Sustainable development of the company on the basis of soft total quality management
Abstract
The article is concerned with studying the impact of soft components of total quality management (TQM) on the company’s environmental and social sustainability. The subject of the research is a set of theoretical, methodical and practical recommendations for implementing the concept of total quality management to ensure sustainable development of a company. The purpose of the article is to theoretically substantiate and develop practical recommendations for identifying the impact of soft TQM on the sustainable development of a company. Achievement of this goal is ensured by fulfilling the following interrelated tasks: to summarise the existing soft TQM practices in the research of scientists, to allocate the features of soft TQM functioning in Ukrainian companies and their success in achieving environmental and social sustainability, to develop recommendations for improving the level of environmental and social sustainability of companies through the implementation of soft TQM practices. The research used general scientific and special methods of cognition: structural-logical, systemic and process approaches, the method of generalisation and comparison, questionnaires, methods of correlation and regression analysis, logical method, method of tabular presentation of data, scientific generalisation. The following results have been obtained: having analysed the work of scientists on the research’s subject, the work of the European Foundation for Quality Management, the aspects of TQM that cover the company’s business activities, as well as the problems that are specific to each of them, have been identified. To identify the level of implementation of detailed issues, a questionnaire was developed and completed by the heads of 68 Ukrainian companies between November 2022 and March 2023. It included a Likert scale assessment of each of the soft TQM dimensions (business management system, HR practices, continuously evolving processes, leading procurement procedures, stakeholder identification, and product competitiveness) based on 28 statements. Five hypotheses were proposed based on the literature on the research topic and our own analytical developments. The data obtained in the course of the survey were analysed using correlation and regression analyses. The results show that two practices – business management systems and human resource management practices – are related to environmental sustainability, while only the business management system is related to social sustainability. The article provides recommendations for supporting the sustainable development of the company. Conclusions. The study demonstrates the effectiveness of TQM practices in ensuring the sustainability of a company’s activities. The business management system affects both environmental and social sustainability of the company. Human resource management practices have a positive impact on environmental sustainability, but not on social sustainability, i.e. organisational factors are key to achieving environmental sustainability. Raising awareness of sustainability is the best way to promote the implementation of procedures that contribute to sustainability. Other TQM practices, such as continuously evolving processes, leading procurement procedures, stakeholder identification, and competitive products, do not affect a company’s environmental and social sustainability. The article raises topics for future research: why human resource management practices and continuously evolving processes do not affect sustainability. It is appropriate to deepen the case studies to identify the mechanisms by which TQM practices contribute to both environmental and social sustainability.
Downloads
References
/References
Alharbi K., Al-Matari E. M., Yusoff R. Y. The impact of Total quality management (TQM) on Organisational sustainability: The case of the hotel industry in Saudi Arabia: Empirical study. The Social Sciences, 2016. № 11(14), Р. 3468– 3473. https://doi.org/10.3923/sscience.2016.3468.3473.
Bakos J., Siu M., Orengo A., Kasiri N. An analysis of environmental sustainability in small & mediumsized enterprises: Patterns and trends. Business Strategy and Environment, 2020, № 29, Р. 1285–1296. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2433.
Bekun F. V., Gyamfi B. A., Onifade S. T., Agboola M. O. Beyond the environmental Kuznets curve in E7 economies: Accounting for the combined impacts of institutional quality and renewables. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2021, № 314, Р. 127924. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.127924.
Chen C.-K., Reyes L., Dahlgaard J., Dahlgaard-Park S.M. From quality control to TQM, service quality and service sciences: a 30-year review of TQM literature. International Journal of Quality and Service Sciences, 2022, Vol. 14 № 2, Р. 217–237. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJQSS-09-2021-0128.
Font X., Garay L., Jones S. Sustainability motivations and practices in small tourism enterprises in European protected areas. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2016, № 137, Р. 1439–1448. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.01.071.
Fotopoulos C. B., Psomas E. L. The impact of “soft” and “hard” TQM elements on quality management results. The International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, 2009, № 26(2), Р. 150–163. https://doi.org/10.1108/02656710910928798.
