Economic, environmental and social dimensions of green transformation in Ukraine: aspects of management in conditions of war and post-war reconstruction

Keywords: green transformation, environmental policy, European Green Deal, economic mechanisms, public administration, sustainable development, investment policy, institutional changes, post-war recovery, environment

Abstract

Purpose. The purpose of the article is to analyze and assess the effectiveness of existing financial and economic instruments of the green transformation in Ukraine’s public administration, and to provide a rationale for improving specific areas in the post-war reconstruction context.

Methods. The research is based on a systemic and comparative analysis of regulatory frameworks, policy documents, and statistical data related to Ukraine’s green transformation. Qualitative and analytical methods were used to identify barriers to effective policy implementation, while comparative assessment allowed evaluation of Ukraine’s mechanisms in the context of EU environmental and fiscal practices. The study also incorporates expert assessments and secondary data from international organizations such as the OECD, World Bank, and UNEP.

Results. The analysis revealed several structural barriers hindering the effectiveness of financial and economic instruments for the green transition. These include policy fragmentation, lack of an integrated national strategy, overlapping departmental functions, and high corruption risks. The impact of the full-scale war has significantly reshaped the priorities of public administration, redirecting fiscal resources toward defense, increasing infrastructure destruction, and slowing green investment. Nevertheless, the post-war recovery period presents opportunities to integrate sustainability principles into the reconstruction process. The key principles of achieving sustainable development goals are determined by the economic, environmental and social components. Criteria for their measurement have been established: economic criteria show how effectively financial resources are used to achieve green goals. Environmental criteria directly measure the impact of the mechanism on the state of the environment. Social and institutional criteria reflect the impact of the mechanism on society and the effectiveness of public administration. The application of these criteria will allow not only to state the fact of the implementation of green policy, but also to objectively assess its effectiveness, identify weaknesses and substantiate recommendations for its improvement.

Conclusions. The study concludes that Ukraine’s post-war recovery represents a unique opportunity for a “green leap,” enabling structural modernization of the national economy according to sustainable principles. Effective implementation of fiscal and institutional reforms, combined with enhanced transparency and public accountability, can accelerate Ukraine’s integration into the European Green Deal and global sustainability frameworks.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Maksym Khozhylo, Dnipro University of Technology

PhD (Technical), Doctoral Student

References

Bilokinna I. (2023). Green economy as a requirement of the time and the basis for successful post-war recovery of the country. Bulletin of Khmelnytsky National University. 2: 79-88. https://heraldes.khmnu.edu.ua/index.php/heraldes/article/view/633/646 [in Ukrainian]

Communication from the commission to the European Parliamen. The European Green Deal. Brussels, 11.12.2019.COM/2019/640. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A52019DC0640

Dzyubak K. M. (2023). Financial instruments for the development of a green economy. Modern Economics. 39: 26-32. https://dspace.mnau.edu.ua/jspui/bitstream/123456789/14847/1/dziubak.pdf [in Ukrainian]

Dyachuk A., Efremova O., Mateyuk O., Shevchenko S. (2024). The impact of environmental projects on the achievement of sustainable development goals by urban territorial communities. Bulletin of Khmelnytsky National University. 3(2): 389-394. https://heraldts.khmnu.edu.ua/index.php/heraldts/article/view/324/314 [in Ukrainian]

European Commission. (2022). The European Green Deal and Ukraine: Pathways to sustainable recovery. Brussels: EU Publications Office.

Kovalenkо Yu., Lytvyn Ya. (2021). Financial instruments, their classifications and areas of innovative explorations. Issues of management and development of the region’s productive forces. 1(17): 132-142. http://ppeu.stu.cn.ua/article/view/176593 [in Ukrainian]

Kolyada T. A., Prozorov Yu. V. (2024). New digital financial instruments: essence and prospects of use in the reconstruction of affected territorial communities of Ukraine. Issues of economics. 2(60): 247-253. https://surl.li/mkgdgh [in Ukrainian]

Maksymenko N., Peresadko V., Hrechko A., Burchenko S., Skryhan H. (2025). Green infrastructure of Ukrainian cities in the context of the European Green Deal. Visnyk of V. N. Karazin Kharkiv National University. Series Geology. Geography. Ecology, (62), 437-451. https://doi.org/10.26565/2410-7360-2025-62-33 [in Ukrainian]

Medynska N. V. (2022). Economic mechanism of nature management in the context of modern challenges: principles and institutionalization. Economy and Society. 38. https://economyandsociety.in.ua/index.php/journal/article/view/1284/1238 [in Ukrainian]

Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). (2023). Financing climate action in Eastern Europe, Caucasus and Central Asia. Paris: OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/2fba1c3b-en

Osipova L. (2025). Modernization of Ukrainian Industry in the Context of European Integration in the War and Post-War Period. International Science Journal of Management, Economics & Finance. 4(4): 27-34. https://isg-journal.com/isjmef/article/view/1069/626 [in Ukrainian]

Petrakov Ya. V. (2016). Financial Instruments: Essence and Classification. Scientific Bulletin of Polissya. 3(7): 235-241. http://nvp.stu.cn.ua/article/view/84140/79615 [in Ukrainian]

Petrova I. (2024). Experience in implementing investment projects based on the principles of partnership between government, business and society in Ukraine. Bulletin of Economic Science of Ukraine. 1(46): 61-67. https://nasplib.isofts.kiev.ua/server/api/core/bitstreams/d659b63a-6a90-414f-8243-8fdb36a7118e/content [in Ukrainian]

Pshybelskyi V. V. (2025). Development of a green economy based on social responsibility: dissertation for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy: 051 "Economics" (05 - Social and Behavioral Sciences). Lutsk, 276. https://uacademic.info/ua/document/0825U001299 [in Ukrainian]

Sachs, J. D., Koundouri, P., & Stiglitz, J. E. (2021). Sustainable development in the post-pandemic world: Pathways toward a green economy. Nature Sustainability, 4(9), 761–768. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-021-00769-1

Sаkal O. V. (2017). Instruments of financial and economic regulation of nature use in the context of deepening institutional transformations. 2017. Economy and Society. 13: 930-937. https://economyandsociety.in.ua/journals/13_ukr/157.pdf [in Ukrainian]

Skoryk M. O., Agafontseva A. A. (2025). Post-war restoration of the Ukrainian economy on the basis of the green transformation. Grail of Science: International Scientific Journal. 52: 351-360. [in Ukrainian]

The 5 Principles of Green Economy. Green Economy Coalition. https://www.greeneconomycoalition.org/news-and-resources/the-5-principles-of-green-economy

United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP). (2022). Green fiscal policy framework: Transforming public finance for environmental sustainability. Nairobi: UNEP.

What are the Sustainable Development Goals? UNDP. https://www.undp.org/ukraine/sustainable-development-goals

World Bank. (2023). Green recovery and reconstruction in Ukraine: Opportunities for sustainable development. Washington, DC: World Bank.

Published
2025-12-01
Cited
How to Cite
Khozhylo, M. (2025). Economic, environmental and social dimensions of green transformation in Ukraine: aspects of management in conditions of war and post-war reconstruction. Visnyk of V. N. Karazin Kharkiv National University. Series Geology. Geography. Ecology, (63), 468-478. https://doi.org/10.26565/2410-7360-2025-63-34