Geoinformation modeling of potentially important territories for the brown bear's stay in the Transcarpathian region

Keywords: brown bear (Ursus Arctos), key areas, ecological corridors, geoinformation modeling, Emerald network


Purpose. Search for important areas for the presence of the brown bear (Ursus arctos) within the Transcarpathian region using geoinformation modeling tools to optimize the boundaries of the structural elements of the econetwork.

Methods. Geoinformation modeling, geospatial analysis, processing of stock materials of environmental protection services.

Results. In order to delineate potentially important areas for the presence of the brown bear (Ursus arctos) within the Transcarpathian region, a comprehensive assessment of the natural environment was carried out using geoinformation modeling tools. This modeling involved a preliminary analysis of the suitability for the life of the species of the following five parameters: types of land cover, proximity of non-forest biotopes to forest, high-altitude bioclimatic zones, degrees of dismemberment of the terrain, distance from settlements and roads. As a result of the integral assessment of these parameters, a cartographic model "Integral suitability of biotopes for the presence of the brown bear (Ursus arctos)" was obtained, which also demonstrated the habitats recorded by experts and the places of registration of the species. It was established that the total area of territories that are potentially suitable for the brown bear (Ursus arctos) within Transcarpathian region  is 574.6 thousand hectares, and covers about 45.1% of the territory of the region. The largest number of such habitats is concentrated in the mountainous southwestern part of the region within the orographic ecoregion of the elevated dissected highlands. The most suitable and suitable biotopes, formed as a result of modeling, are also found within the boundaries of Gorganska Verhovyna (on the border of Transcarpathian and Ivano-Frankivsk regions), which belongs to the ecoregion of elevated lowlands. The simulated territories correlate well enough with localities where real signs of the distribution of the species have been recorded. At the second stage of research, in accordance with the chosen methodology, a cartographic model of "Potentially important areas for the presence of the brown bear" was obtained, on which the population, reproduction and other areas, as well as key areas of the region's eco-network and nature protection areas were outlined. Spatial features of the location of population and breeding areas in other morphogenic ecoregions of the Carpathians were also characterized, natural and anthropogenic obstacles and threats to the species' migration and survival were identified. It is noted that the natural conditions of the border are favorable for the migration of mammals from Romania, Slovakia and Poland, which is also confirmed by monitoring studies conducted by environmental protection institutions, forestry and hunting management, etc.

Conclusions. The Transcarpathian region has favorable conditions for the existence of the brown bear (Ursus Arctos), in particular, a large share of forest ecosystems, the presence of hard-to-reach areas, a decrease in the population of small mountain villages, etc. However, the constant development of recreational and energy infrastructure can lead to the fragmentation of the natural environment. Therefore, the areas outlined by us, which are important for the presence of the brown bear (Ursus arctos), can be the basis for optimizing the boundaries of the structural elements of the eco-network of the mountainous part of the Transcarpathian region. In the future, it is necessary to continue monitoring studies on the presence of the brown bear within the key territories of the Zakarpattia econetwork and to more clearly delimit ecological corridors with the implementation of measures to comply with the norms of environmental protection restrictions.


Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

M. V. Teslovych , Ivan Franko National University of Lviv, 41, Doroshenko Str., Lviv, 79000, Ukraine

graduate student of the Department of Constructive Geography and Cartography

D. A. Krychevska , Ivan Franko National University of Lviv, 41, Doroshenko St., Lviv, 79000, Ukraine

PhD (Geography), Associate Professor of the Department of Constructive Geography and Cartography


Scanes, C. G. (2018). Chapter 19 — Human Activity and Habitat Loss: Destruction, Fragmentation, and Degradation. In C. G. Scanes, S. R. Toukhsati, (Eds). Animals and Human Society,(pp. 451-482). Academic Press.

Action plan on conservation of the Brown bear (Ursus Arctos) in Ukraine dated October 20, 2021 (№679,

Lešová, A., & Antal, V. (Eds). (2015). Ochrana a manažment veľkých šeliem na Slovensku: Protection and Management of Large Carnivores in Slovakia. Banská Bystrica: Štátna ochrana prírody Slovenskej republiky.

Hackländer, K., Frair, J., & Ionescu O. (2022). Large Carnivore Monitoring in the Carpathian Mountains. A joint publication by the International Council for Game and Wildlife Conservation and the Secretariat of the Carpathian Convention. Vienna: University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences.

Penteriani, V & Melletti, M (Eds). (2020). Bears of the World. Ecology, Conservation and Management. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Garcia-Rodriguez, A., Albrecht, J., Szczutkowska, S., Valido, A., Farwig, N., & Selva, N. (2021). The role of the brown bear Ursus arctos as a legitimate megafaunal seed disperser. Scientific Reports. 1282.

Dykyy, I. V., & Shkvyria, M. G. (Eds.). (2015). Brown bear (Ursus Arctos): Problems of conservation and studying of population in Ukraine. Kyiv: LLC «SIK GROUP UKRAINE».

