May Sinclair and suffragism: biographical materials on the writer
Abstract
The article examines the biography, intellectual views, and public activity of the English writer, literary critic, and philosopher May Sinclair in the context of the British suffrage movement of the early twentieth century. The relevance of the study is determined by the fact that Ukrainian historiography and literary study still contain a noticeable gap in research on the role of individual representatives of the British women’s movement who combined literary creativity with civic and educational activities. Despite her significant contribution to the intellectual environment of the feminist movement, the figure of May Sinclair remains insufficiently studied, particularly regarding her participation in organisations that supported the struggle for women’s suffrage.
The aim of the article is to clarify the main biographical features and worldview foundations of May Sinclair in the context of ideas of gender equality and to determine her role in the social and political life of Great Britain through an analysis of her involvement in the suffrage movement.
The research employs general scientific methods of analysis, synthesis, comparison, and generalisation, as well as special historical methods, including the biographical method, historical-cultural approach, and critical analysis of sources. The use of a gender approach made it possible to examine the writer’s activities through the prism of the formation and transformation of gender perceptions in British society at the turn of the nineteenth and twentieth centuries.
The article analyses the life circumstances that influenced the shaping of May Sinclair’s feminist views and reveals her participation in the activities of suffrage organisations, in particular the Women’s Freedom League and the Women Writers’ Suffrage League. It is shown that the writer took part in public campaigns supporting women’s suffrage, published journalistic texts defending the ideas of gender equality, and actively engaged in polemics with opponents of women’s emancipation.
The study concludes that May Sinclair occupied a notable place in the intellectual environment of the British suffrage movement. Her literary works, publicistic writings, and civic engagement contributed to the dissemination of ideas of gender equality and to the shaping of public support for women’s struggle for political rights.
Downloads
References
Honcharova, О.А. (2014). Forgotten names of English modernism: May Sinclair. Scientific Notes of H.S. Skovoroda Kharkiv National Pedagogical University, Series “Literary Study”, 2(78), 1, 36–46. [In Russian] https://dspace.hnpu.edu.ua/server/api/core/bitstreams/213a4565-8dc1-4459-a2f0-b37ae393bd24/content
Honcharova, О.А. (2023). “I can claim only a psychological accuracy”: May Sinclair’s non-fiction writing on war. Scientific Notes of V. I. Vernadsky Taurida National University, Series “Philology. Journalism”, 34(3), 240–245. [In Ukrainian] https://doi.org/10.32782/2710-4656/2023.3/42
Hrytsenko-Veselovska, O.V. (2014). Suffragism as a way to ensure gender equality in women’s voting rights. Current Issues of Politics, 51, 477–484. [In Ukrainian] https://app.nuoua.od.ua/archive/51_2014/60.pdf
Didenko, K.V. (2024). The emergence and development of the suffragist movement in Europe. Proceedings of the 10th All-Ukrainian Scientific Conference “Current Research in Social Sciences” (Uman, March 28, 2024), 204–210. Uman: Vizavi. [In Ukrainian] https://surl.lu/vgwjtn
Zalietok, N.V. (2016). Women in the social and political life of Great Britain (the last third of the 19th century – 1939) [Abstract of PhD dissertation]. Kyiv: M.P. Dragomanov National Pedagogical University. 22 p. [In Ukrainian] http://history.org.ua/LiberUA/ZaletokZhinki_2016/ZaletokZhinki_2016.pdf
Gillespie, Diane F. (1985). “The Muddle of the Middle”: May Sinclair on Women. Tulsa Studies in Women’s Literature, 4(2), 235–251. https://www.jstor.org/stable/463698
Gillespie, Diane F. (2006). “Physiological Emergencies” and “Suffragitis”: Miss May Sinclair, Writer, versus Sir Almroth Wright, MD, FRS. In: Troy, M.K. and Kunka, A.J. (eds). May Sinclair: Moving Towards the Modern, 197–220. London: Routledge.
Honcharova, O.A. (2023). May Sinclair on Things “Worse than War” (1920). Arguments of Contemporary Philology: Freedom and Security. Proceedings of the 3rd International Scientific Conference (Kharkiv, April 6–7, 2023), 42–46. Kharkiv: H.S. Skovoroda Kharkiv National Pedagogical University. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7813512
Park, Sowon S. (1997). The First Professional: The Women Writers’ Suffrage League. Modern Language Quarterly, 57(2), 185–200. https://escholarship.org/content/qt41j5b4jx/qt41j5b4jx_noSplash_3d5ae376a2726e4a42fde4aea6e9db3b.pdf
Pease, Alison. (2006). May Sinclair, Feminism and Boredom: “A Dying to Live”. English Literature in Transition (1880-1920), 49(2), 168–193. https://doi.org/10.2487/p224-x752-6w83-715u
Pudelko, Brygida. (2015). May Sinclair’s and H.G. Well’s Involvement in the Suffrage Movement. Journal of History Culture and Art Research, 4(2), 56–70. https://doi.org/10.7596/taksad.v4i2.433
Raitt, Suzanne. (2000). May Sinclair: A Modern Victorian. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 307 p.
Schwab-Graham, Milena. (2024). Suffrage and subjectivity: reassessing May Sinclair’s feminist writings. Feminist Modernist Studies, 7(1), 17–30. https://doi.org/10.1080/24692921.2023.2269827
Schwab-Graham, Milena. (2014). “Sharp, Queer, Uncertain Happiness”: Walking as Feminist “Affective Militancy” in May Sinclair’s Mary Olivier (1919) and The Three Sisters (1914). In: Bont L. De, Brasme I., Marie F. (eds.), May Sinclair in Her Time (pp. 213–228). Presses universitaires de la Méditerranée.
Sinclair, May. (1908). How it strikes a mere novelist? Votes for Women, 24 December, 211.
Sinclair, May. (1912). Feminism. London: Women Writers’ Suffrage League. 48 p.
Wright, Almroth E. (1912). Suffrage Fallacies: Sir Almroth Wright on Militant Hysteria. The Times, 28 March, 7–8.
