(RE)SEARCH FOR THE DOCTOR IN HEALTH POLICY
Abstract
The article offers an analysis of the «position of the doctor» in the context of the healthcare system, where he acts as a trusted professional who must operate according to the principles of approved and institutionally supported models of doctor-patient relationships (DPR) in accordance with current health policy, as well as in the context of ordinary medical practice, where doctors are bound to deal directly with patients – usually abnormal, incompetent and disobedient – who always have their own ideas about «health», «the goals of medicine», «well-being», etc., and, as consumers, demand solutions to issues and problems «related to health». According to the authors, the general problem context is the uncertainty and impossibility of a monistic definition of the concept of «health», which, however, does not prevent it from occupying a central place in normative communication between doctor and patient, appearing in it as their common goal and as the subject of constructive discussions of mutually acceptable solutions for achieving it. At the same time, the «common language», which is the key to reaching agreement on the scope, methods, and expected results of medical intervention through a certain distribution of power and responsibility between the doctor and the patient, cannot be imagined as a given, ready-to-use, licensed utility, but comes from negotiations and dotted conspiracies between the doctor and a specific patient, that is, through the formation of their power relations. The latter (in terms of Foucault's micro-physics of power) are understood as special, individual, uncertain «low» tactics, which are finalised and formalised at the «upper echelons» of health policy using DPR regulatory models. Thus, a true practising physician should be understood as someone who, in each case (patient), must arbitrarily determine the level of their «power conductivity».
Downloads
References
Barnes, E. (2023). Health problems: philosophical puzzles about the nature of health. Oxford University Press, Incorporated. DOI:10.1093/oso/9780192883476.001.0001
Boorse, C. (2014). A Second Rebuttal On Health. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy, 39, 683–724. DOI:10.1093/jmp/jhu035
Boorse, C. (2024). Boundaries of Disease: Disease and Risk. Medical Research Archives, 12(3). DOI:10.18103/mra.v11i4.3599
Canguilhem, G. (1998). La santé: concept vulgaire & question philosophique. Sables.
Canguilhem, G. (1966). Le normal et le pathologique. (3d ed.). Presses Universitaires de France.
Deleuze, G. (1986). Foucault. Les Éd. du Minuit.
Deleuze, G. (1986а). Sur Foucault. 2ème partie: Pouvoir. 9ème séance, 07 janvier 1986. https://deleuze.cla.purdue.edu/wp-content/uploads/2022/05/09b-Foucault-010786-Fr-Rev-2022_0.pdf
Deleuze, G. (1986b). Sur Foucault. 2ème partie: Pouvoir. 10ème séance, 14 janvier 1986. https://deleuze.cla.purdue.edu/wp-content/uploads/2022/05/10b-Foucault-011486-Fr-Rev-2022_1.pdf (03.10.2025)
Derrida, J. (2004). Structure, Sign and Play in the Discourse of the Human Sciences. In Writing and Difference. Kyiv: Osnovy. (In Ukrainian).
Foucault, M. (1971). L’Ordre du discours: leçon inaugurale au College de France prononcée le 2 Decembre 1970. Gallimard.
Foucault, M. (1994). Les rapports de pouvoir passent à l’intérieur des corps. In Dits et Écrits 1954-1988. III 1976-1979. n197. (pp. 228–236). Galimard.
Foucault, M. (1994b). Un système fini face à une demande infinite. In Dits et Écrits 1954-1988. IV 1980-1988. n216. (pp. 367–383). Galimard.
Gadamer, H.-G. (1996). The enigma of health: the art of healing in a scientific age (J. Gaiger & N. Walker, Trans.). Stanford University Press.
Heidegger, M., & Trawny, P. (2014). Überlegungen VII-XI (Schwarze Hefte 1938/39). Vittorio Klostermann.
Heidegger, M., & Boss, M. (2021). Zollikoner Seminare: Protokolle – Zwiegespräche – Briefe (4th ed). Vittorio Klostermann.
Hirsch, A. (2025). Well-being and enhancement: reassessing the welfarist account. Medicine, HealthCare and Philosophy 28, 185–197. DOI:10.1007/s11019-024-10246-3
Illich, I. (2013). Limits to Medicine: Medical Nemesis. The Expropriation of Health. Marion Boyars.
Kant, I., & Deutsche Akademie der Wissenschaften zu Berlin. (1910). Kant’s gesammelte Schriften. Georg Reimer.
Kierkegaard, S., Hong, H. V., & Hong, E. H. (1980). The sickness unto death: a Christian psychological exposition for upbuilding and awakening (First Princeton paperback printing, with corrections). Princeton University Press.
Kowalski, J. C. (2018). Quantifying Wellness: Beyond the Dichotomous Choice Between Health and Disease Lies the Road to P6 Medicine. Advances in Sciences and Humanities, 4(2), 25–36. DOI:10.11648/j.ash.20180402.12
Kukla, Q. R. (2024). Healthism, Elite Capture, and the Pitfalls of an Expansive Concept of Health. In Schermer, M., Binney, N. (Eds) A Pragmatic Approach to Conceptualization of Health and Disease. Philosophy and Medicine, 151. (pp. 275–294). Springer, Cham. DOI:10.1007/978-3-031-62241-0_21
Kukla, Q. R. (2025). Health Problems: Philosophical Puzzles about the Nature of Health. The Philosophical Review 1 January 2025 [Book review], 134(1), 86–92. DOI:10.1215/00318108-11592443
Kukla, R. (2014). Medicalization, «Normal function», and the definition of health. In The Routledge Companion to Bioethics. (pp. 515–530). Taylor & Francis. DOI:10.4324/9780203804971-54
Linden, R. van der, & Schermer, M. (2022). Health and disease as practical concepts: exploring function in context-specific definitions. Med Health Care Philos. Mar; 25(1), 131–140. DOI:10.1007/s11019-021-10058-9
Lupton, D. (1997). Foucault and the médicalisation critique. In Petersen, A. R., & Bunton, R. (Eds.). Foucault, health and medicine. (pp. 94–110). Routledge.
Lupton, D. (2016). Risk and Personal Responsibility for Health and Illness in the Web 2.0 Era. In Davis, J. E., & González, A. M. (Eds.). To fix or to heal: patient care, public health, and the limits of biomedicine. (pp. 152–176). New York University Press.
Misselbrook, D. (2024). Thinking about medicine: an introduction to the philosophy of healthcare (First edition). CRC Press, Taylor & Francis Group.
Nabokov, V. V. (2010). Bend sinister. Penguin.
Nietzsche, F. (2020). The Gay Science. (V. B. Tchaikovsky, Trans.). Folio. (In Ukrainian).
Tournier, M. (1996). Le miroir des idées: traité (Ed. rev. et augm). Mercure de France.
Copyright (c) 2026 Михайло Шильман, Кирило Широков

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication of this work under the terms of a license Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0).
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.


3.gif)



