CONCEPTUAL FUNDAMENTALS OF GLOBAL GOVERNANCE IN THE FIELD OF SECURITY AND DEFENSE: THE EUROPEAN CONTEXT AND UKRAINE
Abstract
The purpose of the article is to summarize the conceptual basis of the global security governance in the European context. Conceptual approaches to the research of the global governance issues in the field of security are presented on an interdisciplinary basis. It is argued that global security management is a complex phenomenon whose structure takes into account a sphere specificity, in particular, in the field of security. National security in the context of changing the general nature of wars and armed conflicts is considered as an open, dynamic, social system that is an integral part of international security and global governance systems in this area. It is stressed that new contradictions, armed conflicts and new power centers of the multipolar international political system have appeared. It is inappropriate to exaggerate the role of intergovernmental organizations and institutions in resolving international security issues, since implementation of any global solutions is impossible without participation and without taking into account the interests of sovereign states. The features of “hybrid wars” and “hybrid threats” and their powerful destructive potential are revealed in the article. It is consistently stressed that the organization of counteractions to such a system of threats requires timely identification of them on the theoretical level and definition of the status and countermeasures – on the practical level,including obligatory coordination of efforts with international security structures and support from influential states.
It is argued that the existing balance of forces and interests in the world has been disrupted, the nature, scale and content of global challenges, threats and risks formed at the regional and local levels, that aregetting more and more complex in nature, have been changed. It is noted that geopolitical rivalry and struggle of great powers for natural resources have a threatening influence at the regional and local levels.
Downloads
References
Akimova, L. (2018). Vplyv finansovykh kompanii na finansovo-ekonomichnu bezpeku derzhavy: mizhnarodnyi dosvid. Investytsii: praktyka ta dosvid, 20, 71–75. Kyiv [in Ukrainian].
Vlasiuk, O.C., Yavorska, H.M. (2016). Stratehichna adaptatsiia NATO do novykh problem bezpeky: varianty stratehichnoi panoramy Ukrainy. Stratehichna panorama : nauk.-prakt. zhurn, 1, С. 19–25. Nats. in-t strateh. doslidzh. Kyiv [in Ukrainian].
Voitovych, R. (2007). Vplyv hlobalizatsii na systemu derzhavnoho upravlinnia (teoretykometodolohichnyi analiz). Kyiv: NADU [in Ukrainian].
Hlobalni tendentsii i perspektyvy: svitova ekonomika ta Ukraina (2018). V. Iurchyshyn (Ed.). Kyiv: Zapovit. URL: https://razumkov.org.ua/uploads/article/2018_global_trendns.pdf [in Ukrainian].
Horbulin, V. (2017). Svitova hibrydna viina: Ukrainskyi front. Natsionalnyi instytut stratehichnykh doslidzhen. Kyiv: NISD [in Ukrainian].
Honcharenko, O. (2002). Rozuminnia natsionalnoi bezpeky v konteksti natsionalnykh interesiv Ukrainy. Nauka ta oborona, 1, 18–24 [in Ukrainian].
Horbatuk, S. (2016). Evoliutsiia fenomena oborony: vid davnikh politychnykh ta pravovykh doslidzhen do suchasnoi nauky. Visnyk Natsionalnoi akademii Ukrainy pry Prezydentovi Ukrainy, 2, 28–34. Kyiv [in Ukrainian].
Durkalets, J. (2019). European Security without the Treaty of JASD / Center for Global Security Studies CGSR) at the National Laboratory. Lawrence Livermore. NATO-Review, September 30, 1–9.
Zaplatynskyi, V. (2012). Lohiko-determinuiuchi pidkhody do rozuminnia poniattia “bezpeka”. Visnyk Kamianets-Podilskoho natsionalnoho universytetu. Kamianets-Podilskyi, 5, 90–98 [in Ukrainian].
Leonov, V. (2005). Asymetrychna viina: aspekty ta tendentsii. Stratehichna panorama. Shchokvartalnyi naukovo-praktychnyi zhurnal Rady natsionalnoi bezpeky ta oborony Ukrainy, 4, 143–149 [in Ukrainian].
Novak-Kalyayeva, L. (2016). Нybrydowe wojna/pokój na Wschodzie Ukrainy jako czynniki bezpieczeństwa Europejskiego. Bezpieczeństwo państw Europy Środkowowschodniej w kontekście konfliktu na Ukrainie, 41–61. Slupsk: Wydawnictwo Społeczno-Prawne [in Polish]
Stukalin, T. (2016). Systema derzhavnoho upravlinnia u sferi oborony derzhavy ta osnovni napriamy yii rozvytku v konteksti reformuvannia sektoru bezpeky ta oborony. Teoriia ta praktyka derzhavnoho upravlinnia, 2 (53), 213–20. Kharkiv: Vyd-vo “Mahistr” [in Ukrainian].
Sytnyk, H. (2007). Natsionalna bezpeka Ukrainy: teoriia i praktyka. Kyiv: Kondor [in Ukrainian].
Vyshnivskyi, V.V., Vasiechko, S.V., Ivashchenko, A.M., Shpura, M.I. (2010). Transformatsiia pohliadiv na zabezpechennia voiennoi bezpeky ta oborony derzhavy v suchasnykh umovakh. Visnyk Kyivskoho natsionalnoho universytetu imeni T. Shevchenka, 25, 73–79. Kyiv [in Ukrainian].
Khraban, I. (2005). Systema yevropeiskoi bezpeky ta napriamy viiskovo-politychnoi intehratsii Ukrainy do yii struktur. Kyiv: Varta [in Ukrainian].
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
