Spatiotemporal variability of atmospheric blocking within Northern hemisphere of Euro-Atlantic sector during 1976-2015

Є. В. Самчук Researcher

Keywords: atmospheric blocking, baric system, reanalysis, spatiotemporal variability, method, criteria, anticyclone, characteristics

Abstract

Formulation of the problem. The westerly jet and the eastward progression of baric systems are common states of atmosphere in Northern hemisphere’s midlatitudes. But this persistence balance is frequently interrupted by long periods of atmospheric blocking, which is a large-scale quasi-stationary extratropical flow regime. As a specific state of circulation it causes major transformation of baric, thermal and wind in the low and middle troposphere and also affects cyclonic activity in nearby regions. On the local scale blocking can be associated with extreme weather such as droughts in summer and severe cold spells in winter. Also, redistribution of heat and precipitation, caused by blocking events, allows us to consider blocking as a climate factor. However, even now, after decades of study, blocking onset and decay are not well understood, as well as basic blocking theory wasn’t formulated either.

The purpose of the article. Complete study of the atmospheric blocking phenomena requires an objective criterion for blocking anticyclones identification. Such criterion is based on preceding identification and tracking of baric systems throughout low and middle troposphere, which allows us to take into account its vertical structure. This approach is far more direct than existing blocking indices which use indirect evidences of atmospheric blocking existence. Defined criterion takes into account anticyclone’s lifetime duration, mean latitude and longitudinal displacement.

Methods. The author’s own achievements made the methodical basis for the article.

Results. Using a defined criterion, a dataset of atmospheric blocking episodes, occurred during 1976-2015, was created. It contains both detailed and generic characteristics of 210 blocking anticyclones. For case study methods of baric system’s parameters evaluating were developed. These parameters include such characteristics as blocking intensity, affected area and accumulated geopotential anomaly. Analysis of these characteristics shows stable regularity of blocking episode’s spatiotemporal variability. Spatial analysis shows presence of three major cells of atmospheric blocking in Euro-Atlantic sector: Atlantic, Scandinavian and Caspian. Parameters of blocking anticyclones in each cell show different behavior, but common trend is decrease in blocking activity in the last ten years comparing to the rest of research period.

Scientific novelty and practical significance. New approach to the atmospheric blocking study was realized and regional features of spatial distribution of blocking episodes in Europe were discovered for the first time. These features will be used in detailed study of the atmospheric blocking’s effect on regional weather regime and climate.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Є. В. Самчук, Researcher

