Evolution of models of interaction between the state and civil society in Ukraine: from «participatory governance» to «co-creation»
Abstract
The article examines the evolution of conceptual models of interaction between the state and civil society in Ukraine through the prism of the transition from «participatory governance» to «co-creation» as a new paradigm of public administration. The hypothesis of the study is that this transition reflects not just a change in the terminological apparatus, but a fundamental transformation of the roles of the state, civil society and the individual citizen in the process of making and implementing public decisions, and that Ukraine, as a result of three key shocks – the Revolution of Dignity, decentralization reform and full-scale Russian invasion – has undergone an accelerated trajectory of this transformation, which in other countries lasted for decades.
The study uses comparative-analytical and institutional approaches. Based on the systematization of theoretical concepts of New Public Governance (NPG), collaborative governance and co-creation, the key differences between the models are identified and the logic of their sequential deployment in Ukrainian institutional practice is outlined. Particular attention is paid to the analysis of three time horizons: pre-Maidan (before 2014), post-Maidan (2014–2022) and military (from 2022 to the present). It is shown that each of these horizons formed a specific configuration of interaction between public authorities and civil structures – from paternalistic-declarative to participatory-network and, ultimately, to co-creative. The role of digitalization of public administration, in particular the «Diya» platform, in the formation of new forms of civic participation and joint production of public services is established. The challenges facing Ukraine on the path to full-fledged institutionalization of “co-creation” are analyzed: asymmetry of resources between state and civil actors, legal lack of regulation of co-creation mechanisms, risks of co-optation of civil society by the state.
It is concluded that “co-creation” in conditions of martial law acquires an additional dimension – a mechanism for preserving and strengthening social resilience, and post-war recovery requires purposeful formation of the institutional architecture of co-creation as a new social contract between the state and citizens. Four strategic tasks for the institutionalization of “co-creation” in Ukraine are identified: normative consolidation, resource symmetry, development of collaborative culture and ensuring democratic quality.
Downloads
References
Bondarchuk, N. V. (2022). Improving the mechanisms of interaction between public authorities and civil society institutions. Public administration and regional development, 18, 1040–1056. https://doi.org/10.34132/pard2022.18.03 [in Ukrainian].
Bondarchuk, N. V. (2023). Interaction between authorities and civil society in the context of European integration processes in Ukraine. Public administration: improvement and development, 5. https://doi.org/10.32702/2307-2156.2023.5.1 [in Ukrainian].
Hrushchynska, N. M. (2022). Interaction between the state and society as the main condition for the formation of civil society. State and regions. Series: Public administration and administration, 2 (76). https://doi.org/10.32840/1813-3401.2022.2.1 [in Ukrainian].
Hrushchynska, N. M. (2022). Modernization of the system of political and administrative management and development of civil society in Ukraine. Scientific notes of V. I. Vernadsky TNU. Series: Public management and administration, 33 (72), 3. https://doi.org/10.32838/TNU-2663-6468/2022.3/01 [in Ukrainian].
Korotchenko, N. O. (2024). Theoretical foundations of modernization of public administration in the conditions of digitalization of social relations. State construction, 2 (36), 172–181. https://doi.org/10.26565/1992-2337-2024-2-13 [in Ukrainian].
Meduna, B. L. (2023). Participatory democracy as a factor in ensuring the publicity of the constitutional process. Effectiveness of public administration, 68/69, 57–64. https://doi.org/10.36930/506805 [in Ukrainian].
Ansell. C., & Gash. A. (2008). Collaborative Governance in Theory and Practice. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 18, 4, 543–571. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mum032
Ansell, C., & Torfing, J. (2021). Public Governance as Co-creation: A Strategy for Revitalizing the Public Sector and Rejuvenating Democracy. Cambridge University Press, 340. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108765381
Ansell, C., Sorensen, E., & Torfing, J. (2024). The Democratic Quality of Co-creation: A Theoretical Exploration. Public Policy and Administration, 39, 2, 149–170. https://doi.org/10.1177/09520767231170715
Emerson, K., & Nabatchi, T. (2015). Collaborative Governance Regimes. Washington, DC : Georgetown University Press, 280.
