Implementation of Management Decisions for the Implementation of Blockchain Technologies in Public Authorities

doi:10.26565/1727-6667-2022-1-01

Viacheslav Dziundziuk V. N. Karazin Kharkiv National University, 4 Svobody Sq, Kharkiv, 61022, Ukraine http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0622-2600
Boris Dziundziuk V. N. Karazin Kharkiv National University, 4 Svobody Sq, Kharkiv, 61022, Ukraine http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9066-2849

DOI: https://doi.org/10.26565/1727-6667-2022-1-01

Keywords: public administration, public authorities, blockchain, blockchain technologies, public sector, management decisions.

Abstract

In recent years, there has been growing interest in blockchain-based operating systems from computer science, economics, and law, but the literature is still in its infancy. The public sector is becoming an area of application for blockchain technology, with governments and others having published more than 200 examples of its use worldwide. However, despite the growing interest, actual implementation of blockchain-based technologies and systems in public administration remains limited. Previous studies have highlighted a number of challenges associated with its implementation, including inadequate regulation, security and privacy issues, lack of interoperable infrastructure, inefficient and energy-intensive transactions, the need for changes in administrative processes, and ultimately, the lack of effective governance models. The purpose of this paper is to identify what management decisions need to be made for the development of blockchain technologies and systems in public authorities and how different contextual factors in public sector affect the available options for blockchain governance.
The literature review showed that managerial decisions regarding the use of blockchain in public institutions need to be defined at different levels. At the same time, all these levels are not independent levels of blockchain management, but interrelated ones. It was defined, that blockchain governance in public authorities includes different solutions related to decision mechanisms, incentive mechanisms, consensus building mechanisms, organization, accountability, and management control.
Several important conclusions were drawn for system developers and decision makers interested in applying blockchain solutions in public administration. First, politicians and system developers need to consider the interrelationships between levels of public administration and assess the impact of decisions at one level on other levels of public administration. Second, the state current frameworks in a particular sector (e.g., health, security, education, etc.) may influence the choice of a particular blockchain-based governance option. Third, the implementation of blockchain-based systems and technologies in public administration depends on the level of public trust in government. Therefore, further research is needed to clarify the relationship between trust in public institutions and the political choice to build a blockchain-based governance structure.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Viacheslav Dziundziuk, V. N. Karazin Kharkiv National University, 4 Svobody Sq, Kharkiv, 61022, Ukraine

Doctor of Science in Public Administration, Professor,
Head of Public Policy Chair,
Educational and Scientific Institute «Institute of Public Administration»,
V. N. Karazin Kharkiv National University

Boris Dziundziuk, V. N. Karazin Kharkiv National University, 4 Svobody Sq, Kharkiv, 61022, Ukraine

Candidate of Science in Public Administration,
Educational and Scientific Institute «Institute of Public Administration»,
V. N. Karazin Kharkiv National University

References

Atzori, M. (2017). Blockchain technology and decentralized governance: Is the state still necessary? Journal of Governance and Regulation, 6(1), 45–62.

Beck, R., Müller-Bloch, C., & King, J. L. (2018). Governance in the blockchain economy: A framework and research agenda. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 19(10), 1020–1034.

EdChain. (2018). POW vs. PoS. A Comparison of Two Blockchain Consensus Algorithms. London: Sage.

de Filippi, P., Mannan, M., & Reijers, W. (2020). Blockchain as a confidence machine: The problem of trust & challenges of governance. Technology in Society, 62, 101–128.

de Filippi, P., & Wright, A. (2018). Blockchain and the law: The rule of code. Harvard: Harvard University Press.

Finck, M. (2018). Blockchain regulation and governance in Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Governatori, G., Idelberger, F., Milosevic, Z., Riveret, R., Sartor, G., & Xu, X. (2018). On legal contracts, imperative and declarative smart contracts, and blockchain systems. Artificial Intelligence and Law, 26(4), 377–409.

Hassani, H., Huang, X., & Silva, E. (2018). Big-crypto: Big data. Blockchain and Cryptocurrency, 2, 34.

Hermstrüwer, Y. (2019). Democratic Blockchain design. Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics, 175(1), 163–177.

Hileman, G., & Rauchs, M. (2017). 2017 global blockchain benchmarking study. Retrieved from: https://www.cbdcinsider.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/SSRN-id3040224.pdf

Janssen, M., Weerakkody, V., Ismagilova, E., Sivarajah, U., & Irani, Z. (2020). A framework for analysing blockchain technology adoption: Integrating institutional, market and technical factors. International Journal of Information Management, 50, 302–309.

Kannengießer, N., Lins, S., Dehling, T., & Sunyaev, A. (2019). Mind the gap: Trade-offs between distributed ledger technology characteristics. Retrieved from: http://arxiv.org/abs/1906.00861

Karjalainen, Risto (2020). Governance in Decentralised Networks. SSRN Electronic Journal, 1, 1–35.

Lafourcade, P., & Lombard-Platet, M. (2020). About blockchain interoperability. Information Processing Letters, 161, 105–126.

Meijer, D., & Ubacht, J. (2018, May 30). The governance of blockchain systems from an institutional perspective, a matter of trust or control? ACM International Conference Proceeding Series. Retrieved from: https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3209281.3209321

Nakamoto, S. (2008). Bitcoin: A peer-to-peer electronic cash system. Retrieved from: https://bitcoin.org/bitcoin.pdf

Ølnes, S., Ubacht, J., & Janssen, M. (2017). Blockchain in government: Benefits and implications of distributed ledger technology for information sharing. Government information quarterly, Vol. 34, issue 3, pp. 355–364.

Reijers, W., Wuisman, I., Mannan, M., de Filippi, P., Wray, C., Rae-Looi, V., Orgad, L. (2018). Now the code runs itself: On-chain and off-chain governance of blockchain technologies. Topoi, 37, 17–27.

Stephan, Mark., Graham, Marshall., Michael, McGinnis., 2019. An Introduction to Polycentricity and Governance. In Governing Complexity, edited by Thiel, Andreas., Blomquist, William, A., Garrick, Dustin, E. (pp. 21–44). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Treib, Oliver, Holger, B¨ahr, & Gerda, Falkner (2007). Modes of Governance: Towards a Conceptual Clarification. Journal of European Public Policy, 14(1), 1–20.

Wang, S., Ding, W., Li, J., Yuan, Y., Ouyang, L., & Wang, F. Y. (2019). Decentralized autonomous organizations: Concept, model, and applications. IEEE Transactions on Computational Social Systems, 6(5), 870–878.

Werbach, K. (2018). The blockchain and the new architecture of trust. Cambridge, Massachusetts: The MIT Press.

Zachariadis, M., Hileman, G., & Scott, S.v. (2019). Governance and control in distributed ledgers: Understanding the challenges facing blockchain technology in financial services. Information and Organization, 29(2), 105–117.