Long-term dynamics of weather pathogenicity and bioclimatic comfort in the city of Kharkiv
Abstract
Purpose. To determine the main trends of long-term changes in weather pathogenicity indicators in Kharkiv based on the methodology for determining weather pathogenicity indices adapted by the authors.
Methods. The assessment was carried out on the basis of the weather pathogenicity index (J), which takes into account the complex impact of the main meteorological parameters on the human body.
Results. The investigates the long-term dynamics of weather pathogenicity and bioclimatic comfort in the city of Kharkiv. The assessment was carried out using the weather pathogenicity index (J), which considers the combined influence of major meteorological parameters on the human body. Seasonal and interannual variability of the indicators during 2017–2025 was analyzed. Based on the analysis of the main meteorological indicators (air temperature and humidity, wind speed, atmospheric pressure and their daily fluctuations), it was established that the highest values of weather pathogenicity are characteristic of the cold period of the year. The highest pathogenicity values were found during the cold period of the year, whereas relatively comfortable weather conditions prevailed in summer. At this time, increased values of the J index are observed (>20), which is due to a combination of low temperatures, significant wind speed and sharp inter-daily fluctuations in meteorological indicators. In the summer season, the most comfortable bioclimatic conditions generally prevail. The average values of the J index during this period are the lowest for the year (J < 9), which is associated with the relative stability of atmospheric processes and lower contrast of meteorological parameters. The spring and autumn periods are characterized by significant instability of weather conditions and increased variability of the pathogenicity index. Interannual analysis demonstrated a tendency to increase the variability of the pathogenicity index values during the studied period.
Conclusions. The obtained results confirm the feasibility of using the weather pathogenicity index as an integral indicator for assessing the bioclimatic state of urbanized areas. The practical significance of the study lies in the possibility of applying the results for medical and meteorological forecasting, assessing the recreational potential of the territory, as well as developing measures for the adaptation of the population to adverse weather conditions in the context of climate change.
Downloads
References
http://luddovk.univer.kharkov.ua/sites/default/files/Papers/Mirishnih.pdf (in Ukrainian)
Miroshnychenko, V. V. (2012). Comfort of the video-ecological environment of the urban geosystem of Kharkiv city: video-ecological aspect. Man and Environment. Issues of Neoecology, (1–2), 92–99. Retrieved from http://luddovk.univer.kharkov.ua/sites/default/files/Papers/15-12-17.pd (in Ukrainian)
Swanwick, C. (2002). Landscape Character Assessment: Guidance for England and Scotland. The Countryside Agency; Scottish Natural Heritage. Retrieved from https://digital.nls.uk/pubs/e-monographs/2020/216649977.23.pdf
Guidelines for Landscape and Visual Impact Assessment (2013). (3rd ed.). Landscape Institute, & Institute of Environmental Management and Assessment. Routledge. Retrieved from https://www.torbay.gov.uk/media/15326/68-guidelinesforlandscapeandvisualimpactassessment-_3rd-edition_2013.pdf
Lynch, K. (1960). The Image of the City. MIT Press. Retrieved from https://cus.ubt-uni.net/wp-content/uploads/2024/11/Kevin-Lynch-The-Image-of-the-City.pdf
Kaplan, R., & Kaplan, S. (1989). The Experience of Nature: A Psychological Perspective. Cambridge University Press. Retrieved from https://www.hse.ru/data/2019/03/04/1196348207/%5BRachel_Kaplan,_Stephen_Kaplan%5D_The_Experience_of_(b-ok.xyz).pdf
Ulrich, R. S. (1984). View through a window may influence recovery from surgery. Science, 224(4647), 420–421. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.6143402
