Current priorities of monitoring research of roadside ecosystems (on the example of highways of the Cherkask region).

Keywords: roadside ecosystem, landscape, biodiversity, monitoring, noise load, dustiness, soil, anthropogenic impact

Abstract

Implementation of priorities of ecosystem dynamics during monitoring of roadside landscapes determines the role of a buffer between, mainly, agricultural land and the road surface.

Purpose Using monitoring methods to investigate the modern ecosystem dynamics of roadside landscapes.

Methods. Measurement of the level of noise, dustiness, radiation background with special devices, photography of vegetation and traces of the presence of fauna with further interpretation of the photographs. The results of the chemical analysis of soils were carried out by the ICP-OES method on the iCAP6500DUO device.

Results. Monitoring researches were carried out by route advance by car, first from the village of Sychivka (on the border with the Vinnytsia region) to the east to the city of Cherkasy and in the opposite direction to the city of Uman. A total of 8 stops were made for the relevant measurements and sampling. The intensity of the noise load increased around large settlements (Uman, Smila, Cherkasy), and on intermediate sections of the highway, where vehicles could develop high speeds. The dependence of dustiness on the total carrying capacity of vehicles was determined. The radiation background for all polygons corresponded to the background values. Chemical analysis of soil samples directly near the track and at a distance of 25-30 m from it determined a close dependence on the distance. A generalization of various parameters of the current state of roadside ecosystems is made. In particular, the recording of various types of ruderal plants made it possible to draw a diagram of the degree of completion of the formation of roadside ecosystems.

Conclusions. After the construction of the road surface, over a certain period of time, plant and animal communities are formed along it, which later show signs of ecosystem dynamics

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

S. P. Ogilko , Uman National University of Horticulture, Institutska Str., 1, Uman, 20305, Ukraine

Graduate Student of the Department of Ecology and Life Safety

References

Vernadskyi V. (2018). About the scientific outlook; Philosophical views of a naturalist; A few words about the noosphere. In Bury A. R. (Ed.). A thousand years of Ukrainian philosophical thought: an anthology. Ministry of Education and Science of Ukraine, DDPU named after I. Franko. Drohobych, 2, 411–417. (in Ukrainian)

Sonko, S., Maksymenko, N., Vasylenko, O.,Chornomorets, V., & Koval, I. (2021). Biodiversity and land-scape diversity as indicators of sustainable development. E3S Web of Conferences. International Confer-ence on Sustainable, Circular Management and Environmental Engineering (ISCMEE 2021). 255 Odesa, Ukraine, April 16, 2021 https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202125501046

Smaliychuk, A. (2012). Theoretical and conceptual framework of the study of the geoecosystem's anthro-pogenic dynamics. Scientific notes of Ternopil National Pedagogical University named after Volodymyr Hnatyuk. Series: geography. Special issue. (2(32)). 121-125. Retrieved from https://geography.lnu.edu.ua/wp-content/uploads/2016/10/TNPU_2012_2_Smaliychuk.pdf (in Ukrainian)

Denisyk, G.I., & Valchuk-Orkusha, O.M. (2017). Classification and optimization of road landscapes. In-ternational Scientific and Practical Conference "WORLD SCIENCE". 2(8(24)). Retrieved from https://journals.indexcopernicus.com/api/file/viewByFileId/442959.pdf (in Ukrainian)

Sonko, S.P., & Maksimenko, N.V. (2016). «Natural» and «Anthropogenic» in Creating the Landscape. Man and Environment. Issues of Neoecology, (1-2(25), 9-13. Retrieved from https://periodicals.karazin.ua/humanenviron/article/view/6308 (in Ukrainian)

Sonko, S. (2019). Man in Noosphere: Evolution and Further Development. Philosophy and Cosmology, 22,51-75. https://doi.org/10.29202/phil-cosm/22/5

Maksimtsev, S., Dudarets, S., &Yukhnovskyi, V. (2021). Accumulation of heavy metals in soil and litter of roadside plantations in Western Polissia of Ukraine. Folia Forestalia Polonica, Series A – Forestry, 63 (3), 232–242. https://doi.org/10.2478/ffp-2021-0024

