The role of the semantheme “Heart” in the structure of the field “Spiritual state” (based on the material of the Russian language)

  • Ilona Zamanova School of Foreign Languages, Zhengzhou Normal University
Keywords: spirituality in language, denotative space, emotive vocabulary, abstract substances, language consciousness, cognitive linguistics, human systems

Abstract

The article deals with the question of denotative space of spiritual state concepts, analyzes the semantic structure of the lexeme ‘Heart’, author makes attempts to reconstruct the semantheme ‘Heart’, what is based on the lexicographic dictionaries data, contexts usage and stable combinations. The nests of semanthems, where each semantic feature of the stratified complex was acted as dominant, are also analyzed. Thus at the level of language prototypes and at the level of implementation of these prototypes in the language an attempt to fully describe the structure of the semantheme “Heart” is complete. The author drew attention to the texts of the early historical era, where it was noticed that abstract concepts at the language level were denoted using the lexical block “Heart”, but at the present stage of language development all these concepts have a separate lexeme. This observation gave the author the opportunity to assert that the “Heart” is one of the first semanthems in the spiritual sector of the system “Man”. Based on the analysis, author is stated that in the hierarchy of the spiritual sector of the system “Man” semantheme 'Heart' occupies a nuclear position, it is initial nominator of the specific reaction of the heart as an organ, later it spread the field of meaning in the direction of three other basic meanings – thoughts/feelings/desires, which gave the language consciousness the opportunity to build all subsequent abstract concepts, nuclear generalized features of the semantheme 'heart' can be found in the semantic structure of the lexical units, nominating the sphere of spirituality.

The study of the semantheme ‘Heart’ paved the way for the possibility of a new vision to the vocabulary of emotions and mental states in general denotative space. The author suggests including to the denotative space the assessment of the phenomenon by the participant, the intensity of the manifestation of the heart reaction, the intensity of desire, facial or effective reaction. It is proposed to specify the intensity using a scale with positive and negative indicators.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Ilona Zamanova, School of Foreign Languages, Zhengzhou Normal University

master's degree, foreign specialist in the Russian Language Department

References

Apresjan Ju. D. Obraz ljudini za danimi movi. Sproba sistemnogo opisu. Vibranі pracі, tom II. Іntegral'nij opis movi і sistemna leksikografіja. Moskva: Shkola «Movi rosіjs'koї kul'turi», 1995. S. 348–388.

Bіblіja. Moskva: Rosіjs'ke Bіblіjne Tovaristvo, 2014. 292 s.

Vezhbic'ka A. Tlumachennja emocіjnih konceptіv. Mova. Kul'tura. Pіznannja. Moskva: Rosіjs'kі slovniki, 1996. S. 326–376.

Gak V. G. Do tipologії lіngvіstichnih nomіnacіj. Movna nomіnacіja. Moskva: Nauka, 1977. S. 230–294.

Gіl'ferdіng A. Pro sporіdnenіst' movi slov'jans'koї z sanskrits'koju. Sankt-Peterburg: Drukarnja Іmperators'koї Akademії nauk, 1853. 294 s.

Dal' V. Tlumachnij slovnik zhivoї velikorus'koї movi: v 4 t. Moskva: Rosіjs'ka mova, 1989. 779 s.

Danilova R. R. Funkcіonuvannja konceptu «serce» v emocіjno-chuttєvіj і duhovnіj sferah ljudini v tatars'kіj і rosіjs'kіj movnih kartinah svіtu. Vіsnik ChDPU. № 11. 2009. S. 228–234.

Zamanova І. V. Іzomorfіzm nomіnativnih modelej abstraktnih substantivіv dushevnogo і fіzichnogo stanіv. Vіsnik Harkіvs'kogo nacіonal'nogo unіversitetu іm. V. N. Karazіna. Fіlologіja. V. 85. 2020. S. 48–54.

Zamanova І. V. Rol' kompleksnogo pіdhodu v opisі nomіnativnih movnih zasobіv (na prikladі signifіkata «dushevnij stan»). Vchenі zapiski Tavrіjs'kogo nacіonal'nogo unіversitetu іm. V. І. Vernads'kogo. T. 31. № 1. 2020. S. 155–161.

Lakoff Dzh., Dzhonson M. Metafori, jakimi mi zhivemo. Moskva: Editorial URSS, 2004. 256 s.

Makarova V. L. Semantika і funkcіonal'nі harakteristiki slova cor v tekstah Avrelіja Avgustina: na prikladі «Spovіdі»: avtoreferat dis. ... kandidata fіlologіchnih nauk. Sankt-Peterburg. 2011. 18 s.

Ozhegov S. I., Shvedova N. Ju. Tlumachnij slovnik rosіjs'koї movi. Moskva: TOV «ІTІ tehnologії», 2003. 944 s.

Pedchenko L. V. Perceptivna metafora jak zasіb stvorennja «obrazu ljudini» v rosіjs'kіj dіalektnіj movі. Vіsnik Harkіvs'kogo nacіonal'nogo unіversitetu іmenі V. N. Karazіna. Fіlologіja. V. 77. 2017. S. 50–55.

Plotnikova A. M. Dієslova z vkljuchenoju aktantnoj ramkoju: onomasіologіchnij і kognіtivnij aspekti. Denotativnij prostіr rosіjs'kogo dієslova / Za red. Babenko L. G. Єkaterinburg: Vyd-vo Ural. un-tu, 1998. S. 117–120.

Plotnikova Ju. І. Denotativnij prostіr dієslіv «visіti», «lezhati», «sidіti», «stojati». Denotativnij prostіr rosіjs'kogo dієslova / Za red. Babenko L. G. Єkaterinburg: Vyd-vo Ural. un-tu, 1998. S. 130–133

Rudjakov A. N. Mova, abo Chomu ljudi govorjat' (dosvіd funkcіonal'nogo viznachennja prirodnoї movi). Ky`yiv: Gramota, 2004. 224 s.

Sapegіna І. A. Koncept serce jak domіnanta emocіjnoї kartini svіtu v rosіjs'kіj movі v dzerkalі kitajs'koї movi: avtoref. dis. ... kand. fіlol. n. Moskva, 2011. 20 s.

Sokolovs'ka Zh. P. Sistema v leksichnіj semanticі. Ky`yiv: Vishha shkola, 1979. 189 s.

Ushakov D. N. Tlumachnij slovnik. URL: https://ushakovdictionary.ru/word.php?wordid=81019.

Fіllmor Ch. Sprava pro vіdmіnok. Nove v zarubіzhnіj lіngvіsticі. V. 10. Leksichna semantika. Moskva: Progres, 1981. S. 369–495.

Chernejko L. O. Lіngvo-fіlosofs'kij analіz abstraktnogo іmenі. Moskva: Vyd-vo MDU, 1997. 400 s.

Shevel'ova M. S. Slovnik rosіjs'koї movi: t. 4. Moskva: Ros. mova, 1985. 736 s.

NKRM. http://www.ruscorpora.ru/new/index.html

Published
2021-12-13
How to Cite
Zamanova, I. (2021). The role of the semantheme “Heart” in the structure of the field “Spiritual state” (based on the material of the Russian language). The Journal of V. N. Karazin Kharkiv National University. Series “Philology”, (89), 78-86. https://doi.org/10.26565/2227-1864-2021-89-13