Application of a concept of a cognitive factor in managerial decision-making and planning
Abstract
The article examines application of a concept of a cognitive factor in the operational planning process under conditions of a complex and dynamic environment. The main focus is on analyzing the mission and identifying the problem under resource constraints. NATO’s core operational planning doctrines and national doctrines of NATO member states such as AJP-5, COPD and JP 5-0 define operational factors such as time, force, space, and information, but do not take the cognitive factor into account. The necessity of applying the concept of the cognitive factor as an operational factor to ensure effective operational planning for the joint employment of military forces and assets with non-military capabilities has been theoretically substantiated. The concept of the cognitive factor is an integral part of the managerial decision-making process; failure to take it into account may lead to an incorrect identification of the problem, to misidentifying the opposing party as the one causing the problem, and to the failure to develop the optimal solution to the problem. The cognitive factor is archetypal in nature, relatively stable, and can be shaped by values, beliefs, national and organizational cultures, decision-making cultures, mental models, doctrines, and rules. It has been determined that the concept of the cognitive factor integrates the factors of time, force, space, and information into a unified whole in the operational planning process; in particular, it facilitates forming a systematic understanding of the current state of the environment and the social system, visualizing their dynamic development and a desired future state, analyzing the problem, and developing solutions to it. It is proposed to apply the concept of the cognitive factor in the operational planning process at the doctrinal level in conjunction with the operational factors of time, force, space, and information. It can help to improve effectiveness of operational planning and establish decision dominance under the martial law.
Downloads
References
Ackoff, R. L. (1971). Towards a System of Systems Concepts. Management Science, 17(11), 661–671. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2629308
Ackoff, R. L. (1994). Systems Thinking and Thinking Systems. System Dynamics Review . 10. 2-3, Summer-Fall, 175-188. https://doi.org/10.1002/sdr.4260100206
Blatny, Janet M., & Sondergaard, Steen. (2025). Cognitive Warfare: NATO Chief Scientist Research Report. Belgium, Brussels: STO.
Collins dictionary. https://www.collinsdictionary.com/dictionary/english/factor
Constantinescu, Maria. (2026). Weaponizing the mind – emerging technologies in cognitive warfare. Defense & Security Analysis, 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1080/14751798.2026.2641840
Deppe, Christoph, & Gary S. Schaal. (2024). Cognitive warfare: a conceptual analysis of the NATO ACT cognitive warfare exploratory concept. Front. Big Data, 01 November, Sec. Machine Learning and Artificial Intelligence Vol. 7. https://doi.org/10.3389/fdata.2024.1452129
Durand, Gilbert (1992). The Anthropological Structures of the Imaginary. (M. Sankey & J. Hatten, Trans). (11th ed.). Brisbane: Boombana Publication.
Eikmeier, Dale C., & Titel, Iova. (2021). Factor Analysis A Valuable Technique in Support of Mission Analysis. Military review, September-October, 65-73.
Garretson, P. (2017). USAF Strategic Development of a Domain. Over The Horizon (OTH) Journal, 10 June. Montgomery (AL, USA): Air Command and Staff College. https://othjournal.com/ 2017/07/10/strategic-domain-development/.
Guyader, Hervé Le. (2022). Cognitive Warfare: The Future of Cognitive Dominance. B. Claverie, B. Prébot, N. Buchler & F. Du Cluzel (editors). Bordeaux: NATO-STO Collaboration Support Office.
HQs, Department of the Army. (2021). Army Multi-Domain Transformation Ready to Win in Competition and Conflict.
Joint Chiefs of Staff. (2011). Planner’s Handbook for Operational Design. Vertion 1.0. Joint Staff, J-7 Joint and Coalition Warfighting Suffolk, Virginia.
Joint Chiefs of Staff. (2020). Joint Planning (JP 5-0).
Kahneman, D., Sibony, O., & Sunstein, C. (2021). Noise. Harper Collins Publishers.
Llachinski, Andrew. (1996). Land Warfare and Complexity, Part I: Mathematical Background and Technical Sourcebook (U). Center for Naval Analyses.
Naplyokov, Yuriy. (2017). NATO Operational Planning process, Part I. Kyiv: NDUU.
Naplyokov, Yuriy. (2025). Operational planning for maintaining national security and defense. Monograph. Кyiv: NDUU. http://doi.org/10.35668/OPNSD
NATO Standardization Office. (2019). Allied joint doctrine for the planning of
operations (AJP-5).
NATO. (2022). Allied Joint Doctrine (AJP-01. Edition F, Version 1).
NATO SHAPE Allied Command Operations. (2023). Comprehensive Operations Planning Directive (COPD, Version 3.1).
Paul, Richard & Linda, Elder. (2008). The Miniature Guide to Critical Thinking Concepts and Tools. University of California at Berkeley: The Foundation for Critical Thinking.
Rittel, H.W.J., & Webber, M.M. (1973). Dilemmas in a general theory of planning. Policy sciences, 4, 155–169. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01405730
Senge, P. M. (2006). The Fifth Discipline: The Art & Practice of the Learning Organization. New York, NY: Doubleday.
Vego, Milan. (2000). Operational warfare. U. S. Naval War College.
Copyright (c) 2026 Theory and Practice of Public Administration
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
