Genesis of economic inequality in Ukraine in the context of its systemic consequences
Abstract
The article explores the genesis of economic inequality in Ukraine and its systemic consequences amidst contemporary macroeconomic and geopolitical shifts. Particular attention is paid to the fact that wealth stratification has evolved from a purely financial issue into an existential obstacle to sustainable socio-economic development and the preservation of societal integrity. It has been demonstrated that domestic inequality has deep structural roots and is not merely a consequence of objective market processes, but rather a result of the entrenchment of clan-oligarchic capitalism and the institutionalization of political rent extraction mechanisms. The methodological framework of the study is based on a systemic-institutional approach combined with historical-logical, statistical, and comparative methods, which allowed for viewing inequality as a logical consequence of defects in state policy and profound deformations in the public administration system. The empirical and informational basis of the research includes macroeconomic reviews and analytical reports from the World Bank (notably the Macro Poverty Outlook), Credit Suisse, as well as global studies by Oxfam, the IMF, and the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). The article provides a detailed periodization of domestic wealth stratification, structured into three key stages: the transformational crisis with primary capital accumulation (1991–1999), the period of oligarchic institutionalization (2000–2021), and the stage of acute economic inequality under martial law (2022–present). It is shown that the model of national asset distribution formed in Ukraine effectively blocks 99.8% of the adult population from efficient capital formation processes, thereby perpetuating socio-economic stagnation. The key result of the study is the identification of qualitatively new deformations of the social structure during the full-scale war. In particular, the transformation of classical income inequality into an acute polarization by real consumption level has been established, accompanied by an increase in poverty to 38% and a critical rise in the Gini coefficient to 0,50 in 2025. Factors contributing to the deepening of disparities are analyzed, including the intensification of sectoral imbalances and the disproportionate expansion of the shadow labor market, which most severely affects the most vulnerable segments of the population. It is emphasized that excessive stratification erodes public trust in the state, exacerbates legal nihilism, devalues integrity, and acts as a catalyst for demographic depression. Based on the analysis, the necessity for a radical change in the public administration strategy regarding the minimization of economic inequality is substantiated. The inefficiency of fragmented social benefit policies is highlighted, and the need for a transition to a mobilization development model and comprehensive structural reforms is argued. It is concluded that overcoming the destructive consequences of wealth polarization requires a fundamental transformation of the oligarchic governance model, expanding citizens’ access to productive resources, and active de-offshorization and formalization of the economy to establish institutional justice as an integral basis for a human-centric model of sustainable socio-economic development.
Downloads
References
Maitland, A., Taneja, A., Kamande, A., et al. (2026). Resisting the Rule of the Rich: Protecting freedom from billionaire power. Oxford: Oxfam International. https://doi.org/10.21201/2025.000113
World Bank (2024). Macro Poverty Outlook for Ukraine: April 2024. Washington, D.C.: World Bank Group. https://documents.worldbank.org/en/publication/documents-reports/documentdetail/099609004052423960
World Bank (2026). Macro Poverty Outlook for Ukraine: April 2026. Washington, D.C.: World Bank Group. https://thedocs.worldbank.org/en/doc/d5f32ef28464d01f195827b7e020a3e8-0500022021/related/mpo-ukr.pdf
Balabushko, O., Betliy, O., Movchan, V., et al. (2018). Crony Capitalism in Ukraine: Relationship between Political Connectedness and Firms' Performance. Policy Research Working Paper No. 8471. Washington, D.C.: World Bank. https://doi.org/10.1596/1813-9450-8471
World Bank (2026). Survey "Listening to Citizens of Ukraine". https://www.worldbank.org/uk/country/ukraine/brief/listening-to-citizens-of-ukraine-survey [in Ukrainian].
Libanova, E.M. (Ed.). (2012). Inequality in Ukraine: Scale and Influence Opportunities. Kyiv: M.V. Ptukha Institute for Demography and Social Studies of the NAS of Ukraine [in Ukrainian].
Shapoval, Yu.I. (2024). Economic inequality: concept and measurement approaches. History of National Economy and Economic Thought of Ukraine, 57, 426–447. https://doi.org/10.15407/ingedu2024.57.426 [in Ukrainian].
Zavhorodnya, S.P. (2024). Economic inequality in Ukraine: risk assessment for resilience strengthening. Dnipropetrovsk Scientific Journal of Public Administration, Psychology, Law, 2, 36–42. https://doi.org/10.51547/ppp.dp.ua/2024.2.6 [in Ukrainian].
Opal'ko, V.V. (2019). Economic development and socio-economic inequality in the global dimension. Scientific Bulletin of Uzhhorod National University. Series: International Economic Relations and World Economy, 25 (2), 30–36. http://www.visnyk-econom.uzhnu.uz.ua/archive/25_2_2019ua/25_2_2019.pdf [in Ukrainian].
Sun, P. (2026). Does the Targeted Poverty Alleviation Program Reduce Income Inequality in China? Review of Development Economics, 30, 484–502. https://doi.org/10.1111/rode.70012.
Stiglitz, J.E. (2015). The Origins of Inequality, and Policies to Contain It. National Tax Journal, 68 (2), 425–448. https://doi.org/10.17310/ntj.2015.2.09.
OECD (2015). In It Together: Why Less Inequality Benefits All. Paris: OECD Publishing. http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/9789264235120-en.
Ostry, J.D., Berg, A., & Tsangarides, C.G. (2014). Redistribution, Inequality, and Growth. IMF Staff Discussion Note, 14/02. https://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/sdn/2014/sdn1402.pdf.
Milanovic, B. (1998). Income, Inequality, and Poverty during the Transition from Planned to Market Economy. Washington, DC: The World Bank. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/246453761_Income_Inequality_and_Poverty_During_the_Transition_from_Planned_to_Market_Economy
World Bank (2026). Ukraine: Gini index. World Bank Open Data. https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/SI.POV.GINI?locations=UA
Credit Suisse Research Institute (2022). Global Wealth Databook 2022. Zurich: Credit Suisse. https://dataroom.carbogatto.com/u/www/files/document_block/global_wealth_databook_2022.pdf
Zavhorodnya, S. (2024). Economic Inequality among the Population of Ukraine in the Context of Ensuring Resilience. Kyiv: NISS. https://niss.gov.ua/news/komentari-ekspertiv/ekonomichna-nerivnist-sered-naselennya-ukrayini-v-konteksti-zabezpechennya [in Ukrainian].
Zavhorodnya, S.P. (2025). Human and societal well-being during the post-war recovery of the country: examining contradictions in the pursuit of balance of interests. Theory and Practice of Public Administration, 2 (81), 89–110. http://doi.org/10.26565/1727-6667-2025-2-06 [in Ukrainian].
World Bank (2026). Monitoring Living Conditions in Ukraine: Spring 2026 Update. Washington, DC: World Bank. https://thedocs.worldbank.org/en/doc/3df3ca7530237868137cf8a73f9b36b2-0080062026/original/Listening-to-Ukraine-Update-Spring-2026.pdf
Kovalenko, M.M., & Dunayev, I.V. (2023). Components of public policy in the context of implementing a mobilization model of economic development. Theory and Practice of Public Administration, 1 (76), 7–25. http://doi.org/10.26565/1727-6667-2023-1-01 [in Ukrainian].
Copyright (c) 2026 Theory and Practice of Public Administration

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).