Emerson, K., Nabatchi, T., & Balogh, S. (2012). An Integrative Framework for Collaborative Governance. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 22, 1, 1–29. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mur011
Hammerschmid, G., Palaric, E., Rackwitz, M., & Wegrich, K. (2024). A Shift in Paradigm? Collaborative Public Administration in the Context of National Digitalization Strategies. Governance, 37, 2, 411–430. https://doi.org/10.1111/gove.12778
Keudel, O., & Huss, O. (2024). Polycentric Governance in Practice: The Case of Ukraine’s Decentralised Crisis Response during the Russo-Ukrainian War. Journal of Public Finance and Public Choice, 39, 1. 10–35. https://doi.org/10.1332/25156918y2023d000000002
Khutkyy, D., & Matveieva, O. (2024). Sustainable Development, Digital Democracy, and Open Government: Co-Creation Synergy in Ukraine. Comparative Southeast European Studies, 72, 4, 436–464. https://doi.org/10.1515/soeu-2024-0036
Krogh, A. H., & Triantafillou P. (2024). Developing New Public Governance as a Public Management Reform Model. Public Management Review, 26, 10, 3040–3056. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2024.2313539
Mazzucato, M., & Ryan-Collins, J. (2022). Putting Value Creation Back into "Public Value": From Market-Fixing to Market-Shaping. Journal of Economic Policy Reform, 25, 4, 345–360. https://doi.org/10.1080/17487870.2022.2053537
McMullin, C. (2023). The Persistent Constraints of New Public Management on Sustainable Co-Production between Non-Profit Professionals and Service Users. Administrative Sciences, 13, 2. Art., 37. https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci13020037
Nguyen, H., Drejer, I., & Marques, P. (2024). Citizen Engagement in Public Sector Innovation: Exploring the Transition between Paradigms. Public Management Review, 26, 12, 3622–3642. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2024.2347360
Oliychenko, I., Ditkovska, M., & Klochko, A. (2024). Digital Transformation of Public Authorities in Wartime: The Case of Ukraine. Journal of Information Policy, 14, 686–746. https://doi.org/10.5325/jinfopoli.14.2024.0020
Pauluzzo, R., Fedele, P., Dokalskaya, I., & Garlatti, A. (2024). The Role of Digital Technologies in Public Sector Coproduction and Co-creation: A Structured Literature Review. Financial Accountability & Management, 40, 613–640. https://doi.org/10.1111/faam.12391
Roiseland, A., Sorensen, E., & Torfing, J. (Eds.) (2024). Advancing Co-creation in Local Governance: The Role of Coping Strategies and Constructive Hybridization. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing, 227. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781802202236
Schmaing, S. (2024). Urban Democracy in Post-Maidan Ukraine: Conflict and Cooperation between Citizens and Local Governments in Participatory Budgeting. European Societies, 26, 2, 230–252. https://doi.org/10.1080/14616696.2023.2183972
Torfing, J. (2023). Rethinking Public Governance. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing, 252 p. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781789909777
Torfing, J., Andersen, L. B., Greve, C., & Klausen, K. K. (2020). Public Governance Paradigms: Competing and Co-existing. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing, 228 https://doi.org/10.4337/9781788971225
Torfing, J., Sorensen, E., & Decman, M. (2023). Reaping the Fruits of Co-creation through Design Experiments. Public Policy and Administration. https://doi.org/10.1177/09520767231197802
Torfing, J., Sorensen, E., & Roiseland, A. (2019). Transforming the Public Sector into an Arena for Co-creation: Barriers, Drivers, Benefits and Ways Forward. Administration & Society, 51, 5, 795–825. https://doi.org/10.1177/0095399716680057
Zarembo, K., &Martin, E. (2024). Civil Society and Sense of Community in Ukraine: From Dormancy to Action. European Societies, 26, 2, 203–229. https://doi.org/10.1080/14616696.2023.2185652
Copyright (c) 2026 Theory and Practice of Public Administration
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
