Soil phytotoxicity assessment with different types of anthropogenic pollution

Keywords: biotesting, cabbage, capsicum, radish, morphological parameters of sprouts, pH of soil solution, phytotoxic effect

Abstract

Purpose. Determination of soil phytotoxicity in various sites through bioassay using seeds of garden cabbage (Brassica oleracea L.), common bell pepper (Capsicum annuum L.), and garden radish (Raphanus sativus L.).

Methods. Analytical, field research, biotesting, statistical.

Results. It was found that the test site near the landfill is heavily polluted: the phytotoxic effect (PE) reaches 69,6%, indicating significant growth suppression, with soil solution pH of 4,9. The soil along the roadside is polluted above the average level, showing a maximum PE of 53,4% for sweet pepper seed germination, with a pH of 4,9. The sample from the agricultural field showed a moderate phytotoxic effect, with a pH of 5,4. The control site showed a high germination rate without signs of phytotoxicity, with a pH of 4,9. In all contaminated areas, an acidic soil environment with pH 4,5–5,4 was formed in the 0–20 cm layer. At such values, most nutrients become poorly available to plants. Characteristic morphological signs of toxic stress are observed: leaf curling, edge whitening, and root deformation. The greatest sensitivity to contamination was shown by sweet pepper seeds (Capsicum annuum L.).

Conclusions: It were indicated that technogenically loaded soils have a negative impact on seed germination and further development. Biotesting proved to be an effective method of preliminary bioindicative monitoring of soil conditions and can be recommended for use in communities and educational institutions to identify hidden environmental threats.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

I. I. Saranenko, Kherson State University, 14, Shevchenka Str., Ivano-Frankivsk, 76018, Ukraine

PhD (Biology), Associate Prof., Associate Professor of the Department of Geography and Ecology

 

 

References

United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). (n.d.). Research topics. Retrieved April 25, 2025, from https://www.epa.gov/research/research-topics

Kukurdziak, K. V., Bryhas, O. P., & Tertychna, O. V. (2016). Bioindication of soil fertility in the Central Forest-Steppe. Agroecological Journal, (4), 44–50. https://doi.org/10.33730/2077-4893.4.2016.271224 (in Ukrainian).

Symochko, L. Yu., Symochko, V. V., & Dem’ianiuk, O. S. (2017). Bioindication and biotesting of soils – modern methodological approaches. Scientific Bulletin of Uzhhorod University. Series: Biology, (42), 77–78. Retrieved from https://dspace.uzhnu.edu.ua/jspui/handle/lib/20524 (in Ukrainian).

Tverda, O. Ya., & Kosiak, I. V. (2017). Justification for the selection of plant test systems to assess the toxicity of soils of granite quarry surroundings. Bulletin of NTUU “KPI”. Series: Mining, (33), 79–85. https://doi.org/10.20535/2079-5688.2017.33.101742 (in Ukrainian).

Prytula, N. M. (2020). Bioindication: A textbook. Zaporizhzhia: ZNU. Retrieved from https://dspace.znu.edu.ua/jspui/handle/12345/3296 (in Ukrainian).

Symochko, L. Yu., & Dem’ianiuk, O. S. (2020). Bioindication of soil of unauthorized landfills in the Carpathian region. Agroecological Journal, (1), 55–60. Retrieved from https://journalagroeco.org.ua/article/view/234453 (in Ukrainian).

Bodnriuk, R. M., Shkoba, Zh. V., & Savula, M. M. (2023). Bioindication of roadside soil by plant test systems. In Current Issues of Biological and Agroecological Research in the Carpathian Region: Proceedings of the 7th International Scientific Conference of Young Scientists and Students, October 26–27, 2023 (pp. 75–76). Uzhhorod: UzhNU. Retrieved from https://dspace.uzhnu.edu.ua/jspui/handle/lib/57093 (in Ukrainian).

Bessonova, V. P. (2024). Phytoindication and phytomonitoring: A textbook. Dnipro: Herda. Retrieved from https://surl.li/xihilo (in Ukrainian).

