The impact of global institutionalization within the wto on foreign trade flows, the case of Ukraine

Keywords: global institutionalization, institutions, national institutional framework, the World Trade Organization, the WTO, foreign trade, Ukraine


Since the establishment of the World Trade Organization (WTO) as the main institutionalizing force in the trade area more than 20 years ago, developing countries have sought to gain special recognition and treatment within the multilateral system in order to solve their structural and systemic problems.However, the impact of global institutionalization within the WTO on member-countries’ foreign trade remains debatable. The subject of research of the article is the impact of global institutionalization within the WTO on Ukraine’s foreign trade flows. The objective is to evaluate the impact the global institutionalization within the WTO has on the foreign trade of Ukraine and develop a roadmap for national institutional environment improvement. The main method used is gravity modelling.Heritage Foundation’s Index of Economic Freedom, World Economic Forum’s Index of Global Competitiveness and World Bank’s world gavernance indicators are used separately in constructed models as institutional variables. All the models also include dummy variables, which indicate WTO – or RTA-membership of two countries. The sample includes all the countries, which have been trade partners of Ukraine during last 20 years. The following results were obtained:6 gravity models areconstructed, which allowes to calculate the possible percentage of Ukraine’s exports increase due to the enhancement of Ukraine’s institutional variables to theaverage European level and develop a roadmap for national institutional framework improvement. Conclusions: the calculated percentage of increase proves that the global institutionalization within the WTO may have a a positive impact on Ukraine’s foreign trade flows, gravitaty modelling helps in determining how Ukraine’s national institutional framework can be improved.


Download data is not yet available.


Acemoglu, D., Johnson, S., & Robinson, J. A. (2005). Institutions as a fundamental cause of long-run growth. Handbook of economic growth, 1, 385-472.

Anderson, J. E. (2008). Trade and informal institutions. Handbook of International Trade. Blackwell Publishing, Oxford, 279-293.

Berenda, S., Shkonda, S. (2018). The role of WTO Dispute Settlement System in international and national institutional framework: the case of Ukraine. International Journal of Economics, Commerce & Management, 1 (6), 78-98.

Babetskaia-Kukharchuk, O., & Maurel, M. (2003). Accession to the WTO and EU enlargement: what potential for trade increase? CERP Discussion Paper, 3944.

Babetskaia-Kukharchuk, O. A. (2005). On measurement of institutions in trade, growth, and investment studies. Экономический журнал Высшей школы экономики, 9(4).

Drautzburg, T., Melnykovska, I., & Schweickert, R. (2008). Which membership matters? External vs. internal determinants of institutional change in transition countries. Kiel Working Paper, 1421.

Greif, A. (1992). Institutions and international trade: Lessons from the commercial revolution. The American Economic Review, 82(2), 128-133.

Hall, R. E., & Jones, C. I. (1999). Why do some countries produce so much more output per worker than others? The quarterly journal of economics, 114(1), 83-116.

Li, D., & Wu, C. (2004). WTO and Growth: A Cross Country Event Study.

Matthews, R. C. (1986). The economics of institutions and the sources of growth. The Economic Journal, 96(384), 903-918.

North, D. (1990). Institutional Chande and Economic Performance.

Olson, M. (1996). Distinguished lecture on economics in government: big bills left on the sidewalk: why some nations are rich, and others poor. Journal of economic perspectives, 10(2), 3-24.

Persson, M. and Wilhelmsson, F. (2007), Assessing the Effects of EU Trade Preferences for Developing Countries. Bourdet, Y., Gullstrand, J., & Olofsdotter, K. (Eds.). The European Union and Developing Countries: Trade, Aid, and Growth in an Integrated World, Edward Elgar.

Piazolo, D. (1999). Growth effects of institutional change and European integration.

Rodrik, D., Subramanian, A., & Trebbi, F. (2004). Institutions rule: the primacy of institutions over geography and integration in economic development. Journal of economic growth, 9(2), 131-165.

Rose, A., & van Wincoop, E. (2001). National Money as a Barrier to Trade: The Real Case for Monetary Union". American Economic Review, Vol. 91, issue 2, 386-390.

Subramanian, A., & Wei, S. J. (2007). The WTO promotes trade, strongly but unevenly. Journal of international Economics, 72(1), 151-175.

Veblen, T. (2017). The theory of the leisure class. Routledge.

The Heritage Foundation. (2017). Index of Economic Freedom. Retrieved from

World Economic Forum (2018). The Global Competitiveness Report 2017-2018. Retrieved from

World Trade Organization. (2018). World Trade Organization. Retrieved from

World Bank Group. (2018). World Bank Group. Retrieved from

How to Cite
Sholom, A. (2019). The impact of global institutionalization within the wto on foreign trade flows, the case of Ukraine. The Journal of V. N. Karazin Kharkiv National University. Series: International Relations. Economics. Country Studies. Tourism, (9), 75-81.