Hartig, T., Mitchell, R., de Vries, S., & Frumkin, H. (2014). Nature and health. Annual Review of Public Health, 35, 207–228. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-publhealth-032013-182443
Haase, D., Larondelle, N., Andersson, E., et al. (2014). A quantitative review of urban ecosystem service assessments: concepts, models, and implementation. Ambio, 43(4), 413–433. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-014-0504-0
Ahern, J. (2011). From fail-safe to safe-to-fail: Sustainability and resilience in the new urban world. Landscape and Urban Planning, 100(4), 341–343. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2011.02.021
Meerow, S., Newell, J. P., & Stults, M. (2016). Defining urban resilience: A review. Landscape and Urban Planning, 147, 38–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2015.11.011
UNESCO World Heritage Centre. (2023). Operational Guidelines for the Implementation of the World Heritage Convention. Retrieved from https://whc.unesco.org/en/guidelines/
UNESCO. (2026). Damaged cultural sites in Ukraine verified by UNESCO. Retrieved from https://www.unesco.org/en/ukraine-war/damaged-cultural-sites
Ministry of Culture and Strategic Communications of Ukraine. (2025). Due to russian aggression, 1,419 cultural heritage sites and 2,233 cultural infrastructure facilities damaged in Ukraine. Retrieved from https://mincult.gov.ua/en/news/due-to-russian-aggression-1419-cultural-heritage-sites-and-2233-cultural-infrastructure-facilities-damaged-in-ukraine/
World Bank. (2025). Updated Ukraine Recovery and Reconstruction Needs Assessment Released. Retrieved from https://www.worldbank.org/en/news/press-release/2025/02/25/updated-ukraine-recovery-and-reconstruction-needs-assessment-released
Norman Foster Foundation. (2024–2025). Kharkiv Masterplan – Ukraine. Retrieved from https://normanfosterfoundation.org/project/kharkiv-masterplan-housing-pilot-project-kharkiv-ukraine-2024-2025/
European Commission. (2021). New European Bauhaus: Beautiful, Sustainable, Together. COM(2021) 573 final. Retrieved from https://new-european-bauhaus.europa.eu/system/files/2021-09/COM%282021%29_573_EN_ACT.pdf
IPCC. (2022). Climate Change 2022: Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability. Cambridge University Press. Retrieved from https://www.ipcc.ch/report/ar6/wg2/
Eurocities. (2024). Sustainable rebuilding of Ukrainian cities: Toolkit. Retrieved from https://monitor.eurocities.eu/wp-content/uploads/2024/05/Eurocities_Toolkit_Ukraine_final.pdf
ICOMOS. (2022). Recommendations of the ICOMOS Europe Group on the damage and loss of cultural heritage in Ukraine. Retrieved from https://www.icomos.org/images/DOCUMENTS/Secretariat/2022/Ukraine/ICOMOS_Europe_Group_recommendations_Ukraine.pdf
UNESCO. (2024). Action Plan for Culture in Ukraine. Retrieved from https://articles.unesco.org/sites/default/files/medias/fichiers/2024/09/UNESCO%20Action%20Plan%20Culture%20for%20Ukraine%20Recovery%202024.pdf
Oldham, M. (2021). Urban landscapes and climate change: the contribution of Landscape Architects to improve the quality of life. Council of Europe. Retrieved from https://www.iflaeurope.eu/assets/docs/CEP-CDCPP_%282021%29_7E_-_Report_Landscape_Architects.docx%282%29_.pdf
UNDRR. (2024). UNDRR engages with Ukrainian cities at European Urban Resilience Forum. Retrieved from https://mcr2030.undrr.org/news/undrr-engages-ukrainian-cities-european-urban-resilience-forum
Deutsche Gesellschaft für Internationale Zusammenarbeit (GIZ). (2023). Supporting resilient cities and reconstruction in Ukraine. Retrieved from https://www.giz.de/en/projects/strengthening-urban-resilience-areas-supply-infrastructure-and-housing-ukraine
Human Rights Watch. (2024). Destroying Cultural Heritage: Explosive Weapons’ Effects in Armed Conflict and Measures to Improve Protection. Retrieved from https://www.hrw.org/report/2024/04/18/destroying-cultural-heritage/explosive-weapons-effects-armed-conflict-and
Copyright (c) 2026 Maksymenko N. V., & Dolia, D. S.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication of this work under the terms of a license Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0).
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
