Grammatical binomials usage as an author's individual style
Abstract
This article is devoted to investigate the impact of specific linguistic units usage such as grammatical binomials on individual author’s style. The individual author’s style is observed as a writer’s unique signature, manifested in the selective and distinctive combination of linguistic meanings used to achieve poetic goals. The study emphasizes that author’s style is formed during the process of text creation as non-standard models and a striving for the individualization of expression. Particular attention is paid to the category of subjective modality, which permeates the entire textual space and is the main component of the author’s world picture. Modality, in combination with linguistic meanings, becomes a way of expressing the author’s intellectual and emotional reproduction of the worldview. An analysis of subjective modality allows us to identify the author’s favorite techniques and the methods of the formation of modal meanings. The central object of analysis is that the grammatical binomials are consisting of two words of the same part of speech in the same morphological form. The article proposes a stylistic typology of binomials, which includes linguistic, discursive, idiostylistic and contextual-authorial types. Using the works of Hanna Cherin and Boris Oleksandriv, the article demonstrates how these units create a specific rhythm, emotional tension and complex artistic descriptions. Attention also focused on the semantic interaction of the components of the binomial, which create new meanings. The methodological approach is based on a combination of linguistic-stylistic analysis and elements of corpus analysis. It is concluded that grammatical binomials are an effective tool for emphasizing meanings and intensifying the expressive impact on the reader.
Downloads
References
Belinska, Y. (2023). Katehoriia styliu (idiostyliu) yak literaturoznavche yavyshche [The category of style (idiosyncratic style) as a literary phenomenon]. Ukrainska literatura: istorychnyi dosvid i perspektyvy, 2, 114–125. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31652/3041-1084-2023-2-114-125. [in Ukrainian].
Kotkova, L. (2012). Idiostyl, indyvidualnyi styl i idiolekt: problemy rozmezhuvannia [Idiostyle, Individual Style, and Idiolect: Problems of Distinction]. Naukovi zapysky Nizhynskoho derzhavnoho universytetu im. Mykoly Hoholia. Seriia: Filolohichni nauky, 2, 26–29. [in Ukrainian].
Martinchuk, K. (2022). Indyvidualno avtorskyi styl pysmennyka literaturoznavchyi ta linhvistychnyi aspekty. [The writer's unique style: literary and linguistic aspects]. Suchasni filolohichni doslidzhennia ta navchannia inozemnoi movy v konteksti mizhkulturnoi komunikatsii: Zbirnyk studentskykh naukovykh robit, 15, 163–168. [in Ukrainian].
Oleksandiv B. (1965). Tuha za sontsem. Poezii 1945–1965. [Longing For The Sun]. New-York–Toronto: Obiednannia Ukrainskykh Pysmennykiv «Slovo». [in Ukrainian].
Oleksandiv B. (1972). Kolokruh. [The Circuit]. Munich: Instytut Literatury im. M. Oresta. [in Ukrainian].
Povoroznyuk, V. (2016). Ohliad teoretychnykh pidkhodiv do traktuvannia poniattia «idiostyl» [A Review of Theoretical Approaches to the Concept of “Idiostyle”]. Naukovi zapysky Natsionalnoho universytetu «Ostrozka akademiia». Seriia: Filolohichna, 62, 275–278. [in Ukrainian].
Sydorenko, I. (2015). Pidkhody do vyvchennia idiostyliu u linhvistychnykh doslidzhenniakh khudozhnoho tekstu [Approaches to study of idiostyle in linguistic research on literary texts]. Naukovi zapysky Vinnytskoho derzhavnoho pedahohichnoho universytetu imeni Mykhaila Kotsiubynskoho. Seriia: Filolohiia (movoznavstvo), 21, 298–303. [in Ukrainian].
Skorobogatova, O. (2023). Morfolohichni binomy riznykh typiv u dorobku fundatoriv Kharkivskoi filolohichnoi shkoly, suchasnyi stan i perspektyvy doslidzhennia problem [Morphological binomials of various types in the works of the founders of the Kharkiv School of Philology: Current Status and Prospects for Research on the Issue]. The Journal of V. N. Karazin Kharkiv National University. Series Philology, (93), 79–83. DOI: https://doi.org/10.26565/2227-1864-2023-93-12 [in Ukrainian].
Tereshchenko, L., & Tkachuk, T. (2020). Pro dotsilnist ototozhnennia poniat «idiolekt» ta «idiostyl» [On the appropriateness of equating the concepts of “idiolect” and “idiostyle”]. Scientific Letters of Academic Society of Michal Baludansky, Vol. 8 (4), pp 127–130. [in Ukrainian].
Cherin, G. (1962). Chornozem. [Black soil]. Chicago: Ukrainsko-Amerykanske vydavnytstvo Dzherelo: Hurtom. [in Ukrainian].
Cherin, G. (1969). Vahonetky. [Wagons]. Chicago – New-York: Nakladom Avtorky Printed bu A. Orel. [in Ukrainian].
Cherin, G. (1973). Nebesni virshi (Poezii y poema «Dobro i zlo») [Heavenly Verses (Poems and the Poem “Good and Evil”)]. Buenos-Aires: Vydavnytstvo Yuliana Serediaka. [in Ukrainian].
Shvedova, M., Waldenfels von R., Yarygin, S., et al. General Regionally Annotated Corpus of the Ukrainian Language (GRAC). Kyiv, Lviv, Yena, 2017–2026. URL: https://uacorpus.org (accessed 12.03.2026).
Radchuk O., Tuchyna N. (2025). Subjective modality as an anthropocentric attribute of a text and a linguistic personality. The Journal of V. N. Karazin Kharkiv National University. Series Philology, (96), 55–60. 10.26565/2227-1864-2025-96-07 https://periodicals.karazin.ua/philology. [in English].