Honarpour A., Jusoh A., Md Nor K. Total quality management, knowledge management, and innovation: an empirical study in R&D units. Total Quality Management and Business Excellence, 2018, № 29 (7–8). https://doi.org/10.1080/14783363.2016.1238760.
Khalil M. K., Muneenam U. Total quality management practices and corporate green performance: Does organizational culture matter? Sustainability, 2021, № 13, Р. 1–27. https://doi.org/10.3390/su131911021.
Kim H., Park K., Ryu D. Corporate environmental responsibility: A legal origins perspective. Journal of Business Ethics, 2017, № 140(3), Р. 381–402. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-015-2641-1.
Marchiori D., Mendes L. Knowledge management and total quality management: foundations, intellectual structures, insights regarding evolution of the literature. Total Quality Management and Business Excellence. 2020, № 3, Р. 1135–1169. https://doi.org/10.1080/14783363.2018.1468247 9-10pages.
Magd H., Karyamsetty H. Organizational sustainability and TQM in SMEs: A proposed model. European Journal of Business and Management, 2021, № 13(4), Р. 88–97. https://doi.org/10.7176/EJBM/13-4-09.
Markovic S., Iglesias O., Singh J. J., Sierra V. How does the perceived ethicality of corporate services brands influence loyalty and positive word-of-mouth? Analyzing the roles of empathy, affective commitment, and perceived quality. Journal of Business Ethics, 2018, № 148 (4), Р. 721–740. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-015-2985-6.
Nazar N., Jahan S., Amoozegar A., Anjum T., Raju V. The effects of total quality management practices on corporate social responsibility using supply chain model: A review of Malaysian hotel industry. International Journal of Supply Chain Management, 2019, № 8(6), Р. 1217–1227.
Shahlan M. Z., Sidek A. A., Suffian S. A., Hazza M. H., Daud M. R. An examination on the influence of small and medium enterprise (SME) stakeholder on green supply chain management practices. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 2018, № 290, Р. 012059. https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/290/1/012059.
Souza F. F., Corsi A., Pagani R. N., Balbinotti G., Kovaleski J.L. Total quality management 4.0: Adapting quality management to Industry 4.0. TQM Journal, 2022, № 34 (4), Р. 749–769. https://doi.org/10.1108/TQM-10-2020-0238.
Swaen V., Demoulin N., Pauwels-Delassus V. Impact of customers’ perceptions regarding corporate social responsibility and irresponsibility in the grocery retailing industry: The role of corporate reputation. Journal of Business Research, 2021, № 131, Р. 709–721. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.12.016.
United Nations environment assembly of the United Nations environment Programme. United Nations. 2021. URL: https://www.unep.org/environmentassembly/.
Usman M., Balsalobre-Lorente D. Environmental concern in the era of industrialization: Can financial development, renewable energy and natural resources alleviate some load? Energy Policy, 2022, № 162, Р. 112780. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2022.112780.
Zbuchea A., Pinzaru F. Tailoring CSR strategy to company size. Management Dynamics in the Knowledge Economy, 2017, № 5(3), Р. 415–437. https://doi.org/10.25019/MDKE/5.3.06.
Zonnenshain A., Kenett R. Quality 4.0: The challenging future of quality engineering. Quality Engineering. 2020, № 32(4), Р. 614–626. https://doi.org/10.1080/08982112.2019.1706744.
Alharbi, K., Al-Matari, E. M., & Yusoff, R. Y. (2016). The impact of Total quality management (TQM) on Organisational sustainability: The case ofthe hotel industry in Saudi Arabia: Empirical study. The Social Sciences, 11(14), 3468– 3473. https://doi.org/10.3923/sscience.2016.3468.3473.
Bakos, J., Siu, M., Orengo, A., & Kasiri, N. (2020). An analysis of environmental sustainability in small & mediumsized enterprises: Patterns and trends. Business Strategy and Environment, 29, 1285–1296. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2433.
Bekun, F. V., Gyamfi, B. A., Onifade, S. T., & Agboola, M. O. (2021). Beyond the environmental Kuznets curve in E7 economies: Accounting for the combined impacts of institutional quality and renewables. Journal of Cleaner Production, 314, 127924. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.127924.
