Environmental protection standards of the EU - national and regional realities
Abstract
The purpose of the work are assess of the current state of protected areas of the Ternopil region territorial communities and comparison of these parameters with the environmental standards of the European Union.
Methods. Generalisation and systematisation of information, evaluation, comparison, method of analogies and typologies, statistical, mathematical, cartographic and geoinformation.
Scientific novelty. The main geoecological, economic and legal problems related to the prospects for the development of nature conservation at the national and regional levels are identified. These include the lack of motivation in management structures, low environmental culture of the population, insufficient funding for environmental protection, and the existence of different forms of land ownership. The level of conservation of territorial communities and new administrative districts of the Ternopil region is determined.
Results. Analysed by national and international environmental legislation and identifies the main causes of Ukraine's environmental problems, including military operations. Based on the comparative analysis, the authors compares the basic environmental parameters of Ukraine and the European Union, which demonstrate their significant differences. The level of conservation and the number of protected areas of the Ternopil region territorial communities are determined. The data obtained showed that 36.5% of the region's territorial communities have a conservation level of less than 1%. The situation with the low level of conservation is unsatisfactory in sixteen communities in the Ternopil district and four communities in the Kremenets and Chortkiv districts. Typological groups have been created and a corresponding map of the reserve status of the Ternopil region territorial communities has been constructed. It is proposed to create fifty-three new protected areas in twenty-five communities of the Ternopil region with a total area of 39358 hectares. The expediency of creating thirteen regional landscape parks, twenty-three hydrological natural monuments of local significance, six parks of landscape art monuments, four landscape reserves, four botanical natural monuments of local significance and three protected tracts is substantiated.
Conclusions. It has been established that the level of conservation of the Ternopil region territorial communities does not meet the current requirements of the European Strategy for the Conservation of Landscape and Biotic Diversity. In order to achieve international standards of protected areas and waters, the region needs to create both large protected areas – regional landscape and national nature parks – and local protection zones for hydrological objects, individual trees or landscapes. For this purpose, it is necessary to intensify scientific research of local and regional natural complexes. And the administrative staff of territorial communities should include a position responsible for landscaping, sustainable development and nature protection.
Downloads
References
Holik, Yu., Smolyar, N., Ostapenko, P., Chepurko, Iu. (2021). Peculiarities of distribution of objects and territories of the nature reserve fund of Poltava region in the conditions of the new aministrative-territorial structure. Ecological sciences, 6 (39), 171-177. https://doi.org/10.32846/2306-9716/2021.eco.6-39.29 [in Ukrainian]
Grodzinsky, M. D. (2005). Cognition of the landscape: place and space. Monograph. Kyiv. «Kyiv University», 503 [in Ukrainian]
Official website of the Department of Ecology and Natural Resources of the Ternopil Regional Administration. Network of nature reserve fund. Available at: https://ecology.te.gov.ua/prirodno-zapovidnij-fond/merezha-pzf/#l-merezha-pzf [in Ukrainian]
Kovalchuk, I. P., Pavlovska, T. S., Savchuk, D. V. (2011). Nature reserve fund of the Stokhid river basin: current state, cartographic model, ways of optimization of functioning. Journal of cartography: Collection of scientific papers of sciences. Kyiv: Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv, 3, 82-91 [in Ukrainian].
Methodology and practice of assessing the territory of Ukraine for the nature conservation (2020). Edited by Rudenko, L. H. Kyiv: Nauk. Dumka, 232 [in Ukrainian]
Pavlovska, T., Kovalchuk, I., Chizhevska, L. (2013). Modern state of Turia river basin’s natural reserve network. Physical geography and geomorphology. 1 (69), 44-53 [in Ukrainian]
Pavlovskaya, T., Kovalchuk, I., Vasilyuk, L. (2013). The topical aspects of the research of the present state of the natural preservation network of the river Vyzhivka basin (the right bank of the Prypyat river). Scientific Notes Ternopil Volodymyr Hnatiuk National Pedagogical University. Series: Geography, 2 (35), 228-233 [in Ukrainian]
On the Basic Principles (Strategy) of the State Environmental Policy of Ukraine for the period up to 2020. Law of Ukraine dated 21.12.2010, № 2818-VII. Available at: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/2818-17#Text [in Ukrainian]
On the Basic Principles (Strategy) of the State Environmental Policy of Ukraine for the period up to 2030. Law of Ukraine dated 28.02.2019, №2697-VIII. Available at: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/2697-19#Text [in Ukrainian]
Rudenko, L. H., Maruniak, Eu. O. Lisovskyi, S. A., Checkniy, V. M., Golubtsov, O. H., Ivanenko, Ye. I. (2016). Landscape study aspects of the perspective network of protected areas organization in Ukraine. Ukrainian Geographic Journal, 3, 18-26. https://doi.org/10.15407/ugz2016.03.018 [in Ukrainian]
Tsaryk, P. Tsaryk, L., Vitenko, I. (2010). Prospects of protected areas establishment in the valleys of the rivers Gnizna, Dzhuryn and Vilhovets. Scientific Notes Ternopil Volodymyr Hnatiuk National Pedagogical University. Series: Geography, 2, 236-242 [in Ukrainian]
Tsaryk, L.P., Tsaryk, P.L., Kuzyk, I.R., Tsaryk, V.L. (2021). Nature use and nature conservation in small river basins: monography. The second edition is supplemented and revised. Ternopil: Type, 162 [in Ukrainian]
Tsaryk, L., Kovalchuk, I., Tsaryk, P. (2022). Principles, problems and prospects of implementation of the economic approach to optimization of nature management and nature protection of the Podillia Region. Ternopil V. Hnatiuk National Pedagogical University. Series: Geography, 1, 196-209 [in Ukrainian]
Biodiversity strategy for 2030. Available at: https://ec.europa.eu/environment/strategy/biodiversity-strategy-2030_en
Ervin, J. (2003). Rapid Assessment and Prioritization of Protected Area Management (RAPPAM) Methodology. WWF, Gland, Switzerland, 55.
Hockings, Marc, Stolton, Sue, Dudley, Nigel. (2004). Management Effectiveness: Assessing Management of Protected Areas? Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning, 6. https://doi.org/10.1080/1523908042000320731
Hudzevich, A., Liubchenko, V., Bronnikova, L., Hudzevich, L. (2020). Landscape approach to regional features organization of environmental management of the protected area. Visnyk of V. N. Karazin Kharkiv National University, series «Geology. Geography. Ecology», (52), 119-129. https://doi.org/10.26565/2410-7360-2020-52-09
Tsaryk, L.P., Kovalchuk, I.P., Tsaryk, P.L., Zhdaniu, B.S., Kuzyk, I.R. (2020). Basin systems of small rivers of Western Podillya: state, change tendencies, perspectives of nature management and nature protection optimization. Journal of Geology, Geography and Geoecology, 29(3), 606-620. https://doi.org/10.15421/112055
Thomas, Lee, Middleton, Julie. (2003). Guidelines for Management Planning of Protected Areas. IUCN Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge. 79.
Volovyk, V., Lavryk, O., Yatsentyuk, Y., Maksiytov, A. (2022). Polish ethnocultural landscape of Podillya: structure, use, protection of cultural heritage. Visnyk of V.N. Karazin Kharkiv National University, series «Geology. Geography. Ecology», (57), 68-80. https://doi.org/10.26565/2410-7360-2022-57-06
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.