Dahiya, U. R., Das, J., & Bano, S. (2022). Biological indicators of soil health and biomonitoring. In J. A. Malik (Ed.), Advances in bioremediation and phytoremediation for sustainable soil management (pp. 327–347). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-89984-4_21

Dervash, M. A., Yousuf, A., Bhat, M. A., & Ozturk, M. (2024). Bioindicators: The eco-sensors for detecting soil pollution. In Soil Organisms (pp. 47–62). SpringerBriefs in Microbiology. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-66293-5_5

Saranenko, I. I., & Shadura, K. O. (2021). The effect of vehicle exhaust gases on the generative organs of Acer L. species. Ecological Sciences, (6)39, 122–126. https://doi.org/10.32846/2306-9716/2021.eco.6-39.20 (in Ukrainian).

DSTU ISO 18512:2014. (2015). Soil quality. Guidance on long and short term storage of soil samples (ISO 18512:2007, IDT). Retrieved April 21, 2025, from https://online.budstandart.com/ua/catalog/doc-page.html?id_doc=110863 (in Ukrainian).

DSTU ISO 10381-6:2015. (2016). Soil quality. Sampling. Part 6. Guidance on the collection, handling and storage of soil under aerobic conditions for the assessment of microbiological processes, biomass and diversity (ISO 10381-6:2009, IDT). Retrieved April 23, 2025, from https://online.budstandart.com/ua/catalog/doc-page.html?id_doc=73209 (in Ukrainian).

EN ISO 18763:2020 (Main) Soil quality – Determination of the toxic effects of pollutants on germina-tion and early growth of higher plants (ISO 18763:2016. Standards.iteh.ai. Retrieved from https://surl.lu/eqorlj

ISO 16198:2015 Soil quality – Plant-based test to assess the environmental bioavailability of trace elements to plants. Iso.org. Retrieved from https://www.iso.org/obp/ui/ru/#iso:std:iso:16198:ed-1:v1:en

Prytula, N. M. (2019). Bioindication. Zaporizhzhia: ZNU. (in Ukrainian).

Krainiukov, O. M., & Kryvytska, I. A. (2023). Bioindication and biotesting. Kharkiv: V.N. Karazin Kharkiv National University. Retrieved from https://surl.li/jxpojl (in Ukrainian).

DAAD.org.ua. (2023). Student's t-test in Microsoft Excel. Retrieved from https://daad.org.ua/8181-rozrakhunok-kriteriyu-styudenta-v-excel.html (in Ukrainian).

DAAD.org.ua. (2023). Calculation of the coefficient of variation in Microsoft Excel. Retrieved from https://daad.org.ua/8112-yak-rozrakhuvati-koefitsiient-variatsiyi-v-excel.html (in Ukrainian).

Seyhan, M., Yuzbasioglu, E., Dalyan, E., Akpinar, I., & Unal, M. (2019). Genotoxicity and antioxidant enzyme activities induced by the captan fungicide in the root of bell pepper (Capsicum annuum L. var. grossum L. cv. Kandil). Trakya University Journal of Natural Sciences, 20(2), 97–103. Retrieved from https://dergipark.org.tr/en/download/article-file/775480?utm_source=chatgpt.com

Ecology. Law. Human. (2024). Biotesting of soil toxicity in Kamianska Sich National Nature Park using plant test systems. Retrieved from https://surl.lu/tssoor (in Ukrainian).

Saliuk, M. (Ed.). (2022). Methodical recommendations for practical works in Soil Science course for higher education students majoring in 205 Forestry. Uzhhorod: UzhNU. Retrieved from https://surl.lu/balfvz (in Ukrainian).

Published
2025-06-30
How to Cite
Saranenko, I. I. (2025). Soil phytotoxicity assessment with different types of anthropogenic pollution. Man and Environment. Issues of Neoecology, (43), 165-176. https://doi.org/10.26565/1992-4224-2025-43-13