Cooke, S. C., Balmford, A., Donald, P. F., Newson, S. E., & Johnston, A. (2020). Roads as a contributor to landscape-scale variation in bird communities. Nature Communications, 11(1), 1–10. https://doi,org/10.1038/s41467-020-16899-x

Ludovici, G.M., de Souza, S.O., Chierici, A., Cascone, M.G., d’Errico, F., Malizia, A. (2020). Adaptation to ionizing radiation of higher plants: From environmental radioactivity to chernobyl disaster. J. Environ. Radioact., 222, 106375. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvrad.2020.106375

Nawaz, M.F., Rashid, M.H.U., Saeed-Ur-Rehman, M., Gul, S., Farooq, T.H., Sabir, M.A., Iftikhar, J., Abdelsalam, N.R., Dessoky, E.S. & Alotaibi, S.S. (2022). Effect of Dust Types on the Eco-Physiological Response of Three Tree Species Seedlings: Eucalyptus camaldulensis, Conocarpus erectus and Bombax ceiba. Atmosphere 13, 1010. https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos13071010

Rolli N.M., Hiremath P.S., Karalatti, B.I., Hotti Y.B. & Kattimani V.K. (2019). Phytoassay of Heavy Metals Pollution in Roadside Environment: Bioindicators. Int J Recent Sci Res., 10(12), 36499-36503. http://dx.doi.org/10.24327/ijrsr.2020.1012.4934

De Silva S., Ball A.S., Indrapala D.V., Reichman S.M. (2021). Review of the interactions between vehicular emitted potentially toxic elements, roadside soils, and associated biota. Chemosphere, 263, January, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2020.128135

Sordello, R., Ratel, O., Flamerie De Lachapelle, F., Leger, C,. Dambry, A., &Vanpeene, S. (2020). Evidence of the impact of noise pollution on biodiversity: a systematic map. Environ Evid., 9, 20 https://doi.org/10.1186/s13750-020-00202-y

Simcock, R., Innes, J., Samarasinghe, O., Lambie, S., Peterson, P., Glen, A., & Faville, N. (2022). Road edge-effects on ecosystems: A review of international and New Zealand literature, an assessment method for New Zealand roads, and recommended actions (Waka Kotahi NZ Transport Agency research report 692).

Wildlife crossing structure handbook design and evaluation in North America. Chapter 2 - Wildlife populations and road corridor intersections. Retrieved from https://www.fhwa.dot.gov/clas/ctip/wildlife_crossing_structures/ch_2.aspx

.Parakhnenko, V. G. (2023). Geography of invasive flora in roadside landscapes of railways in the Kiro-vohrad region. PhD thezis in specialty 103 Earth Sciences. Uman National University of Horticulture, Uman. (in Ukrainian)

Kruglov, I. (2016). Basic geoecosystem (B-HES) as an integrating object of transdisciplinary geoecology. Scientific Notes Ternopil National Volodymyr Hnatyuk Pedagogical University. Series: Geography, (2 (41). Retrieved from. http://dspace.tnpu.edu.ua/handle/123456789/7111 (in Ukrainian)

Regional report on the state of the natural environment in the Cherkasy region in 2021. Department of Ecology and Natural Resources of the Cherkasy Regional State Administration. Electronic resource. Re-trieved from https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Ph3-6L340rNxBGbvV9ymczAaJ7YqAoCV/edit?pli=1 (in Ukrainian)

Ogilko, S.P. (2023). Monitoring of the radiation background of the city of Uman: after 10 years. Man and Environment. Issues of Neoecology, 39, 77-86. https://doi.org/10.26565/1992-4224-2023-39-07

Kuzemko, A.A., Didukha, J.P., Onishchenko, V.A., & Schaeffer, Ya. (Eds.). (2018). National catalog of bio-topes of Ukraine. Kyiv.: FOP Klymenko Yu.Ya. (in Ukrainian)

Published
2023-11-27
How to Cite
Ogilko , S. P. (2023). Current priorities of monitoring research of roadside ecosystems (on the example of highways of the Cherkask region) . Visnyk of V. N. Karazin Kharkiv National University Series «Еcоlogy», (29), 26-36. https://doi.org/10.26565/1992-4259-2023-29-03