters Than They Post? In S. Žižec (Ed.). Jacques Lacan: Critical Evaluations in Cultural Theory. Vol. I: Psychoanalytic Theory and Practice, (pp. 97–116). N.-Y., L.: Routledge.

McNeill, L. S. (2009). The End of the Internet: A Folk Response to the Provision of Infinite Choice. In T. J. Blank (Ed.). Folklore and the Internet: Vernacular Expression in a Digital World, (pp. 80–97). Logan: Utah State University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctt4cgrx5.7

Němec, J. (2019). Možnosti milostného románu [Possibilities of Love Novel]. Brno: Host.

Saunders, J. (2022). Loves Passed. In A. Grahle, N. McKeever & J. Saunders (Eds.). Philosophy of Love in the Past, Present, and Future, (pp. 131–144). N.-Y. and L. Routledge, 2022. DOI: 10.4324/9781003014331-12

Saunders, J. (2018). Taking Love Seriously: McTaggart, Absolute Reality and Chemistry. British Journal for the History of Philosophy, 26 (4), 719–737. Retrieved from https://dro.dur.ac.uk/26993/1/26993.pdf. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09608788.2017.1393617

Shifman, L. (2014). Memes in digital culture. Cambridge, MA. & L.: The MIT Press.

Soble, A. (2017). Sexual Use. In R. Halwani, A. Soble, S. Hoffman & J. M. Held (Eds.). The Philosophy of Sex Contemporary Readings, (pp. 293–320). Lanham, Boulder, N.-Y. & L.: Rowman & Littlefield.

Zupančič, A. (2004). Investigations of the Lacanian Field: Some Remarks on Comedy and Love. Polygraph: An International Journal of Culture & Politics, 15/16, 131–146.

Zupančič, A. (2003). On Love as Comedy. Journal for Politics, Gender and Culture. Vol. II, 1, Summer, 61–80.

Zupančič, A. (2020). Preston Sturges and The End of Laughter. Crisis and Critique, Vol. 7, Issue 2, 272–289.

Zupančič, A. (2017). What is sex? Cambridge, MA. & L.: The MIT Press.

Vine, L. (2017). Hot Mess. L.: Orion.

Wiggins, B. E. (2019). The Discursive Power of Memes in Digital Culture: Ideology, Semiotics, and Intertextuality. N.-Y. & L.: Routledge.

Published
2023-11-27
Cited
How to Cite
Zahurska , N. (2023). MEMIRONY: REBOUND OF RELATIONSHIPS IN MEMES. The Journal of V. N. Karazin Kharkiv National University, Series "Philosophy. Philosophical Peripeteias", (69), 28-41. https://doi.org/10.26565/2226-0994-2023-69-4
Section
Articles