Neological representation of the concept ILLNESS (as a result of information technology impact) in English-speaking computer discourse

  • N. V. Tatsenko
DOI: https://doi.org/10.26565/2218-2926-2013-07-07
Keywords: computer discourse, concept ILLNESS, neologism, neological representation, frame network

Abstract

The article presents a cognitive analysis and a systematization of ways of linguistic objectification of the concept ILLNESS as a result of speech-thinking impact of information technology on the basis of computer discourse neologisms. A frame network of the concept ILLNESS in computer discourse is built which helps to identify the main ways of its cognitive modeling.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Жаботинская С.А. Principles of building conceptual models for thesaurus dictionaries / С.А. Жаботинская // Когниция, коммуникация, дискурс. – 2010. – № 1. – С. 75–92.
Зацний Ю.А. Інновації у словниковому складі англійської мови на початку XXI століття: Англо-український словник / Ю.А. Зацний, А.В. Янков. – Вінниця: Нова Книга, 2008. – 360 с.
Таценко Н.В. Засоби реалізації мегаконцептів ПРОСТІР, ЧАС, ІНФОРМАЦІЯ в сучасній англійській мові (на матеріалі інновацій віртуальної реальності): дис. ... канд. філол. наук: 10.02.04 / Н.В. Таценко. – Суми, 2009. – 220 с.
Collins English Dictionary / Editors: J. Crozier, A. Grandison, C. McKeown, E. Summers, P. Weber. – Glasgow: HarperCollins Publishers, 2008. – 1040 p.
G. Fauconnier. The Way We Think: Conceptual Blending and the Mind’s Hidden Complexities / Gilles Fauconnier, Mark Terner. – New York: Basic Books, 2002. – 440 p.
McFedries P. Archives [Электронный ресурс] / P. McFedries. – Режим доступа: http://www.logophilia.com/WordSpy, 2001–2012.

Advice and Help, August 12, 2006.
Associated Press, February 20, 2008.
Chicago Tribune, September 8, 2006.
Cognitive Behavior Therapist, April 2, 2009.
Daily Mail, October 5, 2010.
InformationWeek, February 21, 2006.
Information Week, July 8, 2006.
Journal of School Health, April, 2009.
Network World, April 2, 2001.
Sun Francisco Chronicle, February 15, 2004.
The Globe and Mail, February 16, 2007.
The Guardian, April 3, 2003.
The Guardian, May 9, 2006.
The New York Times, December 1, 2005.
The Observer, April 22, 2007.
The Wall Street Journal, November 25, 2006.
Published
2018-09-11
How to Cite
Tatsenko, N. V. (2018). Neological representation of the concept ILLNESS (as a result of information technology impact) in English-speaking computer discourse. Cognition, Communication, Discourse, (7), 100-110. https://doi.org/10.26565/2218-2926-2013-07-07
Issue
No. 7 (2013): Cognition, Communication, Discourse
Section
Articles

Authors, who publish with this journal, accept the following conditions:

The authors reserve the copyright of their work and transfer to the magazine the right of the first publication of this work under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial Non-Derivs License (CC BY-NC-ND), which allows other persons to freely distribute a published work with mandatory reference to the authors of the original work and the first publication of the work in this journal.

Authors have the right to enter into separate additional agreements for the non-exclusive dissemination of the work in the form in which it was published by this journal (for example, to post the work in the electronic institutions' repository or to publish as part of a monograph), provided that the link to the first publication of the work in this journal is given.

The journal policy allows and encourages the authors to place the manuscripts on the Internet (for example, in the institutions' repositories or on personal websites), both before the presentation of this manuscript to the editorial board and during review procedure, as it contributes to the creation of productive scientific discussion and positively affects the efficiency and dynamics of citing the published work (see The Effect of Open Access).