Delehan, I.V., Lushchak, M.M. & Delehan, I.I. (2011). Population dynamics of brown bear populations in the Carpathians Ukrainian. Scientific Bulletin of UNFU. 16-24.

Georgescu, A., Bashta, A-T. & Prots, B. (2014). The Brown Bear, the Treasure of the Carpathian Moun-tains (Ukrainian). Baia Mare, Romania.

World Wildlife Fund of Ukraine. (2022). Lynx, bear, and wolf monitoring methods. Retrieved from

Barton, K. A., Zwijacz-Kozica, T., Zięba, F., Sergiel, A. & Selva, N. (2019). Bears without borders: Long-distance movement in human-dominated landscapes. Global Ecology and Conservation, 17,

Garcia-Sanchez, M.P., Gonzalez-Avila, S., Solana-Gutierrez, J., Popa, M., Jurj, R., Lonescu, G., … Lonescu, O. (2022). Sex-specific connectivity modelling for brown bear conservation in the Carpathian Mountains. Landscape Ecology, 37, 1311–1329.

Pop, I. M., Bereczky, L., Chiriac, S., Iosif, R., Nita, A., Popescu, V. D., & Rozylowicz, L. (2018). Movement ecology of brown bears (Ursus arctos) in the Romanian Eastern Carpathians. Nature Conservation, 26, 15–31.

Neagu, A. C., Manolache, S., & Rozylowicz, L. (2022). The drums of war are beating louder: Media coverage of brown bears in Romania. Nature Conservation, 50, 65–84.

Prots, B., Bashta, A-T., & Yamelinets, T. (2022). Ecological corridors of brown bear migration. Retrieved from

Deodatus, F. & Protsenko, L. (Eds.). (2010). Creation of ecological corridors in Ukraine. Kyiv: "Rainduga Magazine" Publishing House.

Brusak, V., Bezusko, A., Voznyi, Yu., Zinko, Yu., Felbaba-Klushyna, L., Masikevych, Yu., …Prykhodko, M. (2006). Scheme of the eco-network of the Ukrainian Carpathians (national level). Alive Ukraine. 9-10, 8-9.

Krychevska, D., Brusak, V & Zinko, Yu. (2010). The geographical grounds of regional ecological networks development (on UkrainianCarpathian example). Scientific notes of Ternopil National Pedagogical University. Series: geography. 1(27), 316-322. Ternopil: SMP "Type"

Law of Ukraine «On Environmental Network of Ukraine» dated June 24, 2004 (№1864-IV,

Law of Ukraine «On the National Formation Program of the national ecological network of Ukraine for 2000-2015» dated September 21, 2000 (1989-III,

The planning scheme of the territory of Zakarpattia Oblast. (2022, October 19). Retrieved from /storinka/shema-planuvannya-terytoriyi-zakarpatskoyi-oblasti

Turys, E., Drobnych, V., Myhal, A., Kichura, V. & Polianovskyi, A. (2015). On the question of structure formation regional ecological network of the Zakarpata region. Scientific Bulletin of Uzhhorod University. Biology series. 36, 47-51. Uzhhorod

Teslovych, M.V., & Krychevska, D.A. (2021). Historical and geospatial aspects of formation of the eco-network of the Transcarpathian region. Visnyk of V.N. Karazin Kharkiv National University, series "Geology. Geography. Ecology", (55), 299-317.

Animalia. (б. д.). GBIF. Retrieved from

Potapov, P., Hansen, M. C., Pickens, A., Hernandez-Serna, A., Tyukavina, A., Turubanova, S., Zalles, V., Li, X., Khan, A., Stolle, F., Harris, N., Song, X.-P., Baggett, A., Kommareddy, I., & Kommareddy, A. (2022). The Global 2000-2020 Land Cover and Land Use Change Dataset Derived From the Landsat Archive: First Results. Frontiers in Remote Sensing, 3.

Kruhlov, I. (2008). Delimitation, metrisation and classification of morphogenic ecoregions for the Ukrainian Carpathians. Ukrainian Geographical Journal, 3, 59–68.

Hansen, M. C., Potapov, P. V., Moore, R., Hancher, M., Turubanova, S. A., Tyukavina, A., Thau, D., Stehman, S. V., Goetz, S. J., Loveland, T. R., Kommareddy, A., Egorov, A., Chini, L., Justice, C. O., & Townshend, J. R. G. (2013). High-Resolution Global Maps of 21st-Century Forest Cover Change. Science, 342(6160), 850–853.

Environmental monitoring system of Transcarpathian region. Nature reserve fund. (2022, September 7). Retrieved from

Protected planet (2022, November 16). Retrieved from

How to Cite
Teslovych , M. V., & Krychevska , D. A. (2023). Geoinformation modeling of potentially important territories for the brown bear’s stay in the Transcarpathian region. Man and Environment. Issues of Neoecology, (39), 117-131.
Protected Areas Management