Ukrainian Hydrometeorological Institute

References

1. Rex, D. F. Blocking Action in the Middle Troposphere and its Effect upon Regional Climate. II. The Climatology of Blocking Action / Daniel F. Rex // Tellus. – 1950. – Vol. 2, issue 4. – P. 275–301.
2. Lupo, A. R. Climatological features of blocking anticyclones in the Northern Hemisphere / A. R. Lupo, P. J. Smith // Tellus. – 1995. – Vol. 49A. – Р. 439-456.
3. Pelly, J. L. A New Perspective on Blocking / J. L. Pelly, B. J. Hoskins // Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences. – 2003. – Vol. 60, issue 5. – P. 743–755.
4. Atmospheric blocking characteristics in the Northern Hemisphere: Comparison of two climatologies / I. I. Mokhov, E. A. Tikhonova, A. R. Lupo, J. M. Wiedenmann // Research Activities in Atmospheric and Oceanic Modeling / еd. by H. Ritchie ; WMO TD-№ 1064. – Geneva : 2001. – P. 2.20–2.21.
5. Tyrlis, E. Aspects of a Northern Hemisphere Atmospheric Blocking Climatology / E. Tyrlis, B. J. Hoskins // Journal Of The Atmospheric Sciences. – 2008. – Vol. 65. – Р. 1638–1652.
6. Mendes, M. C. D. Southern Hemisphere Atmospheric Blocking Diagnostic By ECMWF and NCEP/NCAR Data / Monica Cristina Damião Mendes, Iracema F. A. Cavalcanti, Dirceu Luis Herdies // Revista Brasileira de Meteoro-logia. – 2012. – Vol. 27, № 3. – Р. 263–271.
7. Blocking Episodes in the Southern Hemisphere: Impact on the Climate of Adjacent Continental Areas / Monica Cristina Damião Mendes, Ricardo Machado Trigo, Iracema F. A. Cavalcanti, Carlos. C. Dacamara // Pure and Applied Geophysics. – 2008. – Vol. 165. – Р. 1941–1962.
8. Davini, P. Northern Hemisphere Atmospheric Blocking Representation in Global Climate Models: Twenty Years of Improvements? / Paolo Davini, Fabio D’Andrea // Journal Of Climate. – 2016. – Vol. 29. – P. 8823–8840.
9. Marques, R. F. C. Interannual variations of blockings in the Southern Hemisphere and their energetics / R. F. C. Marques, V. B. Rao // Journal of Geophysical Research. – 2000. – Vol. 105. – Р. 4625–4636.
10. Croci-Maspoli, M. A Multifaceted Climatology of Atmospheric Blocking and Its Recent Linear Trend / M. Croci-Maspoli, C. Schwierz, H. C. Davies // Journal Of Climate. – 2007. – Vol. 20. – P. 633–649.
11. Sillmann, J. Present and future atmospheric blocking and its impact on European mean and extreme climate /
J. Sillmann, M. Croci-Maspoli // Geophysical Research Letters. – 2009. – Vol. 36, issue 10. – L10702.
12. Observational climatology and characteristics of wintertime atmospheric blocking over Ural–Siberia / Ho Nam Cheung, Wen Zhou, Yaping Shao, Wen Chen, Hing Yim Mok, Man Chi Wu // Climate Dynamics. – 2013. – Vol. 41, issue 1. – Р. 63–79, doi:10.1007/s00382-012-1587-6.
13. A Climatology of Northern Hemisphere Blocking / David Barriopedro, Ricardo García-Herrera, Anthony R. Lupo, Emiliano Hernández // Journal Of Climate. – 2006. – Vol. 19. – P. 1042–1063.
14. Исследование развития атмосферных процессов блокирования и квазистационирования антициклонов в Атлантико-Европейском секторе / В. А. Тищенко, В. М. Хан, Р. М. Вильфанд, Е. Рожет // Метеорология и гидрология. – 2013. – № 7. – С. 15–30.
15. Воскресенская, Е. Н. Блокирующие антициклоны в Европейском регионе и их изменчивость в связи с собы-тиями Эль-Ниньо / Е. Н. Воскресенская, О. Ю. Коваленко // Изв. Рос. акад. наук. Серия географическая. – 2016. – № 1. – С. 49–57.
16. Revisiting the Climatology of Atmospheric Blockingin the Northern Hemisphere / Ho Nam Cheung, Zhou Wen, Hing Yim Mok, Man Chi Wu, Yaping Shao // Advances in Atmospheric Sciences. – 2013. – Vol. 30, № 2. – P. 397–410.
17. The Climatology of Blocking Anticyclones for the Northern and Southern Hemispheres: Block Intensity as a Diagnostic / Jason M. Wiedenmann, Anthony R. Lupo, Igor I. Mokhov, Elena A. Tikhonova // Journal Of Climate. – 2002. – Vol. 15. – P. 3459–3473.
18. Lupo, A. R. Climatological features of blocking anticyclones: A study of Northern Hemisphere CCM1 model blocking events in present-day and double CO2 concentration atmospheres / A. R. Lupo, R. J. Oglesby, I. I. Mokhov // Climate Dynamics. – 1997. – Vol. 13, issue 3. – Р. 181–195.
19. Mokhov, I. I. Changes in atmospheric blocking characteristics within Euro-Atlantic region and Northern Hemisphere as a whole in the 21st century from model simulations using RCP anthropogenic scenarios / Igor I. Mokhov, Alexander V. Timazhev, Anthony R. Lupo // Global and Planetary Change. – 2014. – Vol. 122. – P. 265–270.
20. Самчук, Є Порівняльний аналіз ефективності використання баричних індексів атмосферного блокування / Є. Самчук // Гідрологія, гідрохімія і гідроекологія : періодичний наук. зб. ; Київ. нац. ун-т ім. Т. Шевченка та ін. – Київ – 2015. – Т. 2. – С. 149–155 : табл. – Бібліогр.: 5 назв.
21. Самчук, Є. В. Просторово-часова ідентифікація баричних утворень у нижній та середній тропосфері /
Є. В. Самчук // Укр. гідрометеорол. журн. – 2017. – № 19. – С. 41–47.
22. The NCEP/NCAR 40-year reanalysis project / E. Kalnay, M. Kanamitsu, R. Kistler [et al.] // Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society. – 1996. – Vol. 77, № 3. – Р. 437–470.