Chen, C.-K., Reyes, L., Dahlgaard, J. And Dahlgaard-Park, S.M. (2022). From quality control to TQM, service quality and service sciences: a 30-year review of TQM literature. International Journal of Quality and Service Sciences. Vol. 14, 2, 217–237. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJQSS-09-2021-0128.
Font, X., Garay, L., & Jones, S. (2016). Sustainability motivations and practices in small tourism enterprises in European protected areas. Journal of Cleaner Production, 137, 1439–1448. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.01.071.
Fotopoulos, C. B., & Psomas, E. L. (2009). The impact of “soft” and “hard” TQM elements on quality management results. The International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, 26(2), 150–163. https://doi.org/10.1108/02656710910928798.
Honarpour, A., Jusoh, A., & Md Nor, K. (2018). Total quality management, knowledge management, and innovation: an empirical study in R&D units. Total Quality Management and Business Excellence, 29 (7–8). https://doi.org/10.1080/14783363.2016.1238760.
Khalil, M. K., & Muneenam, U. (2021). Total quality management practices and corporate green performance: Does organizational culture matter? Sustainability, 13, 1–27. https://doi.org/10.3390/su131911021.
Kim, H., Park, K., & Ryu, D. (2017). Corporate environmental responsibility: A legal origins perspective. Journal of Business Ethics, 140(3), 381–402. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-015-2641-1.
Marchiori, D., Mendes, L. (2020). Knowledge management and total quality management: foundations, intellectual structures, insights regarding evolution of the literature. Total Quality Management and Business Excellence. 3, 1135–1169. https://doi.org/10.1080/14783363.2018.1468247 9-10pages.
Magd, H., & Karyamsetty, H. (2021). Organizational sustainability and TQM in SMEs: A proposed model. European Journal of Business and Management, 13(4), 88–97. https://doi.org/10.7176/EJBM/13-4-09.
Markovic, S., Iglesias, O., Singh, J. J., & Sierra, V. (2018). How does the perceived ethicality of corporate services brands influence loyalty and positive word-of-mouth? Analyzing the roles of empathy, affective commitment, and perceived quality. Journal of Business Ethics, 148(4), 721–740. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-015-2985-6.
Nazar, N., Jahan, S., Amoozegar, A., Anjum, T., & Raju, V. (2019). The effects of total quality management practices on corporate social responsibility using supply chain model: A review of Malaysian hotel industry. International Journal of Supply Chain Management, 8(6), 1217–1227.
Shahlan, M. Z., Sidek, A. A., Suffian, S. A., Hazza, M. H., & Daud, M. R. (2018). An examination on the influence of small and medium enterprise (SME) stakeholder on green supply chain management practices. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 290, 012059. https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/290/1/012059.
Souza, F. F., Corsi, A., Pagani, R. N., Balbinotti, G., & Kovaleski, J. L. (2022). Total quality management 4.0: Adapting quality management to Industry 4.0. TQM Journal, 34(4): 749–769. https://doi.org/10.1108/TQM-10-2020-0238.
Swaen, V., Demoulin, N., & Pauwels-Delassus, V. (2021). Impact of customers’ perceptions regarding corporate social responsibility and irresponsibility in the grocery retailing industry: The role of corporate reputation. Journal of Business Research, 131, 709–721. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.12.016.
United Nations. (2021). United Nations environment assembly of the United Nations environment Programme. Available at: https://www.unep.org/environmentassembly/.
Usman, M., & Balsalobre-Lorente, D. (2022). Environmental concern in the era of industrialization: Can financial development, renewable energy and natural resources alleviate some load? Energy Policy, 162, 112780. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2022.112780.
Zbuchea, A., & Pinzaru, F. (2017). Tailoring CSR strategy to company size. Management Dynamics in the Knowledge Economy, 5(3), 415–437. https://doi.org/10.25019/MDKE/5.3.06.
Zonnenshain, A., Kenett, R. (2020). Quality 4.0: The challenging future of quality engineering. Quality Engineering. 32(4): 614–626. https://doi.org/10.1080/08982112.2019.1706744.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication of this work under the terms of a license Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0).
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.