MEDIATION IN THE DISPUTE SETTLEMENT SYSTEM UNDER THE EU- UKRAINE ASSOCIATION AGREEMENT 2014
Abstract
The article examines the system of dispute settlement under the Association Agreement between Ukraine and the EU of 2014, which may arise from the lack of a unified approach to interpreting the provisions of the Agreement or fair use, and due to the improper performance of obligations by one of the Parties. Each individual dispute resolution mechanism is described. In particular, a general dispute settlement mechanism extending to the provisions of the Agreement on Deep and Comprehensive Free Trade Area between Ukraine and the EU (DCFTA), and a dispute settlement mechanism within the DCFTA, implemented through consultation, arbitration or arbitration, are explored. It is stated that the general dispute settlement mechanism is based on a "traditional" diplomatic approach, in which the Association Council, consisting of members of the Government of Ukraine and members of the European Commission, is a key dispute resolution body. The DCFTA dispute settlement mechanism is more complex. Attention is drawn to the fact that the consultation mechanism, which by its content provides for negotiation, can act as a separate dispute settlement procedure or as a stage preceding the arbitration procedure or mediation, if the parties failed to reach a mutually agreed solution. The arbitration procedure involves the consideration of the dispute by a panel of three independent arbitrators whose decisions are binding on the parties. If the respondent Party does not comply with the decision and does not offer temporary compensation, the other Party has the right to apply temporary protection measures, which stipulate the suspension of its obligations. Another mechanism for dispute resolution is mediation, which aims to facilitate a mutually agreed solution through comprehensive and expedited procedures through a mediator.
The features of mediation in the dispute settlement system under this Agreement are identified. Attention is drawn to the benefits of mediation over other dispute resolution tools provided by the UA. In particular, unlike arbitration, any dispute concerning the provisions of Title IV of the AA may be the subject of mediation. In addition, the mediator does not have the right to submit a final dispute resolution to the parties compared to the arbitrators. Its purpose is to facilitate the adoption of a mutually agreed decision taken by the Parties as a result of their independent consent. Such a feature makes the mediation mechanism a more attractive and flexible way of resolving a conflict between the Parties, which is not always ready to commit itself to a legally binding solution. In addition, jointly finding a mutually beneficial solution can help solve problems in interpreting and implementing the terms of the agreement in a more effective way.
Downloads
References
2. Костюченко Я. М. Механізм вирішення спорів в Угоді про асоціацію між Україною та ЄС. Науковий вісник Ужгородського національного університету. Серія ПРАВО. 2019. Вип. 56, том 2. С. 144-147.
3. Мазаракі Н. А. Теоретико-правові засади запровадження медіації в Україні: Дис. … докт. юрид. наук: 12.00.01. К., 2019. 484 с.
4. Муравйов В. І. Способи і механізми врегулювання спорів в угодах Європейського Союзу про асоціацію. Наукові записки Інституту законодавства Верховної Ради України. 2014. № 6. С. 69-74.
5. Поглиблення відносин між ЄС та Україною: Що, чому і як? / за ред. М. Емерсона, В. Мовчан. Вид. 2-е. Брюссель (CEPS), Київ (Ін‑т економічних досліджень і політичних консультацій), 2018. 288 с.
6. Про внесення змін до Закону України «Про особливості державного регулювання діяльності суб’єктів підприємницької діяльності, пов’язаної з реалізацією та експортом лісоматеріалів» щодо тимчасової заборони експорту лісоматеріалів у необробленому вигляді: Закон України від 09.04.2015 № 325-VIII. Офіц. вісн. України. 2015. № 55. Ст. 1782.
7. Угода про асоціацію між Україною, з однієї сторони, та Європейським Союзом, Європейським Співтовариством з атомної енергії і їхніми державами-членами, з іншої сторони, 2014 р. Офіц. вісн. України. 2014. № 75. Ст. 212.
8. Arbitration panel established on Ukraine’s wood export ban – deadline for submissions. News 04.02.2020. URL: https://trade.ec.europa.eu/doclib/press/index.cfm?id=2109&fbclid=IwAR0tIV5Q0FknsVxu2e7MupGdy-c-EeE4UsPQcVy3pvalumpoFvOS2XZU680
9. Association Agreement between the European Union and the European Atomic Energy Community and their Member States, of the one part, and Georgia, of the other part, of 27 June 2014. URL: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/en/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:22014A0830(02)
10. Association Agreement between the European Union and the European Atomic Energy Community and their Member States, of the one part, and the Republic of Moldova, of the other part, of 27 June 2014. URL: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/DE/TXT/?uri=uriserv%3AOJ.L_.2014.260.01.0004.01.ENG
11. Hansel T. P. Developing Countries and the WTO: the need for more mediation. Harvard Negotiation Law Review, Vol. 9, 2004. P. 331-363.
12. Note Verbale № 005/2019 of the European Union Delegation to Ukraine. URL: https://trade.ec.europa.eu/doclib/docs/2019/january/tradoc_157625.pdf
13. Report from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council and the European Economic and Social Committee on the application of Directive 2008/52/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council on certain aspects of mediation in civil and commercial matters of 26.08.2016. URL: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:52016DC0542&from=EN
14. Steffek F. Mediation in European Union: An Introduction / E-Justice. URL: https://e-justice.europa.eu/fileDownload.do%3Fid%3Db3e6a432-440d-4105-b9d5-29a8be95408f+&cd=1&hl=ru&ct=clnk&gl=ua
15. Understanding on rules and procedures governing the settlement of disputes Annex 2 of the WTO Agreement of 15.04.1994. URL: https://www.wto.org/english/tratop_e/dispu_e/dsu_e.htm
16. WTO: Institutions and Dispute Settlement / Eds. R. Wolfrum, P.-T. Stoll, K. Kaiser. Leiden, Boston: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 2006. 671 p.
Copyright (c) 2020 Olena Moiseienko
![Creative Commons License](http://i.creativecommons.org/l/by/4.0/88x31.png)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.