Definition of alternative tourist availability and its mapping

Keywords: tourist destination, assessment, tourist availability, Cherkasy region, Kyiv region, Poltava region, mapping

Abstract

The purpose of the article is to justify approaches to assessing alternative tourist availability (using the example of Cherkasy region and its first-order neighbors) according to the authors’ indicators and their cartographic support.

The main material. The article analyses prevailing approaches to the assessment of tourist destinations, their tourist potential. The authors have found that it is not enough to evaluate the territory itself as it functions and develops in constant competition with neighbours and territories that provide similar tourist services. The need for a traveller to choose a tourist destination between several mutually exclusive possibilities gives rise to the definition of an alternative place of rest. The article proposes to evaluate a comprehensive indicator - alternative tourist accessibility, based on the system of indicators of geographical location, infrastructural, natural-recreational, historical-cultural factors in accordance with territorial, practical, price, and informational accessibility, which is understood as a comparative assessment of territories according to specified criteria using a rating approach, geo-informational - the cartographic method and the sum of places method.

Approbation of the methodology was carried out on the example of Cherkasy region and its neighbours of the first order, as they can pull off potential tourist flows most often or, conversely, act as a donor of potential tourists.

Conclusions and further research. Based on the results of the study, the tourist leader is Kyiv region. Cherkasy region ranks second, losing in terms of territorial, informational and practical accessibility. The third place takes the territory of Poltava region, which is the main competitor for Cherkasy region, especially taking into account the similarity of tourist products. The main advantage of Cherkasy region in determining an alternative place of rest is affordability as the strongest competitive factor. Thus, the evaluation results confirm the present -day depiction of tourism development. We believe that such an indicator must be taken into account while developing tourism strategies and SWOT-analyses, because it allows us to identify prospects and threats, weaknesses and strengths. In the future, this method should be tested on the example of regions that are competitors for a certain type of tourist offer.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Yuliia Prasul, V. N. Karazin Kharkiv National University

Candidate of Sciences (Geography), Associate Professor

Valentyna Klymenko, V. N. Karazin Kharkiv National University

Associate Professor

Natalia Bubyr, V. N. Karazin Kharkiv National University

Candidate of Sciences (Geography), Associate Professor

Yanina Melnyk, V. N. Karazin Kharkiv National University

Magister

Andrii Chudinov, V. N. Karazin Kharkiv National University

Bachelor

References

Beуdyk, O.O. (2009). Recreational resources of Ukraine: А textbook. – Kyiv: Alterpres, 400 (in Ukrainian).

Busel, V.T. (comp.) (2005). Big Explanatory Dictionary of the modern Ukrainian language. – Kyiv; Irpin: Perun, 23 (in Ukrainian).

Davydova, O.H. (2015). Methods of assessing the tourist attractiveness of the regions of the country // Ukrainian Society, 4 (55), 97–107 (in Ukrainian).

Ivanova, K.O. (2017). Methodology and problematics of complex assessment of recreational and tourist resources // Global and National Problems of Economy, 19, 338–342 (in Ukrainian).

Melnik, Ya.R.(2020). Alternative tourist accessibility of the Cherkasy region // Geographical achievements: history, modernity, prospects (based on the material of International conf. student and post-graduate student, invited in memory of Professor G.P. Dubinsky, Kharkiv, April 9, 2020. – Kharkiv: V.N. Karazin KhNU, 13, 131-134 (in Ukrainian).

Muzychenko-Kozlovs'ka, O.V. (2012). Economic assessment of the tourist attractiveness of the territory: Monograph. – Lviv: Novyj svit, 176 (in Ukrainian).

Oklander, M.A. (2002). Problems of formation of the country's marketing system. – Kyiv: Naukova dumka, 167 (in Ukrainian).

Herasymenko, V.H. (ed.) (2016). Assessment of tourist and recreational potential of the region. – Odesa: ONEU, 262 (in Ukrainian).

Prasul, Yu.I., Klymenko, V.H., Melnyk, Ya.R., Andreieva, AA. (2020). Alternative tourist accessibility as a factor in determining the competitive position of the territory. Topical issues of the development of modern science: Abstracts of the 7th International scientific and practical conference, 11-13.03.2020. – Sofia, Bulgaria: ACCENT, 381–384 (in Ukrainian).

Terebukh, A.A., Moroz, O.I. (2016). Assessment of the tourist potential of destinations // Actual Problems of the Economy., 7, 335–343 (in Ukrainian).

Yukhnovska, Yu.O. (2021). Balanced development of the potential of the tourism industry of Ukraine: theory, methodology, practice : Dissertation ... doctor of Economics : 08.00.03. Dnipro: Dnipro National University of railway transport named after academician V. Lazaryan, 580 (in Ukrainian).

Published
2021-12-31
How to Cite
Prasul, Y., Klymenko, V., Bubyr, N., Melnyk, Y., & Chudinov, A. (2021). Definition of alternative tourist availability and its mapping. Problems of Continuous Geographic Education and Cartography, (34), 29-38. https://doi.org/10.26565/2075-1893-2021-34-04
Section
Статті